Please disable your Ad Blocker to better interact with this website.

Connect with us

Politics

Michelle Obama PUBLICLY HUMILIATED After Barack’s Secret Leaks

He lied to everyone!

Published

on

In a new long-awaited tell-all biographical book coming out May 9th “Rising Star,” written by Pulitzer Prize-winning author David J Garrow. We finally learn the truth about former President Barack Hussein Obama’s love life prior to meeting the future First Lady. And his true motives for seeking out and marrying someone like Michele Obama.

Although Sheila Miyoshi Jager was practically erased from existence in Obama’s own 1995 quasi-fiction autobiography, Dreams of My Father, she is quite real and is now speaking up about her relationship with the would be President.

In Dreams of My Father, this fiance was bunched up with other white exes into one person. But this new book states he previously was very in love with his long-time girlfriend. Jager who is now an associate professor and director of the East Asian program at Oberlin College in Ohio stated in an interview that Obama always had a deep seeded need to be “liked and admired.” Like most narcissists have.

Jager went on to state in various interviews that they were both so in love, and so close that he actually proposed to her not once but twice. She accepted the first time but her father rightly opposed because he didn’t see a way “Mr. Shoom Gang” could actually support his daughter. When she flat out rejected him after the second proposal where he also asked her to move to Harvard with him. He then decided he needed to become “full black” and start dating only black women if he were to fulfill his destiny of being “Presidente” of the United States of America. She then went on to say she broke up with him but they still had flings even when he was already involved with Michelle.

The Daily Mail Reports:

Barack Obama proposed to a different woman – twice – before he met Michelle and kept on seeing her for the first year of his relationship with FLOTUS.

Sheila Miyoshi Jager was almost entirely omitted from Obama’s own biography, Dreams of My Father, where she was simply combined with his other white exes into one character.

But according to Rising Star, by David J. Garrow, Jager played a huge role in Obama’s formative years. So much so that even after Barack met his wife-to-be Michelle, he kept seeing Jager on and off for at least a year, the book claims.

They remained together, but it was about this time that Jager began to realize her then boyfriend’s ‘deep-seated need to be loved and admired.’

Now 53, the associate professor and director of the East Asian program at Oberlin College in Ohio, told Garrow that Obama became ‘so very ambitious very suddenly.’

‘I remember very clearly when this transformation happened, and I remember very specifically that by 1987, about a year into our relationship, he already had his sights on becoming president.’

But Obama believed he needed to ‘fully identify as African American’ to fulfill his political ambitions – and believed that having a non-black spouse could damage his prospects, according to the book.

This reportedly put pressure on Obama’s relationship with Jager who is of Dutch and Japanese heritage.

By the time he was leaving for Harvard Law School, their relationship was on the rocks.

But Obama was not ready to give up on Jager and proposed to her for a second time – asking her to join him in Harvard.

Again Jager turned him down.

She believed that his proposal was ‘out of a sense of desperation over our eventual parting and not in any real faith in our future.’

The second marriage rejection was too much for their relationship, and the couple split.

Obama went to law school where he famously met Michelle where she was working. The couple quickly fell for each other and began dating.

But Garrow claims that Jager and Barack continued to see each other on and off after she arrived at Harvard for a teaching fellowship.

‘I always felt bad about it,’ Jager said.”

However, after Barack and Michelle married in 1992, Jager says that they stopped seeing each other and their contact was limited to the odd letter or phone call.

The Obamas have not publicly responded to the claims in the book.”

But it is not the first time Barack’s exes have been laid bare. 

Another biography by Pulitzer-prize-winning journalist David Maraniss detailed his earlier relationships with white women Alexandra McNear and Genevieve Cook who both allegedly accused him of being self-obsessed.

Cook, who dated Obama before he dated Jager, said he would confide that he felt like an ‘imposter’ as there was ‘hardly a black bone in his body’.

She eventually told him he ‘needed to go black’ (to date a black woman), whereas he countered that he would never find a black woman ‘he would feel truly comfortable with’. 

