Please disable your Ad Blocker to better interact with this website.

Connect with us

Politics

BREAKING News From The CIA – President Trump Is In Serious Danger

This is bad. Trump needs our prayers right now!

Published

on

A CIA ex-spy chief who has spoken out publicly against Trump, while at the same time inspiring other career intelligence hacks to do the same, has now actually admitted his leading role within the American intelligence community to wage political war against our president.

During a candid interview, the CIA’s Michael Morell who was Deputy Director and former Acting Director of the world’s most powerful intelligence agency said that it wasn’t a great idea to leak against and bash a new president. You think?

Morell was Former President George W. Bush’s personal daily briefer for the agency before and after the 9/11 terrorist attacks. And he later went on to serve under Barack Hussein Obama until his recent retirement from the agency. But during the Summer of 2016, he took the step intelligence officers usually avoid. He openly endorsed Crooked Hillary Clinton over Donald Trump in a Carlos Slim owned New York Times op-ed piece. The endorsement read as follows, “I Ran the C.I.A. Now I’m Endorsing Hillary Clinton.”

After endorsing Killary he continued to be both an outspoken critic of Donald Trump, and an early CIA voice promoting the Russian collusion and election meddling fake narrative conjured up by the Clinton Machine to justify her loss. This is the official confirmation we have been waiting for that the Deep State is indeed at war with President Donald Trump and will stop at nothing to beat him.

ZeroHedge Reports:

Ex-Spy Chief Admits Role In ‘Deep State’ Intelligence War On Trump

An ex-spy chief who spoke out publicly against Trump while inspiring other career intelligence figures to follow suit has admitted his leading role in the intelligence community waging political war against the president, describing his actions as something he didn’t “fully think through”. In a surprisingly frank interview, the CIA’s Michael Morell – who was longtime Deputy Director and former Acting Director of the nation’s most powerful intelligence agency – said that it wasn’t a great idea to leak against and bash a new president.

Morell had the dubious distinction of being George W. Bush’s personal daily briefer for the agency before and after 9/11, and also served under Obama until his retirement. In the summer of 2016 he took the unusual step (for a former intelligence chief) of openly endorsing Hillary Clinton in a New York Times op-ed entitled, I Ran the C.I.A. Now I’m Endorsing Hillary Clinton, after which he continued to be both an outspoken critic of Trump and an early CIA voice promoting the Russian collusion and election meddling narrative.

As Politico’s Susan Glasser put in a newly published interview, Morell “has emerged out of the shadows of the deep state” to become one of Trump’s foremost critics speaking within the intel community. However, Politico summarizes the interview as follows:

But in a revealingly self-critical and at times surprising interview for this week’s Global POLITICO, Morell acknowledges that he and other spy-world critics of the president failed to fully “think through” the negative backlash generated by their going political. “There was a significant downside,” Morell said in the interview.

Not only had Morell during his previous NYT op-ed stated that he was committed to doing “everything I can to ensure that she is elected as our 45th president” but he went so far as to call then candidate Trump “a threat to our national security” – while making the extraordinary claim that “in the intelligence business, we would say that Mr. Putin had recruited Mr. Trump as an unwitting agent of the Russian Federation.”

Curiously, Morell in his latest Politico interview indicates when asked about his “public profile” and activism so soon after leaving the agency (something that was relatively unusual prior to Trump taking office) that his post-retirement media appearances have been approved and/or received some level of oversight by the CIA. In the interview Morell states, “I did a 60 Minutes interview about my life inside CIA, and it’s something the agency thought that was a good thing to do, and I taped most of it before I left the agency.”

While such CIA review of former employees’ publications and media interaction is nothing new, in Morell’s case was an unprecedented example of a very high profile intelligence figure explicitly campaigning for a presidential candidate and against another while specifically invoking his role at the CIA (he began his NYT column with, “During a 33-year career at the Central Intelligence Agency, I served presidents of both parties — three Republicans and three Democrats…” followed by a litany of key national security events he was central to).

