Please disable your Ad Blocker to better interact with this website.

Connect with us

Culture

Charles Barkley: Black People, Not Whites, Keep Black People Down

It’s the lobster effect, where if one tries to crawl out of the tank, the others pull him back down.

Published

on

Charles Barkley seems to be getting more and more conservative as time goes by. There was a time when I could not stand the guy, but I find myself liking him more and more these days. He was interviewed by a Philadelphia radio station where they discussed racial issues.

Barkley didn’t hold back. He flatly stated that unintelligent and brainwashed blacks are keeping successful black people down… not whites or cops. It takes a lot of guts to say that these days, because it definitely makes you a target in the black community. It’s the lobster effect, where if one tries to crawl out of the tank, the others pull him back down.

From Blue Lives Matter:

“Unfortunately, as I tell my white friends, we as black people, we’re never going to be successful, not because of you white people, but because of other black people. When you’re black, you have to deal with so much crap in your life from other black people. It’s a dirty, dark secret; I’m glad it’s coming out.”

[…]

“One of the reasons we’re never going to be successful as a whole, because of other black people. And for some reason we are brainwashed to think, if you’re not a thug or an idiot, you’re not black enough. If you go to school, make good grades, speak intelligent, and don’t break the law, you’re not a good black person. And it’s a dirty, dark secret.”

[…]

“There are a lot of black people who are unintelligent, who don’t have success, It’s best to knock a successful black person down because they’re intelligent, they speak well, they do well in school, and they’re successful…We’re the only ethnic group who say, ‘Hey, if you go to jail, it gives you street cred.’ It’s just typical BS that goes on when you’re black, man.”

On “Afternoons with Anthony Gargano and Rob Ellis,” Barkley was asked about Russell Wilson of the Seattle Seahawks being accused by teammates of not being ‘black enough’. Which evidently, he thought was ludicrous. What makes someone ‘black enough’? Committing a crime? Being in a gang? Doing time? That’s a hell of a way to prove something… just destroy your whole life and your peers will accept you. Genius.

Those of any race that strive to become better people and more professional at what they do should be lauded, not castigated by any group. Barkley is a success and he comports himself as one. When I look at Charles Barkley, I see a world class athlete and an astute business man. I don’t see the color of his skin.

He’s got a point… black people, not whites keep other black people down.

 

Jeff was the national rally organizer to free Marine Sgt. Tahmooressi from the Mexican prison, chairman emeritus of Ross Perot’s Reform Party of California, and a former candidate for governor. Jeff is editor-in-chief at Freedom Daily. He wrote for former Hollywood talent agent & Breitbart contributor, Pat Dollard, and headed up his 30 person research team. Mr. Rainforth also wrote for the Wayne Dupree Show. Jeff is single & says he is not gay.

Join the conversation

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse.

Culture

BREAKING NEWS About 9th Circuit Judge Who Struck Down Trump’s Travel Ban – This Is DISTURBING!

He had it coming!

Published

on

Every policy that President Donald Trump tries to implement for American’s safety, is not only met with a great deal of resistance from the left but also from defiant judges who block his progress. We saw this several times with Trump’s travel ban from terrorist-tied countries and now we’re seeing it with regards to so-called Sanctuary cities. Judges are disguising their clear liberal bias as judicial rulings and now tensions over this illegal immigrant issue have put America at the breaking point, edging on a civil war. However, one prominent appeals court judge who ceremoniously struck down Trump’s travel ban in a clear act of defiance just met his own demise.

When liberal Judge Alex Kozinski wasn’t busy flipping the proverbial bird at our president with his defiant decisions, he was hiding something much worse from his pretentious perch on the stand. Turns out, Kozinski had a lot of secrets under that black robe of his and now they all just came back to haunt him under the most shocking circumstances.

This new movement that is sweeping the nation taking aim at holding powerful men accountable for sexual harassment, misconduct, and assault has now named a prominent Liberal jurist as a serial harasser. It’s now being reported that six former far left liberal Ninth Circuit clerks and externs are now saying that the liberal Judge Alex Kozinski subjected them to sexual comments and unwelcome situations.

