Please disable your Ad Blocker to better interact with this website.

Connect with us

Government Intel





Since Donald Trump was elected as president, the left has been doing whatever they can to remove him from office by peddling lies to the American people. These spiteful liberals cannot accept the truth that Trump is in fact, the president of the United States and beat Hillary Clinton, so instead, they will continue to fan the flames of division to create as much dissent as possible. The first tactic the left focused on was the bogus Russian collusion story, and as time passed the entire narrative began to blow up in their faces. Every time the left thought they had a piece of so-called “evidence” to tie Trump to the Russians it turned out to be a Clinton operative which has only frustrated the Democrats to no end.

Now, these hateful individuals are focusing on a new tactic to remove President Trump from office and is employing those in his very own cabinet.

Over the past year, the left has been throwing one heck of a temper tantrum and looking for any way they can to remove Trump from office. These radical liberals have made audacious claims about President Trump stating that he stole the election from Clinton to being a sexual predator. Though there is one claim that the left has made over the past several months that is somewhat concerning.

The left has said on numerous occasions that Trump is unfit to be president based on his brashness and his affinity for tweeting on Twitter. Now, those calls had only grown louder over the last several weeks after Trump slurred his speech in one speaking engagement and again when he grabbed a water glass with two hands.

The calls have grown so loud that many on the left have said that they need to invoke the 25th amendment as grounds for removal to “save the country.” While these threats have come from liberals in office it has now been revealed that members of Trump’s cabinet are discussing using this option which proves how deep the swamp really goes.

Here is more from The Washington Times:

Some members of President Trump’s own Cabinet have discussed plans to remove him from the White House, according to Roger StoneMr. Trump’s former presidential campaign adviser.

Mr. Stone claimed during a recent interview aired on C-SPAN that he heard that some members of Mr. Trump’s administration have weighed whether they can invoke the 25th Amendment to take him out of office.

“Do you have any evidence that anyone is actively plotting or attempting or laying the groundwork right now inside the Cabinet — inside the administration — to make that removal?” Associated Press reporter Tom LoBianco asked Mr. Stone.

 “I have sources, and I work my sources, and yes, I believe there are some who have had this discussion. This is both outside the Cabinet and in. I think it’s the fallback plan for the establishment. That’s why I’m trying to sound the clarion call,” Mr. Stoneresponded.

Mr. Stone declined to disclose specifics when pressed for further details, but he insisted his claim wasn’t baseless.

“Like you, Tom, I cannot reveal those sources, and I’m not prepared to do so, but this is not a conspiracy theory,” Mr. Stone told the reporter.

“There are members of the Cabinet who have had this discussion. Let me just leave it at that,” Mr. Stone added.

Mr. Stone, 65, advised Mr. Trump’s successful 2016 campaign through August 2015, and currently he co-hosts an internet and radio program, “War Room,” produced in connection with far-right conspiracy theorist and devout Trump supporter Alex Jones.

Mr. Stone previously advised former President Richard Nixon and co-founded a lobbying firm in 1980 with Paul Manafort, Mr. Trump’s former 2016 campaign chairman. Mr. Manafort is one of four people indicted as a result of special counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation into the 2016 election, and Mr. Stone predicted that the outcome of that probe will have an effect on potentially removing the president from office.

“You’re going to see an enormous uptick in these irresponsible stories smearing this president as, you know, non-compos mentis — not up to the job, and so on — particularly if Mr. Mueller should shoot and miss. So I’m being realistic about what I believe is the resolve of many in the political establishment to remove the president under any means necessary,” Mr. Stone said during the C-SPAN interview.

“There is a plan afoot that is broader than just the Cabinet. The 25th Amendment requires a majority of the Cabinet and the vice president [to remove the president]. I don’t think that is achievable today, not on the heels of the historic tax cut, not on the heels of the disintegration of the credibility of the Mueller investigation. But we have seen what happens when a hysteria is whipped up among the people by some in the mainstream media. And I have always thought this is plan B for the two-party duopoly that has run this country into the ground,” Mr. Stone added.

The White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment concerning Mr. Stone’s claim.

Now, more than ever we need to stand behind Trump since there are those who are actively doing their best to remove him from office. The elites are so angry that Trump is dismantling everything they worked so hard for over the last eight years to implement the New World Order, and they won’t go away quietly.

The plan was for Hillary Clinton to get elected so she could issue the final death blow to our country, and with Donald Trump in office, their plans have been thwarted.

One can only hope that this is not true but considering that Trump is putting America first and not the globalist agenda it cannot be easily dismissed as a possibility which is terrifying.

