Please disable your Ad Blocker to better interact with this website.

Connect with us

Politics

BREAKING NEWS From DC… TRUMP IS NOT GOING!!!

IT’S OBAMA’S MESS!

Published

on

International diplomatic relationships are probably one of the most difficult and frustrating aspects of the job of President. Not only are you required to be firm and friendly with the other world leaders, but you also have to do it in such a way that America stays in a position of power without offending other leaders. This is a balance that former President Obama never quite reached. His modus operandi was to bow to every famous person who came along, making sure that the United States always gave away more money and resources than we received in return.

President Trump isn’t a big fan of handling international relationships the same way that former President Barack Obama did. Trump has gone to great lengths to repair that damage to our reputation since Obama went on his ‘apology tour’ and efficiently embarrassed many Americans. His approach to the America first policy has put the United States back in a position of power with many entities, including the United Nations, but the job isn’t complete yet. According to recent reports, the President is having major problems with an Obama pet project that he can’t quite accept.

The issue is that the Obama Administration greenlit a the continuation of a project that was completely unnecessary and extremely costly. In 2008, the United States made the decision to move the United States Embassy that in London. Unfortunately, that move has a price tag of around $1 billion. According to the Daily Mail, the President disproves that type of wasteful spending, and it’s causing problems with the leadership in London:

“President Donald Trump said he had canceled his trip to London out of concerns about a ‘bad deal’ for the new U.S. embassy building he was to officially open there –and blaming it on his predecessor Barack Obama.

The decision to relocate to a new embassy was inked in 2008 during the administration of George W. Bush. Officials cited security concerns.”

This is where the die-hard Obama fans feel like they’ve got an out. Technically it was the Bush Administration that signed off on the relocation. However, while the preliminary decision might have been made in 2008, it also appears as if the decision to move was established in 2008, not the choice of where to move, or how much money to lose in the process. If nothing else, Obama had the chance to reverse the decision made by Bush if the economic climate made the decision into a bad one.

President Trump was perfectly clear that his problem was with Obama because of the terrible real estate decision that was made, not the fact that papers might be shuffled in a different building for a while:

“‘Reason I canceled my trip to London is that I am not a big fan of the Obama Administration having sold perhaps the best located and finest embassy in London for ‘peanuts,’ only to build a new one in an off location for 1.2 billion dollars,’ Trump wrote on Twitter. ‘Bad deal. Wanted me to cut ribbon-NO!’

The president condemned Obama on Twitter for selling the old site on Grosvenor Square in London’s exclusive Mayfair district ‘for peanuts’.

Trump tweeted shortly before midnight to criticize the move to an ‘off location’ at Nine Elms, south of the River Thames, as a ‘bad deal’.

At the time the government decided to relocate its historic embassy, officials said it wasn’t possible [sic] to retrofit the existing facility.
The government undertook global efforts to upgrade security at its embassies following embassy bombings and an increase in worldwide threats after Sep. 11.

Trump’s tweet, which followed the Daily Mail exclusively revealing last night that the trip to London would be called off, sparked an overwhelming backlash on social media in Britain.

‘We looked at all our options, including renovation of our current building on Grosvenor Square,’ then-Ambassador Robert Tuttle said, CNN reported.

‘In the end, we realized that the goal of a modern, secure and environmentally sustainable embassy could best be met by constructing a new facility,’ he added.”

Once again, the President is using his presence as a bargaining chip with world leaders, just as it should be. Have a visit revoked by the President of the United States is a big international deal, and the President knows that. Not everyone is happy that British officials are causing problems for the President though:

Trump was previously expected to make his first trip to the UK since entering office, but British officials were newly informed he went cold on the idea.

A new date has not been offered, raising the prospect of a major diplomatic snub. One senior source told the Mail that Mr. Trump – who was expected to officially open the new US embassy in London – had canceled because he was unhappy about the arrangements and the scale of the visit.

The reversal comes despite Mr. Trump telling Theresa May last month that he would come to Britain in the New Year.
Preparations were advanced for a ‘working’ visit to officially open the embassy, but the Mail understands this role will now be performed by Secretary of State Rex Tillerson.

