Please disable your Ad Blocker to better interact with this website.

Connect with us


Horrifying Warning Issued After Who’s Coming In People’s Doors Across US – This MUST Be Stopped

Women need to be on alert!



The Quincey Police Department is investigating a disturbing account one woman had at her front door earlier this week. The woman, who is not identifying herself, is saying a man knocked on her door saying her tire had been slashed and she that should come outside to check it.

The problem was that when the woman thanked him and said she would check it later the man proceeded to become agitated more aggressive when she refused to come out at that very moment. When the man left the woman called the police. By the time the police arrived the man was long gone, but they did find the woman’s tire had indeed been slashed. Police are currently investigating whether the man who knocked on the door was the same person who actually slashed the tires in a failed attempt to get the woman to come out of her home in order to do who knows what to her or her property.

Although the woman didn’t want to be identified, she did appear on local tv newscasts in order to do what a responsible member of the community would do and warn other residents about what might be happening in their area and tell them not to leave the protection of their homes to check on their cars if anything like this were to happen to them.

This is actually a very good warning for any of us. Whenever someone knocks on your door in questionable circumstances it’s always best to just stay inside and call the police. Or if you are fortunate enough to live in a state that doesn’t protect the criminal, as California does, get your gun out and if the perpetrator decides to forcefully enter your home, shoot and let God sort it out.

Via Quora:

What is the ideal weapon to use in defending against a home invasion and why?

I don’t think there is such a thing that applies in all circumstances. If you pose this question on an internet forum about guns or at a sporting goods store, you will find yourself buried under suggestions and advice from people who are clearly very wedded to whatever solution they’ve come up with for their own personal defense. Some people say a revolver with hollow-points, some say a shotgun loaded with bird, others say a shotgun loaded with full-power buck, still others say an AR-style rifle with soft-tip ammo, etc, etc, etc. The thinking behind all of these suggestions–which, you’ll notice, all deal with firearms–varies wildly. Some of it is quite smart, some of it is outlandish.

For an example of the kinds of things you’re liable to hear, consider this video by James Yeager, who is kind of a nut and was recently in trouble with the press for saying very naughty things about the US government:
Yeah. Like I said, he deliberately cultivates a certain aggressive image, and belongs to a very different wing of the pro-gun movement than I do. Still, he touches on some important nuances about using firearms for home defense (so watch the entire video, because it’s germane to your question and quite interesting):
Firearms shoot bits of metal at extremely high velocity. Those bits of metal will fly right through humans, walls, furniture and cars, and may still have enough energy to kill someone on the other side
Thinking that handling a home invasion is an exercise in criminal psychology could prove lethal. Merely the sound of racking a shotgun or pointing any old gun at someone are not necessarily effective at protecting yourself
Any weapon will do what it is intended to do–if it’s got a blade on it, it’ll slash, if it’s got a point on it, it’ll stab, if it shoots bits of metal, it’ll shoot bits of metal. The single biggest variable that determines a weapon’s effectiveness, then, is the fleshy part attached to it, also known as a “human”

What all of this tells us is that if you really feel like you have to defend your home from intrusion, you need to consider, among other things:
The layout, location and building materials of your house.
From which weak points (doors, windows, skylights, etc) intruders are most likely to get into your house.
What they are most likely to go after (your TV, your kids, your jewelry box?).
Where you are most likely to be when they come in, and doing what (I reckon for most people, that would be, “in the bedroom, asleep”).
What weapon you are most adept at wielding.
What weapon is most likely to stop, deter or kill the intruder.
Your willingness to use that weapon with lethal intent.
What weapon presents the least risk to damaging other valuables on your property (your children, your dog, a natural gas tank, the Alexander Calder mobile in your dining room).

So if you live in a canvas yurt with your children and pets in a single open space and your cattle grazing right outside, perhaps a shotgun is not a good idea. On the other hand, if you live in a Western-style house with plaster walls and the kids don’t sleep close to where you would likely engage an intruder, then perhaps it is. The Navy SEAL Chris Kyle noted that he didn’t use the same weapon for every different type of tactical situation–so you should have no problem accepting that what may work for your neighbors doesn’t necessarily work for you.

