Please disable your Ad Blocker to better interact with this website.

Connect with us

Crime

BREAKING: He Was Just THROWN IN PRISON!!!!

TRUMP NEEDS TO BAIL HIM OUT!

Published

on

A Marine is in jail for doing what American Citizens have a right to do according to our constitution. The Marine defended himself, his friends, and most of all – his family. An armed criminal tried breaking into the Marine’s home, was warned to leave, and that’s when things escalated to an absolute disastrous level that should not have happened if the criminal obeyed laws and had any sense of moral decency. This sad situation should never happen in America.

Marine Joey Nelson was at home enjoying family time with his fiance, child, and a few close friends one night. It was a cozy evening that many would love to have. Just some good old fashioned downtime that allowed friends and family to relax and enjoy each other’s company. But as the evening progressed they were startled by what was described as violent pounding on their front door. It was someone trying to force their way into the residence. People were scared. This didn’t sound like someone delivering an Amazon Prime package. This was violent, scary, and worrisome. Nelson did what many red-blooded Americans would do, and he grabbed his gun to protect his friends, family, and himself. No one knew what was on the other side of the door as it pounded violently trying to get in. It was horrifying and like something out of a brutally violent scary movie. Nelson told the pounding intruder to leave immediately, but nevertheless, they persisted. That’s when things turned violent and the night went terribly sour.

Nelson warned the intruder that he was armed he should leave, but didn’t seem to get any luck. Nelson braced for the worst as he became proactive in his self-defense. He opened the door to find 39-year-old Michael Wilson from Detroit Michigan standing there. Wilson brandished a gun and started shooting at Nelson, who was shot in the hip. Nelson returned fire while telling all the people in residence to run for cover downstairs and call 911.

The cops arrived and assessed the situation. In what appears to be the wrong side of justice, the homeowner was charged with assault with intent to commit murder, assault with intent to do great bodily harm less than murder, assault with a dangerous weapon and felony firearm possession. If convicted, then Nelson faces up to life in prison. A judge set his bond at $150,000 and scheduled his next court appearance for next week Thursday.

Wilson, the man who was trying to break into the home, who also shot the homeowner first, was only charged with carrying a concealed weapon, a felony punishable by up to five years in prison. Wilson’s bond was set at $5,000 and scheduled his next court appearance for Thursday of next week.

Now we must review the Castle Doctrine and hope that it helps our sturdy Marine from being found guilty of anything. It’s a shame he’s in this position when all he did was protect his castle, family, and friends.

Via FreeAdvise Legal:

What is the Castle Doctrine?

The Castle Doctrine is a self-defense theory which gives a homeowner the right to protect his home with the use of deadly force. The Castle Doctrine originally emerged as a common law theory. Since then, a majority of states have implemented some statutory version of the Castle Doctrine. If a defendant successfully presents a Castle Doctrine defense, then he is completely exonerated of any wrongdoing. Read on to learn more about the proof required to assert a self-defense theory based on the Castle Doctrine.

History of Castle Doctrine
As mentioned, the Castle Doctrine first began as a common law theory. This means that it wasn’t a written law, but rather an understanding everyone had of the rule. Under common law, a person could use deadly force to defend their home, but only after using every reasonable means to avoid the danger. Some states still use the common law version of the Castle Doctrine, but most states have passed statutes to codify (or write down) the common law rules. The rules were passed so that everyone would understand what is required or expected of them before resorting to the use of deadly force. Even though the Castle Doctrine statutes differ by state, many states utilize the same basic requirements for a Castle Doctrine defense.

Current Requirements of Castle Doctrine
The statutory definition of Castle Doctrine is far more formal than the common law version. States place limitations on where, when, and who can use deadly force, and the extent of force allowed. As with any self-defense theory, the burden of proof for a Castle Doctrine defense is on the defendant. The first component of a Castle Doctrine defense is that a person must be inside of his home. Home or habitation in Castle Doctrine statutes tend to be interpreted very strictly. The structure must be the place where the person regularly resides, like a house, apartment, or mobile home. The defendant must be inside the structure. Some defendants have attempted to use the Castle Doctrine to defend the use of deadly force in their front yards. Courts have rejected this and said that the statute is very clear: in order to use the Castle Doctrine, the person must be in the home.