One of the former Kozinski clerks, Heidi Bond, who was his clerk between 2006 and 2007 has gone on the record with allegations that on multiple occasions the judge summoned her alone to his chambers in order to show her pornography which was unrelated to any case before the judge. He then asked if the images turned her on. Bond recounts at least three different instances of being shown porn by her boss and says the experiences were shocking. She has also written an extremely disturbing first-person account of her experiences of clerking for Judge Kozinski where she also details Kozinski isolating her from her co-clerks to discuss his sexual history.

The Washington Post Reports:

Judge Alex Kozinski of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit, pictured in 2003. Six women — all former clerks or externs in the 9th Circuit — alleged to The Washington Post in recent weeks that Kozinski, now 67, subjected them to a range of inappropriate sexual conduct or comments.

A former clerk for Judge Alex Kozinski said the powerful and well-known jurist, who for many years served as chief judge on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit, called her into his office several times and pulled up pornography on his computer, asking if she thought it was photoshopped or if it aroused her sexually.

Heidi Bond, who clerked for Kozinski from 2006 to 2007, said the porn was not related to any case. One set of images she remembered was of college-age students at a party where “some people were inexplicably naked while everyone else was clothed.” Another was a sort of digital flipbook that allowed users to mix and match heads, torsos and legs to create an image of a naked woman.

Bond is one of six women — all former clerks or more junior staffers known as externs in the 9th Circuit — who alleged to The Washington Post in recent weeks that Kozinski, now 67 and still serving as a judge on the court, subjected them to a range of inappropriate sexual conduct or comments. She is one of two former clerks who said Kozinski asked them to view porn in his chambers.

In a statement, Kozinski said: “I have been a judge for 35 years and during that time have had over 500 employees in my chambers. I treat all of my employees as family and work very closely with most of them. I would never intentionally do anything to offend anyone and it is regrettable that a handful have been offended by something I may have said or done.”

Kozinski provided the statement after The Post called and emailed a spokesman with a detailed list of the allegations this story would include. After the story posted online, the judge told the Los Angeles Times, “I don’t remember ever showing pornographic material to my clerks” and, “If this is all they are able to dredge up after 35 years, I am not too worried.”

When Bond was clerking, Kozinski was on the precipice of becoming chief judge for the 9th Circuit — the largest federal appeals court circuit in the country, handling cases for a large swath of the western United States as well as Hawaii and Alaska. The other people who alleged that Kozinski behaved inappropriately toward them worked in the 9th Circuit both before and after her, up to 2012.

Bond said she knew that she was to come to the judge’s office when her phone beeped twice. She said she tried to answer Kozinski’s inquiries as succinctly and matter-of-factly as possible. Bond was then in her early 30s and is now 41.

If the question was about photoshopping, Bond said, she would focus on minor details of the images. If Kozinski asked whether the images aroused her, Bond said, she would respond: “No, this kind of stuff doesn’t do anything for me. Is there anything else you need?” She said she recalled three instances when the judge showed her porn in his office.

“I was in a state of emotional shock, and what I really wanted to do was be as small as possible and make as few movements as possible and to say as little as possible to get out,” Bond said.

Bond, who went on to clerk for the Supreme Court and now works as a romance novelist writing under the name Courtney Milan, and another clerk, Emily Murphy, who worked for a different judge on the 9th Circuit and is now a law professor, described their experiences in on-the-record interviews. The other four women spoke on the condition that their names and some other identifying information not be published, out of fear that they might face retaliation from Kozinski or others.

Kozinski, who served as the chief judge on the 9th Circuit from 2007 to 2014, remains a prominent judge, well known in the legal community for his colorful written opinions. His clerks often win prestigious clerkships at the Supreme Court.

Murphy, who clerked for Judge Richard Paez, said Kozinski approached her when she was talking with a group of other clerks at a reception at a San Francisco hotel in September 2012. The group had been discussing training regimens, and Murphy said she commented that the gym in the 9th Circuit courthouse was nice because other people were seldom there.

Kozinski, according to Murphy and two others present at the time who spoke to The Post, said that if that were the case, she should work out naked. Those in the group tried to change the subject, Murphy and the others present said, but the judge kept steering the conversation toward the idea of Murphy exercising without clothes.

“It wasn’t just clear that he was imagining me naked, he was trying to invite other people — my professional colleagues — to do so as well,” Murphy said. “That was what was humiliating about it.”

Murphy, who was 30 at the time of the incident and is now 36, provided The Post with a 2012 email showing that she told a mentor about what had happened at the time. Two of Murphy’s friends who were present at the time of the encounter, speaking on the condition of anonymity, also confirmed her account.