In general, I would say that the most crucial factor is that you pick a weapon that you are able to use most effectively. Let’s talk for a moment about a popular choice for home defense guns, the Mossberg 590A1:

It is a 12-gauge, pump-action shotgun with an 18.5″ barrel that was specifically designed for use by the Marine Corps and police forces in situations where an armed suspect may be encountered in confined spaces. Like all pump-action guns, it is very reliable because it is mechanically very simple and jams can be cleared quickly. It’s well-made, accurate, short enough to maneuver around in a small room with, and can be loaded with birdshot, buckshot or slugs–any of which can be extremely lethal at close range. Many people pick a weapon like this for home defense because on the whole it’s a very effective gun for that purpose.

But it does have its downsides. For one thing, it’s rather heavy as shotguns go, so someone who isn’t very strong or has poor stamina might want to pick something else. Ammunition for such guns is also fairly expensive; around $1 per round in California. For anyone who is constrained by budgetary realities (as virtually everyone is), the practical ramification of this is likely to be that they don’t spend much time practicing how to use it, which obviously has a deleterious effect on its effectiveness in a dangerous situation. (And do not for a second make the mistake of thinking that shotguns don’t need skill to use–it is very easy to miss with a shotgun, as Yeager pointedly notes in his video.) Furthermore, as I’ve already pointed out, shotguns are extremely powerful and some types of ammo, like slugs and certain types of buckshot, risk going through walls and hitting things you wouldn’t like to hit. And lastly, most tactical shotguns can carry anywhere from 5-9 rounds, which is far less than, say, a Glock handgun, some of which can carry 17 rounds, or an AR-15 type rifle, which can carry 30 rounds. For a number of reasons that I won’t get into here, magazine capacity is not nearly as important an advantage as the press makes it out to be–as they say in the TV show Breaking Bad, if you’re really in such a desperate situation that firing 5 or 6 shots won’t get you out of trouble, you’ve got bigger issues. Still, if you are an infrequent shooter who isn’t very confident, or your home happens to be targeted by a fool who thinks it’s clever to count an opponent’s shots then charge…well, then magazine capacity is another limitation of a shotgun.

So what’s the final read-through from this long, meandering non-answer? Go try out lots of different things. Do some reading online, talk to people at gun shops or shooting ranges, ask stupid questions. There’s a frequent stereotype of novices being intimidated about asking questions when they first visit gun shops, lest they appear silly in front of the tacticool assholes throwing around jargon and talking the sales attendants’ ear off about their impressive gun arsenals. Do not be intimidated by these people; if your home situation is dangerous enough that it warrants buying weaponry to defend yourself and your property, then you’ve got one hell of a more legitimate reason to be asking questions than those other people. Many gun ranges will rent guns to people (provided they can demonstrate basic safety skills), so rent a bunch of different weapons and try your hand at operating them. It’s by shooting a wide variety of things that you’ll eventually realize that guns, like cars, are each very different. They feel different, they sound different, some make you brim with confidence in your own shooting skill and steadiness, while others make you hitch in apprehension. You want to end up staking your safety on whatever you are most capable with.

Please share if you agree every homeowner should be armed….

FOLLOW us on Facebook at Freedom Daily!

Al ran for the California State Assembly in his home district in 2010 and garnered more votes than any other Republican since 1984. He's worked on multiple political campaigns and was communications director for the Ron Nehring for California Lt. Governor campaign during the primaries in 2014. He has also held multiple positions within his local Republican Central Committee including Secretary, and Vice President of his local California Republican Assembly chapter. While also being an ongoing delegate to the California Republican Party for almost a decade.

Join the conversation

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse.


Officials OUTRAGED At Man’s Excuse For Why He Beats His Girlfriend Senseless

He Said It Was Because…



A 19-year-old man was sentenced to a 21-month prison term after being convicted of a four-hour assault on his girlfriend.