The second component is that the victim must be attempting to commit or have committed an unlawful entry into the defendant’s home. Walking across a person’s front yard will not qualify. There must be some actual evidence that the victim was at least attempting an unlawful entry. The Castle Doctrine will not apply to a person who was in the home lawfully, but the defendant decided to force out. Similarly, the defendant cannot be the first aggressor of the confrontation with the alleged victim. For example, if a defendant’s neighbor comes over for a casual visit, but the defendant decides to assault the victim after the otherwise consensual conversation turned ugly, the defendant as the first aggressor could not use the Castle Doctrine as a defense. Many states, like Indiana, prohibit the use of force against peace officers as well. Proving that the victim was engaged in an unlawful entry is critical to a Castle Doctrine defense because the unlawful entry will affect a defendant’s right to use deadly force.

The third component of the Castle Doctrine is proving that the use of deadly force was reasonable. Many states follow Florida and Mississippi, and actually have a presumption in their Castle Doctrines that if a person is entering a home unlawfully, that he is doing so with the purpose to commit an act of force or violence. This means the defendant’s burden of proof regarding the use of force is reduced because he doesn’t have to put on more evidence of reasonable. Some states do not have this presumption. Instead of proving just an unlawful entry, a defendant would also have to show that he was in actual danger of death or major bodily injury from the person trying to enter his home. These states do not authorize the use of deadly force to protect only property. In these few states, if a defendant does not prove he was in real danger of physical injury, then he can not claim or use a Castle Doctrine defense.

The last major component, and most contested, of the Castle Doctrine is the duty to retreat. Older common law versions of the Castle Doctrine required some duty to retreat or avoid the conflict. However, after writing their own Castle Doctrine statutes, many states no longer require defendants to run from their home or to another area of their home before using deadly force. The states are split on the issue of this duty because of the number of incidents of people using deadly force on what turned out to be serious misunderstandings of the Castle Doctrine. To the extent possible, any person should know and understand the duty to retreat laws in their state before using deadly force.

How to Use the Castle Doctrine
In order to invoke a Castle Doctrine defense, a defendant must first offer some evidence showing that it fits the situation in which he was involved. As mentioned, this is the defendant’s burden, not the prosecution’s burden. Putting on evidence is only the first step in using the Castle Doctrine. After presenting evidence, a defendant must request an instruction in a jury charge on the Castle Doctrine theory of self-defense. Jury instructions are the set of rules and law that the jury receives that tells them what they can and cannot do. Without the jury instruction on the Castle Doctrine defense, the jury has no way of exonerating a defendant in their verdict.

Because the Castle Doctrine is a defensive theory, anyone seeking to use it should remember that the burden is on them. Some law enforcement agencies will acknowledge or preserve evidence when they see that the Castle Doctrine applies. However, not all law enforcement agencies are this straightforward. Out of an abundance of caution, anyone charged with a home invasion shooting should at least consult with a criminal defense attorney to insure that evidence and testimony critical to their Castle Doctrine defense is preserved. A criminal defense attorney can also insure that the same evidence reaches a jury in the form of a proper instruction.

When did the American legal system move in the wrong direction so severely that it protects the criminals who attempt to break into our homes and murder us? How can the man who saved his friends and family be the one who might find himself in prison? Hopefully charging him was nothing more than the protocol for the situation and a judge with a rightful mind finds that all charges should be dropped against the Marine. Not only did this man protect and serve his country, but also his family, and there’s no reason why he should be punished for this.

The intruder deserves a firm kick into a cell for what he did to that family.

Please share if you think the Marine did nothing wrong!

FOLLOW us on Facebook at Freedom Daily!

Al ran for the California State Assembly in his home district in 2010 and garnered more votes than any other Republican since 1984. He’s worked on multiple political campaigns and was communications director for the Ron Nehring for California Lt. Governor campaign during the primaries in 2014. He has also held multiple positions within his local Republican Central Committee including Secretary, and Vice President of his local California Republican Assembly chapter. While also being an ongoing delegate to the California Republican Party for almost a decade.

Join the conversation

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse.

Crime

BREAKING!! Hillary In Hiding After Her SICKEST Secret Yet Was Just Pulled Off Her Computer!

SHE FORGOT IT WAS ALL ON THERE, NOW SHE’S GOING TO PAY!

Published

on

The list of crimes that the Clintons have committed seems to be growing by the day, despite the constant denial. Between the deaths, money trails and constant disregard for the laws of the land, it’s a wonder that Bill and Hillary are still out on the street. However, they seem to be employing the “deny, deny, deny” defense to any and all accusations.

