A travel ban that had the distinct purpose of keeping Americans safe, was one of the first executive orders that President Trump signed after taking office in January of this year. He signed the order just hours saying his sacred oath, but 12 months later, because of the activist judges in this country, that order is still seeing opposition.
The ban saw a huge victory just days ago when it was finally upheld and put into effect, after several revisions and much debate. That means that while we will never be 100% safe anywhere at any time, the President is at least patching the dam that was allowing our nation to be flooded with those who believe it’s their divine calling to kill us.
While his order might seem to fall completely under the heading of common sense to many, it’s completely unacceptable to others. The in denial, politically correct who don’t believe that Muslims will actually do what Muhammad told them to do when he ordered them to kill the infidels (that’s you and I) just can’t have anyone turned away from America.
The travel ban taking effect now has put the heat on another case being heard before the Ninth U.S. Circut Court as they hear arguments about Hawaii’s challenge leveled at the ban. It seems that almost everyone in the nation has an idea of what should be done to keep America safe, and they’re not willing to let President Trump take the problem on. Q13Fox reports that these same judges haven’t been favorable toward the President in the past, and the case should turn out a lot of media attention:
“The U.S. Supreme Court’s decision allowing President Donald Trump’s third travel ban to take effect — at least for now — has intensified the attention on a legal showdown Wednesday afternoon before three judges in Seattle who have previously been cool to the administration’s efforts.
Ninth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals Judges Ronald Gould, Richard Paez and Michael Hawkins are scheduled to hear arguments in Hawaii’s challenge to the ban, which restricts travel to the United States by residents of six mostly Muslim countries and has been reviled by critics as discriminatory.
The same panel unanimously ruled against Trump’s second travel ban, saying the president had not made a showing that allowing travelers from the listed nations would harm American interests.”
These judges seem to think that the majority of Americas are interested in something other than staying alive. The problem is that the out of touch bleeding hearts are either uninformed about the actual facts at hand or just don’t believe it will ever affect them. Either way, the masses electing President Trump should have been a good indicator that he’s the one we wanted making the decisions about our safety.
“Citing national security concerns, President Donald Trump announced his initial travel ban on citizens of certain Muslim-majority nations in late January, bringing havoc and protests to airports around the country. A federal judge in Seattle soon blocked it, and since then, courts have wrestled with the restrictions anew as the administration has rewritten them.
The latest version, announced in September, targets about 150 million potential travelers from Chad, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Syria, and Yemen, though it allows for some admissions on a case-by-case basis. It also blocks travel by North Koreans along with some Venezuelan government officials and their families, although those parts of the restrictions are not at issue.”
The reason those parts aren’t considered an issue is that the current state of affairs makes it clear that North Korea is ready to kill us because their leader said that he would. Compare that to the fact that Muslims have it written down in their holy unchangeable words from their prophet that they should kill us and, oh yeah, they already have killed a bunch of us. But nevermind that if the social justice warriors say that they’re OK, apparently the President’s opinion is to be completely ignored.
The lower court rulings ‘threaten the ability of this and future Presidents to address national-security threats and advance foreign policy interests,’ the Justice Department wrote in its 9th Circuit appeal. Further, the government says, courts don’t have the authority to review the president’s decision to exclude foreigners abroad unless Congress authorizes them to, and Congress has provided no such authorization.
Critics of Trump’s travel restrictions insist that they make up the Muslim ban he promised during his campaign, and judges have seized on the president’s public statements on Twitter and elsewhere in finding them unconstitutionally discriminatory.
Despite the Supreme Court’s action Monday, Matt Adams, the legal director of the Northwest Immigrant Rights project, which has also fought Trump’s travel restrictions in court, said he’s hopeful it will be struck down.
‘I’m still optimistic the courts are going to say yes, this is version 3.0, and they might have painted it a little fancier, but it’s still the Muslim ban,’ Adams said.”
The fact is that this decision is going to have to come down to a person getting to decide what is best for the country. We can listen to the President we elected, or we can listen to lobbyists who have a worldview not inclusive of all the information that the President is privy to, and the judges will have to decide which of those is correct.
FOLLOW us on Facebook at Freedom Daily!
Join the conversation
BREAKING News Out Of Virginia… Jury Gives Illegal Alien Special Treatment – THIS IS OUTRAGEOUS!!!
