Please disable your Ad Blocker to better interact with this website.

Connect with us

Politics

Gowdy To Obama: YOU ARE NO LONGER MY PRESIDENT, WE WILL CHARGE HILLARY CLINTON

If anyone can do it… Gowdy can.

Published

on

Gowdy is the man, and if anyone is going to have the stuff to push through charging Hillary Clinton with crimes she is guilty for, it’s going to be him. Right now however, we just have to wait.

People tend to assume that Hillary Clinton lost the election so she should just disappear and go live her life as a Grandmother enjoying what time she has left to hopefully redeem herself of all her dirty work.

However, those that didn’t…are sitting and waiting for the woman to be tried, and then imprisoned for one of many things we all know she is guilty of, but getting a way with anyway.

Either way, Hillary Clinton is once again in the political spotlight and it’s too much for the ‘thinking’ America to handle. Why? Why is she able to walk free after putting us all through the ringer with her cheating, scheming, and setting us up for the fall in many cases during the election. She’s an awful human being…period! So, why is she walking around like the election was stolen from her as if she’s the poor poor victim and Trump is the big bad wolf…

WHATEVER HILLARY!

Her audacity to claim to be someone she isn’t…is INSANE, and she ISN’T the victim!

While Trump is getting ready to transition into the White House, Gowdy is getting ready to find the truth.

Clinton’s operatives have suggested that the original time agreed upon for the Benghazi Select Committee was two years. They want it shelved now, but Gowdy isn’t having it. As the Obama administration and Hillary’s lackeys have used delay tactics in the hope that the investigation would just “go away,” Gowdy shot a letter to Defense Secretary Ash Carter saying that he “intentionally mischaracterizes both the nature of the Committee’s investigation and its interaction with the Department of Defense.”

Gowdy went on, writing:

“It is also riddled with factual inaccuracies, which not only does a disservice to the public but also does a disservice to the women and men who work for the Department of Defense. Your staff is welcome to waste taxpayer dollars writing partisan, factually deficient letters to our Committee, coordinate the language with House Democrats, and then leak it to the media. That is your prerogative.”

Gowdy hasn’t been shy going after Obama, either. It’s most likely that he never considered Obama “his president” given his language.

Here are a few examples:

“These last few years we’ve seen an unacceptable abuse of power, having a president whose priority is expanding his own power.”

“What do we do with a president who can basically change what Congress passed by attaching a letter saying I don’t agree with this part or that part?”

“You know, in the oath that brand-new citizens take, it contains six different references to ‘the law.’ If it’s good enough for us to ask brand-new citizens to affirm their devotion to the law, is it too much to ask that the president do the same?”

“If a president can change some laws, can he change ALL laws? Can he change election laws? Can he change discrimination laws? Are there any laws, under your theory, that he actually HAS to enforce?”

“The president already has a Nobel Prize for peace. I think he’s shooting for one in fiction.”

“I am not surprised that the President of the United States called this a phony scandal. I’m not surprised that Secretary Clinton asked, ‘What difference does it make?’ I’m not even surprised that Jay Carney said that Benghazi happened ‘a long time ago.’ I’m just surprised at how many people bought it.”

Sounds like Gowdy never thought of Obama as his president, and now with Trump taking over in a little over a month, Gowdy doesn’t have to mince words – Obama can go to hell, and Hillary can prepare to be charged for the deaths of four Americans.

The truth about Hillary is…she has earned herself a prison cell, but she’s old… so I’ll settle for forced retirement!

FOLLOW us on Facebook at Freedom Daily!

Join the conversation

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse.

Featured

BREAKING NEWS About STOLEN Alabama Senate Race – This Is BAD

Published

on

If there’s one thing we learned about the presidential election last year, it’s that liberals will do whatever it takes to win. We constantly heard incidents of voter fraud taking place, where Hillary’s minions were voting multiple times, and buses of people were being be transported into key swing state counties in order to throw the vote. Last night Doug Jones defeated Republican Roy Moore in the Alabama Senate race, where liberals are disgustingly throwing the win back in our faces this morning, calling the victory a “stinging snub” to President Trump. But unfortunately for liberals, Jones’ win is being immediately overshadowed by the shady tactics the used to “win,” after several disturbing reports are surfacing about what was really going on at the polls last night.