Even after multiple information leaks from Wikileaks, Judicial Watch and others, Hillary is maintaining that she’s done nothing wrong. The mantra of “I did not have email relations with that server” has grown old, and even the most staunch supporter has to wonder if she’s really telling the truth. Even if she did it unintentionally, or an aide did it, or she thought it wouldn’t matter, it would be better to get it out in the open and defend that than to carry on with the denial.

The problem with this constant denial is that when it’s proved that she was lying (as it’s destined to be, as long as all the witnesses don’t end up dead), she’s going to have to account for the criminal activity and the lying. That’s not slowing her down though, and according to The Gateway Pundit, the evidence is piling up against her. New information released by Judicial Watch has her dead to rights. Her time in the public eye is about to take a very disturbing turn, and America is thrilled about it:

“Judicial Watch president Tom Fitton took to YouTube Monday to report former Secretary of State and failed presidential candidate, Hillary Clinton, was “hiding everything on her private email server.”

The “everything,” Fitton is referring to may hold the key to a plethora of scandals surrounding Clinton, everything from the FBI’s handling of her email investigation to alleged pay-to-play scheme between the Clinton Foundation and State Department agencies. Fitton’s latest video begs the question: why is the Trump State Department taking its sweet time to release the rest of Clinton’s emails while she was Secretary of State?

Releasing the documents will only further granulize Clinton’s corrupt practices, lending even MORE evidence that the Justice Department must finally get serious about investigating Hillary.

Fitton’s latest report underscores an important and unfortunate reality: not enough attention is being paid to the original Clinton email scandal — the missing 33,00 emails.

In addition to Fitton’s report, the New York Post‘s Paul Sperry argued last week that Clinton’s 33,000 emails, which as Fitton hints, are housed on the private email server that is ‘hiding EVERYTHING,’ may not be missing after all.

Sperry reported:

In a May interview with FBI agents, an executive with the Denver contractor that maintained Clinton’s private server revealed that an underling didn’t bleach-clean all her subpoenaed emails, just ones he stored in a data file he used to transfer the emails from the server to Clinton’s aides, who in turn sorted them for delivery to Congress.

The Platte River Networks executive, whose name was redacted from the interview report, said PRN tech Paul Combetta ‘created a ‘vehicle’ to transfer email files from the live mailboxes of [Clinton Executive Services Corp.] email accounts [and] then later used BleachBit software to shred the ‘vehicle,’ but the email content still existed in the live email accounts.’

Clinton’s missing ‘personal’ emails may also be captured on a Google server. According to FBI notes, Combetta ‘transferred all of the Clinton email content to a personal Google email address he created.’ Only the FBI never subpoenaed Google to find out.

As The Gateway Pundit‘s Cristina Laila reported, Judicial Watch announced last Thursday a federal judge ordered the State Department to speed up the release Hillary Clinton’s 72,000 pages of email records.

The records will be released September 28th, 2018 rather than waiting until the year 2020.

“Court Orders State Department to Speed Up Production of Clinton Email Records. State Department Must Complete Review and Release of 72,000 Pages of Records by September 28. State wanted to wait until 2020 to release everything!” Fitton tweeted.”

The fact of the matter is that the facts are there, the proof has been laid out. The question is; does anybody want to go after the Clintons? Do those in the Justice Department care enough about making sure that nobody ever tries to pull this kind of illegal, dangerous wool over our eyes again, that they’ll go after them? The problem is that anyone who dares to take on the Clinton dynasty will have their career ended. Even if they’re able to avoid the fate of Seth Rich, the Clintons will take them down so that they’ll never do any good again.

So yes, taking on Hillary in Washington would be a huge risk, but it’s time that we require that risk of those in power. Becuase she made a stupid mistake, and we were lucky enough to find it. But if we let her get away with it, the next pants suit wearing monster will learn from her mistakes and we might not be lucky enough to find out what they are before it’s too late.

Continue Reading

Crime

He Was Just Found With A Bullet In His Head 1 Week Before Testifying – Here’s What He Knew

NOT COINCIDENTAL!

Published

on

It’s strange but not ironic that one week before a key person was about to provide his crucial testimony in court, he was found dead with a bullet in the back of the head. Despite it being impossible to commit suicide this way, that’s what his cause of death has been ruled as after being found dead in his Miami, Florida home. He’s certainly not the first to be found this way with a certain connection, but he’s the only one with the keys to the most damning information yet that was only a week from coming out.

