Please disable your Ad Blocker to better interact with this website.

Connect with us

Crime

MEDIA SILENT: Obama Illegal Alien Had Sex With Dead Child; Claims It’s Not a Crime

Published

on

via BREITBART: An illegal migrant who was convicted in Wisconsin of sexually molesting the body of a dead girl is seeking to have his conviction on sexual violence charges overturned, by claiming that a dead body can’t be sexually assaulted because it cannot be forced or coerced into a sex act.

The vibrantly diverse migrant, Eusebio Varible-Gaspar, was convicted in Wisconsin of a violent sexual act as well as entering the country illegally, and was given a 57-month sentence.

His lawyers have now filed a motion to have the conviction reversed because, they say, a corpse can’t be raped or sexually abused.

The trial court disagreed with that claim and held that Varible-Gaspar committed an act of sexual violence by having sex with the dead body.

It is this decision that Varible-Gaspar wants to have appealed, so on January 15 he filed this claim:

Varible-Gaspar argues that the district court erred in applying the 16-level enhancement for a crime of violence… He contends that his Wisconsin conviction for first degree sexual assault of a child does not qualify as a crime of violence or as an aggravated felony… because the offense does not fall within the generic, contemporary meaning of sexual abuse of a minor. Varible-Gaspar asserts that an individual may be guilty of the Wisconsin offense if the offender had sexual contact or sexual intercourse with a corpse. For the first time on appeal, Varible-Gaspar argues that the conviction does not qualify as a forcible sex offense because a corpse cannot be forced or coerced into sex.

Oddly, as the Center for Immigration Studies notes, this isn’t the only case where migrants might benefit from someone else being dead.

Obama’s DHS is seeking a change in rules that would aid illegals entering the country to have their status legalized if their return “would have” harmed someone they left behind–even if that someone is already dead.

As CIS puts it, with “a proposed set of DHS regulations, the government is taking the position that an otherwise illegal alien can successfully secure a waiver of his illegal status if his deportation would have caused an extreme hardship to a citizen (a one-time spouse)–even in cases where the citizen involved is dead.”

Crime

Madwoman Maxine Waters Tells Crowd She’s Ready To Kill Trump Herself – Look What Happened Seconds Later

Bad boys, bad boys, whatcha gonna do?

Published

on

No matter what your political affiliation, we should be able to all agree that we need some sort of law and order. Without it, we’re anarchist ascribing to a “might makes right” system of government that is bound for failure. If you don’t believe that, just ask yourself when was the last time you found yourself in a room where the loudest and toughest person was also the wisest and most thoughtful.

Because human nature is what it is, even in a country where we value the right to defend ourselves, we also can’t just take people out because we don’t like them, and we certainly can’t dismantle a fairly elected government because we personally don’t agree with it.

That concept seems to be lost on some of the Democratic representatives who warm the seats of Congress these days. They are circulating the kind of extremist rhetoric that causes unrest among those who already had questionable moral foundations, and it’s verging on illegal.

The worst offender is, of course, Maxine Waters, whose recent speech was more than objectionable, railing against the President. America’s Freedom Fighters reports that her statements were at best, crossing over into threatening.

While this might seem like a clear reason to distance yourself from a political figure, apparently the good people of New York think that Waters is right on track, considering the thunderous applause:

“During an appearance at the Ali Forney Center gala in New York City, Congresswoman and ‘impeachment minstrel’ Maxine Waters promised a roaring crowd that she would “take out” the president that very night – a statement that has left many wondering if this was a direct threat on President Trump’s life or whether it was some sort of sick joke. (especially in the wake of Rep. Steve Scalise being shot by a liberal).

Waters made the promise to the group, which benefits homeless LGBTQ youth, amid the backdrop of violence against conservatives and the mainstream media literally picking apart every single thing Trump says or does for any hint of something to attack him over. Its safe to assume they won’t be doing the same after Waters disgusting remarks.

‘I’m sitting here listening, watching, absorbing, thinking about Ali even though I never met him. And with this kind of inspiration, I will go and take out Trump tonight,’ Waters stunningly said.”

