Please disable your Ad Blocker to better interact with this website.

Connect with us

Politics

Michelle Obama Just Announced Her Terrifying New Presidential Plans Against Trump

This is not good & it will piss you off!

Published

on

The pool of Democratic candidates for the 2020 election is wide open. Many have speculated the Democratic Party will struggle with the same issue that Republicans did in the 2016 election. One in which too many people entered the field, and the result being a less than stellar candidate.

Different names have been thrown around like Bernie Sanders, Elizabeth Warren, Kamala Harris, and others. But now it is former First Lady Michelle Obama whose name is being thrown into the mix. Despite having profusely denied any interest in doing so in the past.

One Democratic pollster and analyst who used to work for former President Bill Clinton has maintained that Michelle Obama is the last best hope for the party if she were to run in the 2020 election. Furthermore, that the Party would be lost without her. The pollster argues that the party has no clear mission or vision right now other than opposing President Trump. Ironically enough, it’s something they accused the Republicans of when President Obama was in office.

Her role in running would be to unite the Democratic Party just in time for the 2018 midterm elections. She appears to be the most unanimously loved and respected member of the party at the moment who carries at least a perceived level of influential clout. Even though this pollster makes it clear he does not agree with many of her positions and initiatives that she advances.

The Hill reported the following,

It cannot be overstated how eagerly the Democrats want to take back the White House in 2020. The Democrats face many obstacles in this effort, but the greatest threat is the fierce internal divisions within the party.

Two of the leading prospective presidential candidates, Sens. Kamala Harris (D-Calif.) and Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), have begun national fundraising operations. Former Vice President Joe Biden has been busy building a national email list to communicate directly with his supporters, and Rep. John Delaney (D-Md.) has already announced his presidential candidacy.

The only person I can see accomplishing this would be none other than the party’s most popular political figure: Michelle Obama.

Let me be clear: This is not an endorsement. I have been, and still am, critical of Barack Obama’s presidency. Michelle Obama would not be my candidate, and I do not agree with many of the positions I believe she would advance. But as an analyst, Michelle Obama is clearly the Democrats’ best chance to reunite the party and win back the White House in 2020.”

He continued his opinion piece saying,

Michelle Obama is perceived as a strong, well-qualified leader with immense national popularity. Broadly, the polls show she is respected by the American people and by the near-entirety of the Democratic Party.

Although Michelle Obama has stated that she is not interested in a presidential bid, her appeal and support for her husband remain robust.

According to the January 2017 USA Today/Gallup poll, Michelle Obama left the White House with a 68 percent favorability rating, compared with 58 percent for President Obama and 61 percent for Vice President Biden.

While it is common for first ladies to be more favored than their husbands, Michelle Obama’s favorability is substantially higher than Hillary Clinton’s rating of 56 percent from 2000 when she and President Clinton left the White House.

Further, in plain terms, Michelle Obama would be a far superior candidate to Hillary Clinton. I opposed Hillary Clinton because she faced ethical issues that could very well have initiated a constitutional crisis had she been elected. Michelle Obama does not face such controversy.

Furthermore, Michelle Obama’s favorability rating is significantly greater than President Trump’s. According to the RealClear Politics Average, Trump’s latest favorability rating lies at 39.7 percent – a whopping 30 points less than Michelle Obama.

Just last month, Public Policy Polling found there to be “significant yearning for a return to the days of President Obama,” with 52 percent of voters saying they wish Barack Obama was still president, and only 39 percent preferring President Trump.

In fact, in a series of hypothetical match-ups between leading Democrats and President Trump, Barack Obama’s 52 percent represents the highest level of support, outnumbering Bernie Sanders, Joe Biden and Elizabeth Warren in particular.

This data makes it clear that President Obama, or at the very least a candidate intimately associated with his tenure, would have a better chance at defeating President Trump than any of the 2020 hopefuls.

Considering that Michelle Obama had an even higher favorability rating than President Obama when he left office, she clearly would have a tremendous opportunity to succeed if she ran.

As an analyst, I believe that she is the candidate the divided Democratic Party needs. Otherwise, the party could well rip itself apart.

Michelle Obama stands a cut above the rest as the only prospective candidate who can bring the party together, rebuild the Obama coalition, win back the Midwest and, thus, win the presidency.”

A Michelle Obama presidency would be just as bad for this country as her husband’s, make no mistake. This is nothing to be promoted or glorified. If this is the best their party can come up with then they are far worse off than anyone had ever imagined.

FOLLOW us on Facebook at Freedom Daily!

