Please disable your Ad Blocker to better interact with this website.

Connect with us

Islam

Jihad-Supporting Democrats BLOCKED BILL that would tighten vetting process for Muslim “refugees” seeking asylum in the U.S

Published

on

From Pam Geller:

After the San Bernardino jihad slaughter demonstrated the catastrophic failure of our current refugee  vetting process, why would the Democrats oppose tightening the process?

The party of treason. ISIS has vowed to send jihadis into the West via refugee migration.

While the measure passed overwhelmingly in the Republican House late last year, Senate Democrats had vowed to stop it, and they did.

This should not be political. It is logical, but the Democrats are aligned with the jihad force.

party of treason

“Senate Blocks Bill on Tougher Refugee Screening,” By Jenniger Steinhauerjan, NY Times, January 20, 2016:

WASHINGTON — A bill that would have greatly tightened screening procedures on refugees from Syria and Iraq failed on a procedural vote in the Senate on Wednesday, saving President Obama from another vexing veto scenario on an issue that has divided the country.

While the measure passed overwhelmingly in the House late last year, Senate Democrats had vowed to stop it, and the matter quickly became enmeshed in presidential politics, presaging what is all but certain to be a contentious and protracted proxy battle for the White House fought in Congress this year.

“Over and over again, Republicans remain committed to pledging loyalty to the divisive platform they have built for Donald Trump,” said Senator Harry Reid of Nevada, the Democratic leader, tying the issue of the refugee screening to Mr. Trump’s proposal to bar Muslims from entering the United States.

Three Republican senators running for president left the campaign trail briefly and returned to vote on the measure, an outgrowth of the terrorist attacks in Paris and elsewhere last year and of increasing unease among American voters over the nation’s security.

The senators — Marco Rubio of Florida, who has missed scores of votes over the last several months; Ted Cruz of Texas; and Rand Paul of Kentucky — all voted to move forward with the bill, along with the rest of their fellow Republicans.

The bill, which the House passed in November, 289 to 137, with nearly 50 Democrats supporting it, would have required that the director of the F.B.I., the secretary of the Department of Homeland Security and the director of national intelligence confirm that each applicant from Syria and Iraq poses no threat, which the White House denounced last year as “untenable.”

In some ways, the refugee issue, attached to a large spending bill in December, was obviated by another measure that made changes to the so-called visa waiver program, which had permitted citizens of 38 countries to travel to the United States without a visa.

Under that new measure, with certain narrow exceptions, the United States now bars residents of Iraq, Syria, Iran and Sudan and foreigners who have traveled to those countries since March 2011 from participation in the program.

Just a few months ago, Republicans were highly motivated to halt the refugee program. On Wednesday, they seemed resigned to move on.

Republicans quickly pivoted to a coming bipartisan bill that would promote energy efficiency; expedite applications to export liquefied natural gas; and improve the nation’s electric grid, among other provisions. “We have a great opportunity to work together,” said Senator John Barrasso, Republican of Wyoming, barely mentioning the refugee bill.

Democrats, after mocking Republicans for rejecting their last-minute amendment effort with, as Senator Dick Durbin, Democrat of Illinois, put it, the fear of “scalded cats,” made only a halfhearted effort to press the issue on the floor.

Mr. Reid offered to come up with Democratic support to debate the bill if Republicans would agree to guarantee votes on four amendments, one of which was specifically designed to embarrass Republicans.

That measure would have officially denounced “Donald Trump’s reprehensible proposal to impose a religious test on admission into the United States,” Mr. Reid said. Another would have prevented people on the no-fly list from being able to buy firearms, which had already failed on the Senate floor. “We’ll not allow Republicans to hijack the Senate floor to play politics with our national security,” Mr. Reid said.

Republicans rejected the Democrats’ assertion that the bill was unfair to refugees, and argued that it was needed because war-torn Syria did not have proper record-keeping on its citizens for vetting.

Saying that supporters of the bill were “motivated by love for their families and communities,” Senator Mitch McConnell, Republican of Kentucky and the majority leader, said, “I understand that the political pressure to oppose this balanced bill may be intense, but it’s also intensely shortsighted.”