President Donald Trump has been reamed by the left over the past several days by referring to so-called the third world country of Haiti as a “shithole.” His comment was accurate of the area that’s been struck by natural disaster and suffered under years of socialism. It’s considered a “third world country” for a reason and the president just rightfully referred to it by a more blunt statement, without a care for who it would offend since it’s the same as calling it “3rd world,”…which is pretty much a third rate place nobody wants to be. However, a heaping dose of irony just surfaced from this “shithole” that’s connected to the supposed suicide death in Miami.

Haiti didn’t have to be a “shithole” today, in fact, there’s only one reason they are after having received a heaping dose of funds. Money donated to this country through relief efforts was filtered through the Clinton’s fraudulent foundation. Hillary and “Slick Willy” Bill made themselves look like philanthropists more than Trump and was something she spun to her advantage during her presidential campaign. It didn’t help her to win and now she’s even a bigger loser after it’s being discovered that not only did she lie about her relief effort, she stole from the victims as well who are suffering in their “shithole” squalor.

What’s even worse, is that more people seemed to be concerned with Trump calling Haiti a “shithole” rather than Hillary stealing donation money that was to go to making it not a “shithole.” Now, one innocent man with all the details has been shot dead – and it’s not suicide as authorities are calling it for reasons we can only believe they were paid to say.

100% Fed Up reports:

It’s no secret that the Clinton Foundation has been facing credible reports of robbing impoverished Haitians who were devastated by Hurricane Hanna in 2008, through their “foundation.” Haitians have been protesting for years outside of the Clinton Foundation offices over the theft of money that was donated by individuals and businesses to the Clinton Foundation that never made it to the poorest of the poor.

One man was set to testify against the Clinton Foundation next week. That man was 50 year old former Haitian government official Klaus Eberwein. He was found dead in his Miami home with a “gunshot to the head” that’s been ruled a “suicide” by the Miami-Dade’s medical examiner records supervisor. (Think Vince Foster)

Klaus Eberwein, a former Haitian government official who was expected to expose the extent of Clinton Foundation corruption and malpractice next week, has been found dead in Miami. He was 50.

Eberwein was due to appear next Tuesday before the Haitian Senate Ethics and Anti-Corruption Commission where he was widely expected to testify that the Clinton Foundation misappropriated Haiti earthquake donations from international donors.

Klaus Eberwein

Eberwein, who had acknowledged his life was in danger, was a fierce critic of the Clinton Foundation’s activities in the Caribbean island, where he served as director general of the government’s economic development agency, Fonds d’assistance économique et social, for three years.

According to Eberwein, a paltry 0.6% of donations granted by international donors to the Clinton Foundation with the express purpose of directly assisting Haitians actually ended up in the hands of Haitian organizations. A further 9.6% ended up with the Haitian government. The remaining 89.8% – or $5.4 billion – was funneled to non-Haitian organizations.

The Clintons leave such a trail of misconduct that’s only bound to catch up with them and has recently it has…repeatedly since Trump isn’t willing to let all these “sudden deaths” go. The body count that continues to accumulate around Clintons has reached unprecedented levels. They operate under the mentality that “dead men don’t talk,” which may be the case, but the evidence proves the truth. It’s just sickening and ironic that the outrage in the country right now is over a word used to describe Haiti and not the blatant theft from the Clintons who could have fixed it with the funds they raised but chose to keep it for themselves. Making it much worse is that the man with the specific answers and details on this is dead, and it’s not ironic. It’s criminal and someone needs to pay for it. Her name is Hillary.

Continue Reading

Crime

BREAKING NEWS! He Was Just Found DEAD After Exposing PODESTAS!

THE BODY COUNT IS HUGE!!!

Published

on

Once again the bodies are piling up around the liberals in Washington, and the media refuses to report on it. The deaths around the Clinton campaign have been rising in number for quite some time, but it’s been hard to pin it on the elusive Hillary and make it stick. Like many of the rich and powerful, Clinton isn’t out there getting her hands dirty, she’s got layers of protection.

One of those layers comes in the form of a slimy layer of Podesta brothers. John Podesta has been with the Clintons for decades, looking after not only the Clintons’ interest but that of his and his brother, Tony. It’s hard to say which brother is the more of a threat to the American people, because while John is watching the Clintons’ backs, Tony is lobbying for the interests of Russian banks here in the United States.