H/T [The Washington Times]

FOLLOW us on Facebook at Freedom Daily!

Liberty Belle is a libertarian and provocateur who believes in freedom and liberty for all Americans. As a passionate journalist, she works relentlessly to uncover the corruption happening in Washington, while exposing politicians and individuals who wish to do us harm. Liberty’s legendary ability to piss off liberals and get to the bottom of corruption makes her an extremely dangerous foe to all the easily-triggered snowflakes out there.

Join the conversation

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse.

Government Intel

BREAKING!! SESSIONS In FULL PANIC!! Trump Just Discovered WHO Deleted FBI Text Messages!!


Frank Lea



Attorney General Jeff Sessions was just questioned for hours about the Russian nonsense about them meddling with the election. That was a joke, but now Sessions might be in panic mode after what was just discovered about who deleted the FBI text messages. Even though the FBI released about 50,000 text messages that were shared between FBI’s investigator Peter Strzok and FBI Attorney Lisa Page, there was still a gap of messages that went missing. There are a few reasons why Strzok and Page wouldn’t want any of these messages revealed.

Any work related text messages were understood to happen, but the couple was having an affair. Page was Strzok’s mistress. If that information leak weren’t damning enough, then they would be shaking in their boots, even more, when the rest of the critical information is revealed. This information could involve anything from the secret society meeting that allegedly happened around the time of Trump winning the election, to Russian meddling and fake news, to an attempt to take Trump and his family out of the Presidency.

The lack of transparency and potential alienation of the FBI to the United States is overwhelming, and readers are head over heels with a ton of information to filter through. 50,000 text messages is a lot of deciphering. Then to find out there’s a potential five-month span that is missing? Well, that’s going to be a long few nights of reading. It might take a team of analysts to figure out what’s going on in all those text messages between Strzok and Page.

How does anyone get any work done if they’re texting 50,000 times?

Sessions will have to act upon this, which is exactly why he should be extremely nervous. Can you now see why Comey got out while he could? Sessions might also find himself being implicated in something. We won’t know until the five-month period of missing text messages is recovered.

The Gateway Pundit had more:
“This weekend the FBI released 50,000 text messages between top FBI Investigator Peter Strzok and his mistress and top FBI Attorney Lisa Page.But the FBI told Congress thousands of text messages between the two agents were deleted during a five month period from December 2016 to May 2017.

The premier international intelligence agency said they lost them.

The FBI “lost” five months of text messages between Chief FBI Investigator Peter Strzok and his mistress and FBI Attorney Lisa Page.

The two agents were using Galaxy S5 phones preloaded with the Samsung Knox security suite.

Reporter Jack Posobiec says the text messages could not have been deleted, altered or disabled by anyone other than an FBI system expert.”

Jack Posobiec is notorious on Twitter and very much hated by liberals in Philadelphia, my hometown. The liberals who I’ve talked to, or read comments on social media from, dislike Jack because he consistently points out truths that are trying to be covered up. To point out the primary security system of the Galaxy S5 phone is something that most people wouldn’t look up, know, or think about. Once Jack Posobiec points this out, then people’s minds wonder about what’s happening. If the FBI investigator and attorney were using that phone, and it’s a generic security suite which might provide backups or traces of deleted text messages, then people will immediately ask “where are the phones” and “are we investigating the phones yet?”

Once people realize that the Knox security suite may have been held, but then only truly deleted by an FBI systems expert, then that’s where the lack of trust and inability to be transparent comes to play. People will need and want the truth. People will expect someone to discover more information, but it often takes a team of independent people putting their name on the line for the sake of transparency and justice. Jack just did that, and now the doors are opening wider for the purpose of an investigation.

Washington Examiner talks more about recovering lost text messages from the phone:
“A sharp digital forensic expert may still be able to recover them,” said Andrew Ziem, creator of BleachBit, the software that Hillary Clinton subordinates used to clear information from her private server. “In general whenever any software deletes any information, traces are left on the storage device, though they become disorganized like the proverbial needle in the haystack.”

Ziem said that “success requires physical access to at least one of the unlocked devices, and it depends whether the messages were accidentally or intentionally erased, as well as other factors. As the device is used over time, the chances of accidental overwriting become more likely, and because so much time has passed since the critical period in the Strzok-Page case, success is not likely. On the other hand, individual text messages are small, so maybe a few survived.”

Investigators “may be able to recover deleted text messages from the cellphones used by the parties,” agreed Dennis Williams, a ‎partner at ‎Pathway Forensics LLC who worked three decades with the FBI, including as director of the Greater Houston Regional Computer Forensics Laboratory.”

