Please disable your Ad Blocker to better interact with this website.

Connect with us


BREAKING: Loretta Lynch Gets What She Deserves For Meeting With Bill Clinton! SHE’S DONE!

What happened in the clandestine meeting on the tarmac? We’re about to find out one way or another! BOOM!



When government has become corrupt, citizens have to take it upon themselves to prosecute the suspects. That’s exactly what’s happening in the case of Attorney General Loretta Lynch’s tarmac meeting with former President Bill Clinton.

As you recall, the FBI was investigating then presidential candidate Hillary Clinton for her use of a private email server, and the possibility that confidential material had been sent over it.

Lynch was awaiting the FBI’s recommendation on whether to file charges against Clinton or not. That’s when Bill Clinton just “happened” to be at the same airport that Lynch was, and asked for a private meeting with her on her plane. Bill, being the charmer that he is, got exactly what he wanted.

The public was in an uproar when it was found out that the husband of a suspect had a meeting with the woman who would possibly prosecute her. Because no one knows what was talked about in the private meeting other than the story Lynch & Bill Clinton gave, it’s necessary to investigate to determine whether Lynch was pressured into not bringing charges against Hillary, regardless of what the FBI recommended. And now we may find what was really discussed between the two.

Earlier this month the American Center for Law and Justice (ACLJ) filed a federal lawsuit against Obama’s Justice Department to get all the facts concerning the clandestine meeting.

Via Daily Mail UK:

Attorney General Loretta Lynch is facing a federal lawsuit to give details of a meeting she had with Bill Clinton days before she was to decide on his wife’s fate.

The meeting in June was barely a week before the Justice Department which she heads dropped its probe into Hillary Clinton’s private email server.

The American Center for Law and Justice (ACLJ) filed the lawsuit against the Department of Justice in Washington on Wednesday demanding more information about the meeting, which led to Lynch stepping aside from the server investigation.

As head of the Department of Justice, Lynch was supposed to be deciding whether to proceed with charging Hillary Clinton over her unauthorized server arrangements while she was secretary of state.

But she met with the Democrat’s husband on June 27 on the tarmac of the Phoenix Sky Harbor International airport, Arizona. Bill Clinton delayed his flight’s departure in order to grab face time with Lynch.

So just exactly what is the ACLJ suing for? Check out this list.

Any and all records containing the names of any DOJ official, staff or employee who participated in any discussion regarding the meeting between General Lynch and Bill Clinton that occurred on Monday, June 27, 2016, at Sky Harbor International Airport in Phoenix, Arizona.

Any and all records, communications or briefings prepared, sent, received or reviewed by General Lynch or any other DOJ official, staff or employee, at any time, containing any discussion of or in any way regarding the meeting between General Lynch and Bill Clinton that occurred on Monday, June 27, 2016, at Sky Harbor International Airport in Phoenix, Arizona.

Any and all records of any communication or briefing received by General Lynch, any DOJ official, staff or employee from Bill Clinton or his staff regarding the meeting between General Lynch and Bill Clinton that occurred on Monday, June 27, 2016, at Sky Harbor International Airport in Phoenix, Arizona, regardless of whether the communication or briefing was received before, during, or after the meeting.

Any and all records of any communication or briefing prepared, sent, received or reviewed by General Lynch, her staff, or any other DOJ official or employee or any other person from June 13, 2016 to Sunday, June 26, 2016, containing any discussion of or in any way naming, regarding, involving or referencing Bill Clinton.

Any and all records of any communication or briefing prepared, sent, received or reviewed by General Lynch, her staff, or any other DOJ official or employee after the meeting on Monday, June 27, 2016, between General Lynch and Bill Clinton at Sky Harbor International Airport in Phoenix, Arizona, containing any discussion of ethics rules or DOJ Standards of Conduct governing attorneys in connection with the meeting or Lynch’s relationship with Bill Clinton.

Any and all records of any communication or briefing prepared, sent, received or reviewed by General Lynch, her staff, or any other DOJ official or employee after the meeting on Monday, June 27, 2016, between General Lynch and Bill Clinton at Sky Harbor International Airport in Phoenix, Arizona, containing any discussion of the press, responding to the press, or the content of any press release or public statements in connection with the meeting.

Will the Justice Department comply, or will they obfuscate, delay, and attempt to cover-up what was really discussed between Lynch & Clinton? My bet is the latter, but not to fear, Trump has named Alabama Senator Jeff Sessions to be the new Attorney General in his administration.