This stunningly direct video was, according to report in The American Mirrortaken down once, and has been replaced just days ago. It’s easy to see why, since a high ranking Democratic Congresswoman who supposedly represents millions of Americans’ sentiments, is talking as if she plans to harm the President of the United States.

While it’s debatable that Waters actually does represent as many Americans as she would like to think, it’s downright despicable that she’s able to speak so openly against a sitting president without retribution.

Omar Navarro, a Republican who is running against Waters in next year’s congressional elections, called for her arrest in a post he made to Twitter.

Navarro went on saying,

“Secret Service should call for Maxine Waters immediate resignation after these comments. We don’t need lip service.”

Waters, unfortunately, wasn’t alone in her violently charged rhetoric, either. Democratic Chairman Tom Perez piled on, calling the President “dangerous”:

“’We have the most dangerous president in American history and one of the most reactionary Congresses in American history,’ Democratic Chairman Tom Perez said during his speech.

Perez also labeled Trump an ‘existential threat’ with no apparent worry that his words could be taken, along with those by Waters and other liberals in the media, as ammunition for a crazy leftist to once again attack Congress or even the White House.

Perez’s comments come as he reorganizes the DNC to better serve establishment candidates, pushing out several prominent Bernie Sanders supporters while pretending the shuffle was about diversity when in reality it was a transparent move to make sure he can control who the party supports for president in 2020.

Going back to liberals seemingly embracing violent rhetoric against the president, it is important to keep in mind that the mainstream media themselves are also directly complicit in this move towards violence as they have either contributed to the vicious rhetoric or refused to call out those that have.” 

These comments are more than just troubling, they’re cause for action by the Secret Service. It’s up to law enforcement to show those who outrageously support people like Waters that these crimes against the President aren’t something we should be clapping about.

Waters seemed to take their applause as the green light to turn every speech that she makes into a political impeachment rally. Just two days after the gala, Waters made these comments at a benefit:

“We face unprecedented challenges today in our struggle against HIV and AIDS and I want you to know those people in Congress on the opposite side of the aisle from me control every branch of our federal government,” Waters said. “And we have, unfortunately, an unstable, erratic person in the White House.”

“We don’t know what this president will do, or say, or tweet from one day to the next. Don’t forget, this is not a political event, but I’m heading toward impeachment.”

She does know that it’s not a political event, but any day she gets to jab the President or rally support for her unprecedented impeachment campaign, is a good day for Waters, apparently.

It’s time that the American people take back their seats in Congress and elect politicians who will uphold the law instead of playing fast and loose with it.

[H/T: America’s Freedom Fighters]

Share if you think Maxine Waters should be removed from office! 

FOLLOW us on Facebook at Freedom Daily!

Continue Reading

Crime

Look What Just Happened To Major Show Host After Exposing D.C.’s SICK Pedophile Ring

This is disgusting!

Published

on

It was not that long ago that WikiLeaks dropped the Podesta emails that depicted pedophilia in our very own government. Of course, the mainstream media has done its best to sweep this disgusting crime under the rug. However, there are those out there who determined to root out these perverts. President Trump is one of those people, who announced that he would investigate the elite pedophile scandal, and another is Dr. Phil.

Dr. Phil recently interviewed a former sex slave by the name of “Kendall” and pushed the topic of elite pedophilia into the mainstream. The account that “Kendall” told millions of people was truly horrific, but Dr. Phil paid a price for telling the truth.

One day after this heinous report aired, a Dutch media company pulled the plug on the Dr. Phil show ending their 15-year partnership. The timing of this happening could not be more suspicious considering the topic that was discussed.

Also, what needs to be considered is the Netherlands history with pedophilia. In 2013, a Dutch court ruled that an abhorrent organization that promotes the legalization of sex between adults and children has the right to continue to promote it.

Then the organization’s founder, Marthijn Uitenboogaard, went on record, saying that society is too overprotective of children.

“A child can see a lot of violence on television, on every cartoon, there’s violence, on movies people get killed,” he explains, “But when Janet Jackson’s breast is shown at the Super Bowl people say: ‘Oh children are watching this.’ Nakedness and everything concerning sexuality is a taboo and violence is the norm. And I think that should be the other way around.” He further believes “almost everyone has pedophile feelings in them. Only the percentage is different, some have more than others.”

