The truth always comes out.
Even after the mainstream media tried to spin false narratives about Ferguson, the true details have now emerged.
The liberal story is simple: White people are racist, so Officer Darren Wilson attacked a black man simply because of his skin color.
Leftist media outlets have also spread the idea that black people in Ferguson and throughout the country are united in their hatred of Wilson and “unjust” white police officers.
There is one problem with that narrative, however. It has been revealed that blackwitnesses are the ones who helped confirm Wilson’s own testimony and discredit the lies that were told about the case.
Sources said that those witnesses discredited the accusation that Darren Wilson was the aggressor, and that he went after a black man in cold blood.
They confirmed that there was a scuffle when Brown struck the officer through the vehicle’s window, and that Brown was aggressively coming toward Wilson without his hands up.
Of course, it’s not just seven black witnesses who helped to defend Wilson. The physical evidence — which has no place in race politics — also backed up the officer’s version of events.
“Physical evidence — including blood spatter analysis, shell casings and ballistics tests — also supports Wilson’s account of the shooting, which cast Brown as an aggressor who threatened the officer’s life,” stated the Post. [H/T Hot Air]
There’s more bad news for the anti-Wilson narrative spread by the media.
While this entire case has been painted as “white versus black,” the reality is very different.
In fact, the grand jury that decided not to indict Darren Wilson was composed of both white and black jurors.
This fact has been conveniently ignored by the media.
All of those jurors reviewed the facts and testimony in the case, and all of them came to the same conclusion: Wilson most likely acted in self defense.
Courtesy of Conservative Tribune