A jury in the newly minted blue state of Virginia saw itself forced to convict a maid for felony grand larceny after she stole $5,000 worth of rings from the home she cleaned. But since they felt bad for the pregnant 19-year-old they all did something truly unthinkable and downright foolish. The Jury foreman, Jeffery Memmott, in a statement, said all the jurors pooled together the $80 so that Sandra Mendez Ortega could pay the $60 fine and go free. Ortega is pregnant with her second child.
But on top of this whole act being outrageous, it gets even worse when you look the other side of the coin.
Of course, Lisa Copeland, who is the accuser is outraged. In a statement, she said she prayed that none of the jurors are ever in my shoes She also added that Ortega never accepted responsibility for the theft nor did she ever apologize, if she had accepted responsibility she would have no issue with this, but since she never did it’s not a good thing and since the maid makes $60 a day she is now $20 richer since the jury gave her $80 to pay her $60 fine.
Now lets sum this whole mess up shall we?
An illegal breaks the law by sneaking into our country to procreate and work for peanuts while sponging off the already overburdened taxpayers and Lisa Copeman is surprised that she stole from her? Copeman was too cheap to get a real cleaning company who is bonded and insured so she decided to employ someone whom she didn’t know to clean her house. And at the same time, the jury fell for the sob story this illegal criminal told them.
Maybe next time Ortega is in court she’ll be pregnant with her 6th anchor baby! When people in Latin America refer to us Americans as “Gringos Estupidos,” they might have a point.
Sorry, But Illegal Aliens Cost The U.S. Plenty
Immigration: A center-left think tank has hailed new findings showing that illegal immigrants contribute $11.6 billion in state and local taxes nationwide. But that report really shows how little they pay compared to the rest of us.
If there’s any doubt America is importing poverty, take a look at a new study this week from the Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy, which touts the $11.6 billion illegals pay in taxes to state and local coffers. This isn’t federal or payroll taxes, just cash paid through sales taxes, property taxes and city and state fees.
“Data show undocumented immigrants greatly contribute to our nation’s economy, not just in labor but also with tax dollars,” ITEP state tax policy director Meg Wiehe said in a statement. “With immigration policy playing a key role in state and national debates, accurate information about the tax contributions of undocumented immigrants is needed now more than ever.”
We couldn’t agree more. So let’s take a look at some actual accurate information:
With an estimated 11 million illegal immigrants in the U.S., that $11.6 billion comes to about $1,050 per person, which The Latin Post hails as “lots of taxes.” In fact, it’s less than the average paid by citizens in even the lowest-tax states, such as Tennessee, where the average per capita state and local tax burden is $2,805, not to mention high tax areas, like Washington, D.C., where the figure is $7,540, according to data from the Tax Foundation. Media reports point out that illegals pay about 8% of their incomes in state and local taxes, compared with 5.4% for “the 1%,” but ignore that average taxpayers, based on the Tax Foundation data, pay an average of 9.48%.
Well, sure, you might say, but once illegals get amnesty, they will contribute similar amounts as the rest of us, right? Actually, no.
Illegals have far less education than average Americans and correspondingly lower base incomes. Based on another study reported this week from two other center-left think tanks, if the U.S. handed out work permits, through a program such as Deferred Action For Parents Of Americans and Lawful Permanent Residents (DAPA), it would add only 10% to illegals’ incomes — meaning, an additional $3,000 per capita, which would then see a small slice taken as state and local taxes, for a grand total of just $805 million to the government. It still wouldn’t approach the average Tennessee local tax rates, cited above.
Illegal immigrants in fact absorb far more in benefits than they contribute. The Heritage Foundation in 2013 found that illegals contribute an average of $10,000 in total taxes (federal and payroll as well as local taxes) but use almost $24,000 in welfare and services, creating a net $14,000 per capita gain per illegal worker.
With benefits like that — and a president determined to shower even more on them — it’s little wonder the world’s impoverished feel the red carpet is out for them to come here illegally.
Steven A. Camarota, director of research at the Center for Immigration Studies, said Heritage understates actual welfare use by illegals by its use of the federal government’s Current Population Survey. “In a more recent study where I looked at welfare use only (not taxes or other expense) using the much more accurate Survey of Income and Program Participation, I found that 62% of households headed by illegal immigrants used at least one major welfare program,” Camarota told IBD via email.