James McCourt locked Kelsie Skillen in their apartment in Glasgow, Scotland, disconnected the internet and took her phone, and attacked her with punches, the Daily Mail reported.

Skillen, 18, said the incident occurred after the couple returned from a night out and McCourt accused her of leaving his jacket and cigarettes behind.

“You’re going to have a bruised face tomorrow so I better do it right,” he reportedly told her during the assault.

The judge on the case, Sam Cathcart, ordered McCourt to be placed under supervision for eight months after his release from jail. McCourt was also banned from contacting his former partner for five years.

“She [Skillen] was so badly bruised she stayed off her work for three weeks,” Cathcart added.

Skillen was relieved following McCourt’s sentencing.

“I’m happy he has been sent away and can’t get to me, I’m so glad,” she said.

Skillen posted photos of her injuries on Facebook to warn others about domestic abuse.

“As you can see mostly kept hitting my face, today was the court case and he was found guilty for everything he done to me, I am also now left with a scar,” she wrote, reports the Daily Mail.

Skillen noted she was hospitalized due to her injuries.

“I would never be able to forgive myself if I didn’t tell people about this and another poor girl ended up in my situation, so thanks to everyone who came to support me today and who has supported me this full way it means a lot,” she added.

Skillen managed to finally escape the assault when McCourt left the room to go to the bathroom, allowing her to retrieve her iPad and contact her mother. When Skillen’s mother arrived, McCourt fled.

“During the incident I kept saying ‘Is it worth going to jail?’ and he said ‘I don’t care if I go to jail as long as you’re dead,’” Skillen said. “I remember thinking, he is trying to kill me. He is dangerous.”

After a while, Skillen said she stopped screaming.

“That was when he started pouring the water over me. I drifted in and out of consciousness during the incident so I didn’t realize it had been going on for so long,” she said.

Continue Reading


BREAKING!! PIPE BOMB At MAJOR US Airport! LOOK Who Brought It!!!


Frank Lea



A major United States airport had quite a scare when security found an explosive device at a checkpoint. This frightful scare occurred at the Newark Liberty International Airport in New Jersey. After things settled down and the people responsible were under control, the security began to learn more information about what was going on. People love to complain about the Transportation Security Administration (TSA), but they did a fantastic job securing the potential threat, calming people down, and allowing the airport to carry on with their routines and procedures.

The TSA is responsible for checking us up, down, left, and right. Sometimes it’s annoying and embarrassing, but the TSA has a job to do, and we can be thankful that they were working to capacity on the day they noticed someone sneaking a device that looked like a pipe-bomb. Had this made it through security checkpoints and onto an aircraft, then there’s no telling what could happen next. There’s no way to predict how that situation could’ve been other than imagining a mass amount of fatalities if an airplane exploded mid-flight. It could have been very, very bad, but thankfully TSA got it right. Sometimes people complain about TSA, but we truly need to be thankful at times.

Many people may have been frightened, but once they learned about who this was and what they were doing, then people became a little more comfortable with the situation. You can only imagine that people thought the airport was about to be attacked or a plane would be hijacked, but that’s when the information came out, and everyone felt better. As it turns out, the people who were caught sneaking the explosives through security were from a cable television crew. They were trying to sneak a fake explosive device through a security checkpoint, but they were caught instantly and dealt with accordingly.

Reports state that at least seven people were arrested for trying to sneak the fake explosive through the security checkpoint at the airport. These are seven people who were not thinking very clearly. Real or fake, this is something that could amount to terrorism. Just the thought of someone carrying a bomb through an airport is enough to cause mass hysteria and widespread panic. provided this report on the incident:
At least seven members of a cable television crew were arrested after they tried to sneak a fake explosive device through a security checkpoint at Newark Liberty International Airport, the Transportation Security Administration said Thursday.

A law enforcement source with knowledge of the investigation said that the team was filming for cable network CNBC, which is based in Englewood Cliffs. The TSA did not release the names of the people they said were arrested, and the Port Authority only said that it was investigating the incident.