Resisting commitments to specific amendments, Mr. McConnell offered a broader amendment process to get the bill moving, which Democrats rejected.

Democrats are almost certain to find opportunities to vote on measures related to the policy positions of Mr. Trump and perhaps of other Republican candidates this year, largely targeting vulnerable Republican senators up for re-election. Republicans have vowed to return to the favor — “What’s good for the goose is good for the gander,” Mr. McConnell said last week.

At the same time, Republicans also looked to other ways to embarrass or annoy the White House. Mr. McConnell immediately moved to set up a vote to override Mr. Obama’s recent veto of a congressional resolution that would have overturned his administration’s regulations on clean water. The House is expected to do the same, an effort that is likely to be successful. Senate Democrats will almost certainly block that effort Thursday, and members of both parties will then race to the airport in hopes of beating an expected snowstorm in Washington.

Republicans will also almost certainly seek to address immigration issues this year once again. Some members are eager to vote on a measure that would impose a five-year mandatory sentence on immigrants who are deported and return to the United States illegally.

Americans are increasingly concerned about national security, and Mr. Obama’s policies in Syria have bedeviled his presidency. In a poll conducted this month by The New York Times and CBS News, Americans disapproved of Obama’s handling of overall immigration policy by 55 percent to 37 percent.

In a similar poll in December, those surveyed were roughly split over whether the United States should allow any refugees from Syria into the United States.

That strong public sentiment has forced Democrats to take the bill quite seriously. At the same time, some Republican senators up for re-election in swing states have been reluctant to take up the issue.

“By blocking this measure, Senate Democrats are making it that much harder for us to keep Americans safe,” said House Speaker Paul D. Ryan of Wisconsin in a statement Wednesday. “Their vote is irresponsible in a time of grave threats. Even the administration’s top law enforcement officials say there are gaps in our refugee program that terrorists can exploit.”

Join the conversation

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse.

Featured

What This Hotel Just Banned Has Muslims Ready To Riot Around The World Right Now

Published

on

Now, this is a smart move in today’s world.

The Malaysian Association of Hotels or also known as MAH has now defended its members’ policy of prohibiting their frontline staff from wearing the hijab, or headscarf while at work saying it is international practice and not meant to be discriminatory.

A spokesperson for the hotels, Cheah Swee Hee, said the hotels, especially the international hotels in Malaysia, which has a huge Muslim population, followed a standard operating procedure and policy on the matter and that it shouldn’t be called discrimination because these hotel companies have international policies to follow. He later added that it’s not about “Islamophobia” because the practice of not letting women wear headscarves has been done from the beginning. But of course, the left is going crazy over this policy.

Via FMT News:

I regret that Muslim women in Malaysia still face religious discrimination, when it comes to the wearing of the hijab, which is a religious requirement that many of them adhere to.

This is according to the report by the Malaysian Employers Federation (MEF).

MEF executive director Shamsuddin Bardan said he had received complaints from hotel employees regarding the banning of headscarves or hijab at the workplace.

This is something we should not tolerate especially when there’s no plausible explanation as to why the hijab is a hindrance to the nature of their work.

This is even more so in a country which holds Islam as the religion of the Federation.

Simply being in the private sector does not exclude the party from respecting one’s right to practice their religious requirements.

This argument also applies to our national airlines, Malaysia Airlines, where there are also calls from flight attendants to be allowed to observe their religious requirement in wearing hijab.

The fact that flight attendants with hijab had been serving the pilgrims during the Hajj season in flights to Mecca is testimony that wearing the hijab does not determine inefficiency.

With regard to hospitality industries, it is not easy for these women to actually lodge reports, especially when allowances, salaries and placement for internship are involved.

If these are students, we know that internship is part of the requirement in their last semester before they can graduate.

Our Muslim students are trapped in a systematic discriminatory process along the line.

I urge Muslim ladies who face such discrimination to come forward and report it to us at [email protected] We promise to maintain their confidentiality.