“Bottom line, illegal immigrants have a 10th grade education on average,” he said. “In the modern American economy people with that level of education tend to make modest wages and as result pay relatively little in taxes, at the same time they tend to use a lot in public services, regardless of legal status. In the case of illegals, they often receive benefits on behalf of their U.S.-born children. If you had to put it in a bumper sticker it would be: ‘there is a high cost to cheap labor.’ “
Please share if you agree we need to build the wall…
FOLLOW us on Facebook at Freedom Daily!
BREAKING NEWS Out of San Francisco…THIS IS OUTRAGEOUS!
Americans are still left in shock following the non-guilty verdict for the illegal alien who shot Kate Steinle in the back of the head in 2015. Her murder launched a national debate on immigration policy in this country, and for the past two years, we had hoped and waited for justice to finally be served, only to realize we live a world where illegals can now shoot Americans in broad daylight and get away with it. As liberals continue to rejoice over their murdering scumbag walking free, they’re twisting the knife even further into our backs with the sickening gift they’re now bestowing on any illegal who lives in San Francisco.
Ever since Trump got in office, liberal mayor and governors across the country have refused to comply with federal law, as they continue to give Trump the middle finger while harboring these dangerous illegals. Following the murder of Kate Steinle at the hands of the very same man the city of San Francisco illegally harbored for years, you would think that liberals would change their dangerous policies, but that’s outrageously, not the case. To add even more insult to injury, not only is the city of San Francisco vowing to keep protecting illegals, but they’re now demanding that Americans pay for the health care of their illegal invaders.
California, flush with cash from an expanding economy, would eventually spend $1 billion a year to provide health care to immigrants living in the state illegally under a proposal.
The proposal, announced on Wednesday by Democratic lawmakers, would eliminate legal residency requirements in California’s Medicaid program, known as Medi-Cal, as the state has already done for young people up to age 19.
It’s part of $4.3 billion in new spending proposed by Assemblyman Phil Ting, a San Francisco Democrat who leads the budget committee.
Assembly Democrats also want to expand a tax credit for the working poor, boost preschool and child care, and increase college scholarships to reduce reliance on student loans.
They also would commit $3.2 billion more than required to state budget reserves.
These people are out of their freaking minds. Not only are illegals protected from deportation in San Francisco, but now they’ll soon be lining up to get a nice hefty dose of government handouts as well. Hopefully President Trump will end the insanity that’s going on in our country, as he’s now sending his DOJ after liberals who keep defying federal law by harboring these invaders in our country. Following the non-guilty verdict of Kate’s killer several weeks ago, Attorney General Jeff Sessions
put sanctuary cities across America on notice, insinuating that heads are about to roll for any other city that continues to harbor illegals and defy federal law. Sessions stated:
“When jurisdictions choose to return criminal aliens to the streets rather than turning them over to federal immigration authorities, they put the public’s safety at risk. San Francisco’s decision to protect criminal aliens led to the preventable and heartbreaking death of Kate Steinle,” he said. “While the State of California sought a murder charge for the man who caused Ms. Steinle’s death—a man who would not have been on the streets of San Francisco if the city simply honored an ICE detainer—the people ultimately convicted him of felon in possession of a firearm.”
Sessions then said that Trump and the DOJ are not playing games at this point, and “will continue to ensure that all jurisdictions place the safety and security of their communities above the convenience of criminal aliens.”
“The Department of Justice will continue to ensure that all jurisdictions place the safety and security of their communities above the convenience of criminal aliens,” Sessions said. “I urge the leaders of the nation’s communities to reflect on the outcome of this case and consider carefully the harm they are doing to their citizens by refusing to cooperate with federal law enforcement officers.”
This is absolute lunacy. How many more Americans have to be raped and murdered before the nauseating love fest between liberals and illegals ends?
BREAKING NEWS About Anti-Trump San Francisco Judge – Prison Life Is Going To HURT
He had it coming!
Every policy that President Donald Trump tries to implement for American’s safety, is not only met with a great deal of resistance from the left but also from defiant judges who block his progress. We saw this several times with Trump’s travel ban from terrorist-tied countries and now we’re seeing it with regards to so-called Sanctuary cities. Judges are disguising their clear liberal bias as judicial rulings and now tensions over this illegal immigrant issue have put America at the breaking point, edging on a civil war. However, one prominent appeals court judge who ceremoniously struck down Trump’s travel ban in a clear act of defiance just met his own demise.