1. Fake Narrative About “Voter Suppression”

It was widely predicted that blacks in Alabama would determine the outcome of the race. When the liberal media began to realize that it would be an incredibly tight race, where we saw Moore and Jones separated by less than 1% for several hours, liberals immediately began to push the false narrative that blacks were being blocked from the polling places. One of the trending stories was from fake liberal website “Verified Politics” was a viral story called “Something Incredibly Shady Is Happening In Alabama Right Now” where they made the ridiculous claim that blacks were being prevented from voting.

In the article, the website asserted that “white supremacy” was preventing black citizens from being able to take to the polls, that no doubt got the black populace fired up just in time to go cast their votes for Jones before the race ended. Here’s a short excerpt of their ridiculous story, where they claimed that “white supremacists” were requiring “poor blacks” from being able to vote because they were required to show an ID.

“Alabama has a long history of suppressing the votes dating back at least to 1901 when the state passed a new constitution whose main purpose was to deny African Americans the right to vote,” they whined. “In 2011, the Republican-controlled state legislature passed a law that all voters must have a photo ID, which immediately disenfranchised many rural and poor Blacks.”

2. Liberals’ ARMY Of Felons

Liberals frequently use the backing of criminals to bolster their agenda which is why they fight so hard to keep Muslim immigrants and Mexican illegals in our country. The Alabama Senate race was no different, as Breitbart exposed how George Soros and infamous race-baiter Al Sharpton had their grubby talons all over this race right from the beginning, where the duo registered an “army” of convicted felons across Alabama to help bolster support for Jones. “An organization partnered with a George Soros-financed group and led by a radical leftist who is the half-brother of the infamous controversial Rev. Al Sharpton has been diligently working over the past few weeks to register convicted felons across Alabama,” Breitbart began. They went on:

“The aim of the effort has been to get as many felons as possible on the roster before last Monday, the deadline to register in order to vote in Alabama’s Dec. 12 senate special election that pits Republican Roy Moore against Democratic challenger Doug Jones.  The man spearheading the campaign has stated outright that his effort is meant to ensure a Democratic victory in Alabama.”

“The thousands of felons reportedly newly registered over the past few weeks were most likely not included in any recent polling on the Alabama senate race put out by major firms.”

“Jones himself is tied to some of the specific organizations associated with the drive to register felons here. Indeed, as Breitbart News first reported, Jones spearheaded a project for a massively Soros-financed legal activist group demanding full voting rights be given to felons released from prison, including those convicted of murder, rape and other violent crimes.”

3. Dark Money From Very Questionable Sources

Whenever you smell a rat, chances are George Soros is somewhere nearby lurking about. The infamous evil billionaire, who turned his own neighbors into the Nazis in the 1940’s, is constantly gunning for the destruction of America, where he’s a huge donor of crooked politicians like Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama, and RINO Republicans like John McCain. So it should come as no surprise that Soros yet again was a the helm causing chaos and trying to throw the election in Alabama. Via Breitbart:

“Politico reported on Monday that the George Soros-funded Priorities USA Action and Sen. Chuck Schumer’s (D-NY) Senate Majority PAC are the dark money behind the Alabama shell group that has spent more than $4.1 million to defeat conservative Republican Roy Moore in Tuesday’s Alabama U.S. Senate special election in which he faces liberal Democrat Doug Jones.”

4. Liberals Behind The Character Assassination Of Roy Moore

For weeks, there was an ongoing barrage of accusations made about Roy Moore, where he was even accused of pedophilia and going after several underage girls. One of Moore’s accusers was Beverly Young Nelson, the ex-waitress who charged that Moore groped her when she was 16 and he was in his 30s, and  used her high school yearbook bearing Moore’s signature as “proof” that she knew him. Even though Nelson would be busted for plagiarizing the  yearbook entry, liberals still used the woman’s false testimony as a way to push the narrative that Moore was a “sexual predator.”

NEW YORK, NY – NOVEMBER 13: Beverly Young Nelson holds her high school yearbook signed by Roy Moore during a news conference where she has accused Alabama Republican Senate candidate Roy Moore of sexually abusing her when she was 16 on November 13, 2017 in New York City. Moore, a controversial politician who recently won a run-off against Luther Strange for Alabama’s Senate seat, is currently fighting accusations alleging that he pursued sexual relationships with teenagers — including a 14-year-old — when he was in his 30s.

There still has yet to be any evidence against Moore except the testimonies of these women, who conveniently crawled out of the woodwork to share their stories right before the race. It was even discovered that George Soros was behind the hit research of Moore, and was encouraging these women to speak out against the Republican judge.