The other important confirmation to come out of the discussion is the clear guiding assumption of the interview – that the intelligence “deep state” did in fact go to war with Trump – which has now been confirmed by Morell himself, which is essentially to hear it straight from the horse’s mouth.

Glasser: Okay, so, flash-forward a year. Was that a mistake?

Morell: So, I don’t think it was a mistake. I think there were downsides to it that I didn’t think about at the time. I was concerned about what is the impact it would have on the agency, right? Very concerned about that, thought that through. But I don’t think I fully thought through the implications.

And one of the ways I’ve thought about that, Susan, is—okay, how did Donald Trump see this? Right? And from—it’s very important—one of the things we do as intelligence analysts is make sure that our guy—the president—understands the other guy. Right?

So, let’s put ourselves here in Donald Trump’s shoes. So, what does he see? Right? He sees a former director of CIA and a former director of NSA, Mike Hayden, who I have the greatest respect for, criticizing him and his policies. Right? And he could rightfully have said, “Huh, what’s going on with these intelligence guys?” Right?

Morell here seems to confirm Trump’s narrative of events concerning Russiagate “fake news” and willful intelligence leaks intended to damage the president, despite his opening obfuscation of “I don’t think it was a mistake” (so he’s essentially admitting the negative consequences but with no regrets).

Surprisingly, Morell even implicates himself with the words, “And then he sees a former acting director and deputy director of CIA criticizing him and endorsing his opponent.” The interview continues:

Glasser: It embroiders his narrative.

Morell: Exactly. And then he sees a former acting director and deputy director of CIA criticizing him and endorsing his opponent. And then he gets his first intelligence briefing, after becoming the Republican nominee, and within 24 to 48 hours, there are leaks out of that that are critical of him and his then-national security advisor, Mike Flynn.

And so, this stuff starts to build, right? And he must have said to himself, “What is it with these intelligence guys? Are they political?” The current director at the time, John Brennan, during the campaign occasionally would push back on things that Donald Trump had said.

So, when Trump talked about the Iran nuclear deal being the worst deal in the history of American diplomacy, and he was going to tear it up on the first day—John Brennan came out publicly and said, “That would be an act of folly.” So, he sees current sitting director pushing back on him. Right?

Then he becomes president, and he’s supposed to be getting a daily brief from the moment he becomes the president-elect. Right? And he doesn’t. And within a few days, there’s leaks about how he’s not taking his briefing. So, he must have thought—right?—that, “Who are these guys? Are these guys out to get me? Is this a political organization? Can I think about them as a political organization when I become president?”

So, I think there was a significant downside to those of us who became political in that moment. So, if I could have thought of that, would I have ended up in a different place? I don’t know. But it’s something I didn’t think about.

Despite Morell’s attempts to mitigate his own significant contributions toward creating a climate of distrust between the White House and the intelligence bureaucracy, it seems clear to the interviewee that Morell’s admissions lend credence to Trump’s side.

Indeed, Susan Glasser reasons, based on Morell’s unexpected confessions, that “you or others who spoke out and have continued to speak out actually tend to underscore his feeling that there’s a political divide.”

Glasser: Well, it’s very interesting, because of course, there are so many things you don’t know at that moment in time, including, of course, I’m sure you assumed, along with everybody else, that Hillary Clinton was likely to be elected, and you saw this as contributing to that in some way. But it’s certainly relevant in the context of the situation we find ourselves in a year later. And, if it tends to embolden Trump in his critique of your former colleagues who are still serving in the intelligence agencies, and not only has this been a theme that he has struck repeatedly to criticize—but also to politicize this.

And inadvertently, perhaps, you or others who spoke out and have continued to speak out actually tend to underscore his feeling that there’s a political divide, and now you and others are on one side of it, and potentially all your former colleagues, and then he’s on the other side of it…

Morell: Yeah, and you can’t pick and choose like that. And when people in the intelligence community—particularly people in CIA, because for every other part of the intelligence community except CIA, you’re working for a cabinet member. At CIA, you are working for the president of the United States. That is your customer. Right?