Now here is the thing. No one is forced to work at this establishment. Just like an individual can pick and choose where they will work, a business should have the right to dictate what and what should not be worn by their employees, especially those who have direct access to the public. I am sure this rule must have been in the contract every employee needs to sign in order to get employment from this company.

The Malaysian Insight Reports:

Wafiq president Associate Professor Dr Rafidah Hanim Mokhtar said the NGO has received four direct complaints while her personal Facebook page has received dozens of grouses .

“Since we have many universities producing graduates in hospitality and tourism, it’s kind of a setback to have international hotels having (such) standards.

“It’s discriminatory against our citizens in terms of employment and training.  I’ll have to work with the respective ministries, such as higher education and tourism (on this matter),” she told The Malaysian Insight in a WhatsApp message.

Syukri, a hotel banquet manager in Kuala Lumpur said the hijab policy had been in place for at least 10 years.

“At a five-star hotel in KL where I once worked, Muslim female staff were not allowed to wear the headscarf so as to attract customers.

“If a woman wanted a job as a waitress, she could not wear a scarf. It was considered unfashionable and unattractive,” said Syukri who did not want to give his full name.

As he was in charge of hiring temporary workers for big functions, he had to tell recruits that they could not wear the headscarf. He said the policy consistently applied to those working in food and beverage, such as servers, and in frontline positions, such as receptionists.

Syukri left the five-star hotel three years ago and found another job at a hotel that did not have such a policy.

“I moved to another hotel because I did not want to be a part of that kind of practice,” the 39-year-old said.

Farisha, who has worked for a year as a receptionist at a five-star hotel in Putrajaya, said she removed her headscarf whenever she went to work

“To be a receptionist at this hotel, you can’t wear the ‘tudung’. They say that this is in line with the image of an international hotel.

“So after I finish work, I will put it back on. I just don’t wear it at work. What else can I do? It is not easy to find a job now,” said the 29-year-old. – November 11, 2017.

Let us be honest with ourselves. This isn’t about a headscarf. This rule has been applied for years. I bet if any of us worked there we wouldn’t be allowed to wear a New York Yankee’s hat. All this is is the left and how they try to push Islam on the rest of the freedom loving world. And if anyone dares to say “NO” they are branded as racists, bigots and “Islamaphobes” which is a term that doesn’t even exist. It’s all part of the globalization movement and some of us just aren’t having anything to do with it. This is a great example as to why we elected President Donald Trump. We are sick and tired of people pushing their own beliefs and culture on us while if we do the same we are branded as criminals.

Please share if you stand against the globalists….

FOLLOW us on Facebook at mPolitical!

Continue Reading

Islam

This Is The Wife Of Most Senior American Member of ISIS And You’ll Be Pissed To Know Why Obama Allowed Her Into America

Published

on

If you thought former President Obama left America with a few hidden presents for citizens, then you should see what’s crawling around the country right now. A British jihadi bride married America’s most senior member of ISIS and now she’s trying to rock out like a soccer mom in suburban Dallas. She must think a new life removes her from the past of her connection to ISIS, but people who know don’t forget. People who learned about it now won’t forget either.

Her name is Tania Georgelas and she’s 33-years-old. She has previously stated that she had a dream like to have her kids become demented terrorists. That’s not like the dream Martin Luther had and the radicalization of her and her family is very disturbing. But then she split with her ISIS husband and now she thinks a new life as a normal person is possible, but once someone goes to that extreme, others will wonder if it’s ever possible to cut ties with ISIS and live a normal life.

An interview with Atlantic gave more harrowing information than you’d like.

‘Our dreams were to have land of our own, raise a family and train them be assassins or whatever, soldiers, and then eventually go join the jihad,’ she said of her ex-husband John Georgelas, an American-born convert to Islam who has risen to the upper ranks of ISIS.

From the comfort of her new life on the northern outskirts of Dallas, where she lives with John’ wealthy parents and attends a Unitarian church with her IT programmer boyfriend Craig, Tania described the extraordinary journey that took her from England to Syria, and finally America.

The first lady of ISIS is reported, by Daily Mail, to be born in London as one of five children. She claimed to face a lot of racism in her childhood due to bad neighbors who would smash their windows and cause her to feel like an outsider. It’s not something kids should ever go through, but that doesn’t mean she should’ve grown up to marry a member of ISIS either.