The key is to find the cell phones and have an independent forensics and technology group study, investigate, and uncover the lost text messages from the specific five-month period.

Sessions must be freaking out. He knows he has to deal with this, but there’s always the possibility that he gets dealt with as a response.

Will Sessions push forward and demand the phones be located and investigated? Or will he turn the other cheek and get out as Comey did?

This is going to be huge. What is your prediction for what happens next?

FOLLOW us on Facebook at Freedom Daily!

Continue Reading

Government Intel

BREAKING!!! TRUMP Just Announced It!! IT’S OPENING!!!


Frank Lea



The embassy planned to open in Jerusalem just had a date change. It was reported that the embassy will now open in 2019, ahead of schedule, as was stated by Vice President Mike Pence. It was initially supposed to take several years to open an embassy in Jerusalem, but now they believe it will be open by the end of 2019. What was originally a 3-4 year plan has now been effectively cut in half if all goes as planned. This is a great announcement by Trump and Pence.

President Donald Trump and Mike Pence have faced scrutiny over the decision to open an embassy in Jerusalem. They faced some minor backlash over recognizing Jerusalem as Israel’s capital, but they also endured a lot of support in the decision that has been called controversial.

During the address to the Israeli parliament, Mike Pence had to defend the decision because it’s reportedly condemned by numerous Palestinians and some of their Arab associates.

NY Daily News reports:
Vice President Mike Pence says the United States will open its embassy in Jerusalem next year, ahead of schedule. In an address to the Israeli parliament on Monday,

Pence defended the controversial decision to recognize Jerusalem as Israel’s capital, which has been condemned by the Palestinians and their Arab allies.

Pence says the administration will advance its plan in the coming weeks and the embassy will open by the end of 2019. Previous estimates had been the move would take three or four years.

The Palestinians claim Israeli-annexed east Jerusalem as their capital. They say the U.S. cannot be a mediator after the decision and have pre-emptively rejected any peace plan presented by the Trump administration.

Mike Pence faced hecklers from Arab lawmakers of the Israeli parliament at the start of his address. The hecklers were involved in a brief scuffle and then removed from the room so the Vice President could continue speaking uninterrupted. The conflict was caught on camera and posted to YouTube by the Associated Press.

The speech took place at the Knesset. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu was present. He stood and gave a round of applause as the protesting lawmakers were forced out of the house.  The troublemaking lawmakers were holding signs stating that Jerusalem was the capital of Palestine.

Haaretz provided further information:

“Ayman Odeh, the head of the Joint List, Israel’s Arab coalition party, called Pence “a dangerous man with a messianic vision that includes the destruction of the entire region.”

After Tuesday’s protest, Odeh said the act was “a strong and legitimate protest against the Trump-Netanyahu regime, against an extreme right that glorifies racism and hate and speaks of peace as lip-service but does anything in its power to further push away peace. Our protest today at the Knesset was done in the name of all citizens opposing the occupation and dreaming of peace.”

Mike Pence had called for peace with Israel and the Palestinians. Pence wanted people at the table talking, not disrupting the event and hindering progress.  The Vice President believes that dialogue is the key to creating a peaceful environment, but that discussion cannot happen when angry protesters cause chaos and ruin things like they always do. Pence was explicitly quoted as saying “peace can only come through dialogue.”

The protesting lawmakers had a chance to be in a room with leadership and have their words heard through peaceful conversation. They refused to be calm and communicate with adults. Instead, the pushed their protest forward and rambled on like children speaking gibberish. They moaned, groaned, and were sent out for a “time out.”

Protesters always forget that those watching them don’t ever take them seriously. Protesters are problems. They are immature and destructive. Protesters shout so loud that people often can’t understand what they’re saying. Or, what they’re saying doesn’t make much sense.

Protesters must realize that what they do turns everyone OFF from listening. When you try to force your message upon people, then people naturally don’t want to hear it. If the information is presented as an option for people to explore, then perhaps people will listen. To be violent, forceful, and chaotic by choice means people lose respect for those protesting. It’s no wonder the protesters are always so angry – no one’s listening.

Maybe if they changed their method of delivery to one that is more respectful, adult-like, and coherent, then perhaps people could finally engage in that peaceful dialogue that Pence suggested.

FOLLOW us on Facebook at Freedom Daily!

Continue Reading

Government Intel





Time is up! The U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency is finalizing plans to raid California and detain at least 1,500 illegal immigrants who broke into the country. The idea is to begin the raid in San Francisco and travel to numerous other cities, which I will not mention. The expected number of arrests reached upwards of 1,500. President Donald Trump warned mayors and governors about being a sanctuary city or state, and now Trump is allowing ICE to do their job. ICE has not announced the date of the raid, nor should it be published, as that would provide illegal immigrants to flock to other states in hopes to seek refuge from the consequences of breaking into a country.