A second source said the fake explosive device was a length of PVC pipe with wires sticking out from it. A bomb tech with the TSA determined that the device posed no threat, and that eight people were taken into custody.

A third source, who also asked to not be identified, said the crew was from the Endemol Shine Group, a Dutch production company that contracts with CNBC.

Endemol is the production company behind MasterChef and The Biggest Loser.

They may have made the biggest loser, but they also just made the biggest mistake. Everyone should know by now that carrying anything that could be mistaken as a terrorist explosive in an airport is a horrible idea. Airports have been on super strict lockdown ever since the tragic events on September 11th took thousands of lives in that extreme act of terrorism.

The seven arrested may find themselves behind bars for a very long time. Even though the device was discovered to not be dangerous or a threat to the public, the device, if seen by a member of the public, could have still sparked a response. The response could have caused absolute chaos at the Newark airport that may have disrupted the flight schedule for the entire country. This type of terrorism, purposeful or accidental, should be dealt with appropriately.

This is something they should have notified the airport about. This was irresponsible and could have been very scary to those around them.

They may find themselves in prison. Maybe they’ll be banned from flying. The suspects will learn when they face the decision of a judge or jury who decides the fate of the seven responsible for carrying a fake explosive through an airport.

FOLLOW us on Facebook at Freedom Daily!

Continue Reading


BREAKING!! Congress Just Released SECRET Details On WHO Was Behind VEGAS Massacre!




If you’ve suspected that the silence around the deadliest mass shooting in US history that ended with no answers was not a coincidence, your instincts were right. It’s been three and a half months since 58 Americans were massacred and 489 more were left wounded. Yet despite all the modern technology and capabilities to conduct a quick and thorough investigation, not a single answer has been provided for the biggest question that has lingered since.

We know that shooter Stephen Paddock pulled the trigger from his sniper’s nest set up in the Mandalay Bay, but it didn’t seem plausible that he could act alone in that moment nor leading up to it with the extensive amount of planning it took to accomplish an attack of this magnitude. It seems that there was credible reason for that suspicion. Congress just revealed shocking details on never released information in their possession on who was really behind this horrific mass murder, and why.

Earlier this week, we reported of a potential motive in this massacre that had come out but now new, more alarming details have come out that suggests that there is far more to this story. It’s now starting to make sense has to why it’s become the country’s biggest secret in modern history. It’s essential that you read the following with an open mind. Consider that this critical involvement of additional players is a real possibility, but not yet proven.

The Daily Mail reports:

A Republican member of Congress said Thursday that he has evidence ISIS may have had a role in the Las Vegas shooting.

US Rep. Scott Perry of Pennsylvania told Fox News host Tucker Carlson: “I smell a rat like a lot of Americans do.”

“Recently, I have been made aware of what I believe to be credible evidence, credible information regarding potential terrorist infiltration through the southern border regarding this incident,” Perry told Carlson.

“Terrorists?” Carlson asked in response.

“Twice before the attack, ISIS warned the United States that they would attack Las Vegas in June and August, and after the attack claimed responsibility four times,” Perry said.

“Meanwhile, the local law enforcement investigative services are telling us there is no terrorist connection, lone gunman, again, something is not adding up.”

Also appearing on Carlson’s show was Catherine Lombardo, a lawyer representing the victims of the Las Vegas attack. She adamantly denies Islamic terrorism, claiming “We’ve seen no evidence of a terrorist attack.”

“I would ask, with all due respect Congressman, unless you have specific evidence to back that up, it seems a bit irresponsible to make that allegation. If you do have any evidence of that, I’m asking you right now.”

Perry responded to counter to his claim saying, “I’m just telling you, I have received what I feel to be…credible evidence of a possible terrorist nexus. We’re going to have to wait until that situation develops.”