Now that’s sick, but then again, what else can we expect from a judge from the infamous 9th circuit court who is known for its radical far left agenda leanings. No wonder the 9th circuit wants Muslims Refugees in this nation, they act the same way their judges act.

It seems that for every right-wing leaning man who is accused of sexual misconduct there are at least 100 liberal men accused of the same, or worse. This whole time all these institutions where being run as brothels and not one person in the outside world even knew. They tell us how to think and what is and isn’t moral while at the same time their stench of immorality is off the charts.

Please share if you agree this Judge needs to be in prison…

Continue Reading

Culture

BREAKING: Trump Could Be Removed From Office Without Impeachment – This MUST Be Stopped!

This is War!

Published

on

Since Donald Trump was elected as president, the left has been doing whatever they can to remove him from office. These spiteful liberals cannot accept the fact that Trump is in fact, the president and beat Hillary Clinton, so instead, they will continue to fan the flames of division. The first tactic the left focused on was the bogus Russian collusion story, and as time passed the entire narrative began to blow up in their faces. Every time the left thought they had a piece of so-called “evidence” to tie Trump to the Russians it turned out to be a Clinton operative which has only frustrated the Democrats to no end.

Now, these hateful individuals are focusing on a new tactic to remove President Trump from office, and if we are not careful, they may get their wish.

Over the past few weeks, we have witnessed an influx of sexual assault allegations coming out against politicians on either side of the aisle. Roy Moore, the Republican candidate for Alabama Senate, was hit with sexual assault allegations stemming from 40 years ago. Even though the claims were hardly corroborated and the chief accuser conceded that she did lie the damage was already done, and Moore lost to the ultra-liberal Doug Jones last night.

Soon after Moore was accused of sexual impropriety, the #METOO campaign took hold as women logged onto social media recounting their stories of sexual assault at the hands of high powered politicians. Then allegations against Democrat Senator Al Franken and Congressman John Conyers emerged, and the two resigned from office.

Now, you may be asking yourself how does this tie into pressuring President Trump to step down from office? Well, the answer is quite simple. If the left can get enough women to come forward accusing President Trump of sexual assault they can do their best to force him to resign from office.

And, that is the entire purpose of the sudden influx of sexual assault allegations against politicians rearing its head at this time.

Here is more from Great American Politics:

Due to the decaying culture and values of America and Donald Trump’s agenda to restore many of those values, Donald Trump is hated and despised by a large sector of the population. They have been trying to find ways to prevent Trump from taking office and then ways to get him out of office now that he has been inaugurated.

Democrats had put their hopes in the Russian election interference investigations, but so far, that seems to be backfiring on them as there has been more evidence linking the Clinton campaign with the Russians than the Trump campaign.

One House Democrat believed he could lead an effort to impeach President Trump and remove him from office, but that effort was soundly defeated with the majority of Democrats voting to table the resolution.

So, how can they possibly get rid of Trump?

‘Me too’!

Several women tried to prevent Trump from winning the election by making sexual allegations against him, but Trump denied the allegations and believed they were handled since no hard evidence was ever presented.

Now that the ‘me too’ craze is causing several members of Congress to resign suddenly, over a dozen women have banded together to make sexual allegations against Trump and immediately, some Democrats in Congress began calling for Trump to resign.

Trump has responded by saying that the allegations are not true, they’re fake news and he denies all of the allegations.

So, who will Congress believe – Trump or his accusers?

If Trump is guilty, then Democrats need to be reminded how they vehemently defended Bill Clinton and refused to vote him out of office during his impeachment hearing. I’m not condoning the behavior, but right now, Trump is the best thing that could happen to America and we need him in the Oval Office.

Now, no one is saying that politicians that are found guilty of sexual assault should remain in office, but just an allegation should not ruin a man’s career. There is a reason that there are a statue of limitations and if these women were genuinely assaulted by a politician or a person in power, there is no reason that there should not be a paper trail to corroborate it their story of abuse. After years of silence, these women should not be given a platform to destroy someone based on what political office these men are for now, and that goes across the board.

If these are the tactics that the left are going to use to silence their opposition you can bet they will use them harder in 2018 and of course, in 2020 with the next presidential election. Make no mistake folks, this is a war we are in and it is now the time to fight back against these tactics or we can say goodbye to the United States.

