Please disable your Ad Blocker to better interact with this website.

Connect with us

Politics

TRUMP WAS RIGHT! CIA Agent Who Worked For Obama Confirms HORRIFIC Muslim Agenda!

We knew it all along and now there’s proof! Sick!

Published

on

A former CIA official is now whistleblowing on the corrupt actions of the Obama administration. She is risking her entire career to do so. Her name is Claire Lopez and she is well respected in the intelligence community. She worked for over two decades in the field and under the Reagan administration. Now she is the manager of the Center for Security Policy. She manages the counter-jihad and shariah programs.

She claims Obama is the reason America completely switched sides during the war on terror. Now she claims the administration funded the Muslim Brotherhood under him. She was seriously concerned about the President and his motivations about foreign policy decisions.

She said the war on terror was working until the former President started making drastic changes that showed support for the Muslim Brotherhood and their jihad interests. The war on terror sought to free everyone from radical shariah law and terror. She insists the war was working until Obama began to let them slide.

Lopez also said that the President did not want to kill Osama Bin Laden but instead he wanted to in-prison him but that the appearance of impropriety was too great to allow him to live. She said,

“Israel fought enemies on all sides to remain free, secure and Jewish, America began to move away from Israel and toward its Muslim enemies. And, as Iran moved inexorably toward a deliverable nuclear weapons capability, America helped.”

The root of the President and his plan was simple she stated it was to do the following,

“to remove American power and influence, including military forces, from Islamic lands.”

Clearly, we now can understand why the President failed miserably at quelling international radical jihad terrorism. He was working hand in hand with them to go easy on them. While not shocking it is certainly saddening.

FOLLOW us on Facebook at Freedom Daily!

Culture

24Hrs After NFL Legend Mike Ditka SLAMS Obama As ‘Worst President In History’ He Gets NASTY Surprise

Published

on

Being a conservative in TV isn’t good for your career. In fact, you don’t even have to be a conservative, you just have to be a free thinker that isn’t willing to drink the liberal kool-aid, and the powers that be will find a way to make sure that you’re either forced our or completely discredited.

This has become especially true in the Trump era where those in the media consider it their mission to make sure they poison every American with what comes through their TV’s and radios. The problem has even spread to sportscasters and is getting worse since the rapid growth of the NFL’s National Anthem protest. The one and only acceptable move on the part of many of these networks’ anchors is to do the politically correct thing and support the protesters.

This isn’t a rule that everyone is okay with. In fact, at least one former ESPN panelist just wasn’t having it. Mike Ditka proved that he’s willing to put his money where his mouth is, where his  viewpoints opinion just cost him a very coveted position at ESPN, according to the Patriot Chronicle:

“Just one week after making a disparaging remark against Barack Obama, NFL legend Mike Ditka has been removed from his position as a panelist for ESPN’s Sunday NFL Countdown.

Appearing on WABC’s The Bernie & Sid Show, Ditka pointed out that Obama was not a leader. In fact, the NFL Superbowl champion pointed out, Obama was worst president that the country had ever had.On the bright side, Ditka did say that Obama would be fun to play golf with, an activity that the president had been able to enjoy repeatedly, even when he heard the news that American soldiers are being killed in Afghanistan. Nothing seemed to interrupt the golf swing of the former community organizer.”

Dikta didn’t get to where he is in life by mincing words, and he isn’t about to start now. Someone asked him his opinion and he gave it. This happened a little over a year ago even before the widespread National Anthem protest picked up so much steam. The fact that ESPN was trying, even before all of this, to silence any voice that made a political statement that they didn’t agree with gives us an idea of how we got into this mess.

It’s no a secret that Ditka is a politically opinionated individual. He has been very open about his frustration with current officials and even considered doing something about it and running for office.

“Mike Ditka almost ran for U.S. Senator in 2004 against, then candidate, Barack Obama, to replace Jack Ryan. Ryan had stepped out of the race after sealed court records from his divorce began to seep out to the media.

Though Ryan’s actual divorce papers had been made public, both he and his former wife Jeri Ryan agreed to keep the custody records private out of respect for their child.

After winning the primary, Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Robert Schnider decided, despite both parents wanting the custody papers to remain sealed, that he would overturn that decision and make the documents available to the public.

Although candidate Obama called for the records to remain out of the race, allegations were thrown that it was Obama-backers who were feeding the information to the press.”

