Please disable your Ad Blocker to better interact with this website.

Connect with us

Crime

FIRING SQUAD: Here’s The LEAKED Emails Where Hillary IGNORED Pleas For Security in Benghazi

TRIGGER WARNING – Emails potentially link Hillary directly with Benghazi

Published

on

 

Benghazi is the topic that won’t vanish. It’s everywhere. You can’t utter the word Hillary without thinking about the silent H in Benghazi…or the silence that came from Hillary Clinton when Americans wanted to come home after they caught some early warning signs of danger.

Then it happened.

The silence lived.

Four Americans died.

And what seems like moments later we’re facing the Podesta emails and reading the very nightmare that many people have thought about day after night after day.

Evidence that points to Hillary’s silence. The same silence that resulted in the loud screams of our dying Americans. The silent treatment that erupted into chaos, conspiracy theories, and endless articles, news casts, and memories spoken of that can’t be forgotten.

Here’s a few of those emails. They might trigger a response from you, possibly a hateful one, but there’s nothing you can do except accept it. Nothing can change what happened, but maybe Americans can help raise enough angered awareness that we can hopefully prevent this from happening again.

wikileak-hillary-ignores-benghazi wikileak-hillary-ignores-benghazi1 wikileak-hillary-ignores-benghazi2 wikileak-hillary-ignores-benghazi3 wikileak-hillary-ignores-benghazi4

Degrading security…why didn’t we reverse that and increase security?

When Hillary Clinton lashed the words “what difference does it make” about the four lost lives of Benghazi, she must not have put herself in the shoes of the family members of J. Christopher Stevens, Sean Smith, Glen Doherty, and Tyrone S. Woods.

It made a difference to their family.

The least Hillary could’ve done was be sympathetic to the families. If you’re possibly the indirect reason that people lose their life, then perhaps a little empathy goes a long way and helps the healing process.

Maybe if Hillary Clinton considered choosing better words, that a huge population of the American people wouldn’t be so sickened by her mere presence.

I know politics are a dirty game and people on both sides bash each other like they’re at a Comedy Central roast talking about people being in gang-bang or who’s face is the most hideous thing on stage – but Hillary brought most of that on herself (the hate from Americans, not gang-bangs).

There’s a way to handle things and a way not to handle things. I’m on the latter end of that because I always end up saying the wrong thing at the wrong time (have you read my articles, oh my – you’ve got to read more) and I end up getting myself in trouble or looks from faces that turned satanic.

But I’m not a politician in the lime light. I’m just some dude sitting home on a laptop acting like a tough guy with a sword made of words.

Hillary is well known and really crushed a nerve when she said “what difference does it make” after being accused of being the main reason that Americans perished when it could’ve possibly been averted.

Even if she was a right winger, Benghazi still took a lot of her votes away.

Doesn’t matter who you are or what party you represent – smart people won’t vote for you if they think you’re treasonous or don’t value the lives of Americans.

never-hillary-benghazi

 

Join the conversation

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse.

Crime

BREAKING News Out Of Virginia… Jury Gives Illegal Alien Special Treatment – THIS IS OUTRAGEOUS!!!

Published

on

Say what?

A jury in the newly minted blue state of Virginia saw itself forced to convict a maid for felony grand larceny after she stole $5,000 worth of rings from the home she cleaned. But since they felt bad for the pregnant 19-year-old they all did something truly unthinkable and downright foolish. The Jury foreman, Jeffery Memmott, in a statement, said all the jurors pooled together the $80 so that Sandra Mendez Ortega could pay the $60 fine and go free. Ortega is pregnant with her second child.

But on top of this whole act being outrageous, it gets even worse when you look the other side of the coin.

Of course, Lisa Copeland, who is the accuser is outraged. In a statement, she said she prayed that none of the jurors are ever in my shoes She also added that Ortega never accepted responsibility for the theft nor did she ever apologize, if she had accepted responsibility she would have no issue with this, but since she never did it’s not a good thing and since the maid makes $60 a day she is now $20 richer since the jury gave her $80 to pay her $60 fine.