It’s pretty disturbing how liberals will not stop in their conquest to destroy this country with their shady and illegal antics, and yesterday was a enormous hit to the Republican Party. Jones’ victory will have significant consequences for Republicans on the national level, where Democrats are now working towards capturing the last Senate seat up for grabs next year in order to gain the majority in the Senate.

 

Continue Reading

Islam

BREAKING! Trump Just Revealed Shocking Method NYC Terrorists Got Into The USA

This has to end, now!

Published

on

Just a couple months after a radical Muslim terrorist ran down pedestrians on a New York City street on Halloween, another deranged Muslim named Akayed Ullah attempted to steal more innocent lives in the bustling city. Thankfully, Ullah was not skilled in his terrorist ways, and his homemade pipe bomb that he strapped to his body malfunctioned only injured the would-be suicide bomber.

Now, literally after the smoke has cleared from the failed terrorist attack people are wondering how in the hell this guy entered the United States, and now we may have some answers thanks to President Trump.

There is a reason that President Trump wanted a stricter vetting process for people coming to America from countries with ties to terrorism, and voila, here it is. The 27-year-old Bangladeshi man identified as 27-year-old Akayed Ullah was allowed into the country thanks to a little thing called chain immigration.

Akayed Ullah after his failed bombing attempt lying on the ground awaiting medical help.

You see how this is works is one family member is approved and receives a green card which then the approved family member is allowed to bring their family members with them. The issue with that is that these family members are not properly vetted and then allowed to enter the country without knowing anything about them. So, common sense dictates that these people should be vetted which is precisely what President Trump would like to do, and this could be just the push that is needed to ensure that the vetting process is followed from here on out.

Akayed Ullah was living in Brooklyn after being allowed in the United States through a process called chain immigration.

Here is more from Daily Mail:

President Donald Trump said Monday a bomb blast in Manhattan highlights the need for an immigration overhaul – as the man arrested was revealed to be part of a large Bangladeshi family sponsored by his aunt or uncle.

Trump said that the U.S. ‘must fix its lax immigration system, which allows far too many dangerous, inadequately vetted people’ into the country.

The Republican president pointed to his controversial travel ban as an example of the kind of policy that needs to be put in place.

And he called on Congress to end ‘chain migration,’ in which family members are permitted to join relatives who have immigrated. 

A Bangladeshi man identified as 27-year-old Akayed Ullah was taken into custody with serious injuries after a pipe bomb he was carrying malfunctioned and exploded prematurely inside a Midtown Manhattan subway station.

He had come from Bangladesh in 2011, apparently with his parents and three or four siblings – all of them sponsored by his aunt or uncle, his immigration status showed.

Ullah is a Bangladeshi national who has been living in the U.S. for the past seven years. Fox News reports that the former taxi driver came to the U.S. on a F-4 visa, a preferential visa for those who have family already in the U.S. The Post says he is a legal green-card holder. 

His immigration designation is F-43, which means he claimed the right to a green card because he is the child of the brother or sister of a U.S. citizen. 

The U.S. citizen can be newly naturalized. Trump’s statement suggests that Ullah claimed a green card by virtue of a citizen who was also an immigrant.

Records show that Ullah moved to the U.S. from Chittagong, Bangladesh in February 2011 on the F4 visa, and is now a legal green-card owner. 

He reportedly immigrated with his parents and three to four siblings. Trump’s statement suggests that one of his parents’ siblings had gained citizenship then petitioned for multiple family members.

Ullah had recently visited his home country on September 8.

Investigators have yet to determine an official motivation for the failed attack, but there have been reports that Ullah was inspired by ISIS.  

It was the second time in two months that New York City was the target of a terrorist attack and the first since President Trump sparked Muslim outrage around the world last week by recognizing Jerusalem as Israel’s capital.

Now, of course, President Trump will do whatever is in his power to make sure that vetting processes are followed, but when you have liberals like Mayor Bill de Blasio usurping his authority it makes the situation rather difficult.

These liberal morons would rather allow radicalized Muslims to enter the country to create chaos in the name of political correctness instead of protecting the American citizens. That is why it is so important that in the upcoming midterm elections the American vote in people that will support President Trump and his agenda to make America great again before these liberal goons try to ruin it forever.

H/T [Daily Mail]

FOLLOW us on Facebook at Freedom Daily!

Continue Reading

Politics

BREAKING News From The CIA – President Trump Is In Serious Danger

This is bad. Trump needs our prayers right now!

