If Hillary Clinton wants to be able to accuse Donald Trump of being the “anti-woman” candidate, she should take a look at her own campaign staff first.
Hillary campaign aide, and the woman who might be the future White House chief of staff to the first female US president, for a decade edited a radical Muslim publication that opposed women’s rights and blamed the US for 9/11.
Abedin was assistant editor of the Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs working under her mother, who remains editor-in-chief. She was also working in the White House as an intern for then-first lady Clinton.
Headlined “Women’s Rights Are Islamic Rights,” a 1996 article argues that single moms, working moms and gay couples with children should not be recognized as families. It also states that more revealing dress ushered in by women’s liberation “directly translates into unwanted results of sexual promiscuity and irresponsibility and indirectly promote violence against women.” So according to this journal, sexually liberated women are just asking to be raped.
How progressive! I wonder if Hillary Clinton will ever evoke that justification to excuse the actions of her husband.
And it’s not just conspiracy theorists saying this. As Dennis Michael Lynch reported:
In a letter dated June 13, 2012, to the State Department Inspector General, five Republican members of Congress—Michele Bachmann of Minnesota, Trent Franks of Arizona, Louie Gohmert of Texas, Thomas J. Rooney of Florida, and Lynn Westmoreland of Georgia—claimed that Abedin “has three family members – her late father, her mother and her brother – connected to Muslim Brotherhood operatives and/or organizations.”The five members of Congress alleged that Abedin had “immediate family connections to foreign extremist organizations” which they said were “potentially disqualifying conditions for obtaining a security clearance” and questioned why Abedin had not been “disqualified for a security clearance.” Ultimately, the White House rejected the claims as a conspiracy theory.
Before you believe the White House, take into account the following two videos. The first video highlights what the five Republican members were claiming about Abedin. The second video is a press conference held by former federal prosecutor and DOJ employee, Andrew McCarthy, who makes a iron clad case against Abedin.
Why isn’t the media paying more attention to Huma? If Trump had someone to close to his campaign that had such a suspicious background, don’t you think it’s all the media would be talking about?
The media won’t spread this information – but you can. Get the word out and share this post on Facebook and Twitter.