Please disable your Ad Blocker to better interact with this website.

Connect with us


Melania Just Got Unexpected ‘Gift’ From Muslims In Saudi Arabia Who Noticed Something Different About Her

Michelle Obama never got This!



Melania Trump has always been the complimenting piece to the Trump puzzle. While many of the Trumps have their own respective niches — as does Melania — she always seems to make time to help them with their projects, too. She’s supportive and brings a strong sense of class back to the White House that has been missing for many years.

The first family is currently on their first international tour where they are making stops in various countries to discuss business, jobs, and ways to work together that allow both countries to mutually benefit. President Trump gave a keynote speech at the Arab Islamic American Summit in Saudi Arabia, where he made it clear that terrorist organizations should fear what is coming for them, that other nations in the Middle East need to step-up and finally start helping with the fight against terrorism, and he called out Iran and Syria as the guilty parties of global terrorism.

Melania, however, is also generating a lot of buzz from the Arab News Media as being a much better first lady than Hillary Clinton and Michelle Obama ever were. Melania is not only receiving compliments about her beauty and modest nature, but also how polite she is.

As reported by Arab News:

“The first lady’s decision to visit Saudi Arabia without a wearing a head covering prompted headlines across the globe on Saturday — but many in the Kingdom took to social media to comment on her classy and conservative look.

Melania Trump landed in the Saudi capital of Riyadh wearing a Stella McCartney jumpsuit adorned with a statement belt, which was the most eye-catching feature of the all-black overall.

The stretch cady jumpsuit — with wide-leg silhouette, keyhole cut-out at the bust, and cuffed sleeves — caught the attention of many international media outlets and was admired by Saudis who appreciated the modest, yet classy look of the first lady.
“Melania Trump before leaving the United States vs. Melania while landing in Saudi Arabia. Respect for the country’s traditions,” one Twitter user said with a thumbs-up. “Not only modest, but elegant at the same time.”

The Arab News paper was highlighting what many of already knew. When former first lady’s like Hillary Clinton and Michelle Obama visited, they never generated as much attention — in a positive way — like Melania was able to capture.

The country was able to see beyond Melania’s beauty and into the fact that she was very intelligent, classy, modest, and was appreciative of the opportunity to be in another country aiming to bring more positive news back to the United States. Melania understands that she is just as important to our country and the president is, and we need both of them to continue to work for us every single day to make the lives of all Americans better.

Melania also received widespread support when both she and Ivanka Trump refused to wear a headscarf in the Muslim nation, breaking away from both Hillary and Michelle cowering and wearing one on their trips.

Russia Today reported:

America’s first lady has not been “ordered” to dress conservatively in Saudi Arabia, the country chosen by her husband as his first official overseas destination. Along with meetings on the US president’s itinerary, there will also reportedly be time for entertainment in the lavish Arab kingdom.

While the choice of the first country to be visited by Trump as America’s 45th president has been widely discussed in the media, a question has arisen whether there is a chance to see the US president’s wife covered in a traditionally strict Muslim attire.

Women in Saudi Arabia, including foreign visitors, are typically expected to wear a floor length dress – abaya, and a head scarf. However, when asked whether the US first lady would have to dress accordingly, a Saudi Arabia official said Riyadh “usually doesn’t demand” a specific dress-code, but rather “accepts suggestions.”

“We welcome any style in clothing,” Saudi Arabia’s Foreign Minister, Adel bin Ahmed Al-Jubeir told the media on Thursday, as cited by RIA Novosti.

Islamic culture is one that suppresses women, forces them to attend to all of their husband’s needs, and that is not something the Trump’s were going to cower to. Other countries are free to do whatever they please, but it is nice knowing that this First Family won’t allow Islam to dictate how they dress or what they are allowed to wear in other countries.

In the United States, we have our own culture — we allow for freedom of expression. Allowing another country to take that away from us, especially our First Family, would be a disgrace.

Kudos to Melania and Ivanka Trump for standing up to the oppressive culture and daring to showcase freedom, boldness, and toughness while acting on before of the United States of America!

FOLLOW us on Facebook at Freedom Daily!

Join the conversation

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse.


BREAKING!!! Trump Just Announced a HUGE Surprise!!




President Trump has done more than any president in recent history to keep the promises that he made while on the campaign trail. That’s because he’s a real man of his word who made grand promises. Those promises are necessary changes that needed to be made to make America great again. That means that everything he promised was common sense and implementable.

Everything from securing the border to bringing manufacturing jobs back to the United States is just a sample of the issues that Americans want to be fixed. Americans want Trump to support these problems because it makes our lives better. Not the lives of illegals, not the lives of administrators at the UN, the lives of middle-class Americans who voted him into office.

That means that every project that the President funds, he has to answer to those whose tax dollars are dearly given. He’s not catering to the super-rich or the extremely poor who live on welfare; he’s working for those who run a small business or work 9-5 for 40+ years and retire if they’re able to. Of course, retirement depends on social security. Those are the people who depend on the government to do its job and nothing less. That’s why the President’s new infrastructure plan is such a welcome announcement. The Washington Free Beacon reports how Trump will divide the $200 billion:

“WASHINGTON (Reuters) – The Trump administration is finalizing its long-awaited infrastructure plan, which would push most of the financing of projects to private investment and state and local taxpayers, according to sources familiar with the proposal taking shape.

President Donald Trump, who spoke frequently of improving U.S. infrastructure during his 2016 campaign, may preview the plan in his Jan. 30 State of the Union address, but details are not expected until afterward, the sources said.

Two people briefed on it said it would likely recommend dividing $200 billion in federal funding over 10 years into four pools of funds. The administration is structuring the plan to encourage $1.35 trillion in state, local and private financing to build and repair the nation’s bridges, highways, waterworks and other infrastructure, one source said.

The numbers in the Trump plan are still in flux and could change before he unveils it. The prospects of winning approval in Congress are uncertain given that Republicans have only a 51-49 majority in the Senate.

Many Republicans want to use private-sector investment to finance infrastructure projects to avoid increasing the national debt. Democrats believe that government money is necessary to produce such a large package.”

This is an excellent move on the part of successful business owner Donald Trump. He understands what it takes for the private sector to want to invest in a national project like this. If the government can defer some of the cost now, then it will make a stronger budget in the future.

“Under the Trump plan being shaped, the largest share of the federal money – $100 billion – is expected to go toward cost-sharing projects with local governments, similar to grants.

The goal would be to reduce the ratio of federal funding, which often now is 80 percent, by awarding funds only to projects that are able to provide more local funding or leverage private investment, said a business lobbyist familiar with the discussion.

Some $50 billion would be earmarked for rural projects, the lobbyist said. Those funds would help governors on projects like roads, broadband access and replacing aging lead pipes. Including a pool for rural infrastructure could also reduce concerns among some Republican senators who fear rural areas may be unable to attract private investments.

Twenty-five billion dollars would go toward existing federal infrastructure loan programs that seek to spur private investment, the lobbyist said.

The final $25 billion would be designated for so-called transformative projects – an effort being dubbed ‘American Spirit’ projects. They could include high-speed trains or the Gateway Tunnel, the stalled proposal to build a new rail connection between New York City and New Jersey.

The plan may not deliver any additional federal money than in years past. The proposal could take $200 billion from existing spending plans – although the administration has not yet committed to whether it would come from existing programs or whether the money would be found elsewhere.

The administration is unlikely to rule out any forms of funding – including increasing the federal gas tax or creating a vehicle mileage tax, which would put electric cars that now use the roads but do not consume much gasoline on the same footing as cars with internal combustion engines, sources said.

Donohue, the Chamber of Commerce president, is also expected to recommend expanding the ability of states to access private investment funds to complete projects, reducing the federal permitting process and addressing state and local permitting rules.

He will call for more federally backed workforce training – including creating an apprenticeship task force. As part of that, Donohue will reiterate the Chamber’s call for passing comprehensive immigration reform, a proposal where business has been at odds with the Trump administration.”

One of the great things about President Trump is that he understands what the government is supposed to be doing. They have a very select few jobs, including defending us and keeping the roadways safe. Focusing on those jobs and not on expanding the power of the government is a welcome reprieve from the previous leadership in the White House. It appears as though the last resident of the White House was growing monster in Washington. Trump’s plans are what will make America great. Those ideas must include small government with great accountability.

FOLLOW us on Facebook at Freedom Daily!

Continue Reading


BREAKING! Trump Was Misdiagnosed! Whose Side Is The Doc On? FIRE HIM!!




The mainstream media spends a lot of time and money trying to convince us that something is wrong with President Trump. They first tried saying that something was wrong with his family and morals, but that didn’t stick. Then they decided to say that something was wrong with the way he won the election, but after a year of pounding the Russian drum, still, nothing has been found. Now that Trump’s family and presidency seem safe, the leftist mainstream media has tried to convince the nation that something is wrong with the man himself.

