Please disable your Ad Blocker to better interact with this website.

Connect with us


Michelle Obama “Encourages” College Graduates With “America Is Racist” Speech (VIDEO)



Michelle Obama addressed the graduates of Jackson State University, a historically black college in Mississippi, and capitalized on her audience by reminding them that racism is alive and well in America… because that’s encouraging to everyone’s futures, I guess.

This is par for the course, though, as her other commencement speeches are racially charged and very political, as well. But a lot of her speech this time was dedicated to defending her husband. As the Obama family approaches the end of their time at the White House, the president has been consumed with leaving behind a sterling legacy and frankly, he needs all the help he can get. And his wife went to bat for him:

“We all know that empathy, that preparation, that moral compass, that relentless work ethic has led to so much progress over the past seven years. We’ve gone from the brink of another Great Depression in this country to our businesses creating more than 14 million new jobs. Our unemployment rate has been cut in half. Our deficits are down by two-thirds. Our high school graduation rates are the highest on record. Over 20 million more people now have health insurance. And people in this country are finally free to marry the person they love.

Is he running again? Because this sounds like a stump speech!

“And on the global stage, the vast majority of our troops are home today and our country isn’t putting our heads in the sand on climate change. No, we are leading the way to stop it. I could go on and on, but that’s the progress we’ve seen under this president. That’s the kind of change we all hoped was possible eight years ago.”

Now that the hero protagonist has been fully established, it’s time to introduce the evil antagonist: Racist Republicans, at least that’s what she implied:

“We pay endless attention to folks who are blocking action, blocking judges, blocking immigration, blocking a raise in the minimum wage. Just blocking! We are consumed with the anger and vitriol that are bubbling up with folks shouting at each other, using hateful and divisive language. And then there are the countless times when that language gets personal and is directed at my husband; charges that he doesn’t love our country, the time he was called a liar in front of a joint session of Congress. The nonstop questions about his birth certificate and his belief in God!”

How is being the polar opposite politically now mean racist? According to the first lady, it stems from a perceived hatred of the skin color of the first black president by his political opposition:

“Those age-old issues that have always roiled our country. The problems a lot of folks would rather brush under the rug. Those challenges are still with us today. We can’t deny it.”

That’s pretty divisive language coming from someone who just complained about divisive language! Not to mention the fact that President Obama, her husband, has contributed a lot to the racial tension she thinks just “bubbled up” out of nowhere. Does she really think that only Republicans are to blame for polarizing the country?

This isn’t the 1960s, but listening to her speech, you’d think it was:

“No longer can we be barred from a university or hotel or arrested for sitting at the front of the bus, or forced to use a separate bathroom or water fountain because of the color of our skin.”

There you go, graduates, have a great life! Hope you left encouraged!

Via Patheos

“For God and Country—Geronimo, Geronimo, Geronimo……..Geronimo E.K.I.A.” -U.S. Navy SEAL VI

Join the conversation

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse.



She Didn’t Think Anyone Would Find Out But She Was Wrong!



The liberal attacks on President Trump are never-ending. Some believe that Democrats paid off some of the women who accused President Trump of sexual assault in order to tarnish his reputation. While others believe the accusations are valid. However, a recent development on that front has brought into question it all.

Turns out that high profile Hollywood attorney Lisa Bloom was working with alleged victims of the President to try and get them paydays associated with their sexual assault accusations. This all took place during the final months of the election last year. Something that many Trump voters and citizens found suspicious.

On Friday, reporters with the Hill reported that Bloom had been working with campaign donors and media outlets that were tabloids to try and get compensation for the alleged victims as well as a little commission of her own. Her commission was based on her legal services and selling the stories of the alleged victims.

In one case she tried negotiating a six-figure payout for one alleged victim and a mortgage payoff for another. However, after being offered close to $750,000, the alleged victims all backed away and refused to take any more public action.

The reporter who leaked the story had evidence based on emails and text messages they obtained. One of those exchanges were texts between an alleged victim and Bloom where they were referring to a pro-Hillary Clinton political action committee that was involved in what they were doing.

An important variable to mention is that Bloom is the daughter of another famous attorney Gloria Allred who is known for high profile cases many of which include sexual harassment cases perpetrated against women. Four of her clients were women accusing President Trump of sexual harassment. While two went public with the accusations and two declined to do so. Not to mention she represented Kathy Griffith during the faux presidential beheading scandal. Perhaps it’s President Trump she has a problem with.

Fox News reported,

Bloom did not immediately respond to requests for comment from Fox News.
In a statement to The Hill, Bloom acknowledged trying to get her clients paid, but said the payments were to help the women stay safe, and in some cases relocate.