When liberal Judge Alex Kozinski wasn’t busy flipping the proverbial bird at our president with his defiant decisions, he was hiding something much worse from his pretentious perch on the stand. Turns out, Kozinski had a lot of secrets under that black robe of his and now they all just came back to haunt him under the most shocking circumstances.
This new movement that is sweeping the nation taking aim at holding powerful men accountable for sexual harassment, misconduct, and assault has now named a prominent Liberal jurist as a serial harasser. It’s now being reported that six former far left liberal Ninth Circuit clerks and externs are now saying that the liberal Judge Alex Kozinski subjected them to sexual comments and unwelcome situations.
Multiple women say appeals court judge Alex Kozinski asked them to watch porn or subjected them to sexually inappropriate comments https://t.co/v7VbysRsxG
— Washington Post (@washingtonpost) December 8, 2017
One of the former Kozinski clerks, Heidi Bond, who was his clerk between 2006 and 2007 has gone on the record with allegations that on multiple occasions the judge summoned her alone to his chambers in order to show her pornography which was unrelated to any case before the judge. He then asked if the images turned her on. Bond recounts at least three different instances of being shown porn by her boss and says the experiences were shocking. She has also written an extremely disturbing first-person account of her experiences of clerking for Judge Kozinski where she also details Kozinski isolating her from her co-clerks to discuss his sexual history.
Judge Alex Kozinski of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit, pictured in 2003. Six women — all former clerks or externs in the 9th Circuit — alleged to The Washington Post in recent weeks that Kozinski, now 67, subjected them to a range of inappropriate sexual conduct or comments.
A former clerk for Judge Alex Kozinski said the powerful and well-known jurist, who for many years served as chief judge on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit, called her into his office several times and pulled up pornography on his computer, asking if she thought it was photoshopped or if it aroused her sexually.
Heidi Bond, who clerked for Kozinski from 2006 to 2007, said the porn was not related to any case. One set of images she remembered was of college-age students at a party where “some people were inexplicably naked while everyone else was clothed.” Another was a sort of digital flipbook that allowed users to mix and match heads, torsos and legs to create an image of a naked woman.
Bond is one of six women — all former clerks or more junior staffers known as externs in the 9th Circuit — who alleged to The Washington Post in recent weeks that Kozinski, now 67 and still serving as a judge on the court, subjected them to a range of inappropriate sexual conduct or comments. She is one of two former clerks who said Kozinski asked them to view porn in his chambers.
In a statement, Kozinski said: “I have been a judge for 35 years and during that time have had over 500 employees in my chambers. I treat all of my employees as family and work very closely with most of them. I would never intentionally do anything to offend anyone and it is regrettable that a handful have been offended by something I may have said or done.”
Kozinski provided the statement after The Post called and emailed a spokesman with a detailed list of the allegations this story would include. After the story posted online, the judge told the Los Angeles Times, “I don’t remember ever showing pornographic material to my clerks” and, “If this is all they are able to dredge up after 35 years, I am not too worried.”
When Bond was clerking, Kozinski was on the precipice of becoming chief judge for the 9th Circuit — the largest federal appeals court circuit in the country, handling cases for a large swath of the western United States as well as Hawaii and Alaska. The other people who alleged that Kozinski behaved inappropriately toward them worked in the 9th Circuit both before and after her, up to 2012.
Bond said she knew that she was to come to the judge’s office when her phone beeped twice. She said she tried to answer Kozinski’s inquiries as succinctly and matter-of-factly as possible. Bond was then in her early 30s and is now 41.
If the question was about photoshopping, Bond said, she would focus on minor details of the images. If Kozinski asked whether the images aroused her, Bond said, she would respond: “No, this kind of stuff doesn’t do anything for me. Is there anything else you need?” She said she recalled three instances when the judge showed her porn in his office.
“I was in a state of emotional shock, and what I really wanted to do was be as small as possible and make as few movements as possible and to say as little as possible to get out,” Bond said.
Bond, who went on to clerk for the Supreme Court and now works as a romance novelist writing under the name Courtney Milan, and another clerk, Emily Murphy, who worked for a different judge on the 9th Circuit and is now a law professor, described their experiences in on-the-record interviews. The other four women spoke on the condition that their names and some other identifying information not be published, out of fear that they might face retaliation from Kozinski or others.