H/T [Great American Politics]

FOLLOW us on Facebook at Freedom Daily!

Continue Reading

Culture

Look Who Just PAID OFF The Women ACCUSING TRUMP Of Groping Them – This Is SICK!

Published

on

The only thing that could shut down the nauseating Russia collusion chatter from Democrats is to flip the script on their own perverted party problems and accuse President Donald Trump of being a groper. In a matter of just a couple of days, the country has forgotten all about the sexual misconduct allegations plaguing liberals and is hyperfocused on Trump allegedly being inappropriate.

The attention switch is no coincidence either. All it took was a few obscure women to come out of the woodwork together with some well-crafted harrowing tales of feeling violated by the Commander-in-Chief. It also wasn’t a trending hashtag that made them feel “brave” enough to share their stories, it was a heaping pile of cash. However, you’ll be shocked who was behind that profitable set-up in paying them all off.

Democrats aren’t even good at their own game. In setting up the president to look like a pervert, they picked they couldn’t even pick believable accusers.  Victims come in all shapes, sizes, and aesthetics. However, it’s really hard to actually buy into the fact that billionaire Trump, who has constantly been surrounded around beautiful women all of his adult life, would grope, grab, or touch the less than appealing women who are accusing him now of such things. That’s for starters, but adding to this curiosity is the timing of these allegations coming in the midst of so many sexual misconduct controversies among liberal men.

The fake outrage and seemingly false allegations has reached such a level of absolute ridiculousness, that Trump’s latest accuser was said to have a witness who also happened to be blind. That’s right, the one person who saw Trump grope another woman, can’t actually see.

The Daily Mail reports:

Another woman from Donald Trump’s past came forward on Tuesday to reassert her allegations that the former real estate mogul sexually assaulted her.

Mindy McGillivray told Megyn Kelly ‘Today’ that Trump grabbed her ‘caboose’ in front of Ray Charles at a 2003 concert at Mar-a-Lago and flirted with her on another occasion, upsetting, Melania.

McGillivray, was 23 at the time, says she was backstage with Trump, her friend Ken Davidoff and Regis Philbin and his wife as Ray Charles stood in front of them with his security guard.

“And the next thing you know, I feel a grab on my right side. So I quickly turn to look at what this is. I initially think this is probably Ken, Ken’s camera bag. But to my surprise it’s Donald.”

“I stand there. I’m stunned. I’m speechless,” she said.

In the interview with Kelly, McGillivray was adamant that she is not ‘a liar,’ regardless of what Trump says, and admitted to felonies she committed and was held accountable for in the past.

What’s really sad about all of these accusers is that they are actually discrediting the real suffering that actual victims have and do endure by making up and/or exaggerating their allegations that may or may not have happened. Worse yet, they are doing it for money and where there is a scandal aimed at Trump to manipulate things to the benefit of Democrats, it always comes back to one bank account.

According to the Daily Wire:

A far-left activist group funded by George Soros is readying the women who accused President Donald Trump of sexual misconduct to demand a congressional investigation. The women had made their accusations just before the November 2016 election.

The women will speak on Monday at 10:30 a.m. ET to call for “accountability and an investigation by Congress of sexual misconduct.” They had accused Trump of “groping, fondling, forcibly kissing, humiliating and harassing women.”

The group behind this obvious new attempt to force Trump out of the White House, Brave New Films, is a non-profit 501(c)(3) organization that claims to be “non-partisan” — a claim that becomes laughable upon a review of their donors and partners which include left-wing hit groups like Media Matters For America and Democracy For America.

Brave New Films claims that they do not “expressly advocate for the election or defeat of candidates for public office,” a statement that is not even remotely accurate looking at just some of the propaganda-style videos they created, including:

– Stand Up, Senate! The President-elect is a hypocrite.
– Protect Public Education – Stop Betsy DeVos!
– Indivisible: A Practical Guide For Resisting The Trump Agenda
– GETTING DONALD TRUMP OFF NBC’S SNL

There needs to be a #MeToo movement started for all the men whose lives, careers, and families have been destroyed by depraved women who make false sex assault allegations against them. The belief that the woman is always right is no longer right since there’s a wad of cash behind more claims now than ever before. What’s truly sad is that it will now call actual, legitimate claims into question. For the party that preaches “women’s rights,” how is this the right thing to do to real victims of sex assault?

Continue Reading

Latest Articles

Trending