But then you realize what may have brought her to that decision, which we can infer from when she said “I was looking for a way to retaliate” and it makes you feel like she was bullied. But still, she’s connected to ISIS and you can only imagine it might be nearly impossible to disconnect from a terrorist organization, or if she’s truly removed from them at all. All conspiracy theories aside, it’s a legitimate concern to America to have her in the country due to her previous connections and unknown connections now. Who is she still in touch with? Who is she talking to when no one’s listening?

Her ISIS husband grew up in Plano, Texas and Daily Mail reports that he was a rebellious teenage drug user who dropped out of school and converted to Islam after the events of 9/11 and likely the condemnation of the Islamic religion. John eventually met Tania and they began having children and talking about joining ISIS in Syria. How they went from the honeymoon stage of a relationship to the possible planning of traveling to Syria to become terrorists is quite the extreme.

They’d had three children and another on the way when, in 2013, they began discussing joining ISIS in Syria.

‘John wanted to go to Syria, and I said I wasn’t ready, not while the kids are small,’ she recalls.

It’s great to know that John the drug using ISIS guy was sympathetic about the kids. It’s all about the kids in marriage, right? Maybe not. If it was, then people wouldn’t join ISIS and drag them into a life of distorted inabilities to assimilate to modern civilized culture and oppression of women. If they really cared about their kids, then they wouldn’t have had kids in the first place knowing that they planned to live a life in terrorism. ISIS isn’t exactly the best influence on children unless one is breeding just to build future detonation devices for their explosive vests. A life decision that will affect the children forever and strip them of the ability to live a normal life.

What’s next for Tania? She’s on Match.com doing online dating ever since breaking up with John.

‘I went to the dating website Match, I wrote an essay: “I have four kids, my husband abandoned me to go become the next Osama Bin Ladin”. I got 1,300 replies.’

She met her new beau Craig, an IT worker, within 24 hours on the site.

Does Craig know about her former life living with the top ISIS guy in America? Is Craig her new ISIS sympathizing boyfriend?

Craig might be the new pawn in a deadly attack as he either knows not what he’s gotten into or he’s well into it and can’t wait for the sparks to fly.

Authorities should keep an eye on these two.

Continue Reading

Featured

60,000 Sneaky Muslims In Houston Just Woke Up To NASTY Surprise From Pissed Of Texans

Published

on

It’s been a particularly bloody couple of weeks around the world as terror attacks continue in Europe where refugees have been widely welcomed in to take over. Meanwhile, in America, Muslims who call the great state of Texas home are realizing that things aren’t so great for them there as they are in more apologetic liberal states and nations.

The last time statistics were available of how many Muslims there are in Houston, was in 2000 when reports estimated the Islamic population in the city had reached about 60,000. Since it’s been 17 years since, that’s now just the minimum number of Muslims there, as they procreate like crazy to increase their Islamic community, and were moved to the U.S. in droves under Barack Obama. However, each one of them just suffered a huge blow to the biggest part of their belief system.

Texas isn’t just taking their state back from these people, they’re the first to hit them where it really counts regardless of the subsequent outrage from Muslims and apologists about “rights.” Everyone has a right to safety and the governor just ensured that with a swift, yet surprising, move he just made.

When Muslims move into an area in groups, their plan isn’t to assimilate to the American culture or “coexsist.” Islam preached for a takeover and world domination, by killing or converting all non-believing infidels. Anyone who knows even just the smallest part of what the Muslim holy book, the Koran, preaches, it’s that women and children are horribly mistreated. They’re used and abused by men in their lives who hold all of the power. This comes with the cornerstone of the religion, which is “Sharia Law.”

Despite Sharia Law being unconstitutional and illegal in the U.S., liberals are open to the idea to make this place better for Muslims. There are sneaky ways to slip it into our way of life and make it legal, which Muslims who want to dominate with it are well aware of. Liberals fall fast for this by making it sound that it’s their “religious right,” but that doesn’t mean they have a right to impose these inhumane rules on those who want no part of it in a free country.