An extremely convenient win for the Obama campaign for sure. It’s easy to see that Dikta is one of the many conservatives that are held to a different standard than other people in their same position. ESPN makes a show of putting sports first, but this, plus all the coverage and commentary that has covered the anthem protest would point to them putting their politics first.

To be clear, putting your politics first isn’t wrong, it’s just a little underhanded to pretend that you only care about sports when you’re also trying to endorse liberals and shut down conservatives.

“Ditka, who considers himself to be a Conservative, said in a 2013 interview that the biggest mistake of his life was not running against Barack Obama in 2004, lamenting that if he had won, Obama would probably not have gotten to the White House.

He’s not a leader. This country needs leadership. It needs direction. It needs somebody that steps up front.”

While most on the outside looking in can see that the United States needs a unifying force, companies like ESPN and the others in the mainstream media seem bound and determined to continue to divide us by whatever means necessary. If that means shutting down the voice of a Super Bowl-winning coach in favor of the younger Antifa and BLM supporters, they’re apparently willing to do that.

ESPN seems to not be satisfied until they go the way of the NFL; tanked ratings, lost money and a slippery slope into irrelevance.

[H/T: Patriot Chronicle]

Share if you think we should boycott ESPN along with the NFL!

Continue Reading

Politics

Rogue Judge Just Stabbed Trump In Back With What She Did To Secretly DESTROY Pardoned Sheriff Joe

Published

on

Here we go again. Once again an activist rogue judge intent on legislating from the bench has decided to not follow the United States Constitution.

Former Maricopa County Arizona Sheriff Joe Arpaio received a pardon from President Donald Trump last August, but the judge who found him guilty of criminal contempt is now refusing to erase evidence of his conviction.

A presidential pardon ensures that Sheriff Arpaio is protected from prosecution, and the United States Justice Department had asked Judge Susan Ritchie Bolton to have her rulings vacated from the court so no trace of the judgment exists. But like the good little liberal globalist that she is, she has refused.

The liberal hack judge wrote in her denial that the power to pardon is an executive prerogative of mercy, but what it doesn’t do is modify how judicial records are kept. And that to vacate the ruling, in this case, would run afoul of this important distinction.

Arpaio has vowed to keep fighting, and his legal team has said they will appeal Bolton’s ruling on grounds that she misstated the facts in a previous presidential pardon case involving former President Bill “BJ” Clinton, of course, which she used as legal precedent for this ruling.

AZCental Reports:

Sheriff Joe Arpaio in contempt of federal court, judge rules

Six months after arguments concluded in a case against “America’s Toughest Sheriff,” U.S. District Judge G. Murray Snow broke his silence on Friday, filing a series of withering findings with one big conclusion:

Sheriff Joe Arpaio is in civil contempt of federal court.

Snow ruled that the Maricopa County lawman and three of his top aides violated an order meant to curtail racial profiling in his agency, according to the ruling issued Friday.

The ruling held Arpaio in contempt on all three potential counts, ending a lengthy proceeding that started a year ago when Snow convened a series of hearings in downtown Phoenix to determine whether Arpaio and his commanders defied Snow’s court orders.

Chief Deputy Jerry Sheridan was found in contempt on two counts, and retired Chief Brian Sands and Lt. Joe Sousa each were found in contempt of one.

The ruling set the stage for reforms, costly sanctions and a potential referral for criminal prosecution, although the judge refrained from making any official decisions on those matters yet.

“In short, the Court finds that the Defendants have engaged in multiple acts of misconduct, dishonesty, and bad faith with respect to the Plaintiff class and the protection of its rights,” Snow wrote in the 162-page ruling.

While a milestone, the ruling is largely a formality given the case’s history. Arpaio and Sheridan admitted to violating the judge’s orders before the hearings’ start date but repeatedly insisted that it was due to miscommunication and confusion rather than willful defiance.

The distinction could mean the difference between civil contempt and criminal contempt — or “fix it” remedies compared with outright punishment.

The judge set a May 31 date for a hearing for attorneys to discuss penalties. Shortly thereafter, Snow said, he would issue an order on sanctions and whether he would refer the case for a criminal contempt trial.

3 violations came under judge’s scrutiny

The contempt proceedings were based on three violations that occurred throughout the history of the underlying racial-profiling case: that the Sheriff’s Office failed to turn over video evidence that was required before the trial; that officials continued to enforce immigration law after Snow barred the practice; and that Sheridan failed to quietly collect evidence after the trial, as Snow had ordered him to do.

Attorneys from the American Civil Liberties Union and Covington & Burling represented plaintiffs both in the initial racial-profiling case and contempt hearings.

Arpaio’s “state of mind” served as the primary topic for debate throughout the contempt proceedings, as the evidence left little doubt that his agency failed each order.

The hearings, which started with four days of testimony in April 2015 and resumed with 16 days in the fall, often turned into a much broader discussion focused on the sheriff’s enforcement priorities and whether he was more interested in settling political scores than rooting out the racial profiling that Snow had found in the Sheriff’s Office.

Arpaio’s acknowledgment in April that his attorneys had hired a private detective to investigate Snow’s wife was among the most bizarre moments in the lengthy proceeding. It set the tone for exchanges among Snow and Arpaio, his aides and attorneys that were occasionally pointed and personal.

Two other large topics developed out of the proceedings: what plaintiffs’ attorneys said were worthless internal investigations; and whether the sheriff employed a Seattle-based computer programmer to concoct a conspiracy that would free Arpaio of his legal woes.

In exhaustive detail, Snow agreed with each of the plaintiffs’ allegations, often bolstering his findings with Arpaio’s own words.

In reference to his December 2011 preliminary injunction that banned deputies from detaining individuals because of their immigration status and without state charges, Snow noted that Arpaio was fully aware of the order yet flaunted his decision to defy it.

He cites Arpaio’s reaction in fall 2012, after Immigration and Customs Enforcement announced it no longer would accept undocumented immigrants from the Sheriff’s Office.

At that point, the sheriff announced his “backup plan” to drop off the individuals at Border Patrol facilities instead and boasted that deputies had recently done so for two “suspects.”

Snow found that deputies had detained and turned over to federal authorities at least 157 individuals who had not committed state crimes, in violation of his order.

Snow said both Arpaio and Sheridan made numerous misstatements under oath.

In particular, he noted Arpaio’s testimony about the “Seattle Operation,” a catchall used to refer to the sheriff’s many covert dealings with Seattle-based computer programmer Dennis Montgomery.

Arpaio maintained Montgomery was employed to investigate illegal CIA harvesting of citizens’ financial information, but some of the programmer’s work product indicated another goal.

Montgomery compiled timelines and flow charts that seemed to allege an elaborate conspiracy against the sheriff involving Snow, former U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder and various other federal officials.

In his testimony April 23, 2015, Arpaio said he never had been involved in an investigation into Snow.

Internal-affairs office in the spotlight

Throughout the proceedings, plaintiffs asserted that the primary function of the Sheriff Office’s internal investigations was to absolve the accused of any wrongdoing. Snow agreed.

The judge highlighted an internal-affairs case in which deputies had been accused of “pocketing” items from investigations.

Although Sheridan initiated a probe into the matter, Snow said, there was a tacit understanding that it would go nowhere.

Sheridan testified that he believed there was no basis for a criminal investigation, that he felt sorry for the human-smuggling unit members and only ordered the investigation to deflect scrutiny from the plaintiffs.

“In short, Sergeant Tennyson’s investigation ended up being what he and Chief Deputy Sheridan intended it to be: a perfunctory whitewash,” Snow concluded.

Snow also found Sheridan had ignored his own conflicts of interest by overseeing a probe into Detective Brian Mackiewicz, who was accused of padding his timesheet and having an inappropriate relationship with the victim of a domestic-violence incident he investigated.

Sheridan was close with Mackiewicz, Snow found, and Sheridan’s wife stood to make $100,000 in commission from a home sale to one of Mackiewicz’s female friends. Mackiewicz was also Arpaio’s point person in the “Seattle Investigation.”

In sum, Sheridan maintained control of the investigations to ensure “nothing became of them,” Snow said.

Sheriff’s attorneys, ACLU weigh in on the ruling

The Arizona Republic was unable to reach Arpaio’s attorneys for comment Friday, but in a statement they said they have begun reading and analyzing the lengthy document.

“Despite disagreeing with some of the Court’s findings, the Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office will continue to work with the court appointed Monitor, the ACLU and Plaintiffs to comply with the Court’s Orders, as it has since January 2014,” it said.

Cecillia Wang, a plaintiffs’ attorney with the ACLU’s Immigrants’ Rights Project, called the ruling “careful” and abundantly supported by evidence and the defendants’ admissions.

“Based on that evidence, it’s a damning finding — that they intentionally and repeatedly flouted the court’s orders,” she said.

Maricopa County Supervisor Steve Gallardo said in a statement the ruling was the “first step in achieving justice for those whose civil rights were intentionally violated by Sheriff Arpaio.”

Gallardo, a longtime Arpaio critic, noted that the taxpayers would be picking up the tab for millions of dollars to ensure the Sheriff’s Office would be in compliance with the court’s orders.

“The irony is, while citizens pay the bill for the sheriff’s violation of the previous court orders, they are the only ones who can remove Arpaio from office and restore professionalism to our law enforcement agency.”

Arpaio is running for his seventh term as Maricopa County sheriff this year.

Next steps: A response to the judge, a hearing

Snow has asked all parties, including the U.S. Department of Justice, to file a response to his rulings by May 27. The Justice Department settled a separate racial-profiling case against Arpaio last year and has since joined this case.

Snow said he will discuss sanctions when the hearings pick back up May 31. Shortly thereafter, he said, he would issue orders on remedies and decide whether to refer the case for criminal contempt.

Snow betrayed little about either upcoming decision in his Friday ruling, although he repeatedly asserted that Arpaio and his aides’ violations were “intentional.”

It’s the key word that could be used to refer the matter to the U.S. Attorney’s Office for criminal contempt charges. Snow also has said his decision will be based on whether he feels civil penalties are adequate.

Civil penalties are largely used to force a defendant’s hand in fixing a problem, while criminal contempt signals punishment. Both can include financial sanctions, but only criminal contempt could lead to jail time.

Snow did signal in his ruling that reforms over the office’s internal investigations are necessary.

And plaintiffs say the parties are already working on a system where victims of the office’s racial profiling could be compensated.

“We are hoping for the court to issue an order that would authorize some type of mechanism whereby victims could come forward and make claims for some type of compensation that stems from the violations of the preliminary injunction,” said Lauren Pedley, a litigation associate for Covington & Burling.

Offshoot of racial-profiling case

The contempt ruling is the latest development in a case that began when Manuel de Jesus Ortega Melendres, a Mexican tourist legally in the United States, was stopped outside a church in Cave Creek where day laborers were known to gather. Melendres, the passenger in a car driven by a white driver, claimed that deputies detained him for nine hours and that the detention was unlawful.

Eventually, the case grew to include complaints from two Hispanic siblings from Chicago who felt they were profiled by sheriff’s deputies, and an assistant to former Phoenix Mayor Phil Gordon whose Hispanic husband claims he was detained and cited while white motorists nearby were treated differently.

Snow issued a preliminary injunction in December 2011 that prohibited sheriff’s deputies from engaging in law-enforcement practices that unfairly targeted Latinos, and he followed it up in 2013 with an order that included a court-appointed monitor to oversee reforms in the agency.

The costs associated with the racial-profiling case now exceed $60 million, including at least $8.2 million in tax money tied to the outside attorneys required to represent all the parties in the ongoing legal proceedings.

Obama's Birth Certificate

Isn’t it great how the law changes depending on who the plaintiff is in these cases? When it comes to a liberal globalism, these hack judges bend over backwards to comply with the law. But if it comes to a person who was defending the very sovereignty and security of our nation, they just don’t seem to want to let it go. I wonder how many of the criminals former president Barack Hussein Obama pardoned still have a criminal record?

Please share if you want judges to be held to account for their actions….

Continue Reading

Culture

Hrs After NFL Commissioner Makes NASTY Kneeling Decision, Look What TRUMP Just Did To Make Him Pay

Published

on

The President of the United States has many jobs and none of them are easy. In the case of President Trump, his workload doubled when those who supported his opponent decided that they could disown and work against him. But despite all the cries of “not my President,” he still is our President, and no matter how many people kneel during the National Anthem, he will still be the President.

Contrary to what the media would have you believe, the President is working very hard to unify the country, but he’s only looking to do it under the banner of the red white and blue. That’s what we are all supposed to pledge our allegiance to, and it’s what the President is sworn to protect.

To that end, President Trump has been putting pressure on every single person who wants to disrespect that flag by trying to make sure that their employers don’t tolerate it in their place of work. But despite his best efforts, the NFL teams are still going to allow their unpatriotic players to put on a racist and anti-American show before every game.

Because of their lack of patriotism, the President has approved a petition and according to the Daily Wire, he’s asking each of us to sign it if will be standing for the National Anthem:

“On Thursday, President Trump, vitally concerned with the disrespect shown toward the National Anthem that was triggered by former San Francisco 49er quarterback Colin Kaepernick, and later spread across the NFL, fired a warning shot across the bow, approving a petition addressed to the American people asking who will stand for the National Anthem.

The petition can be found on the GOP website. It reads: ‘The President has asked for a list of supporters who stand for the National Anthem. Add your name below to show your patriotism and support.’ According to the website, the petition is ‘Paid for by the Trump Make America Great Again Committee, a joint fundraising committee authorized by and composed of Donald J. Trump for President, Inc. and the Republican National Committee.'”

It’s sad that this even needs to be a petition and it makes one wonder what happened to get us to a place where we’re differentiating ourselves by who will stand and who will sit. It used to be a given that you’d show respect, but now it’s somehow a political statement.

Since the left has made it unacceptable for their minions to have even a  modicum of respect for our country, the President is looking to help those who still know what it means to love their country rally together. There’s something very powerful to be able to know exactly how many people there are who still support the same values that you do. Unfortunately, many that run the NFL aren’t in that group.

“On Tuesday, 13 players, owners of 11 teams, NFL commissioner Roger Goodell, vice president of football operations Troy Vincent, NFL Players Association executive director DeMaurice Smith, as well as assorted other people, met in a conference room inside NFL headquarters to discuss the controversy regarding the National Anthem protests and to decide how to move forward.

On Wednesday, Trump had resumed his attack on those who would disrespect the National Anthem, tweeting:

In mid-September, Trump had triggered a firestorm when he stated at a rally in Alabama, “Wouldn’t you love to see one of these NFL owners, when somebody disrespects our flag, to say, ‘Get that son of a b**** off the field right now. Out. He’s fired! He’s fired!’ … You know, some owner is going to do that. He’s going to say, ‘That guy that disrespects our flag, he’s fired.’ And that owner, they don’t know it [but] they’ll be the most popular person in this country.’ Trump added that the NFL protests during the National Anthem had exhibited a ‘total disrespect of our heritage’ and ‘everything that we stand for.’

Trump reiterated a few days later, ‘This has to do with respect for our country, and respect for our flag.'”

There are those who say that the anthem protest isn’t what we think it is, and that it’s just their own way of making a statement. Even if that were the case in the first place, the President made it clear what disrespecting the National Anthem says to the world. If they had even stopped at that point, it would have shown that they still loved the USA. But of course, that only added fuel to their alt left agenda.

Thankfully, the President isn’t one to back down from a fight, and he has just upped the ante with this petition. The country and the world are going to know just how many hard working Americans still love this country.

[H/T: Daily Wire]

Share if you’re glad the President is making a stand against the anti-American NFL! 

Continue Reading

Latest Articles

Culture39 mins ago

24Hrs After NFL Legend Mike Ditka SLAMS Obama As ‘Worst President In History’ He Gets NASTY Surprise

Being a conservative in TV isn’t good for your career. In fact, you don’t even have to be a conservative,...

Politics2 hours ago

Rogue Judge Just Stabbed Trump In Back With What She Did To Secretly DESTROY Pardoned Sheriff Joe

Here we go again. Once again an activist rogue judge intent on legislating from the bench has decided to not...

Culture3 hours ago

Hrs After NFL Commissioner Makes NASTY Kneeling Decision, Look What TRUMP Just Did To Make Him Pay

The President of the United States has many jobs and none of them are easy. In the case of President...

Culture3 hours ago

Melania Just Dropped Everything And Takes Off On Sudden Trip After Getting HEARTBREAKING News

Liberals constantly disappoint with their ongoing attacks targeted at our incredible first lady who they love to hate. She doesn’t...

Featured4 hours ago

BREAKING: Trump Just ENDED It For Every NASTY Liberal Who Crossed Him In One INCREDIBLE Call

Liberals’ latest attack on President Donald Trump in a desperate effort to take him down was to claim that he...

Featured6 hours ago

NASTY Congresswoman’s DIRTY Secret Out About What SHE Did To Dead Soldiers After Slamming Trump For It

The barrage of vicious attacks against our President never cease. Now bored with accusing President Trump of “colluding with the...

Sports7 hours ago

Racist NFL Player Just Denounced The U.S. After Devastating Blow, Now Look Where He’s Headed

One of the two players leading the charge and subsequent demise of the 2017-18 NFL season this year was Seattle...

Trending