Now lets sum this whole mess up shall we?

An illegal breaks the law by sneaking into our country to procreate and work for peanuts while sponging off the already overburdened taxpayers and Lisa Copeman is surprised that she stole from her? Copeman was too cheap to get a real cleaning company who is bonded and insured so she decided to employ someone whom she didn’t know to clean her house. And at the same time, the jury fell for the sob story this illegal criminal told them.

Maybe next time Ortega is in court she’ll be pregnant with her 6th anchor baby! When people in Latin America refer to us Americans as “Gringos Estupidos,” they might have a point.

Investor’s Business Daily Reports:

Sorry, But Illegal Aliens Cost The U.S. Plenty

Immigration: A center-left think tank has hailed new findings showing that illegal immigrants contribute $11.6 billion in state and local taxes nationwide. But that report really shows how little they pay compared to the rest of us.

If there’s any doubt America is importing poverty, take a look at a new study this week from the Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy, which touts the $11.6 billion illegals pay in taxes to state and local coffers. This isn’t federal or payroll taxes, just cash paid through sales taxes, property taxes and city and state fees.

“Data show undocumented immigrants greatly contribute to our nation’s economy, not just in labor but also with tax dollars,” ITEP state tax policy director Meg Wiehe said in a statement. “With immigration policy playing a key role in state and national debates, accurate information about the tax contributions of undocumented immigrants is needed now more than ever.”

We couldn’t agree more. So let’s take a look at some actual accurate information:

With an estimated 11 million illegal immigrants in the U.S., that $11.6 billion comes to about $1,050 per person, which The Latin Post hails as “lots of taxes.” In fact, it’s less than the average paid by citizens in even the lowest-tax states, such as Tennessee, where the average per capita state and local tax burden is $2,805, not to mention high tax areas, like Washington, D.C., where the figure is $7,540, according to data from the Tax Foundation. Media reports point out that illegals pay about 8% of their incomes in state and local taxes, compared with 5.4% for “the 1%,” but ignore that average taxpayers, based on the Tax Foundation data, pay an average of 9.48%.

Well, sure, you might say, but once illegals get amnesty, they will contribute similar amounts as the rest of us, right? Actually, no.

Illegals have far less education than average Americans and correspondingly lower base incomes. Based on another study reported this week from two other center-left think tanks, if the U.S. handed out work permits, through a program such as Deferred Action For Parents Of Americans and Lawful Permanent Residents (DAPA), it would add only 10% to illegals’ incomes — meaning, an additional $3,000 per capita, which would then see a small slice taken as state and local taxes, for a grand total of just $805 million to the government. It still wouldn’t approach the average Tennessee local tax rates, cited above.

Illegal immigrants in fact absorb far more in benefits than they contribute. The Heritage Foundation in 2013 found that illegals contribute an average of $10,000 in total taxes (federal and payroll as well as local taxes) but use almost $24,000 in welfare and services, creating a net $14,000 per capita gain per illegal worker.

With benefits like that — and a president determined to shower even more on them — it’s little wonder the world’s impoverished feel the red carpet is out for them to come here illegally.

Steven A. Camarota, director of research at the Center for Immigration Studies, said Heritage understates actual welfare use by illegals by its use of the federal government’s Current Population Survey. “In a more recent study where I looked at welfare use only (not taxes or other expense) using the much more accurate Survey of Income and Program Participation, I found that 62% of households headed by illegal immigrants used at least one major welfare program,” Camarota told IBD via email.

“Bottom line, illegal immigrants have a 10th grade education on average,” he said. “In the modern American economy people with that level of education tend to make modest wages and as result pay relatively little in taxes, at the same time they tend to use a lot in public services, regardless of legal status. In the case of illegals, they often receive benefits on behalf of their U.S.-born children. If you had to put it in a bumper sticker it would be: ‘there is a high cost to cheap labor.’ “

Please share if you agree we need to build the wall…

FOLLOW us on Facebook at Freedom Daily!