Published

on

A CIA ex-spy chief who has spoken out publicly against Trump, while at the same time inspiring other career intelligence hacks to do the same, has now actually admitted his leading role within the American intelligence community to wage political war against our president.

During a candid interview, the CIA’s Michael Morell who was Deputy Director and former Acting Director of the world’s most powerful intelligence agency said that it wasn’t a great idea to leak against and bash a new president. You think?

Morell was Former President George W. Bush’s personal daily briefer for the agency before and after the 9/11 terrorist attacks. And he later went on to serve under Barack Hussein Obama until his recent retirement from the agency. But during the Summer of 2016, he took the step intelligence officers usually avoid. He openly endorsed Crooked Hillary Clinton over Donald Trump in a Carlos Slim owned New York Times op-ed piece. The endorsement read as follows, “I Ran the C.I.A. Now I’m Endorsing Hillary Clinton.”

After endorsing Killary he continued to be both an outspoken critic of Donald Trump, and an early CIA voice promoting the Russian collusion and election meddling fake narrative conjured up by the Clinton Machine to justify her loss. This is the official confirmation we have been waiting for that the Deep State is indeed at war with President Donald Trump and will stop at nothing to beat him.

ZeroHedge Reports:

Ex-Spy Chief Admits Role In ‘Deep State’ Intelligence War On Trump

An ex-spy chief who spoke out publicly against Trump while inspiring other career intelligence figures to follow suit has admitted his leading role in the intelligence community waging political war against the president, describing his actions as something he didn’t “fully think through”. In a surprisingly frank interview, the CIA’s Michael Morell – who was longtime Deputy Director and former Acting Director of the nation’s most powerful intelligence agency – said that it wasn’t a great idea to leak against and bash a new president.

Morell had the dubious distinction of being George W. Bush’s personal daily briefer for the agency before and after 9/11, and also served under Obama until his retirement. In the summer of 2016 he took the unusual step (for a former intelligence chief) of openly endorsing Hillary Clinton in a New York Times op-ed entitled, I Ran the C.I.A. Now I’m Endorsing Hillary Clinton, after which he continued to be both an outspoken critic of Trump and an early CIA voice promoting the Russian collusion and election meddling narrative.

As Politico’s Susan Glasser put in a newly published interview, Morell “has emerged out of the shadows of the deep state” to become one of Trump’s foremost critics speaking within the intel community. However, Politico summarizes the interview as follows:

But in a revealingly self-critical and at times surprising interview for this week’s Global POLITICO, Morell acknowledges that he and other spy-world critics of the president failed to fully “think through” the negative backlash generated by their going political. “There was a significant downside,” Morell said in the interview.

Not only had Morell during his previous NYT op-ed stated that he was committed to doing “everything I can to ensure that she is elected as our 45th president” but he went so far as to call then candidate Trump “a threat to our national security” – while making the extraordinary claim that “in the intelligence business, we would say that Mr. Putin had recruited Mr. Trump as an unwitting agent of the Russian Federation.”

Curiously, Morell in his latest Politico interview indicates when asked about his “public profile” and activism so soon after leaving the agency (something that was relatively unusual prior to Trump taking office) that his post-retirement media appearances have been approved and/or received some level of oversight by the CIA. In the interview Morell states, “I did a 60 Minutes interview about my life inside CIA, and it’s something the agency thought that was a good thing to do, and I taped most of it before I left the agency.”

While such CIA review of former employees’ publications and media interaction is nothing new, in Morell’s case was an unprecedented example of a very high profile intelligence figure explicitly campaigning for a presidential candidate and against another while specifically invoking his role at the CIA (he began his NYT column with, “During a 33-year career at the Central Intelligence Agency, I served presidents of both parties — three Republicans and three Democrats…” followed by a litany of key national security events he was central to).

The other important confirmation to come out of the discussion is the clear guiding assumption of the interview – that the intelligence “deep state” did in fact go to war with Trump – which has now been confirmed by Morell himself, which is essentially to hear it straight from the horse’s mouth.

Glasser: Okay, so, flash-forward a year. Was that a mistake?

Morell: So, I don’t think it was a mistake. I think there were downsides to it that I didn’t think about at the time. I was concerned about what is the impact it would have on the agency, right? Very concerned about that, thought that through. But I don’t think I fully thought through the implications.

And one of the ways I’ve thought about that, Susan, is—okay, how did Donald Trump see this? Right? And from—it’s very important—one of the things we do as intelligence analysts is make sure that our guy—the president—understands the other guy. Right?