So, when you see your customer questioning what it is that you are providing to him or her, and that person seems to be cherry-picking what they accept and what they don’t accept, it’s demoralizing. And when it’s demoralizing, people take actions, right? So, I live pretty close to the agency, and there’s a coffee shop between me and the agency, and I’ve met a number of agency officers in that coffee shop who have said to me, “I’m thinking about leaving.”

Yet Morell in a round about way previously admitted that he is personally one of the chief authors of precisely this “demoralizing” scenario in which the president doesn’t fully trust his intelligence briefers.

But we should all remember that this is a man who on the one hand described “Russia’s hacking is the political equivalent of 9/11” and constantly hyped “Russian propaganda”, while on the other he went on a lengthy RT News segment in order to promote his newly published book.

The Deep State, which is something I would have personally called anyone a nutty conspiracy theorist just for even mentioning it two short years ago, is real and it’s livid at the fact that an outsider like Donald Trump, who actually cares about us peons, is taking them apart at the seams. As of now, no one knows how this will end, but one thing is for certain, our President is in extreme danger and the Secret Service better be on top of their game.

Please share in support of President Donald Trump…

FOLLOW us on Facebook at Freedom Daily!

Al ran for the California State Assembly in his home district in 2010 and garnered more votes than any other Republican since 1984. He’s worked on multiple political campaigns and was communications director for the Ron Nehring for California Lt. Governor campaign during the primaries in 2014. He has also held multiple positions within his local Republican Central Committee including Secretary, and Vice President of his local California Republican Assembly chapter. While also being an ongoing delegate to the California Republican Party for almost a decade.

Join the conversation

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse.

Politics

BREAKING: The Clinton’s Were Just Caught Paying For It! There’s No Hiding It Anymore!

THEIR SICKEST SECRET YET IS OUT

Published

on

It seems that every talking head in the nation has become increasingly disturbed about some of the less than complimentary comments that President Trump made about the third world country of Haiti. Their outrage seems to hinge upon the fact that he made disparaging remarks about the condition of the country when everyone knows that today’s PC culture requires that we never speak the truth even if it hurts not to.

In true liberal fashion, no one is worried about the state of the country itself. The leftists are mad that President Trump commented that they considered offensive, even though his comment was based on fact and something that many Americans probably agreed with. The facts of the matter might be in President Trump’s favor, but since it’s not politically correct, the mainstream media and leftists bashed him for it. Ironically, the same country that President Trump called an unflattering name is the same one that the Clinton Foundation was supposed to be helping with earmarked funds. Unfortunately, the Clinton family had a significant expense come up around the same time, and they allegedly used those funds for their benefit instead.

The big event was the marriage of former First Daughter Chelsea Clinton to her hedgefund manager husband. The reports began swirling about whether the Clinton family somehow spent Haiti relief money on Chelsea’s wedding. The accusations unraveled bill Clinton, so he just had to speak up and defend the untarnished reputation of the Clinton Foundation. Fox News covered Bill’s violent reaction to these allegations:

“Former President Bill Clinton said on Twitter Saturday that no Clinton Foundation funds were used to pay for his daughter’s wedding.

After President Trump reportedly made crude remarks about Haiti and other less-developed countries, some on the right pointed to alleged mishandling of Haitian earthquake relief funds by the Clinton Foundation.

On Twitter, President Clinton slammed the notion that any funds from the foundation, whether earmarked for Haiti or not, were used in association with his daughter Chelsea’s wedding to investment banker Marc Mezvinsky.”

“No Clinton Foundation funds—dedicated to Haiti or otherwise—were used to pay for Chelsea’s wedding. It’s not only untrue, it’s a personal insult to me, to Hillary, and to Chelsea and Marc,’ he said.

On ‘Fox & Friends,’ Judicial Watch president Tom Fitton said the foundation’s 2010 earthquake relief project was subjected to ‘Bill’s machinations.’

Fitton said then-Secretary Hillary Clinton’s State Department ‘outsourced’ its duties to the Clinton Foundation.”

“Fitton said leaked emails reportedly showed allegations were made by Clinton Foundation official Doug Band that foundation funds may have been misused, and references were made to the Clinton-Mezvinsky wedding.