Mr. Trump was also scheduled to hold talks with Mrs. May in No 10, with February 26 and 27 marked in the diary. Downing Street had hoped to confirm the dates this week.

UK Foreign Secretary Boris Johnson appeared to allude to these promised protests on Twitter, where he accused the London Mayor and opposition leader Jeremy Corbyn of putting the US-UK relationship at risk by encouraging anti-Trump demonstrations.

The Prime Minister and the President clashed in November when she criticised his decision to re-tweet anti-Muslim propaganda from a far-Right group, Britain First. In a rare public rebuke, she said: ‘I am very clear that retweeting from Britain First was the wrong thing to do.’

Mr. Trump hit back on Twitter, saying: ‘Don’t focus on me, focus on the destructive Radical Islamic Terrorism that is taking place within the United Kingdom.’ He added: ‘We are doing just fine!'”

It appears that not everyone in jolly old England has figured out that the President won’t be backing down the way Obama did. They would do well to remember that they need us a lot more than we need them.

FOLLOW us on Facebook at Freedom Daily!

Kat Stevens is a Constitutional Originalist who’s main goal is to keep the wool from being pulled over your eyes. She believes that the liberal agenda will always depend on you being uneducated and easy to manipulate. Her mission is to present the news in a straightforward yet engaging manner, disproving as much liberal propaganda as possible along the way. She believes that we must stay as informed as we can because when it comes to Washington “…this is our circus and those are our monkeys.”

Join the conversation

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse.

Politics

BREAKING: The Clinton’s Were Just Caught Paying For It! There’s No Hiding It Anymore!

THEIR SICKEST SECRET YET IS OUT

Published

on

It seems that every talking head in the nation has become increasingly disturbed about some of the less than complimentary comments that President Trump made about the third world country of Haiti. Their outrage seems to hinge upon the fact that he made disparaging remarks about the condition of the country when everyone knows that today’s PC culture requires that we never speak the truth even if it hurts not to.

In true liberal fashion, no one is worried about the state of the country itself. The leftists are mad that President Trump commented that they considered offensive, even though his comment was based on fact and something that many Americans probably agreed with. The facts of the matter might be in President Trump’s favor, but since it’s not politically correct, the mainstream media and leftists bashed him for it. Ironically, the same country that President Trump called an unflattering name is the same one that the Clinton Foundation was supposed to be helping with earmarked funds. Unfortunately, the Clinton family had a significant expense come up around the same time, and they allegedly used those funds for their benefit instead.

The big event was the marriage of former First Daughter Chelsea Clinton to her hedgefund manager husband. The reports began swirling about whether the Clinton family somehow spent Haiti relief money on Chelsea’s wedding. The accusations unraveled bill Clinton, so he just had to speak up and defend the untarnished reputation of the Clinton Foundation. Fox News covered Bill’s violent reaction to these allegations:

“Former President Bill Clinton said on Twitter Saturday that no Clinton Foundation funds were used to pay for his daughter’s wedding.

After President Trump reportedly made crude remarks about Haiti and other less-developed countries, some on the right pointed to alleged mishandling of Haitian earthquake relief funds by the Clinton Foundation.

On Twitter, President Clinton slammed the notion that any funds from the foundation, whether earmarked for Haiti or not, were used in association with his daughter Chelsea’s wedding to investment banker Marc Mezvinsky.”

“No Clinton Foundation funds—dedicated to Haiti or otherwise—were used to pay for Chelsea’s wedding. It’s not only untrue, it’s a personal insult to me, to Hillary, and to Chelsea and Marc,’ he said.

On ‘Fox & Friends,’ Judicial Watch president Tom Fitton said the foundation’s 2010 earthquake relief project was subjected to ‘Bill’s machinations.’

Fitton said then-Secretary Hillary Clinton’s State Department ‘outsourced’ its duties to the Clinton Foundation.”

“Fitton said leaked emails reportedly showed allegations were made by Clinton Foundation official Doug Band that foundation funds may have been misused, and references were made to the Clinton-Mezvinsky wedding.