President Trump has warned local leaders numerous times about being host to illegal immigrants, especially criminals. Those who oppose will criticize Trump for allowing ICE to do their job, but those in disagreement should remember that former President Obama had deported more than 2.5 million illegal immigrants. Obama’s nickname was “deporter in chief.” President Trump is not close to attaining a nickname until he meets or beats Obama’s deportation numbers, and Trump has a very long way to go until that’s a possibility.

The sweeping raid starting in California will target the illegal aliens. However, it’s the criminals who are most likely the most sought after. In particular, the ICE agents will be delighted to arrest violent illegal immigrants. The violent offenders who are illegal aliens may pose a threat to ICE agents, and there could be a battle to detain the suspects. There could be an all-out war, shootout, or gang fight as ICE runs through the ruined land of California. Detaining and deporting the proven illegal immigrants who are violent is essential because it returns California to a safer haven for legal residents. Unfortunately, some residents in California believe in the sanctuary city/state concept, but they won’t be supporters for long if their child was a rape or murder victim at the hands of an illegal immigrant with a violent tendency.

The Federalist Papers Project shared more on the raid:
“Trump and the Justice Department have bristled at the fact that state and local sanctuary laws around the country are not only unconstitutional but they interfere with the goal of cracking down on illegal immigration.

The operation, sources say, will target people who have been previously identified for deportation – including those who have been served with final deportation orders and those who are criminal illegal aliens.

That 1,500 is a low target and this number could rise as they come across other immigrants – called “collateral arrests.”

This would be the first large-scale targeting of illegal immigrants in California since Gov. Jerry Brown signed legislation enacting a statewide “sanctuary state” law.

Acting director of Immigration and Customs Enforcement Thomas Hogan said that California “Better hold on tight.” He said the federal government will not permit California to be “a sanctuary state for illegal aliens,” and would have no choice but to “conduct at-large arrests in local neighborhoods and at worksites, which will inevitably result in additional collateral arrests, instead of focusing on arrests at jails and prisons where transfers are safer for ICE officers and the community.”

California Senator Dianne Feinstein was not happy when she learned about the ICE raid. She believes immigrants may be targeted in the raids only because they live in California and Trump may be attempting to make a point about his sanctuary city warnings. Feinstein also noted that “the administration is carrying out its enforcement actions to make a political point and not based on the security of the country.” Feinstein is incorrect. The point of a massive scale ICE raid is to gather criminals and deport them if necessary. Some of the offenders might have a violent history and removing them instantly makes any city a little bit safer than it was the day before. Due to America’s weak prison system that doesn’t do much to reform criminals into productive citizens, the offenders who were violent before may often repeat their previous actions. How many times do people get out of prison and go right back in?

If the criminal is an illegal immigrant, then they should be deported to their homeland.

The Federalist Papers Project mentioned that immigration officers would be called in from other parts of the country. The extra manpower will be useful if a gunfight or violence breaks out during a round-up of illegals.

Critics will have very harsh words for President Trump and him allowing ICE to do their job, but critics can be silenced by reminding them that Obama deported over 2.5 million from America. That number is more prominent than many major American cities. Imagine waking up, and your entire city is empty. It’s like Will Smith in “I Am Legend,” and you’re the only person left. I suppose the violent creatures hiding in run-down buildings could be the remaining violent illegal immigrants who hid from ICE. That’s how many people Obama deported, and Trump is nowhere close to that number.

The concept of a sanctuary city would be acceptable if it refused to protect violent criminals. If an illegal alien was caught doing a victimless crime, like jaywalking or something silly, then their punishment could be discussed. Someone like that could be placed on probation and in the path to citizenship. Their probation would include a stipulation where one violation is instant deportation. The violent illegal immigrants would be immediately deported. Then again, would it be worth taxpayer money to keep them in jail, THEN deport them? Some violent criminals who get deported may not ever face punishment in their homeland. They might return to America, illegally, sooner than we know.

The sanctuary city concept needs to be eliminated. If it’s not removed, then it needs should be reworked so that violent offenders are not protected. We cannot protect drug dealers, murders, and rapists any longer. Sanctuary cities protect the wrong people and leave the American citizens at risk.

FOLLOW us on Facebook at Freedom Daily!

Continue Reading

Latest Articles

Subscribe to our newsletter

Become An Insider! Sign up for our free email newsletter, and we'll make sure to keep you in the loop on the top breaking news of the day.