Kozinski, who served as the chief judge on the 9th Circuit from 2007 to 2014, remains a prominent judge, well known in the legal community for his colorful written opinions. His clerks often win prestigious clerkships at the Supreme Court.
Murphy, who clerked for Judge Richard Paez, said Kozinski approached her when she was talking with a group of other clerks at a reception at a San Francisco hotel in September 2012. The group had been discussing training regimens, and Murphy said she commented that the gym in the 9th Circuit courthouse was nice because other people were seldom there.
Kozinski, according to Murphy and two others present at the time who spoke to The Post, said that if that were the case, she should work out naked. Those in the group tried to change the subject, Murphy and the others present said, but the judge kept steering the conversation toward the idea of Murphy exercising without clothes.
“It wasn’t just clear that he was imagining me naked, he was trying to invite other people — my professional colleagues — to do so as well,” Murphy said. “That was what was humiliating about it.”
Murphy, who was 30 at the time of the incident and is now 36, provided The Post with a 2012 email showing that she told a mentor about what had happened at the time. Two of Murphy’s friends who were present at the time of the encounter, speaking on the condition of anonymity, also confirmed her account.
Now that’s sick, but then again, what else can we expect from a judge from the infamous 9th circuit court who is known for its radical far left agenda leanings. No wonder the 9th circuit wants Muslims Refugees in this nation, they act the same way their judges act.
It seems that for every right-wing leaning man who is accused of sexual misconduct there are at least 100 liberal men accused of the same, or worse. This whole time all these institutions where being run as brothels and not one person in the outside world even knew. They tell us how to think and what is and isn’t moral while at the same time their stench of immorality is off the charts.
Please share if you agree this Judge needs to be in prison…
BREAKING: RETIREMENT Age Going UP!!!! To Pay For Mass Muslim Population BOOM!
This is what happens when a population gets talked into having open borders under the threat of being called a...
BREAKING: ALL OUT WAR Erupts After SICK Liberal Mayor Brought Soldiers In To Fight Trump’s Feds!
They're Trying To Take Over!
BREAKING: He Betrayed Him… NOW Trump’s Set To FIRE HIS A*S!!!
President Trump has enough to deal with when dealing with crazed liberals, but you would think that members of his...
One Word Explains SJWs Attempt To Change Our Culture
2017 is definitely the year that social justice warriors (SJWs) have been active in removing Confederate statues and anything else...
BREAKING NEWS From WHITE HOUSE… Trump’s New Hat Is GLORIOUS!
Former President Barrack Obama and current President Donald Trump are a study in contrasts. Whether they are meeting and supporting the victims...
BREAKING NEWS From ALABAMA… Roy Moore Just Made URGENT Announcement
Last week, the residents of Alabama voted in a Senate race to determine the future of their state and of course,...
BREAKING! MSNBC Caught On HOT MIC… Sexually Harassing MELANIA!
And another so-called feminist bites the dust! On Saturday evening it was reported that NBC has confirmed through a spokesman...
Featured3 days ago
BREAKING NEWS From John McCain’s Deathbed – THIS IS VERY SCARY!
Culture3 days ago
BREAKING: They Were Just Found In The Oval Office Last Night – Not There Anymore!
Crime2 days ago
BREAKING: It Just Happened! He Broke Federal Law And Will Be Heading To Prison – Trump FURIOUS!
Crime2 days ago
SHOCKING News From California… Major Company Makes Assassination Threat At Trump!!!
Politics2 days ago
BREAKING NEWS From Alabama… ROY MOORE Just Made MAJOR ANNOUNCEMENT… THIS IS HUGE!!!
Culture3 days ago
BREAKING NEWS – Matt Lauer Took A HOSTAGE… HIS LIFE IS OVER!!!
Politics1 day ago
BREAKING: Trump Just Called McCain’s Wife – IT’S BAD!
Culture3 days ago
BOMBSHELL- Hillary Just Caught! SHE’S DISGUSTING!!!
Politics1 day ago
BOMBSHELL Evidence How CIA Made Obama A US Citizen – DRAIN THE SWAMP!!!!
Crime3 days ago
BREAKING: SHOTS Just FIRED! – WWIII About To EXPLODE!!!
Government Intel9 hours ago
BREAKING: He Betrayed Him… NOW Trump’s Set To FIRE HIS A*S!!!
Featured2 days ago
BREAKING NEWS Out of San Francisco…THIS IS OUTRAGEOUS!