In the email, released by WikiLeaks, Band writes to Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta:

‘The investigation into her getting paid for campaigning, using foundation resources for her wedding and life for a decade, taxes on money from her parents,’ he wrote.

‘I hope that you will speak to her and end this once we go down this road,’ Band continued.”

Wikileaks responded quickly to Clinton’s feigned outrage at the thought that they would misuse funds:

The following leaked email may shed some light on the potential misuse of funds. This email is courtesy of Wikileaks and might be very crucial evidence to any possible indictment of a Clinton family member.

Bill Clinton didn’t feel the need to defend himself against the people who had actual proof against him. The former President has more than one skeleton his closet that may come tumbling out upon more digging and revealing of evidence.

James Wood probably said it best:

The Clinton’s allegedly stole hard earned Haiti relief money from the compassionate American people to supposedly use on their daughter’s wedding. The money was either kept, funded their daughter’s wedding, and acted like it didn’t happen. Liberals are cool with that. President Trump saw a picture of that developing country, had the usual emotional response and called it as he saw it. The entire nation is up in arms about it.

Liberal logic appears to suggest that if you want to get away with something, then just act offended when you get called on it. It’s worked for the Clinton’s those in need of the safe spaces. Call me crazy, but I think we should be more worried about people stealing and using charitable funds for personal use than President Trump’s verbal description of a country that is barely civilized.

FOLLOW us on Facebook at Freedom Daily!

Continue Reading

Politics

BREAKING!! Trump’s Attorney Just Served The CLINTONS – He’s Taking It From Them!

NEVER AGAIN!! NOT ON OUR WATCH!!

Published

on

The Clinton family has evaded prosecution for years, but that may change after what has been discovered over the last several weeks. There are so many people begging for them to be prosecuted, but they’ve kept on waiting for so long. Over the years, the Clinton’s have been involved in numerous scandals that would land anyone else behind bars for an extremely long sentence. However, since the Clinton’s are the top leading Democrat politicians, they have been able to fly under the radar despite the public outcry for their arrest and prosecution. This time it may be different.

To prove how privileged they are, you don’t have to look much further than last year when Hillary Clinton was cleared of any wrongdoing for deleting highly classified emails from her private server. Instead of Hillary being indicted, she was cleared of all charges, which seemed only to encourage her as she began to accuse President Trump of Russian collusion and a myriad of other crimes worthy of his impeachment. Nothing of which came to be anything meaningful or worthy of impeachment, but it may have been a distraction tactic used to get people off her back for a few moments.

Now the tables have turned as new evidence of Hillary Clinton’s involvement in the Uranium One scandal have been revealed This could be what provides the prosecution with enough evidence to find her behind bars sooner than later. The first indictments have been handed out over this weekend, but that is just the beginning of a very long grueling legal battle that will likely ensue.

Over the weekend, it was discovered that a Grand Jury in Arkansas had been convened to look into the Clinton Foundation’s deeds over the last several years. According to recent reports, Hiland has reopened the Clinton Foundation investigation that was shut down by Loretta Lynch and former FBI Director James Comey. Of course, the left is doing their best to protect the Clinton family, and there could be a significant distraction or delay coming from them.

The mainstream media may desire to shield the criminal Clinton’s and has done their best to push this significant news story under the rug. That won’t stop independent and right-wing aligned news sources from reporting on the truth and recent indictments handed down.

Breitbart reports:

“An 11-count indictment has been handed down from a grand jury investigating possible Russian bribery involving former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s Uranium One deal negotiated when she was part of the Obama administration, a report says.

The indictment was levied against Maryland resident Mark Lambert, a former co-president of a nuclear transportation company involved in Hillary Clinton’s deal to sell U.S. uranium interests to a Russian company. A Department of Justice statement says that the 54-year-old Lambert was charged with “one count of conspiracy to violate the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) and to commit wire fraud, seven counts of violating the FCPA, two counts of wire fraud and one count of international promotion money laundering.”

The Clinton’s and their powerful allies in the media and government may think they have nothing to worry about, but that is not the case after what Attorney General Jeff Sessions just said.