Continue Reading

Crime

BOMBSHELL! Hillary Tarmac SECRET Revealed! This is HUGE!!! LOCK THEM UP NOW!!!

They Tried To Hide It But It’s Out Now!

Published

on

New information is continuing to come out regarding the now infamous Tarmac Meeting between the serial rapist and former President Bill Clinton and the Barack Hussein Obama administration Attorney General Loretta Lynch.

But what is indeed the most alarming part of this whole ordeal is the FBI’s reaction to the leaking of this clandestine meeting to the public. Agency leadership wasn’t even a tab bit concerned about how they should respond the meeting between Lynch and Clinton or how it would look considering Crooked Hillary was at that time under a full investigation by the FBI?

You would think the FBI would be concerned about the optics of this matter, but It will come as a surprise to some, not many at this point after everything we’ve learned in the past few months, that the FBI was actually more concerned about where the leak came from than about what actually went down on that tarmac. All they were concerned about is finding who within the FBI leaked the information about the meeting to the press and making that person pay.

As Katie Pavlich reported at Townhall, the FBI released a series of emails yesterday afternoon where we learn more details about the Department of Justice’s response to the information leak of the now infamous secret meeting between Lynch and Clinton.

The dates on the emails range from July 1-3, 2016. On July 5, 2016, FBI Director James Comey announced former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton would not face criminal charges for mishandling classified information. Interesting dates, don’t you think?

Since the Clintons have always treated the American people like idiots Bill said at the time that he, and Lynch, only spoke only about their grandchildren, but since we know perfectly well the former Attorney General isn’t Bill Clinton’s type, the only possible answer to this tarmac meeting is Bill was trying to get Hillary off the hook.

Via Newsweek:

AFTER CLINTON-LYNCH TARMAC MEETING, FBI SCRAMBLED TO FIND AND PUNISH SOURCE, NEWLY RELEASED EMAILS SHOW

After news broke about an airport meeting between former Attorney General Loretta Lynch and former President Bill Clinton in the midst of last year’s presidential campaign, the FBI scrambled to identify the source who leaked details about the encounter and discipline him or her, according to emails released on the FBI website on Friday.

The meeting between Lynch and Clinton took place in June 2016, while the FBI was investigating Hillary Clinton’s use of a private email server. Bill Clinton boarded Lynch’s plane while it was on the tarmac at Phoenix’s Sky Harbor International Airport. The following month, then-FBI Director James Comey announced the bureau would not recommend that the Department of Justice pursue charges in the email probe. Comey has testified before Congress that Lynch asked him to refer to the probe as a “matter,” a request that made him feel “queasy.”

Related: What will Loretta Lynch tell Russia investigators?

Keep Up With This Story And More By Subscribing Now

The internal emails show that on June 29, 2016, a senior spokeswoman for the Justice Department emailed her counterparts at the FBI to flag articles that were starting to appear about the meeting. In the email, the spokeswoman, Melanie Newman, described the encounter as “a casual, unscheduled meeting.” She provided talking points, which are redacted in the released version.

That same day, multiple FBI officials sent links about the story to Comey, who responded to one email, “Got it, thanks sir.” Also on those email chains were FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe, whom President Donald Trump and others have accused of a pro-Clinton bias because his wife received money for a political campaign from entities associated with Virginia Governor Terry McAuliffe, a Clinton ally; and Peter Strzok, who was removed from special counsel Robert Mueller’s team because of text messages critical of Trump. Strzok oversaw the Clinton email investigation.

But after Observer published an article containing additional details about the encounter, citing an anonymous “security source” who had been present, the FBI and Justice Department moved from damage control to discussions about identifying the source and punishing that person, the emails show. At the time, the publisher of Observer was Jared Kushner, Donald Trump’s son-in-law and one of his senior advisers.