Join the conversation

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse.

Politics

BREAKING!! IT’S ABOUT TO BE DISMISSED!! Trump VICTORY! HELL YEAH!

DON’T MESS WITH TEAM TRUMP!!

Published

on

Coincidences happen all the time to people on a daily basis that hardly makes anyone think twice. For example, you bump into someone at the grocery store you were just talking about, or you want chicken for dinner, and your spouse brings it home without you asking. You get the gist, those are coincidences, but in case of the fake Russian Collusion investigation and Hillary Clinton, that word could be the worst to describe the latest developments.

Ok, let us back up a bit and recap everything that has recently occurred.

Earlier in December, the American people learned that Special Counsel Robert Mueller used information obtained from disgraced FBI agent Peter Strzok. Then it was discovered Strzok was involved in the Hillary Clinton email investigation and he was also apart of launching the Trump investigation too. Then Peter was fired, and the world learned of his affair and text messages between himself and mistress and co-worker Lisa Page, who was also part of the Trump-Russia probe.

As these text messages were reported on, one message found between Strzok and Page showed a sinister plot underway to stop Trump’s candidacy. On August 15, 2016, Strzok texted Page in regards to Trump,  “I want to believe the path you threw out for consideration in [deputy FBI director Andrew McCabe’s] office that there’s no way he gets elected — but I’m afraid we can’t take that risk. It’s like an insurance policy in the unlikely event you die before you’re 40…”

Now, just recently we learned that Strzok and Page sent more messages to each other suggesting that they knew then-Attorney General Loretta Lynch would clear Hillary Clinton of any charges. Shortly after that, Lynch announced that she would do what FBI Director James Comey wanted her to do regarding the Hillary Clinton email investigation. Then Lynch was caught on camera with Bill Clinton in the infamous tarmac shot, and of course, Strzok and Page could not help but message each other about it.

Strzok texts Page, “Timing looks like hell.” To which Page responds, “It’s a real profile in courage [sic] since she knows no charges will be brought.”

I do not know about you, but that sure sounds like the FBI was working hard to protect Hillary Clinton and not at all a coincidence. So, that brings us to today’s discovery where hundreds of text messages for five months between Strzok and Page have gone missing, which the Department of Justice blames on a “technical glitch.”

Dr Evil Whatever GIF - Find & Share on GIPHY

Though while the rest of us know, this was not a coincidence it does spell good news for President Trump and the rest of the country. Now that these text messages have gone missing, it could form the motion to dismiss Mueller from this absurd Russian Collusion probe and end the madness once and for all.

Here is more from Law & Crime:

The fact that now nearly half a year’s worth of text messages between Strzok and Page during the time leading up to Robert Mueller‘s appointment as Special Counsel weren’t preserved by the Justice Department will surely fuel motions from Team Trump’s lawyers against the investigation.

Months of text messages don’t just accidentally disappear. One past conversation between Strzok and Page indicated that former Attorney General Loretta Lynch knew there would be no charges filed against Clinton well before that investigation ended. Given the significant evidence of impropriety in the Clinton case, a foregone conclusion of innocence before the FBI wrapped up their investigation looks shady at best. Trump’s lawyers will surely argue that after those messages came to light, the DOJ intentionally “lost” those five months’ worth of other messages.

Look for Paul Manafort to jump all over this. He’s already fighting his indictment, claiming that Mueller is overstepping his authority and shouldn’t be running the investigation. Throw in this evidence that the investigation may have been tainted before Mueller even took over and that the DOJ could be covering up damaging information, and a motion to dismiss alleging prosecutorial misconduct is a near certainty.

And, the hits against Mueller do not stop there.

Representative Jim Jordan (R-OH) is now asking that a second special counsel investigate the first special counsel, and for a good reason. There is now more than enough evidence to prove that this entire Russian Collusion investigation was politically motivated over the fact that Hillary Clinton lost the election.

These liberals are still so angry that their agenda to destroy America was stopped that they will do whatever it takes to make Trump pay and they don’t care who they hurt or how much division they cause. Hopefully, now these people who have done so much harm to the country will be forced to answer for their obstruction and justice will be finally dealt.

H/T [Conservative Daily Post, The Gateway Pundit]

FOLLOW us on Facebook at Freedom Daily!

Continue Reading

Politics

Traitor Chelsea Manning Caught! Could Be Heading Back To Prison!

LOCK HIM UP!!!

