Please disable your Ad Blocker to better interact with this website.

Connect with us

Politics

Howard Stern DESTROYS anti-gun nut who happens to be his producer! (LISTEN)

Published

on

LOL! Stern is great. His producer asks “should a guy be able to have 300 guns?” Stern: “Yes!” Love Stern’s take on terrorists in a mall… “Just shoot ’em in the f-cking head!” Great listen!

In a really entertaining segment on a recent Howard Stern show, he really lights into the arguments being given by an anti-gun nut. But he isn’t just ANY anti-gun nut! It’s the producer of the Stern show!!

It’s a really good segment:

Howard doesn’t always offer the best argument in the debate, as when he opines that our God-given rights are there in case there ever happens to be a zombie apocalypse. But even so, he still slaps down most of the objections from his gun-grabbing producer.

“For God and Country—Geronimo, Geronimo, Geronimo……..Geronimo E.K.I.A.” -U.S. Navy SEAL VI

Join the conversation

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse.

Politics

BOMBSHELL Evidence How CIA Made Obama A US Citizen – DRAIN THE SWAMP!!!!

Trump was right!

Published

on

Whistleblower Dennis Montgomery may have discovered the CIA and/or other government entities illegally hacked into the Hawaii Department of Health records in an effort to search for birth records on Barack Obama.

Investigators report government breaches began on November 14, 2008.  This was just after Obama’s first presidential victory. Those breaches continued through January 12, 2011 – some three months before the White House issued a computerized version of what Obama claimed was the authentic long-form version of his birth certificate from 1961. Meanwhile, the mainstream media scoffed and laughed at anyone that dared to question the authenticity of said document.

A database created in 2013 by Montgomery contained large sections of an electronic surveillance database was provided to Michael Zullo, formerly the commander and chief investigator of the Cold Case Posse (CCP), a special investigative group created in 2006 in the office of Joseph M. Arpaio, formerly the sheriff in Maricopa County, an Arizona State Certified Law Enforcement Agency, headquartered in Phoenix, Arizona. It shows this database was created by the NSA as part of the NSA’s illegal and highly unconstitutional surveillance of American citizens in violation of their 4th amendment rights under the label of Project Dragnet.

Dennis Montgomery is former U.S. intelligence contractor and he walked away with more than 600 million classified documents on no less than 47 hard drives from both the NSA and the CIA. His breach is considered even larger than that of Edward Snowden. The evidence provided by Montgomery detailed warrantless collection of phone, financial and personal data and the unmasking of identities in spy data about millions of Americans. He has accused the Bureau of massive and flagrant amendment violations of the American people. Among those 47 hard drives included information supplied to Zullo regarding Obama’s fraudulent birth certificate.

Montgomery also filed suit against the FBI, NSA, DOJ, and several other government agencies in June 2017 for their illegal conducted surveillance of millions of American citizens for years, as reported by AFF in June 2017.  Circa reported Montgomery divulged to the FBI “a pattern and practice of conducting illegal, unconstitutional surveillance against millions of Americans, including prominent Americans such as the chief justice of the U.S. Supreme Court, other justices, 156 judges, prominent businessmen, and others such as Donald J. Trump, as well as Plaintiffs themselves.” As such Montgomery is represented by prominent Conservative attorney Larry Klayman of FreedomWorks in U.S. District Court.  The case is being heard by the exact same federal judge who has already ruled that the NSA’s collection of data on Americans is a Fourth Amendment violation making for a legal proceeding that will affect all Americans for the future.

 

Date

 

Time Target

 

11/14/08

 

03: 13 PST     Hawaii Government Department of Health

Vital Records

 

07/03/09

 

05:12 PST Hawaii Government Department of Health

Archives

 

09/03/09

 

03 :11 PST Hawaii Government Department of Health

Vital Records

 

12/13/09

 

01:11 PST Hawaii Government Department of Health

Vital Records

 

11/17/10

 

05:12 PST Hawaii Government Department of Health

Archives

 

11/22/10

 

05:12 PST Hawaii Government Department of Health

Archives

 

12/22/10

 

06:11PST Hawaii Government, Office of the Governor
01/13/11

 

11:10 PST Hawaii Government, Office of the Governor

According to InfoWars.com – 

The IP addresses, both from the Hawaii government offices breached and from the CIA proxy IP addresses used in the breaches.

“Montgomery also traced the IP data paths of the breached servers and discovered on a number of occasions information was sent from the breached Hawaii computers, only to be routed to a server located in Jakarta, Indonesia,” Zullo said.

From Indonesia, the data was sent back through the server in Jakarta, routed back to government servers in the United States.  Montgomery claims the server used in Jakarta was operated by the CIA at the time the breaches were executed.”

Montgomery brought forward to Arpaio and Zullo the information presented here regarding the CIA breaches of Hawaii government computers that Montgomery alleges was collected while he was employed as a subcontractor for the NSA, working on PROJECT: SPEARIT and various surveillance projects.

Court documents do verify Montgomery was contracted by the NSA, in part to develop computer breaching software that has been utilized in government mass surveillance operations targeting American citizens without legal justification.

While Montgomery’s credibility has been called into question, Zullo maintains that the amount of information provided by Montgomery related to Operation Dragnet was extraordinarily voluminous and that Montgomery had shared information with investigators in 2013 that is only now being revealed by media outlets.

Zullo claims to have received information from top officials with the Hawaii Department of Health claiming prior to the release of the long Obama’s Long-Form Birth Certificate by the White House the Hawaii Department of Health was in the process of forging a birth certificate for Obama. Arpaio’s investigators also revealed that this same source revealed the attending physician named on the forged document was known to be deceased and was believed to have destroyed all birth records after leaving practice making him an ideal candidate for forgers.

Zullo also claimed to have received information from two different hospital administrators independent of one another regarding meetings held in 2008 as Obama was preparing for his initial presidential bid where all hospitals on the island worked to identify which hospital Obama was born in. Both administrators attested to the fact no hospital in Hawaii could locate any records to prove Ann Dunham Obama had been a patient, or that Barack Hussein Obama was born there.

Zullo states –

“Queens Hospital was the hospital originally named by the Obama family as the birth hospital, but when it developed that Queens did not have records of Obama’s birth, the family shifted to story to claim Obama was born at Kapiolani Hospital. Queens Hospital quickly reported publicly that Obama was not born in their hospital. The admission of Queens Hospital that no birth record existed presented a serious problem for the already belabored Obama birth narrative. Kapiolani refused to comment neither confirming nor denying Kapiolani Hospital was Obama’s birth hospital. 

To date, Kapiolani has not produced a single shred of evidence that any original birth records exist, nor has Kapiolani Hospital ever produced any supporting documentation or released any information that proves Stanley Ann Dunham was a patient at Kapiolani in August 1961 who gave birth to a son, Barack Obama, supposedly born on Aug. 4, 1961.”

InfoWars.com also reveals that Zullo went on to point out that a written statement of former Hawaii Director of Public Health Dr. Chiyome Fukino issued in October 2008 cast further doubt that an original 1961 LFBC for Obama ever existed in the Hawaii Department of Health archives.

On Oct. 31, 2008, Fukino issued a statement that read in part:

“Therefore, I as Director of Health for the State of Hawaii, along with the Registrar of Vital Statistics who has statutory authority to oversee and maintain these type of vital records, have personally seen and verified that the Hawaii State Department of Health has Sen. Obama’s original birth certificate on record in accordance with state policies and procedures.

No state official, including Governor Linda Lingle, has ever instructed that this vital record be handled in a manner different from any other vital record in the possession of the State of Hawaii.”

Zullo was not convinced, stating –

“That statement would indicate, if true, that Fukino simply walked in to the file vault at the Hawaii Department of Health, went to the shelf containing the bound book volume holding some 500 certificates including Obama’s, located it inside that bound book, touched it, and returned the bound volume back to its proper place, back on the shelf along with 500 others.