It’s really getting tired that everyone is always saying that this recurring information of a connection that keeps surfacing with additional details is incorrect or not valid in some way, yet provides no facts to contradict it. So unless they can provide answers to these major looming questions, all should be taking into consideration fro what happened that deadly day.

Also, Perry is correct in ISIS did previously claim responsibility for the Vegas massacre on October 1. It’s only been the FBI who has repeatedly stated that there is “no connection” between Paddock and his attack and international terrorism. This is also the same FBI whose job it is to have answers and can’t seem to find them or is perhaps just hiding them.

There are so many open holes in the case of Stephen Paddock and the Vegas shooting, but one thing many people overlooked is who else was staying at the same hotel. This boils down to what the true motive may have been in the shooting if not Islamic terrorism, or perhaps tied to ISIS in a different way. It also reveals who shot all those people and if this is true, it’s extremely frightening.

The other guest at the Mandalay Bay hotel in Las Vegas is said to be the Crown Prince of Saudi Arabia, Mohammad Bin Salman Al Saud. There are reports that the events that happened that night leading to hundreds of injured or dead people was the result of a cover-up from the assassination attempt. Other reports suggest that Bin Salman is now living scared and has increased his security.

Anyone who wants to visit Bin Salman has to pass a triple security check. Since he has increased security, then there could be some truth behind the assassination attempt that possibly happened at the Mandalay Bay. If this were an assassination attempt, then it wouldn’t be shocking. It’s not the first time that there was an attempt to assassinate him.

Pars Today reports:

“Bin Salman is living in horror. All those who want to meet him (even the closest ones) should go through three inspection rooms and all their belongings and whatever they carry are taken away from them, even a small pen in the second room,” al-Ahd al-Jadid wrote on its twitter page on Tuesday.

Anyone who wants to meet bin Salman is thoroughly checked from top to toe, and this is done on everyone even close relatives and family members.

Other Arab media outlets also reported in August that bin Salman had escaped an assassination attempt at one of the royal family palaces in Jeddah.

Arabic language Mer’at al-Jazeera quoted sources close to the royal family as saying that bin Salman was targeted by an assassination attempt in Jeddah by one of the Saudi princes.

Also, a western diplomat in Riyadh said that the Saudi crown prince wasn’t harmed in the failed attempt and the prince who made a move was arrested.

Multiple assassination attempts and increased security means someone must be out to get him.

Now people will want to know why cover up an assassination attempt? People will want to know why FBI would participate in the coverup of a foreign prince. That part doesn’t make much sense either. Why would Americans need to be shielded from an attempted assassination? Did the Stephen Paddock story make more sense in a political way that would push a gun narrative? Was it Stephen Paddock or two attempted assassins who truly shot up Las Vegas?

What’s your theory on the Las Vegas massacre?

Continue Reading

Latest Articles

Politics23 mins ago


And the senior citizen music band that is U2 is desperate for attention once again. This time the extreme left-wing...

Culture46 mins ago


Over the last 24 hours, the country has been plunged into chaos after the government shutdown. Well, that is what...

Immigration2 hours ago


During Barack Obama’s presidency, he did all he could to destroy this nation, and he got pretty darn close to...

Politics2 hours ago

BREAKING!! Michelle Obama IS PISSED After Malia’s Boyfriend’s NASTY Habit Comes Out!

While the Obamas are no longer in the spotlight any longer they do get reported on from time to time....

Politics2 hours ago

BREAKING NEWS From Little Rock!! FBI Arrived And Has Them Cornered!

The crimes of the Clinton family are endless. They have gotten away with murder literally for decades. But their time...

Politics2 hours ago

BREAKING!!! IT’S HAPPENING NOW After Shutdown!! BLOOD Is On Schumer’s Hands!

Press Secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders took to social media to make a point about the government shutdown. She has been...

Immigration3 hours ago


President Trump is not one to pull his punches when calling out the disgusting filth in our government today. Of...

Subscribe to our newsletter

Become An Insider! Sign up for our free email newsletter, and we'll make sure to keep you in the loop on the top breaking news of the day.