BOMBSHELL: Wikileaks Suggests Murdered DNC Staffer Was Their Email Source

27 year old Democratic National Committee staffer Seth Rich was murdered on July 10 of last month. Authorities called it a robbery despite the fact that all his belongings remained on him. People have cried foul since the beginning saying it was a staged hit.

The Young Conservative posted a video of Wikileaks founder Julian Assange. Assange insinuated that Seth was the Wikileaks source for their completely explosive DNC email leak that proved the high level corruption of the DNC. The leaks of the emails rattled the core of the Democratic party in the middle of the contentious DNC.

He said,

Our whistleblowers go to significant efforts to get us material and often very significant risks.”

WikiLeaks is personally offering a reward of $20,000 for any information leading to the criminal conviction of Rich’s murderer as they insist his killing was no simple robbery. Assage and Wikileaks are not conservative allies despite their DNC leaks. Seems as though Wikileaks and Assange really don’t like the establishment of the left or right.

He has in the past attacked the former Secretary of State and now democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton for advocating his indictment and putting him behind bars. As well as for not being anti-war enough for his tastes.

It is rather ironic that the party of gun control and gun free zones has not uttered a word about guns in relation to Rich’s death despite the fact he was murdered with a firearm. Mostly because it does not suit their benefit and just makes them look bad.

Now that a clear connection between the murdered DNC staffer and the Wikileaks informant has been made it is incredibly clear why the Democratic Party and Clinton and her cronies wanted him dead. He was a large and annoying inconvenience and they got rid of him.

Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse.