Please disable your Ad Blocker to better interact with this website.

Connect with us

Featured

It’s Official! Here’s Who Will Be Completely Eliminated By February 2018

Trump is keeping his word to Make America Great Again!

Published

on

President Trump has done many things that infuriated liberals, but today he might have done the worst yet. Not only has he made a great stride toward deportation of illegals, but he’s also rolled back one of Obama’s pet projects. We’re talking, of course about the DACA program that allowed almost 1 million illegals to be grandfathered into temporary citizenship because they illegally entered the country as children.

The ending of this project is a huge deal for a couple of reasons; not only is it good for America to take back the power that we lost when illegals began to stomp all over our nation’s laws, but it’s reversing presidential overreach by our former Commander-in-Chief. Obama took it upon himself to basically give our prizes to about 800,000 illegals who arrived in our country illegally, and everyone turned a blind eye. That was completely out of line, and President Trump is giving back the power that Obama took from Americans.

The ending of the DACA means that the “dreamers” will be headed back to their country of origin pronto. While a few hold visas or green cards that will extend their stay, the 800,000 little rascals without documentation that have grown up here and soaked up our resources illegally will be headed home within the next six months if all goes well.

Via Fox News:

The Trump administration on Tuesday announced the “orderly wind down” of the Obama-era program that gave a deportation reprieve to illegal immigrants who came to the U.S. as children – putting pressure on Congress to come up with a replacement.

“I do not favor punishing children, most of whom are now adults, for the actions of their parents. But we must also recognize that we are a nation of opportunity because we are a nation of laws,” Trump said, in a lengthy written statement explaining the decision.

The Department of Homeland Security formally rescinded the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program, known as DACA, with a six-month delay for current recipients. According to Acting Homeland Security Secretary Elaine Duke, the interval is meant to give Congress “time to deliver on appropriate legislative solutions.”

“However, I want to be clear that no new initial requests or associated applications filed after today will be acted on,” Duke said in a written statement.

The decision touched off a firestorm on Capitol Hill, where Democrats blasted the president and Republicans blamed the prior administration for putting Trump in a legal bind.

Attorney General Jeff Sessions, speaking to reporters, decried what he called the Obama administration’s “disrespect for the legislative process” in enacting the 2012 policy. He said the “unilateral executive amnesty” probably would have been blocked by the courts anyway.

“The executive branch, through DACA, deliberately sought to achieve what the legislative branch specifically refused to authorize on multiple occasions,” Sessions said, blaming the policy for the recent “surge” at the border. “Such an open-ended circumvention of immigration laws was an unconstitutional exercise of authority by the executive branch.”

In his statement, Trump stressed that while new applications for work permits won’t be accepted, “all existing work permits will be honored until their date of expiration up to two full years from today.”

Trump also said applications in the pipeline will be processed.

During the 2016 presidential campaign, Trump had promised to terminate DACA, though he appeared to soften his stance since taking office. In ending the program with a six-month delay, Trump put the onus on Congress to pass a legislative fix.

According to DHS, no current beneficiaries will be impacted before March 5, 2018.

“Congress, get ready to do your job – DACA!” Trump tweeted Tuesday morning.

While some Republicans support the goals of the DACA program, many opposed the use of executive action to institute it, describing the move as a presidential overreach.

Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., is among those who now support the call to protect so-called “Dreamers” with legislation.

“I have always believed DACA was a presidential overreach,” he said in a statement. “However, I equally understand the plight of the Dream Act kids who — for all practical purposes — know no country other than America.”

On a conference call, administration officials said Tuesday they are still prioritizing criminal aliens for deportation. But they described the original DACA criteria as very broad and cited the legal determination of the Justice Department.

During the presidential campaign, Trump referred to DACA as “illegal amnesty.” However, he seemed to edge away from that stance in April when he told the Associated Press that DACA recipients could “rest easy.”

The DACA program was formed through executive action by former President Barack Obama in 2012, allowing recipients to get a deportation reprieve – and work permits – for a two-year period subject to renewal. Under the program, individuals were able to request DACA status if they were under the age of 31 on June 15, 2012, came to the U.S. before turning 16 and have continuously lived in the country since June 15, 2007. Individuals must also have a high school diploma, GED certification, been honorably discharged from the military or still be in school. Recipients cannot have a criminal record.

Congress had been considering legislation to shield young illegal immigrants from deportation for years, dating back to the George W. Bush administration. Lawmakers tried again to pass a bill during the Obama administration, but couldn’t muster the votes amid flagging Republican support before Obama formed the program in 2012.

Nearly 800,000 undocumented youth are currently under the program’s umbrella.

So what does this mean for you and me? For now, not much other than that we’re going to have to hear about it from the liberals in our lives. There will no doubt be a push to stop the order, but hopefully, Congress will get their job done, just like the President asked, and we can all go back to our regularly scheduled activities, minus a few illegal immigrants.

But prepare yourself; there will be sob story after sob story about the DACA “dreamers” who’ve come to the United States and made good, or done good things for others while they were here. There is already a story about at least one who went to help with Hurricane Harvey relief and died to help others who were affected by the storm.

There’s no doubt that we are grateful for people of any race or creed who go out of their way to help others.

What’s funny is, Obama himself said that DACA was temporary and not a path to citizenship or amnesty. Watch.

Let’s just assume, for the sake of argument, that those are the only people who are staying here under DACA. The question that we have to ask ourselves is why are they here? The most obvious answer is that these 800,000 people are here to make their own lives better. Which makes you think; what if they did all their good deeds in their own country. Maybe it wouldn’t be a place that everyone wanted to leave.

(Source: Fox News)

Share if you’re glad the President is upholding our immigration laws! 

FOLLOW us on Facebook at Freedom Daily!

Kat Stevens is a Constitutional Originalist who’s main goal is to keep the wool from being pulled over your eyes. She believes that the liberal agenda will always depend on you being uneducated and easy to manipulate. Her mission is to present the news in a straightforward yet engaging manner, disproving as much liberal propaganda as possible along the way. She believes that we must stay as informed as possible because when it comes to Washington “...this is our circus and those are our monkeys.”

Join the conversation

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse.

Crime

Hillary Begged For Forgiveness And Didn’t Get It, Now Look Who Was Just Found Dead In Field Today

Published

on

Another day and another dead body with a connection that cannot be ignored as Hillary Clinton’s body count seems to be on the rise once again, after a brief reprieve of no sudden, mysterious casualties. The latest is possibly the most shocking yet in the truly startling trail of dead bodies that keep accumulating around this crooked woman with major secrets she’s desperate to keep hidden no matter who has she has to kill off to ensure it. Hillary begged for forgiveness and didn’t get it and now someone whom she owed “penance” is suspected of being caught in her wrath.

In what’s being reported as a freak, unfortunate private plane and helicopter accident, where the two aircrafts collided mid-air, leaving four dead, is far more mysterious than is being said, based on who was on board and is now dead. Air traffic control “staff shortages” have been blamed for this collision which is a convenient excuse to cover up a connection one of the victims has to Hillary who always seems to come up in random tragic events like this.

The Telegraph reported on the mid-air collision, with a not-so-ironic landing spot:

“Four people have been killed in a mid-air collision between a helicopter and light aircraft flying from an airfield where air traffic control had been shut due to ‘staff shortages.’ Wreckage from the aircraft tumbled from the sky and landed just over a mile from the former home of the Rothschild banking family at Waddesdon Manor in Buckinghamshire, yesterday lunchtime.”

“Members of the Rothschild reported hearing a ‘loud bang’ and a plume of smoke could be seen above trees.”

“The Air Accidents Investigation Branch said the collision involved a helicopter and  a two-seat Cessna 152 aircraft, each carrying two people, both of the craft had taken off from Wycombe Air Park, 23 miles away near High Wycombe.”

“A Notice to Airmen was previously issued to warn pilots the air field’s air traffic control services would be closed during three 30-minute periods on selected days between November 7-30 due to a ‘staff shortage.'”

“The crash occurred around half an hour after the latest closure was due to end.”

What makes this collision strange, outside of how it happened, is that it took place right outside the Rothschild estate and only three of the four victims have been named. It’s being speculated that Lord Jacob Rothschild is among the casualties and if true, this could be really bad for Hillary. So far, the only victims to be identified, perhaps on purpose, is the pilot of the helicopter, Captain Mike Green, and a student and flight instructor aboard the Cessna, 18-year-old Saavan Mundae, who was being instructed by Jaspal Barha, according to The Sun. So, was Jacob Rothschild, with a very big connection to the Clintons the fourth victim. Several sources seem to suggest that’s the case but the Rothschild estate has not confirmed nor denied Jacob’s well-being.

Your News Wire reports:

Nathaniel Charles Jacob Rothschild, 4th Baron Rothschild, is a member of the powerful elite Rothschild banking family.

The Rothschild’s are commonly believed to have engineered WWI in order to force the British government into creating Israel by getting them to sign the Balfour Declaration in 1917.

Lord Rothschild also boasted that the New World Order, which his family heads, would be in place by 2018.

 

We must reiterate that it’s not confirmed who the fourth passenger is, but it’s suspicious that this victim has not been identified when the other three were. Sources suggesting that it was Jacob are only doing so as an assumption. What is fact, is that this collision took place near the Rothschild estate which is strange considering it could have gone down anywhere and perhaps there was a reason the aircrafts went down here.

Here’s Hillary Clinton’s connection with the Rothschild and why she had previously begged them for forgiveness, according to True Activist:

Hillary Clinton asked Lady de Rothschild “Let me know what penance I owe you” after requesting Tony Blair accompany her on official business, preventing him from attending a Rothschild event scheduled for that same weekend.

Several politicians, especially those who are the most willing to bend over backwards for wealthy interests, have made their careers by catering to the whims of the Rothschilds and other families like them. In US politics today, there is no better example of this archetype than Democratic Presidential nominee Hillary Clinton. In fact, less than two months ago, Clinton flew just 20 miles in a private jet to attend a private Rothschild fundraiser in her honor. Yet, this is just one of the latest examples of her intimate relationship to the banking dynasty.

In emails from her private server made available to the public by WikiLeaks, Clinton’s close relationship to Lady de Rothschild is evident due to their warm exchanges which include phrases such as “You are the best […] Sweet dreams,” “I remain your loyal adoring pal,” and “Much love.” This is significant as, judging by Clinton’s other emails, her communication style is almost always curt and concise, never approaching the outright declarations of affection found only in her exchanges with Lady de Rothschild. Lady de Rothschild, married into the Rothschild family in 2000 after being introduced to Sir Evelyn de Rothschild, who alone is worth $20 billion, at the 1998 Bilderberg Conference. War criminal Henry Kissinger served as the couple’s “match-maker.”

Yet, the most bizarre interaction between Clinton and Lady de Rothschild took place in an email titled “Info for you” (ID#1606), which was sent while Clinton was serving as US Secretary of State. In the email, Clinton tells Lady de Rothschild that she had to ask Tony Blair (then-Prime Minister of England) to accompany her to Israel due to the Middle East peace negotiations taking place at the time. Blair had previously planned to spend the weekend in Aspen, Colorado with the Rothschilds at an unspecified conference, but accepted Clinton’s invitation. Clinton then says “I hope you all understand. […] Let me know what penance I owe you.” For those who are not familiar with the word, penance is defined as follows: “An act of self-mortification or devotion performed voluntarily to show sorrow for a sin or other wrongdoing.” Does this sound like something Hillary Clinton would normally say?

Hillary Clinton never seems to be able to escape scandal and as long as she’s a free woman, rather than being locked up where she belongs, she will be continued to be questioned in everything that she has any kind of connection to.

 

Continue Reading

Featured

What This Hotel Just Banned Has Muslims Ready To Riot Around The World Right Now

Published

on

Now, this is a smart move in today’s world.

The Malaysian Association of Hotels or also known as MAH has now defended its members’ policy of prohibiting their frontline staff from wearing the hijab, or headscarf while at work saying it is international practice and not meant to be discriminatory.

A spokesperson for the hotels, Cheah Swee Hee, said the hotels, especially the international hotels in Malaysia, which has a huge Muslim population, followed a standard operating procedure and policy on the matter and that it shouldn’t be called discrimination because these hotel companies have international policies to follow. He later added that it’s not about “Islamophobia” because the practice of not letting women wear headscarves has been done from the beginning. But of course, the left is going crazy over this policy.

Via FMT News:

I regret that Muslim women in Malaysia still face religious discrimination, when it comes to the wearing of the hijab, which is a religious requirement that many of them adhere to.

This is according to the report by the Malaysian Employers Federation (MEF).

MEF executive director Shamsuddin Bardan said he had received complaints from hotel employees regarding the banning of headscarves or hijab at the workplace.

This is something we should not tolerate especially when there’s no plausible explanation as to why the hijab is a hindrance to the nature of their work.

This is even more so in a country which holds Islam as the religion of the Federation.

Simply being in the private sector does not exclude the party from respecting one’s right to practice their religious requirements.

This argument also applies to our national airlines, Malaysia Airlines, where there are also calls from flight attendants to be allowed to observe their religious requirement in wearing hijab.

The fact that flight attendants with hijab had been serving the pilgrims during the Hajj season in flights to Mecca is testimony that wearing the hijab does not determine inefficiency.

With regard to hospitality industries, it is not easy for these women to actually lodge reports, especially when allowances, salaries and placement for internship are involved.

If these are students, we know that internship is part of the requirement in their last semester before they can graduate.

Our Muslim students are trapped in a systematic discriminatory process along the line.

I urge Muslim ladies who face such discrimination to come forward and report it to us at [email protected] We promise to maintain their confidentiality.

Now here is the thing. No one is forced to work at this establishment. Just like an individual can pick and choose where they will work, a business should have the right to dictate what and what should not be worn by their employees, especially those who have direct access to the public. I am sure this rule must have been in the contract every employee needs to sign in order to get employment from this company.

The Malaysian Insight Reports:

Wafiq president Associate Professor Dr Rafidah Hanim Mokhtar said the NGO has received four direct complaints while her personal Facebook page has received dozens of grouses .

“Since we have many universities producing graduates in hospitality and tourism, it’s kind of a setback to have international hotels having (such) standards.

“It’s discriminatory against our citizens in terms of employment and training.  I’ll have to work with the respective ministries, such as higher education and tourism (on this matter),” she told The Malaysian Insight in a WhatsApp message.

Syukri, a hotel banquet manager in Kuala Lumpur said the hijab policy had been in place for at least 10 years.

“At a five-star hotel in KL where I once worked, Muslim female staff were not allowed to wear the headscarf so as to attract customers.

“If a woman wanted a job as a waitress, she could not wear a scarf. It was considered unfashionable and unattractive,” said Syukri who did not want to give his full name.

As he was in charge of hiring temporary workers for big functions, he had to tell recruits that they could not wear the headscarf. He said the policy consistently applied to those working in food and beverage, such as servers, and in frontline positions, such as receptionists.

Syukri left the five-star hotel three years ago and found another job at a hotel that did not have such a policy.

“I moved to another hotel because I did not want to be a part of that kind of practice,” the 39-year-old said.

Farisha, who has worked for a year as a receptionist at a five-star hotel in Putrajaya, said she removed her headscarf whenever she went to work

“To be a receptionist at this hotel, you can’t wear the ‘tudung’. They say that this is in line with the image of an international hotel.

“So after I finish work, I will put it back on. I just don’t wear it at work. What else can I do? It is not easy to find a job now,” said the 29-year-old. – November 11, 2017.

Let us be honest with ourselves. This isn’t about a headscarf. This rule has been applied for years. I bet if any of us worked there we wouldn’t be allowed to wear a New York Yankee’s hat. All this is is the left and how they try to push Islam on the rest of the freedom loving world. And if anyone dares to say “NO” they are branded as racists, bigots and “Islamaphobes” which is a term that doesn’t even exist. It’s all part of the globalization movement and some of us just aren’t having anything to do with it. This is a great example as to why we elected President Donald Trump. We are sick and tired of people pushing their own beliefs and culture on us while if we do the same we are branded as criminals.

Please share if you stand against the globalists….

FOLLOW us on Facebook at mPolitical!

Continue Reading

Crime

BREAKING: BIG Gov’t Bust In Vegas Massacre With Who Gave Shooter Meds – Here’s Why The Story Vanished

Published

on

It’s been a month and a half since the nation’s largest mass shooting in modern history happened with more questions lingering than answers – until today. It’s been strange, in the least, that a crime of mass casualty has been swept under the rug and all but forgotten as authorities and the mainstream media have abandoned the story altogether, seemingly hoping that the American people would move on. However, now it’s become clear as to what the supposedly sloppy investigation has been hiding all along, and it’s clear as to the reason why now that it’s been revealed as who gave the shooter his medication and perhaps why.

It’s been known since the beginning shooter Stephen Paddock was on Diazepam, which is a drug used to treat anxiety, muscle spasms, and seizures. The known side effects of this controlled substance it’s likely to cause paranoid or suicidal ideation and impair memory, judgment, and coordination. Paddock was a known drinker who often over-imbibed which has particular damning effects on someone taking Diazepam. “Combining with other substances, particularly alcohol, can slow breathing and possibly lead to death,” but can also dramatically increase the effects of the drug.

So either Paddock was dishonest with his doctor about his alcohol use, abused the medication on purpose, or was prescribed this particular drug with an ulterior motive by the prescriber. Considering who gave it to, seems to suggest the latter as well as the reason why the government is so desperate to hide the details of this horrifying mass casualty case.

SOTT reports:

The physician who last June prescribed accused Las Vegas shooter Stephen Paddock Diazepam (a drug used to make some more hypno-suggestible or “hypnotizable” and induce amnesia), according to  Las Vegas Review-Journal and is Dr. Steven P. Winkler of Las Vegas, NV. Winkler is the Chief Medical Officer of Nevada-1 DMAT (Disaster Medical Assistance Team). DMATs operate under the direction of the Department of Homeland Security and Winkler is thus what is known as an intermittent federal employee and also serves on a number of professional committees. NV-1 DMAT is also a division of Nevada’s Clark County Emergency Management agency who just prior to the October 1, 2017 Las Vegas mass shooting, hosted at least one multi-agency mock-mass casualty terrorism response exercise in Las Vegas. CIA code namedMK-ULTRA” “mind control” programs experimented heavily with amnesia-inducing hypnosis, facilitated by certain drugs like Diazepam.

It’s hard to believe that the very doctor who prescribed the shooter with the exact drug his group talked about using, and also staged a “mass-casualty” even prior to the real thing happening, had nothing to do with this massacre. It raises a lot more questions as to who else was involved and exactly what they were trying to accomplish in the long run with this but could answer why the story of this deadly incident seems to have disappeared.

The question of government involvement has come up more than once with one particular tie that Paddock had with government contractors that added a lot to the thickening plot last month. With this tie-in, things are getting even stranger.

If you suspected a government involvement in the scrupulous planning that no average joe is really capable of doing on his own, you were probably right.

The mysterious Stephen Paddock is an average, faceless guy who blends into society despite being rather wealthy. Paddock had several investment properties and apparently at least one private plane which ended up in unusual use after he reportedly sold it to an intelligence contractor who was part of Obama’s administration. While that raises some eyebrows, what else was discovered about this alarming sale pretty much blows the investigation wide open as to why the FBI is protecting and even changing so many facts about this crucial incident that killed 59 Americans and wounded over 500 more.

“A few internet sleuths have taken matters into their own hands after the obvious disinformation campaign by the mainstream media surrounding the Las Vegas shooting,” the Daily Sheeple reported. Before you board the skepticism train the proof is in the information provided on via the FAA. Of course, this isn’t something that CNN will be quick to expose, as it reveals the attack is worse than we thought and may not end with these 59 victims.

Mike Toke is limited to a certain character count in the written portion fo the tweet so his message only says so much. However, he lets the evidence he lays out say far more than what the site limits him to writing. It’s now becoming more clear than ever that the government is hiding the facts from us to protect themselves.

The Daily Sheeple explains what the evidence in this tweet means and is not looking good for Obama’s administration. Not surprisingly, the former president is nowhere to be seen since initially trying to come out as a hero, pushing for gun control, of course.

“Looking closely, the first thing you will notice is that the shooter, Stephen Paddock, had a pilot license and owned two planes. This is well-established fact. The tail number of one of those planes is N5343M, a Cirrus SR-20. You can see that this was owned by Paddock by going to the website Flightaware.com. But Paddock doesn’t own this plane anymore. It was grounded three years ago, and it’s now in the hands of none other than Volant LLC, which there is little information on.”

“However, Volant Associates is none other than a Department of Defense contractor. Meaning Paddock’s plane has been in the hands of the United States government for the past three years and grounded since – if Volant LLC is being used as a way to hide information. Considering what Volant Associates does, that wouldn’t be so far fetched.  But the plane’s information is all easily verified here on Flightaware.com. It’s been in Roanoke, Virginia since April 25, 2014.”

Volant’s describes it’s mission on their website as providing ‘the industry’s preeminent professionals to discriminating U.S. government and intelligence-and-defense-industry customers.

“The registration of this plane is also listed as “active” even though it hasn’t been flown in three years. Strange enough yet? Well, it gets even better. The FAA should have this same information. But they don’t. Their website shows that a different aircraft, a Cessna 152, maintains that tail number and it was last registered to a person in San Diego, California. The FAA (Federal Aviation Administration) is a government agency, and it appears that it has scrubbed this plane’s information. Now, why would they do that? Well, the plot still thickens.”

In the age of the Internet with every reputable business being represented by some kind of a website, it’s strange that a contractor company successful enough to purchase an airplane is practically nowhere to be found online. The only plausible reason for this is something to hide, or perhaps Volant LLC is a cover company for the defense contractor. If so, inquiring minds want to know what they’re trying to hide and why.

Continue Reading

Latest Articles

Trending