In the email, released by WikiLeaks, Band writes to Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta:

‘The investigation into her getting paid for campaigning, using foundation resources for her wedding and life for a decade, taxes on money from her parents,’ he wrote.

‘I hope that you will speak to her and end this once we go down this road,’ Band continued.”

Wikileaks responded quickly to Clinton’s feigned outrage at the thought that they would misuse funds:

The following leaked email may shed some light on the potential misuse of funds. This email is courtesy of Wikileaks and might be very crucial evidence to any possible indictment of a Clinton family member.

Bill Clinton didn’t feel the need to defend himself against the people who had actual proof against him. The former President has more than one skeleton his closet that may come tumbling out upon more digging and revealing of evidence.

James Wood probably said it best:

The Clinton’s allegedly stole hard earned Haiti relief money from the compassionate American people to supposedly use on their daughter’s wedding. The money was either kept, funded their daughter’s wedding, and acted like it didn’t happen. Liberals are cool with that. President Trump saw a picture of that developing country, had the usual emotional response and called it as he saw it. The entire nation is up in arms about it.

Liberal logic appears to suggest that if you want to get away with something, then just act offended when you get called on it. It’s worked for the Clinton’s those in need of the safe spaces. Call me crazy, but I think we should be more worried about people stealing and using charitable funds for personal use than President Trump’s verbal description of a country that is barely civilized.

FOLLOW us on Facebook at Freedom Daily!

Continue Reading

Politics

BREAKING!! Trump’s Attorney Just Served The CLINTONS – He’s Taking It From Them!

NEVER AGAIN!! NOT ON OUR WATCH!!

Published

on

The Clinton family has evaded prosecution for years, but that may change after what has been discovered over the last several weeks. There are so many people begging for them to be prosecuted, but they’ve kept on waiting for so long. Over the years, the Clinton’s have been involved in numerous scandals that would land anyone else behind bars for an extremely long sentence. However, since the Clinton’s are the top leading Democrat politicians, they have been able to fly under the radar despite the public outcry for their arrest and prosecution. This time it may be different.

To prove how privileged they are, you don’t have to look much further than last year when Hillary Clinton was cleared of any wrongdoing for deleting highly classified emails from her private server. Instead of Hillary being indicted, she was cleared of all charges, which seemed only to encourage her as she began to accuse President Trump of Russian collusion and a myriad of other crimes worthy of his impeachment. Nothing of which came to be anything meaningful or worthy of impeachment, but it may have been a distraction tactic used to get people off her back for a few moments.

Now the tables have turned as new evidence of Hillary Clinton’s involvement in the Uranium One scandal have been revealed This could be what provides the prosecution with enough evidence to find her behind bars sooner than later. The first indictments have been handed out over this weekend, but that is just the beginning of a very long grueling legal battle that will likely ensue.

Over the weekend, it was discovered that a Grand Jury in Arkansas had been convened to look into the Clinton Foundation’s deeds over the last several years. According to recent reports, Hiland has reopened the Clinton Foundation investigation that was shut down by Loretta Lynch and former FBI Director James Comey. Of course, the left is doing their best to protect the Clinton family, and there could be a significant distraction or delay coming from them.

The mainstream media may desire to shield the criminal Clinton’s and has done their best to push this significant news story under the rug. That won’t stop independent and right-wing aligned news sources from reporting on the truth and recent indictments handed down.

Breitbart reports:

“An 11-count indictment has been handed down from a grand jury investigating possible Russian bribery involving former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s Uranium One deal negotiated when she was part of the Obama administration, a report says.

The indictment was levied against Maryland resident Mark Lambert, a former co-president of a nuclear transportation company involved in Hillary Clinton’s deal to sell U.S. uranium interests to a Russian company. A Department of Justice statement says that the 54-year-old Lambert was charged with “one count of conspiracy to violate the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) and to commit wire fraud, seven counts of violating the FCPA, two counts of wire fraud and one count of international promotion money laundering.”

The Clinton’s and their powerful allies in the media and government may think they have nothing to worry about, but that is not the case after what Attorney General Jeff Sessions just said.