Besides that commentary, there have been many high ranking politicians in the Dutch government exposed as pedophiles. Also, recent reports show that worldwide child trafficking is on the rise according to recent statistics from (UNODC) United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime.

It is entirely possible that the Dutch television station desired different programming which is why they canceled the show. However, is it also possible that this was retaliation for reporting on rampant pedophilia rings around the world?

Or this could be just another example of how far these sick individuals will go to keep their depraved secret hidden.

H/T [ The Free Thought Project, InfoWars ]

FOLLOW us on Facebook at Freedom Daily!

Continue Reading

Crime

El Chapo’s Cash Won’t Be Used On Trump’s Wall So Look Who Showed Up With $21 Bil For It Overnight

Published

on

President Donald Trump was recently presented with an incredible surprise of who could be paying for one of his most important and expensive campaign promises when Texas Senator Ted Cruz proposed a bill to use $14 billion seized from notorious drug lord Joaquin ‘El Chapo’ Guzman. The ingenious and perfectly ironic funding source for this important safety feature was met with as many road blocks as the idea for the wall itself. As quickly as that idea was shot down, a surprise financier showed up overnight with the approximately $21 billion needed to foot the bill and you won’t believe where it came from.

The only thing that’s been holding America’s safety and security back is the ability to fund the 40-foot tall wall that’s expected to stretch approximately 1,000 miles along the U.S. – Mexico border. Although the lengthy construction process is already underway, it could be finished much quicker than originally thought after having solved one of the biggest challenges it has faced to date.

“Building ‘a big, beautiful wall’ on the Southern border was Trump’s signature promise during his campaign, winning him support from advocates for hard-line immigration reform,” Politifact reported.

Original estimates for the cost of this project came in at $12 to $15 billion, however, Bernstein Research, who calculates total building cost believes it could actually come in somewhere around $15 billion to $25 billion. The Department of Homeland Security agrees, estimating a specific $21.6 billion price tag for this massive project, according to Politifact. While that total is in excess of the $14 billion taken from El Chapo upon his arrest, the financing problem could soon be solved if Alabama Senator Luther Strange gets his way.

Strange went on Fox News’ Tucker Carlson to discuss his idea of where this much-needed wad of cash could come from right now, and it’s as ironic as using drug money to pay for it. Those who want immigrants in this country don’t seem to have an issue with paying for them to be here, so they should be okay with footing the bill to keep them in their country.

Strange explained to Tucker that the funds should come directly from so-called Sanctuary Cities who don’t follow the law. In essence, this would be a fine for going against the President, not cooperating with local police, refusing to turn immigrants in, and worst of all, actually preventing people from fairly bidding on the border wall. Sanctuary cities like San Francisco, California punish their citizens for participating in bidding on the construction of the wall by banning them from doing any other work in the city. This is not a democracy, it’s a dictatorship decided by liberals and since they aren’t stopping, Strange wants them to pay for the wall that’s already written into law.

The Senator’s simple solution is that cities who refuse to comply with the nation’s law aren’t going to get the money that they expect from the government because it’s going to go to building the wall. It makes perfect sense to not reward bad behavior with cash that could be used to ensure the rule of law which our nation is built on. Sanctuary Cities don’t make their own rules and can’t expect other people to pay for it when it goes against what the president has already set. Rather than defunding these defiant cities, divert the funding and let their laws be the country’s gain.

Along this same line of logic that Strange presented, costs of this wall could also be met it America stopped or slowed the flow of funding to Mexico. It only makes sense to use the money being sent over the border for the barrier between us since we’re also trying to block Mexican citizens from entering America illegally.

This isn’t about keeping good people out and prevent people from wanting to seek a better life and the American dream, it’s only about preventing those from entering the wrong way and wreaking havoc, compromising citizen’s safety, and sapping off our resources. If it’s important to become a law-abiding American citizen and reap the rewards of living in this country, there’s an immigration to follow to prove those intentions.

The next best thing to using a drug lord’s seized money earned from abusing our border is to make Sanctuary Cities pay for it. They can’t make their own laws to harm people and force other people to pay for it too.

Continue Reading

Latest Articles

Trending