“Donors reached out to my firm directly to help some of the women I represented,” Bloom said. Bloom, who has also represented accused sexual harasser Harvey Weinstein, in addition to women who’ve accusing Bill Cosby and Bill O’Reilly, acknowledged her standard terms require clients to pay her commissions, which may be as high as 33 percent if she sells their stories to media outlets. Bloom told The Hill she had no contact with Clinton or her campaign.

The Hill spoke to makeup artist Jill Harth, who filed a sexual harassment lawsuit against Trump in 1997, accusing him of pushing her up against a wall at his Mar-a-Lago estate and groping her. Although she withdrew the suit, nearly 20 years later, the litigation resurfaced during the presidential campaign and Harth was thrust into the spotlight. She asked Bloom to represent her after Trump denied her accusations.
“I consider myself lucky to have had Lisa Bloom by my side after my old lawsuit resurfaced. She advised me with great competence and compassion,” Harth told The Hill.

Bloom arranged payment from the licensing of some photos Harth had to the news media, and then helped set up a account to raise money for Harth, The Hill reported. “Jill put herself out there, facing off with Donald Trump,” Bloom’s husband wrote in a fund-raising appeal, according to The Hill. “Let’s show her some love”

The effort raised a little over $2,300, according to The Hill. Bloom also reportedly arranged for a Clinton donor to help Harth pay off the mortgage on her Queens apartment. The amount was less than $30,000, according to a source directly familiar with Harth’s situation. Public records show Harth’s mortgage was recorded as extinguished on Dec. 19, 2016, public records show. Trump denies assaulting or harassing women, although an “Access Hollywood” tape surfaced during the campaign in which he boasted he could grab women by their privates and get away with it. Trump dismissed the comments as “locker room talk.””

While it has been over a year since President Trump won his election and the conversation about sexual assault has continued because of the recent accusations against dozens of men and women both in Hollywood and Washington, D.C., the Harvey Weinstein sexual assault scandal created a snowball affect and now so much more has been revealed.

It doesn’t appear to be stopping anytime soon as more and more allegations continue to be made against Congressmen and Senators. The conversation is also changing. People are contemplating this culture of guilty until proven innocent when in reality it should be innocent until proven guilty. And whether or not we all believe these allegations to be true.

Share if you believe people should be innocent until proven guilty!

Comment below on what you think about this conversation surrounding sexual assault and harassment.

FOLLOW us on Facebook at Freedom Daily!

Continue Reading


BOMBSHELL! Hillary Tarmac SECRET Revealed! This is HUGE!!! LOCK THEM UP NOW!!!

They Tried To Hide It But It’s Out Now!



New information is continuing to come out regarding the now infamous Tarmac Meeting between the serial rapist and former President Bill Clinton and the Barack Hussein Obama administration Attorney General Loretta Lynch.

But what is indeed the most alarming part of this whole ordeal is the FBI’s reaction to the leaking of this clandestine meeting to the public. Agency leadership wasn’t even a tab bit concerned about how they should respond the meeting between Lynch and Clinton or how it would look considering Crooked Hillary was at that time under a full investigation by the FBI?

You would think the FBI would be concerned about the optics of this matter, but It will come as a surprise to some, not many at this point after everything we’ve learned in the past few months, that the FBI was actually more concerned about where the leak came from than about what actually went down on that tarmac. All they were concerned about is finding who within the FBI leaked the information about the meeting to the press and making that person pay.

As Katie Pavlich reported at Townhall, the FBI released a series of emails yesterday afternoon where we learn more details about the Department of Justice’s response to the information leak of the now infamous secret meeting between Lynch and Clinton.

The dates on the emails range from July 1-3, 2016. On July 5, 2016, FBI Director James Comey announced former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton would not face criminal charges for mishandling classified information. Interesting dates, don’t you think?

Since the Clintons have always treated the American people like idiots Bill said at the time that he, and Lynch, only spoke only about their grandchildren, but since we know perfectly well the former Attorney General isn’t Bill Clinton’s type, the only possible answer to this tarmac meeting is Bill was trying to get Hillary off the hook.

Via Newsweek:


After news broke about an airport meeting between former Attorney General Loretta Lynch and former President Bill Clinton in the midst of last year’s presidential campaign, the FBI scrambled to identify the source who leaked details about the encounter and discipline him or her, according to emails released on the FBI website on Friday.