In the end, Cook tired of his emotional ‘withheld-ness, his lack of spontaneity’, and broke up with him in 1985. 

What a love story Barack and Michelle turned out to be. Must be a Democrat thing to advertise a fairy tail wedding only to later find out later that it was was all a sham for political convenience from the start. Wonder how well it would go over if a book came out stating that now President Donald Trump wanting to only date white women to forward his political “destiny.” But I’m sure since Obama is a liberal, and black, the lame stream media will pretty much ignore these little facts about their messiah, Barack Hussein Obama, mmm mmm mmm

FOLLOW us on Facebook at Freedom Daily!

Al ran for the California State Assembly in his home district in 2010 and garnered more votes than any other Republican since 1984. He’s worked on multiple political campaigns and was communications director for the Ron Nehring for California Lt. Governor campaign during the primaries in 2014. He has also held multiple positions within his local Republican Central Committee including Secretary, and Vice President of his local California Republican Assembly chapter. While also being an ongoing delegate to the California Republican Party for almost a decade.

Join the conversation

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse.

Politics

President Trump Signs An Executive Order To Combat Veteran Suicide

Chuck Yarling

Published

on

On January 9, 2018, President Trump signed an Executive Order (EO) entitled, “Presidential Executive Order on Supporting Our Veterans During Their Transition From Uniformed Service to Civilian Life” This EO is designed to combat veterans suicide that is prevalent among servicemembers during the time they are adjusting to a new life outside the military.

Here are five important attributes of this EO.

• #1: It identified that the largest number of suicides of our military personnel occur within the first year during their transition from military to civilian life.

• #2: It is during this time that the rate of veterans suicide is two times higher than the overall rate for service members.

• #3 Care may be provided at VA or by a private facility, depending on wait times where you live. This section re-enforces the Veteran’s Choice Act of 2017 which allows

Any veteran who lives 40 miles or more from the closest VA medical facility, or who faces a 30-day or more wait time, can seek out treatment from a private facility and the VA will handle the payment.

• #4: All service members leaving the military will receive screening for mental health issues for one year.

and

• #5: Implementation of the EO is being made at the highest levels of the administration via the Secretary of Defense, the Secretary of Veterans Affairs, and the Secretary of Homeland Security.At the meeting, Secretary of Veterans Affairs David Shulkin, remarked,

“Currently, 40 percent of those servicemembers had coverage in the VA to get mental health. Now 100 percent will have that coverage, and it’s the full array of services that the Department of Defense and the Department of Veteran Affairs will be able to provide in terms of mental health coverage.”

This EO is excellent news for transitioning servicemembers. Indeed, it will help make their future in the civilian workforce a success.

FOLLOW us on Facebook at Freedom Daily!

Continue Reading

Politics

BREAKING! Homeland Security Is DOING IT NOW! HELL YEAH TRUMP!!!

Published

on

The left has made it abundantly clear that they do not want the United States to thrive which was confirmed by the numerous asinine policies they have pushed down the American peoples’ throats over the last several years. Not only have we seen Democrats in power water down our nation’s culture and border security by allowing illegals to flood into the country and then stay here on the taxpayer’s dime, but now they are doing their best to make sure they can never be deported. After years of witnessing liberal politicians abuse the system, President Trump is in charge and doing his best to ensure that our immigration laws are followed again, and of course, the liberal snowflakes are melting at the news.

Well, if we thought the left was throwing a temper tantrum before, we have not seen anything yet after what Homeland Security just announced.

Since President Trump has been in office, all he has tried to do is re-establish law & order back in our nation which has been one hell of an uphill battle.

Instead of Democrat politicians applauding Trump’s desire to focus on strengthening our country by helping our citizens and deporting illegals, these race baiting individuals instead they scream that Trump is racist. No matter what Trump does, the left is ready to block it by pushing some absurd feel-good argument that liberal sheep cling to without a moment’s hesitation such as the “no human is illegal” nonsense.

Yep, you have heard that mantra a few times over the last year.

You see, all of the sudden people who come to America are not illegal, and they should be able to stay here and live off the government with no problems. Insanity, right?