If Obama’s Justice Department won’t provide documents related to the meeting, Trump’s surely will. We have 62 days until Obama is out of office, and Trump takes over. Then maybe we’ll find out whether Lynch & Clinton lied. If they did, well, I’m all up for jailing the lot of them!

Share this if you want the Truth about what happened!

By Jeff Rainforth
Like Jeff on Facebook
Follow Jeff on Twitter

FOLLOW us on Facebook at Freedom Daily!

Jeff was the national rally organizer to free Marine Sgt. Tahmooressi from the Mexican prison, chairman emeritus of Ross Perot’s Reform Party of California, and a former candidate for governor. Jeff is editor-in-chief at Freedom Daily. He wrote for former Hollywood talent agent & Breitbart contributor, Pat Dollard, and headed up his 30 person research team. Mr. Rainforth also wrote for the Wayne Dupree Show. Jeff is single & says he is not gay.

Join the conversation

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse.


President Trump Signs An Executive Order To Combat Veteran Suicide

Chuck Yarling



On January 9, 2018, President Trump signed an Executive Order (EO) entitled, “Presidential Executive Order on Supporting Our Veterans During Their Transition From Uniformed Service to Civilian Life” This EO is designed to combat veterans suicide that is prevalent among servicemembers during the time they are adjusting to a new life outside the military.

Here are five important attributes of this EO.

• #1: It identified that the largest number of suicides of our military personnel occur within the first year during their transition from military to civilian life.

• #2: It is during this time that the rate of veterans suicide is two times higher than the overall rate for service members.

• #3 Care may be provided at VA or by a private facility, depending on wait times where you live. This section re-enforces the Veteran’s Choice Act of 2017 which allows

Any veteran who lives 40 miles or more from the closest VA medical facility, or who faces a 30-day or more wait time, can seek out treatment from a private facility and the VA will handle the payment.

• #4: All service members leaving the military will receive screening for mental health issues for one year.


• #5: Implementation of the EO is being made at the highest levels of the administration via the Secretary of Defense, the Secretary of Veterans Affairs, and the Secretary of Homeland Security.At the meeting, Secretary of Veterans Affairs David Shulkin, remarked,

“Currently, 40 percent of those servicemembers had coverage in the VA to get mental health. Now 100 percent will have that coverage, and it’s the full array of services that the Department of Defense and the Department of Veteran Affairs will be able to provide in terms of mental health coverage.”

This EO is excellent news for transitioning servicemembers. Indeed, it will help make their future in the civilian workforce a success.

FOLLOW us on Facebook at Freedom Daily!

Continue Reading





The left has made it abundantly clear that they do not want the United States to thrive which was confirmed by the numerous asinine policies they have pushed down the American peoples’ throats over the last several years. Not only have we seen Democrats in power water down our nation’s culture and border security by allowing illegals to flood into the country and then stay here on the taxpayer’s dime, but now they are doing their best to make sure they can never be deported. After years of witnessing liberal politicians abuse the system, President Trump is in charge and doing his best to ensure that our immigration laws are followed again, and of course, the liberal snowflakes are melting at the news.

Well, if we thought the left was throwing a temper tantrum before, we have not seen anything yet after what Homeland Security just announced.

Since President Trump has been in office, all he has tried to do is re-establish law & order back in our nation which has been one hell of an uphill battle.

Instead of Democrat politicians applauding Trump’s desire to focus on strengthening our country by helping our citizens and deporting illegals, these race baiting individuals instead they scream that Trump is racist. No matter what Trump does, the left is ready to block it by pushing some absurd feel-good argument that liberal sheep cling to without a moment’s hesitation such as the “no human is illegal” nonsense.

Yep, you have heard that mantra a few times over the last year.

You see, all of the sudden people who come to America are not illegal, and they should be able to stay here and live off the government with no problems. Insanity, right?

Well, this is the left we are talking about, and they hardly make sense, but that has not stopped them from trying to halt Trump from enforcing our immigration laws by harboring these illegals in cities across the nation.

Now, the Department of Homeland Security is stepping in saying they will begin to issue criminal charges against elected officials of cities that will not cooperate with deportation efforts, and it is about damn time.

Here is more from The Western Journal:

Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen confirmed Tuesday that her department has spoken to federal prosecutors about the possibility of leveling criminal charges against elected officials of cities that refuse to cooperate with federal deportation efforts.