Regardless of which brother would win the sleaze award for most dangerous, they’re both once again in the hot seat as investigators wonder if they’re guilty of yet another murder. Truth Unsealed reports that the most recent death was of an investigator who connected to brothers to the death of Madeline McCann. In case you’ve forgotten, Madeline McCann disappeared while on holiday from the UK with her parents, Kate and Gerry McCann, her two-year-old twin siblings. The media coverage and investigation was massive, and sometime during that investigation, Kevin Halligen connected the deadly brothers to the missing girl. And as often happens when someone points a finger at someone involved with the Clinton Foundation, he woke up dead at a mansion in England:

“The blood-soaked body of a private detective who linked John and Tony Podesta to the disappearance of Madeleine McCann has been found at a mansion in Surrey, England.

Mystery surrounds the death of Washington D.C. based Kevin Halligen, 56, who presented himself as a ‘cloak-and-dagger, James Bond-style spy’ who took on the most difficult cases. Surrey Police confirmed Saturday that a probe has been launched into his death.

FOUL PLAY SUSPECTED

Kevin Halligen took over the private investigation into the Madeleine McCann case in May 2008 and was responsible for linking John and Tony Podesta to the disappearance of the 3-year-old girl in Portugal, sparking frenzied speculation that the brothers, both high-level Democratic Party operatives, were responsible for her murder.

The 56-year-old detective and his partner Henri Exton were responsible for the two e-fit sketches, that were released in the search for the Madeline McCann abductor(s), and which bore more than a passing resemblance to John and Tony Podesta.

The e-fit sketches released by Metropolitan police, which bore a striking resemblance to John and Tony Podesta.

Kevin Halligen’s investigative work into the disappearance of Madeleine McCann revealed that one of the men pictured in the e-fit sketches was seen carrying a young child that resembled the 3-year-old child on a beach in Praia da Luz, Portugal, a popular beach holiday location where Halligen also proved the Podesta brothers were holidaying at the time.

HALLIGAN HAD ‘DIRT’ ON THE PODESTAS

Mainstream media attempted to convince everyone that it was a co-incidence. However the 56-year-old private detective knew more about the Podesta brothers and their secrets than many initially assumed. The British investigator was D.C. based, and worked for Oakley International, an intelligence operation that considered the Podesta Group to be its natural enemy.

Actual pictures of the Podesta brothers.

Oakley International was based out of 2550 M Street, NW, Washington, DC. This address is also the office of Patton Boggs, Washington’s most politically-connected law firm and lobbyist organization. When Halligan first moved to D.C. in 2005, he hired Patton Boggs to help set up his new business.

Through his close connection with Patton Boggs, Kevin Halligen was more than familiar with The Podesta Group. They are closely connected. Tony Podesta has gone on record on multiple occasions praising Tommy Boggs of Patton Boggs: ‘He’s a brilliant guy who invented what a lot of us do.’ 

Nick Allard, Patton Boggs co-chairman also returns the praise for Tony Podesta: ‘Tony and his group are the right people at the right time in the right place…Tom Boggs invented the lawyer-lobbyist model and Tony perfected it. They are probably the two giants of the modern practice. There is no one else in the same zip code.’

So there is no question Halligen knew about the Podestas and their reputation. Why did he link them to Madeleine McCann’s disappearance in Portugal? What dirt did Halligan have on the two powerful Democratic operatives?

Why did Kevin Halligen, hired by the McCann’s to investigate their daughter’s disappearance, produce e-fits closely resembling (beyond reasonable doubt) his client’s (Patton Boggs) biggest rivals?

Who persuaded – and why – Gerry and Kate McCann to put their faith in a random Washington DC-based private detective, and pay him $500,000, after he reached out to them telling them he could find their daughter?

Halligen was found at the home of his long-term girlfriend, which is among the private Henley Park gated community (pictured) in Guildford, Surrey.

And why was Gerry McCann pictured laughing and joking his way around Washington D.C., in July 2007 (less than three months after his daughter Madeleine disappeared), lobbying statesmen on child trafficking, kissing Laura Bush’s dog, and generally enjoying the limelight?

Kevin Halligen’s blood-soaked death in Surrey, England this week stinks to high heaven. The man who linked the Podestas to the disappearance of Madeleine McCann appears to have paid the ultimate price for something he did during his 56 years on this earth. Many believe linking the powerful Podestas to the disappearance of the 3-year-old was the moment he signed his death warrant.”

At this point, we might not ever know what happened to poor little Madeleine, because of the number of millionaires that the Podestas are in bed with, but if they were looking to throw suspicion someplace else, killing the man who connected them to the case was probably not the way to do it. This whole thing is being brought up once again, all because someone else who crossed the Clinton Foundation met an untimely end.

[H/T: Truth Unsealed]

Continue Reading

Trending