Sessions made it clear that the era of “free passes” is over and has briefed the Department of Justice and the FBI that justice must be served this time around.

Here is more from Lifezette who chronicles the many investigations into the Clintons and their bogus foundation and how many times they were given a free pass.

“Until recently, the Clinton Foundation has been monitored by the IRS, the Department of Justice, and the FBI, and multiple state government authorities that are seeded with persons loyal to either the Clintons or the Obamas.

Every time, the Clinton Foundation got a free pass.

But now it appears key authorities may finally be turning strict attention toward answering tough questions about public filings of Clinton “charities” inside and outside the United States. When these powerful organizations engage motivated minds, they will wish to concentrate on a few areas that have long gone begging for attention.

The first time the Clinton Foundation was investigated, between 2001 and 2005, then-FBI Director Robert Mueller, then-Deputy Attorney General James Comey, and others could not seem to find obvious and escalating frauds as a supposed presidential library complex in Little Rock, Arkansas, also “fought HIV/AIDS internationally” from unregistered offices in New York and Massachusetts without ever obtaining required audits of worldwide activities.

Strangely, as the first investigation wound down, evidence in the public domain suggests that the Clinton Foundation also defrauded the National Archivist by making demonstrably false representations in a binding legal agreement.

For example, there is no evidence the IRS provided final approval to the Clinton Foundation to “fight HIV/AIDS internationally” as a tax-exempt purpose by Nov. 18, 2004, the date the presidential archive was officially donated.

That Nov. 18, 2004, agreement is nowhere to be found today on the Clinton Foundation website and in public filings despite the charity’s more than 13 years of widespread solicitation across state and national boundaries using telephones, mail, and the internet.

The next major investigation started in December 2009 when the French government launched a detailed look into UNITAID, a multilateral international organization — primarily funded by France — that has sent more than $650 million to arms of the Clinton Foundation engaged, at least in theory, in fighting HIV and AIDS.
Reports concerning this investigation, written in French and published in 2010 and 2011, show that French government authorities, like their U.S. counterparts, missed the heart of the problem posed by the Clinton Foundation.”

Bill and Hillary Clinton are not above the law even though they tend to act like that. For too long we have seen Hillary Clinton and her husband Bill traipsing around the country spewing their lies and getting away with various crimes. The liberal elitists have been able to get away with their crimes for too long, but it appears as though the Trump administration will finally put an end to the long line of broken laws. It’s about time.

FOLLOW us on Facebook at Freedom Daily!

Continue Reading

Crime

BREAKING NEWS! He Was Just Found DEAD After Exposing PODESTAS!

THE BODY COUNT IS HUGE!!!

Published

on

Once again the bodies are piling up around the liberals in Washington, and the media refuses to report on it. The deaths around the Clinton campaign have been rising in number for quite some time, but it’s been hard to pin it on the elusive Hillary and make it stick. Like many of the rich and powerful, Clinton isn’t out there getting her hands dirty, she’s got layers of protection.

One of those layers comes in the form of a slimy layer of Podesta brothers. John Podesta has been with the Clintons for decades, looking after not only the Clintons’ interest but that of his and his brother, Tony. It’s hard to say which brother is the more of a threat to the American people, because while John is watching the Clintons’ backs, Tony is lobbying for the interests of Russian banks here in the United States.

Regardless of which brother would win the sleaze award for most dangerous, they’re both once again in the hot seat as investigators wonder if they’re guilty of yet another murder. Truth Unsealed reports that the most recent death was of an investigator who connected to brothers to the death of Madeline McCann. In case you’ve forgotten, Madeline McCann disappeared while on holiday from the UK with her parents, Kate and Gerry McCann, her two-year-old twin siblings. The media coverage and investigation was massive, and sometime during that investigation, Kevin Halligen connected the deadly brothers to the missing girl. And as often happens when someone points a finger at someone involved with the Clinton Foundation, he woke up dead at a mansion in England:

“The blood-soaked body of a private detective who linked John and Tony Podesta to the disappearance of Madeleine McCann has been found at a mansion in Surrey, England.