Frank Lea

Published

on

Traitor Bradley Manning became famous for leaking mass amounts of documentation to WikiLeaks, spending seven years in prison, and later being freed by former President Barrack Obama. Manning participated in traitorous behavior and became a full-blown anti-American transgender. Barack Obama commuted Manning’s 35-year sentence, but his tirade against America didn’t stop. Brad became Chelsea, and he lives a lie trying to get others to accept his identity change. But the identity change is just another one of his gimmicks, much like his careless handling of documents.

After Obama restored Manning’s freedom, Manning then seemed to become hostile towards Americans, mostly Republicans, and anyone who refuses to believe or accept a full grown man in a dress who claims he is a woman. As Manning runs amok on his gender identity crisis, anti-American barrage on social media, and inability to be thankful for the country he ditched, but later freed him – he then makes a sudden announcement much more distracting than his change from pants to a dress. Manning announced that he would run for Senate.

People gasped at the notion that someone who mishandled that many American documents would want to run for a position with the government. Not only was this man a traitor to his country and comrades, but he spends time on social media trashing about with his generic nonsense that Americans can’t stand. Now he wants to represent Americans in the government with a seat in the Senate. There appears to be a significant conflict of interest for the country, but possibly an illegal situation as well.

But there’s a catch. The catch isn’t that someone has to zip up his dress in the back. The catch means Manning could be sent back to prison for running for Senate.

Based upon Manning’s status with the military and criminal conviction, there are two possible routes for him to be ineligible to run for Senate. Doing so could result in prosecution and a return to prison for the transgender traitor.

Daily Caller had more information about Manning’s potential run for Senate:
“The Army further stated that Manning holds an active-duty identification card and acknowledged his status and access to government health care prior to his release.

While Manning’s felony conviction does not appear to automatically disqualify a run for office, his active-duty status presents a much more troubling issue. Such a status, in other words, has enormous implications for engaging in any kind of political activity, especially a Senate run.

Dru Brenner-Beck, retired Army judge advocate general and president of the National Institute of Military Justice, told The Daily Caller News Foundation that on the face of it, Manning is prohibited by Department of Defense regulations from running for office while serving in an active-duty capacity. The only exception is if Secretary of Defense James Mattis grants explicit permission, a power that cannot be delegated by a secretary to anyone else.

According to Brenner-Beck, the regulation in question is DOD Directive 1344.10 Directive 1344.10, Political Activities by Members of the Armed Forces, dated Feb. 9, 2008, para. 4.2.2.

“That paragraph is punitive and violation of it subjects her to courts-martial for violation of a lawful order or regulation under Article 92,” Brenner-Beck told TheDCNF. “Her activities campaigning for herself and fundraising for herself may also violate other provisions of the DoD Directive, themselves separately punishable under the UCMJ, art. 92.”

Brenner-Beck added that prosecution in this case is a “discretionary decision by her chain of command.”

Victor M. Hansen, law professor at New England Law and former military lawyer, also agreed that Manning’s run for office is legally prohibited and could result in prosecution.”

Based on the information from Daily Caller, it appears as though the only way that Manning can run, without facing prosecution, is to receive a granted permission from James Mattis. As per the law, it appears as though the Department of Defense does not permit running for office while still listed as an active-duty participant. If that’s the case with Manning, then Manning must seek permission, and forgiveness, from General Mattis. Receiving that from Mattis might be next to impossible after the implications of Manning’s mishandling of documents and work with WikiLeaks.

When a former military attorney agrees that Manning is legally prohibited from running for Senate and could face prosecution, then that’s information that one must believe is right. Mr. Hansen, who now teaches law, would be at risk of providing false information if his words were untrue. He wouldn’t risk that when there’s nothing for him to gain upon delivering, or agreeing with, data that suggests Manning’s run for Senate is unlawful.

There’s many Americans who would enjoy watching Manning placed in handcuffs again.

If he runs for Senate, then it could certainly go that route, and it will be an ugly battle.

Americans reacted strongly to Manning’s announcement.

FOLLOW us on Facebook at Freedom Daily!

Continue Reading

Politics

BREAKING NEWS! THEY’VE GONE MISSING!! Clintons SILENCE another!!

THIS IS WAY TO SUSPICIOUS!

Published

on

In the months since the change in administration, there has been a constant stream of finger pointing and blame placing. The Democrats seriously shot themselves in the foot by insisting on an investigation into the Russia collusion theory, assuming that they would find something on President Trump. In reality, all that has been uncovered is a whole lot of somewhat shady business deals and back ally meetings between Hillary supporters and every possible saboteur.