The CIA breach would also enable the undetectable insertion of fraudulent digital information of a fictitious birth event to be surreptitiously implanted into the Hawaii Department of Health vital records computers database.Once the fictitious record has been created that would allow an unsuspecting clerk to simply locate the fraudulent record in the computer database and print a computer-generated Short-Form Birth Certificate (SFBC) without ever verifying the existence of the original Long Form Certificate (LFBC) in the file room vault.

Hawaii did in fact originally produce a Short-Form Birth Certificate in 2008.  In an attempt to quell the growing controversy and to satisfy the questions surrounding the Obama birth narrative, a Short-Form was released in 2008 during Obama’s presidential campaign. However, that was a digital record and not an original Long Form Birth Certificate. This did not satisfy the growing number of skeptics. In various discussions with Montgomery, he suggested ‘three-letter agencies’ had the ability to not only hack into a computer network unnoticed and to download information out of that computer network undetected, but also had the ability to upload information into a computer, again undetected. 

That upload capability would allow the implantation of completely fictitious or altered information at will. Once implanted, this would grant an unsuspecting clerk the ability to create and issue a Short-Form Birth Certificate that was retrieved from Hawaii Department of Health legitimate computers in accordance with Hawaii Department of Health procedures and customary practices.”

Montgomery turned this information over to the FBI along with 600 million records illegally obtained by the federal government for an immunity deal 2 years ago.

Zullo went on to explain –

“The Obama birth certificate information was included in the information Montgomery turned over to the FBI. The FBI has done nothing with Montgomery’s information for more than two years.

That’s when the White House released to the public via the internet a computer-generated PDF File of a purported Long-Form Birth Certificate claiming to be a copy of Obama’s birth records located in the Hawaii Department of Health vault on April 27, 2011.

What the White House released was not a physical hard copy document. It was not a copy of any verified authentic document, it was absolutely nothing. It was a computer-generated PDF file containing a copy of something that had its metadata erased from the electronic file, making it impossible to determine origin and authenticity of the file. This PDF file cannot be relied on as proof a birth event in any legal setting,” Zullo insisted. “It is not paper, it was created in cyberspace and resides in a computer.  On April 27, 2011, Obama showed the nation and the world absolutely nothing.”

Arpaio and Zullo held a press conference showing Obama’s birth certificate where a forensic expert explained it contained “nine points of forgery,” establishing that Obama’s Long-Form computer-generated birth certificate released by the White House on April 27, 2011, had been copied from Johanna Ah’Nee’s birth certificate.

FOLLOW us on Facebook at Freedom Daily!

Continue Reading

Politics

BREAKING BOMBSHELL! Trump Is Going To FIRE HIM!!! This Is HUGE!

Published

on

And it’s about damn time!

On Friday, Liberal California Congresswoman Jackie Speier, the Obama Administration lapdog from my own home district, sat down at the KQED Newsroom to whine and moan about the Republicans’ so-called effort to shut down Capitol Hill’s investigation into the fake Trump Russian collusion narrative.

All kidding aside, someday I will understand why the ignorant extreme far left liberals in my home district keep electing this hack politician into congress with a margin of almost 80%. She hasn’t done a damn thing to help anyone here or anywhere else in the nation. In fact, her only claim to fame was that she was shot on her rear end during the Jonestown massacre where Congressman Leo J. Ryan was killed back in 1978.

Via Gateway Pundit:

When asked why there are no witnesses scheduled for the probe in January, Speier replied, “well, we can read between the lines, I think there is a rush to try and shut this committee investigation down.”

“This week was a great example, three interviews simultaneously, one of the off the Hill with someone who comes to Washington frequently but wanted to do it now and so we were actually off the Hill doing the interview, had to race back to vote….this is a circus at this point,” added Speier.

Speier then went on to claim President Trump wants all Russia investigations to be “shut down.”

The California lawmaker then told KQED Newsroom that, “The rumor on the Hill when I left yesterday was that the president was going to make a significant speech at the end of next week. And on December 22nd, when we are out of D.C., he was going to fire…Robert Mueller.”

President Trump should fire Mueller and the whole team. The investigative team was originally set up to get to the bottom of the accusations started by the Clinton Machine of Russia Collusion in order to excuse the fact that she lost in an electoral landslide. But after it became apparent that nothing was coming of it they started to go after President Trump’s and his families finances. When that amounted to nothing they charged Michael Flynn with lying to the FBI, I guess the FBI doesn’t like it when citizens do the same to them than they do to the whole nation.

Via Heavy:

At least nine of the lawyers on special prosecutor Robert Mueller’s Russia investigation team of 16 attorneys donated to Democrats, with most giving money to either the campaigns of Barack Obama or Hillary Clinton, a review of Federal Election Commission records shows.

Seven other lawyers on the team do not have previous federal campaign donations, a review of FEC records shows, and Mueller himself has served in the administrations of both Republican and Democratic presidents (and was a registered Republican in the past). None of the 16 lawyers on his team is listed as donating money to President Donald Trump’s campaign or to the presidential campaigns of any past Republicans, although one donated to two Republicans in non-presidential races in addition to giving more money to Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama, and a string of Democrats.

Whether the donations matter is a question that tends to divide along partisan lines (conservative sites say it’s important; liberal sites like ThinkProgress argue that Trump himself previously donated to Democrats and say it’s irrelevant). However, the campaign donations are likely to receive more attention now that Mueller, according to CNN, is poised to announce the first criminal charges in the Russian probe. The New York Times is reporting that Mueller has indicted Manafort and his former business associate, Rick Gates.

Of the nine who donated to political candidates, all gave to Democrats (with one giving mostly to Democrats and also to two Republicans), five gave to Hillary Clinton and seven gave to Barack Obama. Putting it another way, of the nine with donations, 8 of those gave money to either Hillary Clinton or Barack Obama, and the ninth gave money to Senate Democratic candidates.

The Los Angeles Times reported that “at least seven of the 15 lawyers have previously given money to Democrats.” However, other lawyers have been added to the team since that time. The lawyers on Mueller’s team include mostly attorneys with backgrounds in the Justice Department, Solicitor General’s Office, and east coast U.S. Attorney’s offices. In addition, one of the team members is married to a U.S. District Judge who is an Obama appointee, and another served as a clerk for liberal Supreme Court Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Elena Kagan.

In June, CNN reported that “three members of the legal team known to have been hired so far by special counsel Robert Mueller to handle the Russia investigation have given political donations almost exclusively to Democrats,” naming Jeannie Rhee, James Quarles, and Andrew Weissmann. That was before most of the lawyers on the team were identified, however. The list of Mueller team members with previous Democratic campaign donations has risen to nine.

A review of FEC records and news reports shows that these are the seven identified Mueller lawyers with no campaign donations to their names: Michael Dreeben (although some media outlets initially falsely reported a donation as his that was made by a person with the same name); Aaron Zebley; Lisa Page; Adam Jed; Aaron Zelinsky; Scott Meisler; and Zainah Ahmad. (A 17th member, Peter Strzok, who had no campaign donations, is no longer with the probe.) In addition, Justice Department spokesman Peter Carr joined the team as its spokesman; he previously served as spokesman for Republican Senator Orrin Hatch.

This whole thing has been a sham since day one, and it’s time to put a stop to it. The only Russia Collusion there was was the paying of the fake Trump Dossier by the DNC and the Crooked Hillary Campaign. Michael Flynn did contact the Russians but that was after Candidate Trump had been elected. And it’s 100% normal for a President-Elect to start reaching out to foreign leaders once he is about to be sworn in as President.

Please share if you agree the Democrat Party needs to go back to the drawing board…

FOLLOW us on Facebook at Freedom Daily!

Continue Reading

Politics

BREAKING NEWS From White House… Trump Family Just Got The BEST NEWS EVER!!!!

Published

on

While some have criticized the First Lady her approval rating has climbed close to 17 points since her husband Donald Trump took office in January of this year. Now close to 54 percent of those who were polled say they have a favorable view of the First Lady. However, those same people say they view the President unfavorably. Interesting correlation. Gallup has now indicated the president has a 41 percent approval rating. Only a one percent increase since January.

The Daily Mail reported,

The percentage of people who view him unfavorably has also risen by one percent from 55 to 56. It is an increase from last week when, in a separate study by The Pew Research Center, 31 percent said they liked him. Melania’s boosted popularity is evidence of an encouraging increase since the start of the year when, not long before accompanying her husband to his Inauguration ceremony, her approval rating sat at 37 percent. The same number viewed her unfavorably.

Now, 33 percent have that view.  She has proved less polarizing than her husband – while 13 percent said they had no opinion of Melania, only 3 percent said the same of the president. In January, 26 percent said they had no view of the incoming First Lady, demonstrating that her efforts over the last year have led most to form an opinion of her.”

Melania spent the first half of the year quietly, residing in New York City with her son Barron to ensure he saw out his school year without disruption. Her public engagements were few and she rarely spoke in public. But since relocating to The White House in the summer, Mrs Trump has embraced a more proactive stance.
She has proved a hit with foreign leaders and their partners and has consistently dazzled sartorially. Indeed, so unwavering is her commitment to fashion that she chose to fly to disaster-struck Houston to offer hurricane relief in a pair of $500 Manolo Blahnik stilettos. Countless photo-ops with children in hospitals and at festive White House events have seasoned her first year as First Lady.”

The First Lady during her time in the White House has focused on anti-bullying initiatives, Children’s Hospitals and their patients, as well as spending time with veterans, their children, and their families. While every First Lady has their own pet projects they work on she has certainly carved her own space in history for what she wants to work on.

Many view the First Lady and the Trump family as an asset to the President. While President Trump has always been more crass and rough around the edges his family has been the exact opposite. Well educated, kind, cultured, generous, and by all accounts lovely to be around. Ivanka Trump, Barron Trump, the Trump grandchildren, and Melania Trump are perfect examples.

Newsweek reported,

Just before the Trumps became the first couple on January 20, the first lady-elect had the country split in opinion: About 37 percent viewed her favorably and 37 percent unfavorably, with 26 percent undecided. About a year later, only 13 percent of Americans still have no opinion of the Slovenia-born former model, and her unfavorables have dropped a bit, to 33 percent.

“Melania Trump’s favorability advantage … is consistent with Gallup’s findings that recent first ladies are, on average, more popular than their husbands,” pollsters said in a statement about their December 4-11 questioning. “This is likely because a first lady’s role is more ceremonial and generally much less divisive than that of the president.”

Trump is indeed a notably unpopular president. A Gallup spokeswoman told Newsweek that Trump’s current approval ratings, now in the mid-30s, are the lowest among the modern presidents, including Eisenhower, Kennedy, Nixon, Carter, Reagan, the Bushes, Clinton and Obama, in the first year of a first term.

That said, even the best-liked presidents have trouble keeping up with their spouses in the popularity contest of U.S. politics. “Michelle Obama and Laura Bush outpaced their husbands, holding an average 12-point and 17-point edge in favorability, respectively, over their spouses,” Gallup noted. Melania Trump is currently about on par with those predecessors; Hillary Clinton averaged one point lower favorability than her husband during their White House years. Melania Trump has taken some heat during the course of her first year as first lady, including for delaying her move from Manhattan to the White House and even some of her fashion choices, but the nation is clearly warming to her.”

Sometimes transitions are difficult so it is not surprising that the First Lady had a drastic spike in her approval rating. She is almost a year into her duties and she is getting used to them and carving a space for herself. Perhaps she just needed some time to transition into her role in order to fully feel comfortable. Now she is killing it and doing her roles as First Lady extraordinarily well.

Share if you agree with this sentiment about Melania Trump.

FOLLOW us on Facebook at Freedom Daily!

Continue Reading

Latest Articles

Trending