On December 15, the FBI released documents related to the so-called tarmac meeting in Phoenix between former Attorney General Loretta Lynch, pictured here on June 20, and former President Bill Clinton.
SPENCER PLATT/GETTY

On July 2, a person whose name is redacted in the FBI release wrote to a bureau employee about the Observer article. The employee, whose name is also redacted, responded, “I agree with your assessment about the source, which in reading the article, I believe was one of the local PD officer [sic] assisting with one of the two motorcade [sic] there on the Tarmac. Either way, they should have never offered any type of opinion or details of what did or didn’t happen, as this is the most principle and basic tenant of executive protection.”

The FBI employee added, “Unfortunately, this article is a breach in security protocol and I am addressing it with the Phoenix division to make certain that they pursuit [sic] this and identify the source of the breach.”

The next day, an undisclosed FBI employee, presumably the same person from the earlier email, wrote to several colleagues, “I believe that the source quoted in this article is one of the local Phoenix LEO’s. Needless to say that I have contacted the Phoenix office and will contact the local’s [sic] who assisted in an attempt to stem further damage.”

An FBI employee responded, “This article is infuriating.” Another FBI person wrote in response, “You think there will be a need for non-disclosure agreements in the future?” A colleague wrote back, “That might not be a bad idea, given the circumstances.” All of their names are redacted.

Another FBI employee whose name is redacted responded to the email about the article, “We need to find that guy and bring him or her before a supervisor.” A colleague responded, “I’m trying to find out thru [sic] the PX STL. Hopefully, we will find out and at the very minimum, make sure he never works on any detail.”

Republican lawmakers and at least two of Trump’s lawyers have called for a special counsel to investigate the handling of the Clinton emails probe. Several congressional committees are also looking into that subject, as is the Justice Department inspector general.

Both Lynch and Clinton still maintain the chance meeting, which Clinton waited for 30 minutes on that tarmac to have, was only by chance.

Please share if you want to get to the bottom of this mess….

FOLLOW us on Facebook at Freedom Daily!

Continue Reading

Crime

SHOCKING News From California… Major Company Makes Assassination Threat At Trump!!!

Published

on

Liberal companies have been mobilizing against Donald Trump almost immediately after he was inaugurated. After Trump issued his executive order banning travel from seven Muslim countries, those liberal companies really went into overdrive, publicly opposing both the order, and Trump himself. But this liberal CEO? He just took it way too far.

Most liberal CEOs keep to opposing Trump in the usual way. Howard Schultz, CEO of Starbucks, announced that he would hire 10,000 refugees in response to Trump’s executive order. It’s irritating to many Americans, but it’s not criminal. What Ted Kornblum just did, though, is.

Kornblum is the CEO of Magnatone Guitars and Amplifiers. And apparently, he isn’t very bright. Like a typical liberal, he opposes Donald Trump. But most liberals are at least smart enough to know that posting assassination fantasies online isn’t the best idea; at the very least, it will get the attention of the Secret Service rather quickly.

Yet Kornblum still went ahead and posted an assassination threat, on both Facebook and Twitter. He evidently really, really wanted to make sure everyone knew about it.

It didn’t take long for Twitter users to start bringing the threats to the attention of the Secret Service, and to call out the media for ignoring it:

Can you imagine the reaction if the CEO of a right-wing company had said the same thing about Obama while he was in office? The media would have had a field day! But because it’s Trump, the media is silent.

Still, even without any media attention, Kornblum realized that he had stepped in it, big time, and put out an apology on Facebook:

magnatone
Still, the damage may have already been done. The Magnatone Facebook page appears to have been yanked. Nothing about the assassination threat, including the apology, appears on the Magnatone website. Kornblum appears to have gone underground, possibly in fear of being arrested by the Secret Service.

It’s one thing to peacefully protest — but liberals don’t seem to understand that when you start advocating for violence, or rioting, or physically attacking people, you can no longer call what you’re doing a “protest”. And it certainly can’t be called peaceful, either. Calling for the president to be assassinated isn’t just an invalid form of protesting, it’s illegal and stupid.

 

Continue Reading

Latest Articles

Trending