Sessions made it clear that the era of “free passes” is over and has briefed the Department of Justice and the FBI that justice must be served this time around.

Here is more from Lifezette who chronicles the many investigations into the Clintons and their bogus foundation and how many times they were given a free pass.

“Until recently, the Clinton Foundation has been monitored by the IRS, the Department of Justice, and the FBI, and multiple state government authorities that are seeded with persons loyal to either the Clintons or the Obamas.

Every time, the Clinton Foundation got a free pass.

But now it appears key authorities may finally be turning strict attention toward answering tough questions about public filings of Clinton “charities” inside and outside the United States. When these powerful organizations engage motivated minds, they will wish to concentrate on a few areas that have long gone begging for attention.

The first time the Clinton Foundation was investigated, between 2001 and 2005, then-FBI Director Robert Mueller, then-Deputy Attorney General James Comey, and others could not seem to find obvious and escalating frauds as a supposed presidential library complex in Little Rock, Arkansas, also “fought HIV/AIDS internationally” from unregistered offices in New York and Massachusetts without ever obtaining required audits of worldwide activities.

Strangely, as the first investigation wound down, evidence in the public domain suggests that the Clinton Foundation also defrauded the National Archivist by making demonstrably false representations in a binding legal agreement.

For example, there is no evidence the IRS provided final approval to the Clinton Foundation to “fight HIV/AIDS internationally” as a tax-exempt purpose by Nov. 18, 2004, the date the presidential archive was officially donated.

That Nov. 18, 2004, agreement is nowhere to be found today on the Clinton Foundation website and in public filings despite the charity’s more than 13 years of widespread solicitation across state and national boundaries using telephones, mail, and the internet.

The next major investigation started in December 2009 when the French government launched a detailed look into UNITAID, a multilateral international organization — primarily funded by France — that has sent more than $650 million to arms of the Clinton Foundation engaged, at least in theory, in fighting HIV and AIDS.
Reports concerning this investigation, written in French and published in 2010 and 2011, show that French government authorities, like their U.S. counterparts, missed the heart of the problem posed by the Clinton Foundation.”

Bill and Hillary Clinton are not above the law even though they tend to act like that. For too long we have seen Hillary Clinton and her husband Bill traipsing around the country spewing their lies and getting away with various crimes. The liberal elitists have been able to get away with their crimes for too long, but it appears as though the Trump administration will finally put an end to the long line of broken laws. It’s about time.

FOLLOW us on Facebook at Freedom Daily!

Continue Reading

Crime

BREAKING NEWS! He Was Just Found DEAD After Exposing PODESTAS!

THE BODY COUNT IS HUGE!!!

Published

on

Once again the bodies are piling up around the liberals in Washington, and the media refuses to report on it. The deaths around the Clinton campaign have been rising in number for quite some time, but it’s been hard to pin it on the elusive Hillary and make it stick. Like many of the rich and powerful, Clinton isn’t out there getting her hands dirty, she’s got layers of protection.

One of those layers comes in the form of a slimy layer of Podesta brothers. John Podesta has been with the Clintons for decades, looking after not only the Clintons’ interest but that of his and his brother, Tony. It’s hard to say which brother is the more of a threat to the American people, because while John is watching the Clintons’ backs, Tony is lobbying for the interests of Russian banks here in the United States.

Regardless of which brother would win the sleaze award for most dangerous, they’re both once again in the hot seat as investigators wonder if they’re guilty of yet another murder. Truth Unsealed reports that the most recent death was of an investigator who connected to brothers to the death of Madeline McCann. In case you’ve forgotten, Madeline McCann disappeared while on holiday from the UK with her parents, Kate and Gerry McCann, her two-year-old twin siblings. The media coverage and investigation was massive, and sometime during that investigation, Kevin Halligen connected the deadly brothers to the missing girl. And as often happens when someone points a finger at someone involved with the Clinton Foundation, he woke up dead at a mansion in England:

“The blood-soaked body of a private detective who linked John and Tony Podesta to the disappearance of Madeleine McCann has been found at a mansion in Surrey, England.