The potential obstruction of justice charges is piling up. Everyone from Hillary to Comey to lower level FBI agents are looking as guilty as a kid with his hand in a cookie jar. In this case, the cookie jar looks a lot like career advancement and those involved are still trying to cover the tracks that they took to get there.

Since the FBI has been proven to be compromised, a Congressional probe is being utilized to see what they might be covering up, and the results are appalling. According to The Gateway Pundit, recent reports reveal that FBI officials, decided, in their own infinite wisdom to omit text messages received by disgraced FBI agent Peter Strzok between Dec. 14, 2016, and May 17, 2017:

AP reports:

“In addition to the communications already made public, the Justice Department on Friday provided Johnson’s committee with 384 pages of text messages, according to a letter from the Wisconsin lawmaker that was obtained by The Associated Press.

But, according to the letter, the FBI told the department that its system for retaining text messages sent and received on bureau phones had failed to preserve communications between Strzok and Page over a five-month period between Dec. 14, 2016, and May 17, 2017. May 17 was the date that Mueller was appointed as special counsel to oversee the Russia investigation.

According to Johnson’s letter, the Bureau told Stephen Boyd, the Assistant Attorney General for the Office of Legislative Affairs, that due to FBI-provided Samsung 5 mobile phones with software upgrades that ‘conflicted,’ with ‘collection capabilities,’ the text messages were not recorded.”

At this point we are faced with one of two problems; either a grossly incompetent Federal Bureau of Investigation, or a deeply corrupt one. Who’s to say which is worse. They’re apparently staking their bets on the incompetence angle getting them less time behind bars. However, if this turns out to be obstruction of justice, originating in the Justice Department, it will truly be time for an overhaul/swamp drain/chopping block situation.

“However, according to the Daily Caller’s Chuck Ross, the FBI claimed it the reportedly missing text messages to Justice Inspector General Michael Horowitz on August 10th, 2017.

‘After finding a number of politically-oriented text messages between Page and Strzok, the OIG sought from the FBI all text messages between Strzok and Page from their FBI-issued phones through November 30, 2016, which covered the entire period of the Clinton e-mail server investigation,’ Horowitz wrote to Grassley and Johnson on Wednesday.

The FBI handed over those messages on July 20, 2017. After reviewing those exchanges, Horowitz expanded the investigation to include all of the text messages exchanged between Strzok and Page from Nov. 30, 2016 to July 28, 2017.

Horowitz’s office received those messages on Aug. 10.

Here is a screenshot from Justice Department Inspector General Michael Horowitiz’s letter to Grassley and Johnson confirming the FBI successfully sent over Page and Strzok’s text messages.

Credit: Strzok Text Messages Deleted – Letter From Ron Johnson to Christopher Wray Letter

In December 13th, Horowitz confirmed to Johnson and Grassley that the text messages were received. However, just over a year later, Johnson, citing Boyd, said the FBI never handed over the text messages.

Credit: ZeroPointNow

The conflicting reports raise new questions about verification processes used by the Justice Department and FBI. Horowitz may have told Senate investigators that he received something, but had not verified they were indeed the text messages he requested.

Conversely, did the FBI knowingly or unknowingly send the wrong documents to Horowtiz, only for Inspector General’s Office to realize they were in possession of the incorrect documents?

According to Byron York of the Washington Examiner, Congressional investigators are deeply skeptical of the FBI losing the text messages:

“Very suspicious,” said one investigator about the news. “Hard to believe,” said another.

When asked to rate his trust of the FBI on a scale from 1 to 10, the investigator quickly answered, “Zero.”

Following reports of the FBI’s mystery “glitch,” Rep. Jordan Jordan (R-OH) is renewing his call for a second special counsel to investigate the former Mueller team member.

‘First the IRS destroyed emails pivotal to our investigation of their political targeting. Now the FBI ‘failed to preserve’ texts between Peter Strzok & Lisa Page following the ’16 election. The time for a second special counsel is now,’ tweeted the Ohio lawmaker.”

Basically, what Rep. Jordan is saying is that if you’ll buy that he’s also got a bridge he’d like to sell you. This is one of the most transparent and “the dog ate my homework” type excuses that the already shady FBI has ever tried to pass off on inelegant Americans yet.

It’s once again time for the Trump administration to force the loyal Clinton supporters to step back from protecting those who’ve broken the law and make sure that justice is served.

FOLLOW us on Facebook at Freedom Daily!

Continue Reading

Latest Articles

Subscribe to our newsletter

Become An Insider! Sign up for our free email newsletter, and we'll make sure to keep you in the loop on the top breaking news of the day.

Trending