In what is being billed as a death blow punch in the fight against Islam and their savage Sharia Law. Texas state legislators just passed a law called the “American Law for American Courts” bill, or Texas House Bill 45, Freedom Daily recently reported.

“This new law now makes it illegal to practice Muslim Sharia law within the Texas state lines. Both houses of the Texas legislature voted in favor of HB 45. The ‘Texas Foreign Law Procedural Protection Act.’ on Monday, and today the bill has been signed by Texas Governor Greg Abbot.”

“Sharia Law is the Islamic religious governing code which governs all aspects of Muslim daily life. Including death for infidels, adulterers, the LGBTQ community, the crucifixion of highway robbers, amputation of limbs for theft, and so many other none or petty crimes.”

“This law is also the one responsible for Muslim honor killings of women and young girls who have been deemed to have brought shame to their families. Which is something that is already starting to happen here in the states. There have been cases reported in Texas and especially the state of Michigan which is currently starting to resemble an Islamic 3rd world cesspool.”

This house bill was necessary and urgent since an Islamic Tribunal is already set up in Texas and is practicing Sharia Law, as Breitbart recently uncovered:

“An Islamic Tribunal using Sharia law in Texas has been confirmed by Breitbart Texas. The tribunal is operating as a non-profit organization in Dallas. One of the attorneys for the tribunal said participation and acceptance of the tribunal’s decisions are ‘voluntary’.”

“Breitbart Texas spoke with one of the ‘judges,’ Dr. Taher El-badawi. He said the tribunal operates under Sharia law as a form of ‘non-binding dispute resolution.’ El-badawi said their organization is ‘a tribunal, not arbitration.’ A tribunal is defined by Meriam-Webster’s Dictionary as ‘a court or forum of justice.’ The four Islamic attorneys call themselves “judges” not ‘arbitrators’.”

“El-badawi said the tribunal follows Sharia law to resolve civil disputes in family and business matters. He said they also resolve workplace disputes.”

Muslims have a great way of skirting the system and making things sound innocent when there’s always something much more sinister beneath the surface. While they take advantage of liberals as their useful idiots to impose Islam on them, it’s time for states to follow in Texas’s lead and start fighting back against this evil. Montana recently attempted to ban Sharia Law in their state, but liberals won in the end. Anyone who fights to defend this set of rules and lifestyle should be forced to live it for a week and see if they still think it’s a good idea to make America a Muslim nation.

h/t: [ConservativeTribune]

Continue Reading

Latest Articles

Culture5 hours ago

Eminem Just Got DEVASTATING Dose Of Karma 1 Week After Telling Trump And His Fans To ‘F’ Themselves

Ever since Trump won the election, liberal butt-hurt has been on full display. Obama-worshiping celebrities are worst types of liberals,...

Politics5 hours ago

BREAKING: Hillary Just Announced She’s Leaving U.S. To Be President – Here’s Where She’s Headed

Hillary Clinton has wanted to be president for decades, and last year she really thought she would win. Hillary had...

Featured7 hours ago

Trump Drops Everything To Go To Hospital With Melania – Here’s Who Else Is There

President Donald Trump has a lot on his plate and frequently turns his weekends into work days, as he tirelessly...

Politics8 hours ago

Racist NAACP Wants To Make Sick New Change To National Anthem That Will Infuriate Every White American

In another attempt to rewrite our American history the far left, race-baiting NAACP has stepped forward demanding to change the...

Featured9 hours ago

BREAKING: Major NFL Star Just Found Dead Overnight And The Reason Why Is Absolutely Horrific

This football season will forever go on record as being the most difficult one in the history of the league....

Crime9 hours ago

These Are The 4 Women Who Hold Bill’s FILTHIEST Secret Yet That Will Put Him In Prison For Years

For decades, serial rapist Bill Clinton has continued to sexually assault women while getting a free pass from the liberal...

Crime10 hours ago

This Is What Trump Did IMMEDIATELY After Illegal Killed Border Agent To Ensure It NEVER Happens Again

This is it!

Trending