The meeting between Lynch and Clinton took place in June 2016, while the FBI was investigating Hillary Clinton’s use of a private email server. Bill Clinton boarded Lynch’s plane while it was on the tarmac at Phoenix’s Sky Harbor International Airport. The following month, then-FBI Director James Comey announced the bureau would not recommend that the Department of Justice pursue charges in the email probe. Comey has testified before Congress that Lynch asked him to refer to the probe as a “matter,” a request that made him feel “queasy.”

Related: What will Loretta Lynch tell Russia investigators?

Keep Up With This Story And More By Subscribing Now

The internal emails show that on June 29, 2016, a senior spokeswoman for the Justice Department emailed her counterparts at the FBI to flag articles that were starting to appear about the meeting. In the email, the spokeswoman, Melanie Newman, described the encounter as “a casual, unscheduled meeting.” She provided talking points, which are redacted in the released version.

That same day, multiple FBI officials sent links about the story to Comey, who responded to one email, “Got it, thanks sir.” Also on those email chains were FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe, whom President Donald Trump and others have accused of a pro-Clinton bias because his wife received money for a political campaign from entities associated with Virginia Governor Terry McAuliffe, a Clinton ally; and Peter Strzok, who was removed from special counsel Robert Mueller’s team because of text messages critical of Trump. Strzok oversaw the Clinton email investigation.

But after Observer published an article containing additional details about the encounter, citing an anonymous “security source” who had been present, the FBI and Justice Department moved from damage control to discussions about identifying the source and punishing that person, the emails show. At the time, the publisher of Observer was Jared Kushner, Donald Trump’s son-in-law and one of his senior advisers.

On December 15, the FBI released documents related to the so-called tarmac meeting in Phoenix between former Attorney General Loretta Lynch, pictured here on June 20, and former President Bill Clinton.

On July 2, a person whose name is redacted in the FBI release wrote to a bureau employee about the Observer article. The employee, whose name is also redacted, responded, “I agree with your assessment about the source, which in reading the article, I believe was one of the local PD officer [sic] assisting with one of the two motorcade [sic] there on the Tarmac. Either way, they should have never offered any type of opinion or details of what did or didn’t happen, as this is the most principle and basic tenant of executive protection.”

The FBI employee added, “Unfortunately, this article is a breach in security protocol and I am addressing it with the Phoenix division to make certain that they pursuit [sic] this and identify the source of the breach.”

The next day, an undisclosed FBI employee, presumably the same person from the earlier email, wrote to several colleagues, “I believe that the source quoted in this article is one of the local Phoenix LEO’s. Needless to say that I have contacted the Phoenix office and will contact the local’s [sic] who assisted in an attempt to stem further damage.”

An FBI employee responded, “This article is infuriating.” Another FBI person wrote in response, “You think there will be a need for non-disclosure agreements in the future?” A colleague wrote back, “That might not be a bad idea, given the circumstances.” All of their names are redacted.

Another FBI employee whose name is redacted responded to the email about the article, “We need to find that guy and bring him or her before a supervisor.” A colleague responded, “I’m trying to find out thru [sic] the PX STL. Hopefully, we will find out and at the very minimum, make sure he never works on any detail.”

Republican lawmakers and at least two of Trump’s lawyers have called for a special counsel to investigate the handling of the Clinton emails probe. Several congressional committees are also looking into that subject, as is the Justice Department inspector general.

Both Lynch and Clinton still maintain the chance meeting, which Clinton waited for 30 minutes on that tarmac to have, was only by chance.

Please share if you want to get to the bottom of this mess….

FOLLOW us on Facebook at Freedom Daily!

Continue Reading



Revenge Is So SWEET!!!



Alabama Republican Senatorial hopeful Roy Moore is keeping the dream alive for supporters in the hotly contested Alabama Senate race against Democrat Doug Jones. Moore told his base the ‘battle is not over’ despite President Donald Trump and others calling on him to concede. Moore lost to Jones on Tuesday night by some 20,000 votes – 650,436 votes, or 48 percent, to 671,151, or 50 percent.

Moore is not ruling out asking for a recount in his failed bid for the U.S. Senate though but that does not mean it will happen or even be allowed in this instance.

Moore sent a fundraising email to supporters asking for contributions to his “election integrity fund” so he could investigate reports of voter fraud, telling supporters – “I also wanted to let you know that this battle is NOT OVER!”.

On Tuesday Jones was announced as victorious by about 20,000 votes, or 1.5% according to unofficial returns. But Moore has not yet conceded the heated Alabama race to fill the seat that previously belonged to U.S. Attorney General Jeff Sessions. Moore has refused to concede the race to Jones, saying he will wait until all provisional and military ballots are counted and the race is certified.

Moore told supporters that the race was “close” and some military and provisional ballots had yet to be counted. Those are expected to be counted next week. Moore has also said his campaign is collecting “numerous reported cases of voter fraud” to send to the secretary of state’s office.

Moore told supporters Tuesday night –

“Realize when the vote is this close, it’s not over and we still got to go by the rules about this recount provision. It’s not over, and it’s going to take some time. 

Alabama Secretary of State John Merrill says it is unlikely that the last-minute ballots will change the outcome of the election or even trigger a recount.  The margin must be under 0.5% in order to trigger an automatic recount and in this instance, the state would pay for it roughly to the tune of a cool $1 million in taxpayer money. The results of Alabama’s Senate race will be certified between Dec. 26 and Jan. 3 after counties report their official totals.

Merrill stated –

“I know a lot of people would say it’s never over until it’s over, but the margin of victory for Doug Jones at this particular time looks like a very difficult amount of votes to overcome as the remaining votes that are out there to be counted next week begin to be considered at the local level.”

Merrill has also stated his office has investigated reports of voting irregularities, but have not discovered any that have been proven factual in nature. President Trump has endorsed Jones’ win, calling to congratulate him as well as calling on Moore to concede the race.

If Jones’ margin of victory ends up being more than 0.5% then things get a little dicier for a recount option.

According to

Alabama’s election handbook spells out several offices that are not included in state laws for contesting elections: lieutenant governor, U.S. senator, and U.S. representative.

There are other provisions, however, that indicate a candidate or political party could request a recount.

Who might challenge Doug Jones in 2020?

“It’s our contention the votes can be recounted,” John Bennett, Deputy Chief of Staff for the Secretary of State’s office told “We contend that authority is there.”

Bennett said, however, that the office will not make a determination on a recount until after the ballots are certified.

“We’re not at that point,” he said.

If Moore is allowed to request a recount, it will be at his expense and that could be considerable.

Merrill told Fortune the cost of recount would be between $1 million and $1.5 million and the total amount must be put up when the request is made. Moore’s most recent financial report showed he had about $636,000 cash on hand.

It’s also unlikely the Alabama Republican Party – which backed Moore even after the national GOP temporarily suspended its support – would be willing to help fund a recount.

Alabama Republican Party Chairman Terry Lathan issue a statement after Jones’ win saying “the race is over.”

“While we are deeply disappointed in the extremely close U.S. Senate election results, with our candidate Judge Roy Moore, we respect the voting process given to us by our Founding Fathers,” Lathan said.


It is important to note that Merrill and others are missing that there were some rather significant irregularities in the Jones/Moore Senatorial election in Alabama as just even a cursory search of the internet reveals.

According to mainstream left-leaning Newsweek, thousands of felons registered to vote in this Senatorial election.

Thousands of felons may have registered to vote in the weeks leading up to the Alabama Senate election on Tuesday, in which Democrat Doug Jones pulled off a surprise victory. 

Pastor Kenneth Glasgow, who spearheaded the effort, said on the November 27 registration deadline that at least 5,000 to 10,000 people statewide had registered that month.

“I’ve got people all over the state registering people,” Glasgow, who is president of The Ordinary People Society (TOPS) advocacy group, told at the time. “With my TOPS branches in Tuscaloosa, Birmingham, Montgomery, Enterprise, Dothan, Abbeville, Geneva, Gordon, Bessemer, we have a lot.”

But according to Merrill, that’s not worth noting??

Then there was the eleventh-hour court order that gave election officials the green light to NOT preserve electronic ballot records which would form the basis for any recount effort in the first place.

According to the left-leaning Guardian

A court in Montgomery, the state capital, issued an injunction on Monday afternoon ordering election officials around the state to preserve digital images of the ballots cast by Alabama voters in the hard-fought contest between controversial Republican Roy Moore and Democrat Doug Jones.

Then there was the enthusiastic volunteer that announced to one and all that people came from “all over the country” to Alabama to vote for Jones.

It certainly seems like there is more than ample evidence of potential skewing of election results especially in light of the disproven 40-year-old allegations of sexual impropriety levied against Moore just 30 days before election day.  He himself had been in the public eye for more than 40 years with no hint of such allegations. Yet all of sudden here they come standing beside Gloria Allred. One victim was traced directly to the Democratic party, another was called out by her own stepson, one has an ax to grind due to Moore representing her mother in a contentious child custody case, and yet a third admitted to forging Moore’s signature in her yearbook.

This whole thing smells to me. What do you think? Does this whole thing sound fishy to you? Does Alabama need a recount? Sound off in the comments and let us know what you think!

FOLLOW us on Facebook at Freedom Daily!

Continue Reading

Latest Articles