If you’re wondering why the media spares no expense to make the President seem like he’s somehow unfit for office, then think of it as their shady long-term investment. If they can keep Democrats in power, then that ensures big government, which ensures that their propaganda will be perpetuated and their viewership and advertising dollars will keep rolling in. That’s all this is to them. It’s a money grab, and the mainstream media doesn’t seem to care about anything else but the dollar signs.

To perpetuate the idea that President Trump will drop dead of a health problem any day now, and that the nation will plunge into turmoil, they have to fabricate commentary on the results of his physical so that they can freak out the country. The Gateway Pundit reports that CNN is leading the charge in this particular campaign, and they act like the President will have a heart attack in the next 3-5 years:

“On Tuesday White House Dr. Ronny Jackson delivered President Trump’s medical results to anxious left-wing reporters in the White House press room.

Medical correspondent Sanjay Gupta told the CNN audience that based on the president’s calcium scores President Trump CNN predicted the president will have a ‘heart attack or heart disease’ in ‘3-5 years.’

Gupta said Trump has heart disease based on his test results.”

You’ve heard the saying “figures don’t lie, but liars can figure?” That seems to be happening here. Not only are we dealing with the opinion of a biased “expert”, but the numbers can be interoperated to say basically anything someone wants them to. Since you could hear in the clip above, that the anchor was clearly rooting for the bad news, here’s the opinion of another expert:

“Dr. Andrew Bostom also looked at the president’s test results and calcium levels.

According to Dr. Bostom President Trump’s calcium level is BELOW THE MEDIAN level.”

As Freedom Daily reported on Wednesday, the doctor that actually administered the physical which produced these much-debated results, and the only one to reasonably give the diagnosis, isn’t concerned with the President’s health at all.

“Jackson, who has served as the presidential physician since 2013, on Tuesday gave Trump a clean bill of health, declaring him physically and mentally fit for office.

He said that Trump’s “overall health is excellent,” adding that the president had mostly normal results on several tests of his cholesterol and heart health.

‘His cardiac performance during his physical exam was very good, he continues to enjoy the significant, long-term cardiac and overall health benefits that come from a lifetime of abstinence from tobacco and alcohol,’ Jackson said.’

So, apparently he’s in better than average health for someone his age (which, by the way, is very close to the age of the liberal darling, Hillary, that they wanted in office) and it’s being attributed to his personal choice to not take part in drinking or smoking.”

This seems to just be the latest ploy in the national effort to make sure that no one trusts the President. The problem that the media is having is that they started this campaign with an extremely tarnished reputation. The tiff between the President and the “fake news media” has gotten national attention, and it’s well known by now that there is bad blood. Because of that, people really aren’t buying what CNN is selling.

Here are just a few of the comments being made by readers when they heard about CNN’s attempt at smearing the results of the President’s physical:

“more liberal bull!! they were pathetic yesterday trying to dig ANYTHING up on our Pres!!”

“This is only a lay speculation, but I suspect Dr. Sanjay Gupta has excess calcium in vessels leading to the brain.”

“We can’t trust anything else that comes from the Communist News Network, why on earth would we give any credence to Gupta? Maybe we should get Dr. Oz and Marcus Welby to weigh in on this one as well.”

“What a talent Gupta has. He can also see under womens‘ clothing just with his eyes half closed. And, he sees constellations millions of light years away from Earth. Someone should buy him a beer.” 

“I am surprised they have not found something racist about his health but give them time.”

When it comes to the mainstream media, we as Americans have had to adopt the motto “believe nothing that you hear and only half of what you see.” It’s sad that it’s come to that, but after as many lies as we’ve been told, there’s not much else to be done.

Read the full White House report on Donald Trump’s health.

FOLLOW us on Facebook at Freedom Daily!

Continue Reading


BREAKING News From Alabama!! Judge Just Upheld It!!! RIOTS Are Around The Corner!




Earlier this week United States District Judge L. Scott Coogler rejected arguments by pro-illegal immigration and civil rights groups that asking for a photo ID to vote is racially discriminatory and racist. They made the argument that this requirement would deny equal protection under the law and that it violates the Voting Rights Act.

This is what “Make America Great Again” is all about. Last week a federal judge threw out a lawsuit which challenged the constitutionality of Alabama’s new voter ID law. The plaintiffs argued the typical talking points that requiring an I.D. puts an undue burden on minorities. In part because the state had curtailed driver’s license operations in several majority black counties. But Judge Coogler agreed with the state’s argument that it had important “regulatory interests” in passing the law. And that it was not intended to disenfranchise black or minority voters. The state said the law was part of a national trend to combat voter fraud, increase voter confidence and modernize elections.

Via The Federalist:

“Voter Fraud Is Real. Here’s The Proof
Data suggests millions of voter registrations are fraudulent or invalid. That’s enough to tip an election, easily.

This week, liberals have been repeating their frequent claim that voter fraud doesn’t exist. A recent Salon article argues that “voter fraud just isn’t a problem in Pennsylvania,” despite evidence to the contrary. Another article argues that voter fraud is entirely in the imagination of those who use voter ID laws to deny minorities the right to vote.

Yet as the election approaches, more and more cases of voter fraud are beginning to surface. In Colorado, multiple instances were found of dead people attempting to vote. Stunningly, “a woman named Sara Sosa who died in 2009 cast ballots in 2010, 2011, 2012 and 2013.” In Virginia, it was found that nearly 20 voter applications were turned in under the names of dead people.

In Texas, authorities are investigating criminals who are using the technique of “vote harvesting” to illegally procure votes for their candidates. “Harvesting” is the practice of illegally obtaining the signatures of valid voters in order to vote in their name without their consent for the candidate(s) the criminal supports.

These are just some instances of voter fraud we know about. It would be silly to assume cases that have been discovered are the only cases of fraud. Indeed according to a Pew Charitable Trust report from February 2012, one in eight voter registrations are “significantly inaccurate or no longer valid.” Since there are 146 million Americans registered to vote, this translates to a stunning 18 million invalid voter registrations on the books. Further, “More than 1.8 million deceased individuals are listed as voters, and approximately 2.75 million people have registrations in more than one state.” Numbers of this scale obviously provide ripe opportunity for fraud.

Don’t Let Data Contradict My Narrative
Yet in spite of all this, a report by the Brennan Center at New York University claims voter fraud is a myth. It argues that North Carolina, which passed comprehensive measures to prevent voter fraud, “failed to identify even a single individual who has ever been charged with committing in-person voter fraud in North Carolina.” However, this faulty reasoning does not point to the lack of in-person voter fraud, but rather to lack of enforcement mechanisms to identify and prosecute in-person voter fraud.

The science of criminal justice tells us that many crimes go unreported, and the more “victimless” the crime, the more this happens. The fact is, a person attempting to commit voter fraud is very unlikely to be caught, which increases the incentive to commit the crime.

The National Crime Victimization Survey (NCVS) is a sophisticated, comprehensive effort to catalog “the number and types of crimes not reported to law enforcement authorities.” However, it tends to deal mostly in violent crimes. As complex as the NCVS is, gathering accurate data for unreported victimless crimes such as voter fraud is even harder, since 1) outside of the criminal, no one may know a crime has taken place, and 2) there is no direct victim to report the crime in the first place. Yet we are expected to believe that, unlike violent crime, voter fraud is limited only to the cases that are actually reported and prosecuted? This is a senseless position.

Further, the Brennan Center report argues that because prosecutor Kris Kobach’s review of 84 million votes cast in 22 states found only 14 instances of fraud referred for prosecution (which amounts to a 0.00000017 percent fraud rate), voter fraud is so statistically small that it’s a non-issue. Let’s follow this logic. Does the fact that 109 people were cited for jaywalking in Seattle in 2009 mean that only 109 people jaywalked in Seattle that year? Does the fact that 103,733 people were cited for driving without a seatbelt in Tennessee in 2015 mean that only that many people were driving without seatbelt in Tennessee in 2015?

Absolutely not. This can be proven easily because in 2014, the previous year, only 29,470 people were cited. The disparity is largely due to increased enforcement efforts in 2015. In other words, increasing enforcement of the crime revealed a much larger number of people committing the crime.

The exact same is true for voter fraud. We have no reason to believe that the low number of prosecutions means only that exact amount of voter fraud is happening. Rather, it could mean a lack of enforcement is failing to reveal the bulk of the violations that are occurring.

In the decision, Coogler states he discovered that even though Black and Latino registered voters are almost twice as likely as white voters to lack an acceptable photo ID, the state is making it extremely easy to get an ID and no one is preventing anyone from voting…”

Why do people in relatively less developed countries make residents get a voter ID card, but liberals in America try convincing us that minorities are unable to? It sounds like it could be very far-fetched.

Please share if you agree with Judge Coogler.

FOLLOW us on Facebook at Freedom Daily!

Continue Reading

Latest Articles

Subscribe to our newsletter

Become An Insider! Sign up for our free email newsletter, and we'll make sure to keep you in the loop on the top breaking news of the day.