BREAKING! Australian Columnist Explains Secret Deal Between Obama and Australia and it’s bad

Barack Obama completed his goal of bringing in and resettling over 10,000 Syrian refugees into the U.S., but the numbers of Christians among them is far below their share of the Syrian population. Since Christians are target number one for ISIS, you’d think we’d see more Christian Syrian refugees among those resettled.

But nope. Of 12,587 Syrian refugees brought in, there were 12,486 Muslims, 68 Christians, and 24 Yazidis. So…. good job on bringing in those least likely to be threatened by ISIS in the first place, I guess? T

his is social engineering, not a genuine response to a refugee crisis. Ten percent of Syria was Christian before the war, and the Christians have been particularly brutalized, often by Obama-backed jihad groups. The refugee population should thus be at least 10% Christian…. not 0.54 percent like we see in reality.

And while we’re bringing in hordes of Muslim refugees (which, in all fairness, Trump will put an end to), what else is Obama doing?

According to Red State Watcher, Australian collumnist/author Nick Adams has revealed a deal between the US and Australia to bring in 2500 illegal Muslim immigrants to the US.

Watch below:

Yup. Australia rejected 2500 Muslim refugees because they came from terrorism hotspots and would pose a high risk of resulting in terrorists slipping through the cracks. And Obama’s response? Bring em right in! Not only does this number (2,500) include refugees from “terrorism hotspots,” but that the State Department has refused to release the details of this “backroom deal” — the creation of seems to have been kept secret even from members of Congress.

No wonder Obama waited until he only has two months left in his presidency before he made such a controversial move. Now we know how he really thinks…

Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse.