Please disable your Ad Blocker to better interact with this website.

Connect with us

Matt Palumbo

FBI Agent Just Said These Two Words And It Will Forever Change The Clinton Lives!

She’s headed to jail folks.

Published

on

Who are you voting for next Tuesday? I’ll be voting for the candidate that isn’t under FBI investigation….. for the third time this election.

Yes – Hillary really has been under investigation three separate times by the FBI. Let’s recap. First came the initial FBI investigation into Hillary’s private email server, which she got off the hook from. Then came the FBI’s multiple probes into the Clinton Foundation, which are still ongoing.

And lastly, there’s the reopening of the FBI’s investigation into Hillary’s emails – all thanks to Anthony Weiner. Huma Abedin has since disappeared from the campaign trail, and the polls have surged in favor of Trump. The ABC News poll which showed Trump behind Hillary by 12 points on October 23rd now shows Trump ahead Hillary by a 1 point. It’s an incredible reversal of fortune, and unprecedented in politics.

But Donald Trump is hardly Hillary’s biggest threat: the FBI is. And guess what? As we just learned – an indictment is likely.

As Real Clear Politics reported:

Fox News Channel’s Bret Baier reports the latest news about the Clinton Foundation investigation from two sources inside the FBI. He reveals five important new pieces of information in these two short clips:

1. The Clinton Foundation investigation is far more expansive than anybody has reported so far and has been going on for more than a year.

2. The laptops of Clinton aides Cherryl Mills and Heather Samuelson have not been destroyed, and agents are currently combing through them. The investigation has interviewed several people twice, and plans to interview some for a third time.

3. Agents have found emails believed to have originated on Hillary Clinton’s secret server on Anthony Weiner’s laptop. They say the emails are not duplicates and could potentially be classified in nature.

4. Sources within the FBI have told Baier that an indictment is “likely” in the case of pay-for-play at the Clinton Foundation, “barring some obstruction in some way” from the Justice Department.

5. FBI sources say with 99% accuracy that Hillary Clinton’s server has been hacked by at least five foreign intelligence agencies, and that information have been taken from it.

Watch below:

Donald Trump is now leading in Florida, Ohio, Nevada, Iowa, and North Carolina. Trump is within spitting distance in Colorado and Pennsylvania, and two new polls show Trump up in Virginia and New Hampshire, respectively. If Trump picks off any of those latter states, he wins the election.

And how are things looking for Hillary? Even if she wins the election, that’s just the first nail biter she can finally take a breath of relief on. Then comes the second impeachment of a Clinton.

Matt Palumbo

Police Get Last Laugh On Cocky Thug With BRUTAL Lesson They Left On The Back Of His Brand new Truck

Published

on

By

Well, here’s a reminder that you don’t exactly want to be cocky in front of the people who have the power to put you in jail as a criminal.

It doesn’t take a genius to realize it’s a bad idea, but it’s not all too uncommon for drug dealers to boast about the fruits of their “labor” on social media – the cash, cars, and random luxury goods. Given countless stories out there of people who’ve lost their jobs over comments they made on social media they didn’t expect certain people to see, you’d think that people would wise up. I guess it’s no surprise that drug dealers aren’t among those who know better.

According to Bunker Buster News:

Police in an unidentified jurisdiction apparently decided to have a little fun at the expense of one of these criminals who found himself busted, according to Mad World News, and it’s sure to leave everyone who sees it smiling knowing there is some justice in the world.

While we don’t know many of the the details to this story, Mad World News said that police arrested a drug dealer and impounded his truck as a result of that arrest. A picture of that truck later appeared on Twitter showing that police actually did much more than that.

To act as a deterrent – and boast about the fruits of their own labor, police got creative with what they did to his truck. They turned it into police property, and put the words “This vehicle belonged to a drug dealer: He went to jail and we are driving his car” on the back.

Well, it’s clear who got the last laugh on that one.

Police in the UK had the same idea too. And lucky them – they managed to nab a Rolls Royce as a result.

Catching drug dealers is apparently more profitable than dealing drugs!

Continue Reading

Matt Palumbo

Liberals Are Demanding You Download This App To ‘Protect’ You From Conservatives — Look What It REALLY Does!

This Proves liberals are idiots!

Published

on

By

Following the election of Donald Trump, the narrative of an epidemic of “fake news” quickly emerged. It’s not hard to see why.

The media in its entirety absolutely despised Donald Trump – and he still won. How could they explain away his victory aside from competition from media that couldn’t possibly be as reliable as them?

In reality, people simply woke up to the B.S. that the media was spinning. If you want proof that “fake news” for those in the liberal media is synonymous with nothing more than “conservative news,” (unlike “CNN” for the rest of us). Just take a look at who the “experts” consider fake news.

As Right Wing News reported:

Harvard University, a.k.a. snowflake central has just established a research guide on fake news. It just so happens that all of those identified on their fake news guide happen to dozens upon dozens of respectable conservative websites…and they are being described as “unreliable” or “fake”.

The Daily Caller, for instance, is labeled as being “political,” “clickbait,” and having “bias,” whereas The Daily Kos is labeled as “political” “clickbait,” yet is considered “credible.”

Several other influential conservative outlets are included on the list of potentially fake or discredited sources, such as Independent Journal Review, Newsmax, Conservative Review, and The Washington Free Beacon, though none of their liberal counterparts, like Vox, Slate, or Buzzfeed, are on the list.

In fact, the word “conservative” appears 19 times on the list while the term “liberal” appears only 4 times.

Even if you consider the sites above to be sensationalist (and Newsmax, Conservative Review, and the Free Beacon seldom are), that hardly makes them “false.” Maybe “disagreeable” is the word they were looking for.

You can view the full list here.

Hilariously, websites like The Onion, Andy Borowitz’s column, and Clickhole are listed as “fake news,” when everyone and their mother understands that they’re satirical.

And of course, Freedom Daily gets an honorary mention. Thank God they didn’t forget us.

FOLLOW us on Facebook at Freedom Daily!

Continue Reading

Matt Palumbo

BAD News For 3 Anti-Trump Judges Who Allowed Obama To Wiretap, After Trump Finds BIG Secret They Hid

Obama’s shadow government is falling!

Published

on

By

Last weekend, Donald Trump made an explosive claim that during his campaign Trump Tower was wiretapped – and that then-President Barack Obama was behind it.

Trump offered no evidence for the claims, but what he said may be some “truthful hyperbole” (a term Trump himself coined).

As former prosecutor Andrew McCarthy summarized in National Review, Obama’ Justice Department considered a criminal investigation aimed at a number of Trump’s associates – and found nothing criminal.

After that fail, they converted the investigation into an intelligence probe under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA). Elements of that story have been confirmed by The New York Times, the BBC and McClatchy newspapers.

FISA surveillance has to be approved by a special court, which almost always allows the government to spy on people when asked. To the Obama administration’s surprise, the Justice Department refused in this case. As McCarthy noted, this is notable because “the FISA court is notoriously solicitous of government requests to conduct national security surveillance.”

The Obama administration wasn’t ready to take no for an answer and came back during the final weeks of the election with a narrower request that didn’t specifically mention Trump. That narrower request was granted by the court – though no articles confirming it mention any wiretapping.

But who the heck was it who signed off on those FISA requests that were initially denied.

According to the Gateway Pundit – none other than Loretta Lynch.

According to ABC, all applications to the FISA Court were signed off on by the Attorney General and therefore if any applications were processed in the past year, they were signed off on by Loretta Lynch. This means that Lynch signed off on any requests for wire tapping President Donald Trump during the Presidential race. This is disheartening knowing that she released a video over the weekend calling for the need for more marching, blood and death on the streets. This also means that she chose not to investigate the Clinton Foundation for illegal activities but rather signed an application to wire tap President Trump.

The Gateway Pundit also notes that “Five of the current eleven judges on the court are scheduled to be on the court for President Trump’s entire first term with six of the judges’ terms expiring before January 2021. Seven of the judges are scheduled into the year 2020.”

And with that, we just found one more part of the swamp that needs to be drained.

FOLLOW us on Facebook at Freedom Daily!

Continue Reading

Trending