Nielsen revealed that a request has been submitted to the Justice Department for their review, according to The Daily Caller.

“The Department of Justice is reviewing what avenues might be available,” Nielsen said during a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing.

“The context of this is of course not only putting my ICE officers at risk but also finding an efficient and effective way to enforce our immigration laws.”

Democrat Sen. Kamala Harris of California — a state that is largely viewed as an illegal immigrant safe haven after legislation that protects them from federal prosecutors went into effect this year — continued probing the secretary about the department’s plans to go after sanctuary city leaders.

Nielsen said she is not aware of any specific cases where the Homeland Department will criminally charge elected officials, but that her department was simply looking into the possibility.

Harris’ line of questions were in response to comments previously made by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement Director Tom Homan, who said during an interview earlier this month that the DOJ had been asked to “look into criminal charges for elected officials with sanctuary policies as they are harboring illegal aliens.”

At that time, Homam was responding to California’s new law that gives added protections to illegal immigrants across the entire state and blocks federal immigration authorities from doing their job.

The move to criminally charge elected officials of sanctuary cities would be an escalation of already heated tensions between immigration doves and the Trump administration.

The White House is in an ongoing courtroom battle to defund sanctuary cities, with Attorney General Jeff Sessions actively trying to withhold criminal justice from localities that refuse to work with federal immigration agents.

The escalation is also due to high-profile crimes committed by immigrants residing in the U.S. — crimes that immigration hardliners argue would never have happened if sanctuary policies were not in place.

Some have even said sanctuary leaders should be held responsible for heinous crimes committed by illegal immigrants.

“Politicians don’t get to pick and choose what laws to comply with,” Rep. Todd Rokita told Fox News last month. “Americans are dying because politicians sworn to uphold the law refuse to do so.”

Rokita, a Republican congressman from Indiana who is running for U.S. Senate this year, introduced legislation that threatens elected leaders in sanctuary cities with prison time and fines.
Rokita’s bill comes in the aftermath of the Kate Steinle verdict, in which an illegal immigrant, who had already been deported to Mexico five times, was acquitted for the 2015 killing of Steinle in San Francisco, a sanctuary city.

It goes without saying that any elected official that is stopping illegals from being deported should be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law, but there is another way to get rid of these criminals once for all. If states cut off all welfare to illegal immigrants and those that are have been on it for more then one year, you can be sure the issue will rectify itself within a matter of months.

The only reason these people are here and continue to come here is for all of the “free” benefits they receive, but if that were to end, these “immigrants” would head right back to where ever they came from with no problem.

However, until government officials grow a spine and take drastic action against these criminals harboring illegals, this is the next best thing. Hopefully, this will wake enough of these bleeding hearts up to realize they are breaking the law and only doing more harm to the country than good.

What do you think? Will this stop these states from harboring illegals in their cities?

FOLLOW us on Facebook at Freedom Daily!
Continue Reading


BREAKING NEWS!! Shocking Announcement About Flu Vaccine!



Ronald Regan is credited with having said that the 9 most terrifying words in the English language are “I’m from the government and I’m here to help” (it’s 9, stop counting). In other words; the government has a very specific purpose, and it’s not to interfere with our lives unless certain circumstances require it. This is something that many in government don’t seem to understand, and the situation gets even messier when businesses start putting the thumbscrews to certain government agencies to look after their own interests and bottom line.

When that happens, the government’s already tenuous grip on where their influences should begin and end seems to get even more shakey. It’s widely accepted that this is the case with the FDA and it’s acceptance and encouragement of any and every vaccine that big drug companies crank out as something that the American people need. Many have doubts and fears about some of the new vaccines being touted as the biggest advancements in health for the human race in the past millennia.

This is an especially troubling issue where it concerns the flu vaccine. Not only are the drug companies who have the government in their substantial back pockets just guessing what strain of flu will affect us this year, but there is virtually no accountability if they get it wrong. Top that off with the fact that if someone works in the healthcare industry, they are usually required to get the shot (that may or may not work) in order to keep their jobs.

All of that would probably be acceptable if the shots were: a) proven to work most of the time, and not proven to cause a serious decrease in overall health. However, recent information, even from former proponents of the flu vaccine, contradict that. Multiple news agencies, including InfoWars  have been reporting that the same states who have the highest numbers of flu vaccination are also the states with the biggest decline in health and wellness, overall:

“In a Daily Beast opinion piece on December 15, Paul Offit—one of the vaccine industry’s most strident ambassadors—puzzles over a seeming contradiction.

How, Offit wonders, could the state of Mississippi, which has ‘the worst overall health in the nation,’ have used standout efficiency” to achieve over 99.4% vaccine coverage in kindergartners? Rather than seriously investigate this apparent enigma, Offit presents his ready-made answer and reveals his article’s true purpose. According to Paul Offit, Mississippi’s high vaccination rates are due to the state’s 1979 decision to make the government—rather than parents—the primary vaccine decision-maker for children.

Reflecting on the Mississippi Supreme Court’s 1979 elimination of that state’s religious exemption to vaccination, Offit applauds the Court’s position, stating, “If a parent harbors a religious belief that contradicts a basic tenant [sic] of modern medicine…the state has a right to protect the child from the irresponsible acts of the parent.” Offit—though a parent himself—tells readers that the state-determined “duty” to vaccinate supersedes other parental rights. In short, Offit appears to believe that coercion is the name of the game, openly admitting that he disapproves of the 47 states that still allow parents in the U.S. to take religious, moral or personal beliefs into account when making vaccine decisions on behalf of their children.

‘The worst health in the nation’

According to the comprehensive state-by-state health rankings that Offit cites, Mississippi has remained squarely at the bottom of the nation’s overall health rankings for decades (Figure 1). The low ranking correlates, in part, with the state’s poverty statistics: one-third of Mississippi’s children live in poverty (the highest percentage of any state), and 87% of the state’s Medicaid enrollees are children. But from birth on, scattered health statistics suggest that Mississippi’s children and adolescents face other physical and mental health challenges as well. To cite some examples from the available data:

  • Mississippi’s infant mortality rate is more than twice as high (8.8 deaths per thousand live births) as New Hampshire’s (4.2 per 1000), which is the U.S. state with the highest health ranking. The percentage of low birthweight babies in Mississippi is also high—11.4% versus 6.9% in New Hampshire.
  • Asthma-related emergency department visits and hospital discharges are higher for children ages 0-4 than for any other pediatric or adult age group.
  • The obesity rate for Mississippi high school students (18.9%) is significantly higher than the national average (13.9%) and has been increasing steadily since 2001.
  • A study that examined Medicaid recipients in Mississippi who received services related to autism spectrum disorder (ASD) in 2007 found that 88% were age 21 or younger (1170/1330). Most young Medicaid recipients with ASD were on psychotropic medications (62% of 10-and-under children and 75% of youth in the 11-21 age group). On average, over the one-year study period, each young Medicaid recipient with ASD had twelve (< 10 years old) to sixteen (ages 11-21) psychotropic drug claims.
  • Mississippi’s high school students are significantly more likely than the nation’s high schoolers to attempt suicide (12.7% versus 8.6%), and the percentage has doubled since 2001. The percentage of Mississippi students making a suicide plan has increased by 45% since 2011.

Avoiding the obvious question

Despite juxtaposing two critical pieces of health information about Mississippi’s children—high vaccine coverage and poor health rankings—Offit does not ask the obvious elephant-in-the-room question: Could one have something to do with the other? Clearly, factors such as poverty and nutrition are one set of influences on health status, but vaccines—potent immune-system-stimulating medical interventions administered repeatedly, both prenatally and from birth—must be considered as another influence. Mississippi’s medical practitioners and Offit are shirking their ethical responsibilities by denying vaccines’ ability to trigger adverse health outcomes, including death.

Researchers who are less disingenuous than Offit have plausibly linked many of the above-listed health conditions (asthmaobesity, ASD and other neurodevelopmental disorders and infant mortality) to vaccines. ASD, in turn, has been associated with disrupted circadian rhythms, which appear to be linked to increased risk of suicide attempts in adolescents also have reported suicide as an outcome of devastating HPV vaccine damage. None of these associations should come as a surprise, given that vaccines intentionally tamper with normal immune system functioning and also contain unsafe aluminum adjuvants and/or other toxic ingredients such as thimerosal and formaldehyde.”

Vaccines are a huge hot-button issue, and whether you believe that any of those things really could happen to anyone who receives these shots, there is certainly enough evidence to make it worth some doubt and research.

No parent should ever fear that their child will be taken away if they’re unsure about a medical treatment. At a minimum, it should be up to an individual, or their parent, to choose whether to take the risks involved in the preventative treatment.

FOLLOW us on Facebook at Freedom Daily!

Continue Reading

Latest Articles