Mystery surrounds the death of Washington D.C. based Kevin Halligen, 56, who presented himself as a ‘cloak-and-dagger, James Bond-style spy’ who took on the most difficult cases. Surrey Police confirmed Saturday that a probe has been launched into his death.

FOUL PLAY SUSPECTED

Kevin Halligen took over the private investigation into the Madeleine McCann case in May 2008 and was responsible for linking John and Tony Podesta to the disappearance of the 3-year-old girl in Portugal, sparking frenzied speculation that the brothers, both high-level Democratic Party operatives, were responsible for her murder.

The 56-year-old detective and his partner Henri Exton were responsible for the two e-fit sketches, that were released in the search for the Madeline McCann abductor(s), and which bore more than a passing resemblance to John and Tony Podesta.

The e-fit sketches released by Metropolitan police, which bore a striking resemblance to John and Tony Podesta.

Kevin Halligen’s investigative work into the disappearance of Madeleine McCann revealed that one of the men pictured in the e-fit sketches was seen carrying a young child that resembled the 3-year-old child on a beach in Praia da Luz, Portugal, a popular beach holiday location where Halligen also proved the Podesta brothers were holidaying at the time.

HALLIGAN HAD ‘DIRT’ ON THE PODESTAS

Mainstream media attempted to convince everyone that it was a co-incidence. However the 56-year-old private detective knew more about the Podesta brothers and their secrets than many initially assumed. The British investigator was D.C. based, and worked for Oakley International, an intelligence operation that considered the Podesta Group to be its natural enemy.

Actual pictures of the Podesta brothers.

Oakley International was based out of 2550 M Street, NW, Washington, DC. This address is also the office of Patton Boggs, Washington’s most politically-connected law firm and lobbyist organization. When Halligan first moved to D.C. in 2005, he hired Patton Boggs to help set up his new business.

Through his close connection with Patton Boggs, Kevin Halligen was more than familiar with The Podesta Group. They are closely connected. Tony Podesta has gone on record on multiple occasions praising Tommy Boggs of Patton Boggs: ‘He’s a brilliant guy who invented what a lot of us do.’ 

Nick Allard, Patton Boggs co-chairman also returns the praise for Tony Podesta: ‘Tony and his group are the right people at the right time in the right place…Tom Boggs invented the lawyer-lobbyist model and Tony perfected it. They are probably the two giants of the modern practice. There is no one else in the same zip code.’

So there is no question Halligen knew about the Podestas and their reputation. Why did he link them to Madeleine McCann’s disappearance in Portugal? What dirt did Halligan have on the two powerful Democratic operatives?

Why did Kevin Halligen, hired by the McCann’s to investigate their daughter’s disappearance, produce e-fits closely resembling (beyond reasonable doubt) his client’s (Patton Boggs) biggest rivals?

Who persuaded – and why – Gerry and Kate McCann to put their faith in a random Washington DC-based private detective, and pay him $500,000, after he reached out to them telling them he could find their daughter?

Halligen was found at the home of his long-term girlfriend, which is among the private Henley Park gated community (pictured) in Guildford, Surrey.

And why was Gerry McCann pictured laughing and joking his way around Washington D.C., in July 2007 (less than three months after his daughter Madeleine disappeared), lobbying statesmen on child trafficking, kissing Laura Bush’s dog, and generally enjoying the limelight?

Kevin Halligen’s blood-soaked death in Surrey, England this week stinks to high heaven. The man who linked the Podestas to the disappearance of Madeleine McCann appears to have paid the ultimate price for something he did during his 56 years on this earth. Many believe linking the powerful Podestas to the disappearance of the 3-year-old was the moment he signed his death warrant.”

At this point, we might not ever know what happened to poor little Madeleine, because of the number of millionaires that the Podestas are in bed with, but if they were looking to throw suspicion someplace else, killing the man who connected them to the case was probably not the way to do it. This whole thing is being brought up once again, all because someone else who crossed the Clinton Foundation met an untimely end.

[H/T: Truth Unsealed]

Continue Reading

Latest Articles

Trending