Mystery surrounds the death of Washington D.C. based Kevin Halligen, 56, who presented himself as a ‘cloak-and-dagger, James Bond-style spy’ who took on the most difficult cases. Surrey Police confirmed Saturday that a probe has been launched into his death.

FOUL PLAY SUSPECTED

Kevin Halligen took over the private investigation into the Madeleine McCann case in May 2008 and was responsible for linking John and Tony Podesta to the disappearance of the 3-year-old girl in Portugal, sparking frenzied speculation that the brothers, both high-level Democratic Party operatives, were responsible for her murder.

The 56-year-old detective and his partner Henri Exton were responsible for the two e-fit sketches, that were released in the search for the Madeline McCann abductor(s), and which bore more than a passing resemblance to John and Tony Podesta.

The e-fit sketches released by Metropolitan police, which bore a striking resemblance to John and Tony Podesta.

Kevin Halligen’s investigative work into the disappearance of Madeleine McCann revealed that one of the men pictured in the e-fit sketches was seen carrying a young child that resembled the 3-year-old child on a beach in Praia da Luz, Portugal, a popular beach holiday location where Halligen also proved the Podesta brothers were holidaying at the time.

HALLIGAN HAD ‘DIRT’ ON THE PODESTAS

Mainstream media attempted to convince everyone that it was a co-incidence. However the 56-year-old private detective knew more about the Podesta brothers and their secrets than many initially assumed. The British investigator was D.C. based, and worked for Oakley International, an intelligence operation that considered the Podesta Group to be its natural enemy.

Actual pictures of the Podesta brothers.

Oakley International was based out of 2550 M Street, NW, Washington, DC. This address is also the office of Patton Boggs, Washington’s most politically-connected law firm and lobbyist organization. When Halligan first moved to D.C. in 2005, he hired Patton Boggs to help set up his new business.

Through his close connection with Patton Boggs, Kevin Halligen was more than familiar with The Podesta Group. They are closely connected. Tony Podesta has gone on record on multiple occasions praising Tommy Boggs of Patton Boggs: ‘He’s a brilliant guy who invented what a lot of us do.’ 

Nick Allard, Patton Boggs co-chairman also returns the praise for Tony Podesta: ‘Tony and his group are the right people at the right time in the right place…Tom Boggs invented the lawyer-lobbyist model and Tony perfected it. They are probably the two giants of the modern practice. There is no one else in the same zip code.’

So there is no question Halligen knew about the Podestas and their reputation. Why did he link them to Madeleine McCann’s disappearance in Portugal? What dirt did Halligan have on the two powerful Democratic operatives?

Why did Kevin Halligen, hired by the McCann’s to investigate their daughter’s disappearance, produce e-fits closely resembling (beyond reasonable doubt) his client’s (Patton Boggs) biggest rivals?

Who persuaded – and why – Gerry and Kate McCann to put their faith in a random Washington DC-based private detective, and pay him $500,000, after he reached out to them telling them he could find their daughter?

Halligen was found at the home of his long-term girlfriend, which is among the private Henley Park gated community (pictured) in Guildford, Surrey.

And why was Gerry McCann pictured laughing and joking his way around Washington D.C., in July 2007 (less than three months after his daughter Madeleine disappeared), lobbying statesmen on child trafficking, kissing Laura Bush’s dog, and generally enjoying the limelight?

Kevin Halligen’s blood-soaked death in Surrey, England this week stinks to high heaven. The man who linked the Podestas to the disappearance of Madeleine McCann appears to have paid the ultimate price for something he did during his 56 years on this earth. Many believe linking the powerful Podestas to the disappearance of the 3-year-old was the moment he signed his death warrant.”

At this point, we might not ever know what happened to poor little Madeleine, because of the number of millionaires that the Podestas are in bed with, but if they were looking to throw suspicion someplace else, killing the man who connected them to the case was probably not the way to do it. This whole thing is being brought up once again, all because someone else who crossed the Clinton Foundation met an untimely end.

[H/T: Truth Unsealed]

Continue Reading

Latest Articles

Trending