So, let’s put ourselves here in Donald Trump’s shoes. So, what does he see? Right? He sees a former director of CIA and a former director of NSA, Mike Hayden, who I have the greatest respect for, criticizing him and his policies. Right? And he could rightfully have said, “Huh, what’s going on with these intelligence guys?” Right?

Morell here seems to confirm Trump’s narrative of events concerning Russiagate “fake news” and willful intelligence leaks intended to damage the president, despite his opening obfuscation of “I don’t think it was a mistake” (so he’s essentially admitting the negative consequences but with no regrets).

Surprisingly, Morell even implicates himself with the words, “And then he sees a former acting director and deputy director of CIA criticizing him and endorsing his opponent.” The interview continues:

Glasser: It embroiders his narrative.

Morell: Exactly. And then he sees a former acting director and deputy director of CIA criticizing him and endorsing his opponent. And then he gets his first intelligence briefing, after becoming the Republican nominee, and within 24 to 48 hours, there are leaks out of that that are critical of him and his then-national security advisor, Mike Flynn.

And so, this stuff starts to build, right? And he must have said to himself, “What is it with these intelligence guys? Are they political?” The current director at the time, John Brennan, during the campaign occasionally would push back on things that Donald Trump had said.

So, when Trump talked about the Iran nuclear deal being the worst deal in the history of American diplomacy, and he was going to tear it up on the first day—John Brennan came out publicly and said, “That would be an act of folly.” So, he sees current sitting director pushing back on him. Right?

Then he becomes president, and he’s supposed to be getting a daily brief from the moment he becomes the president-elect. Right? And he doesn’t. And within a few days, there’s leaks about how he’s not taking his briefing. So, he must have thought—right?—that, “Who are these guys? Are these guys out to get me? Is this a political organization? Can I think about them as a political organization when I become president?”

So, I think there was a significant downside to those of us who became political in that moment. So, if I could have thought of that, would I have ended up in a different place? I don’t know. But it’s something I didn’t think about.

Despite Morell’s attempts to mitigate his own significant contributions toward creating a climate of distrust between the White House and the intelligence bureaucracy, it seems clear to the interviewee that Morell’s admissions lend credence to Trump’s side.

Indeed, Susan Glasser reasons, based on Morell’s unexpected confessions, that “you or others who spoke out and have continued to speak out actually tend to underscore his feeling that there’s a political divide.”

Glasser: Well, it’s very interesting, because of course, there are so many things you don’t know at that moment in time, including, of course, I’m sure you assumed, along with everybody else, that Hillary Clinton was likely to be elected, and you saw this as contributing to that in some way. But it’s certainly relevant in the context of the situation we find ourselves in a year later. And, if it tends to embolden Trump in his critique of your former colleagues who are still serving in the intelligence agencies, and not only has this been a theme that he has struck repeatedly to criticize—but also to politicize this.

And inadvertently, perhaps, you or others who spoke out and have continued to speak out actually tend to underscore his feeling that there’s a political divide, and now you and others are on one side of it, and potentially all your former colleagues, and then he’s on the other side of it…

Morell: Yeah, and you can’t pick and choose like that. And when people in the intelligence community—particularly people in CIA, because for every other part of the intelligence community except CIA, you’re working for a cabinet member. At CIA, you are working for the president of the United States. That is your customer. Right?

So, when you see your customer questioning what it is that you are providing to him or her, and that person seems to be cherry-picking what they accept and what they don’t accept, it’s demoralizing. And when it’s demoralizing, people take actions, right? So, I live pretty close to the agency, and there’s a coffee shop between me and the agency, and I’ve met a number of agency officers in that coffee shop who have said to me, “I’m thinking about leaving.”

Yet Morell in a round about way previously admitted that he is personally one of the chief authors of precisely this “demoralizing” scenario in which the president doesn’t fully trust his intelligence briefers.

But we should all remember that this is a man who on the one hand described “Russia’s hacking is the political equivalent of 9/11” and constantly hyped “Russian propaganda”, while on the other he went on a lengthy RT News segment in order to promote his newly published book.

The Deep State, which is something I would have personally called anyone a nutty conspiracy theorist just for even mentioning it two short years ago, is real and it’s livid at the fact that an outsider like Donald Trump, who actually cares about us peons, is taking them apart at the seams. As of now, no one knows how this will end, but one thing is for certain, our President is in extreme danger and the Secret Service better be on top of their game.

Please share in support of President Donald Trump…

FOLLOW us on Facebook at Freedom Daily!

Continue Reading

Latest Articles

Trending