Well, this is the left we are talking about, and they hardly make sense, but that has not stopped them from trying to halt Trump from enforcing our immigration laws by harboring these illegals in cities across the nation.

Now, the Department of Homeland Security is stepping in saying they will begin to issue criminal charges against elected officials of cities that will not cooperate with deportation efforts, and it is about damn time.

Here is more from The Western Journal:

Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen confirmed Tuesday that her department has spoken to federal prosecutors about the possibility of leveling criminal charges against elected officials of cities that refuse to cooperate with federal deportation efforts.

Nielsen revealed that a request has been submitted to the Justice Department for their review, according to The Daily Caller.

“The Department of Justice is reviewing what avenues might be available,” Nielsen said during a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing.

“The context of this is of course not only putting my ICE officers at risk but also finding an efficient and effective way to enforce our immigration laws.”

Democrat Sen. Kamala Harris of California — a state that is largely viewed as an illegal immigrant safe haven after legislation that protects them from federal prosecutors went into effect this year — continued probing the secretary about the department’s plans to go after sanctuary city leaders.

Nielsen said she is not aware of any specific cases where the Homeland Department will criminally charge elected officials, but that her department was simply looking into the possibility.

Harris’ line of questions were in response to comments previously made by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement Director Tom Homan, who said during an interview earlier this month that the DOJ had been asked to “look into criminal charges for elected officials with sanctuary policies as they are harboring illegal aliens.”

At that time, Homam was responding to California’s new law that gives added protections to illegal immigrants across the entire state and blocks federal immigration authorities from doing their job.

The move to criminally charge elected officials of sanctuary cities would be an escalation of already heated tensions between immigration doves and the Trump administration.

The White House is in an ongoing courtroom battle to defund sanctuary cities, with Attorney General Jeff Sessions actively trying to withhold criminal justice from localities that refuse to work with federal immigration agents.

The escalation is also due to high-profile crimes committed by immigrants residing in the U.S. — crimes that immigration hardliners argue would never have happened if sanctuary policies were not in place.

Some have even said sanctuary leaders should be held responsible for heinous crimes committed by illegal immigrants.

“Politicians don’t get to pick and choose what laws to comply with,” Rep. Todd Rokita told Fox News last month. “Americans are dying because politicians sworn to uphold the law refuse to do so.”

Rokita, a Republican congressman from Indiana who is running for U.S. Senate this year, introduced legislation that threatens elected leaders in sanctuary cities with prison time and fines.
Rokita’s bill comes in the aftermath of the Kate Steinle verdict, in which an illegal immigrant, who had already been deported to Mexico five times, was acquitted for the 2015 killing of Steinle in San Francisco, a sanctuary city.

It goes without saying that any elected official that is stopping illegals from being deported should be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law, but there is another way to get rid of these criminals once for all. If states cut off all welfare to illegal immigrants and those that are have been on it for more then one year, you can be sure the issue will rectify itself within a matter of months.

The only reason these people are here and continue to come here is for all of the “free” benefits they receive, but if that were to end, these “immigrants” would head right back to where ever they came from with no problem.

However, until government officials grow a spine and take drastic action against these criminals harboring illegals, this is the next best thing. Hopefully, this will wake enough of these bleeding hearts up to realize they are breaking the law and only doing more harm to the country than good.

What do you think? Will this stop these states from harboring illegals in their cities?

FOLLOW us on Facebook at Freedom Daily!
Continue Reading

Politics

BREAKING NEWS!! Shocking Announcement About Flu Vaccine!

Published

on

Ronald Regan is credited with having said that the 9 most terrifying words in the English language are “I’m from the government and I’m here to help” (it’s 9, stop counting). In other words; the government has a very specific purpose, and it’s not to interfere with our lives unless certain circumstances require it. This is something that many in government don’t seem to understand, and the situation gets even messier when businesses start putting the thumbscrews to certain government agencies to look after their own interests and bottom line.

When that happens, the government’s already tenuous grip on where their influences should begin and end seems to get even more shakey. It’s widely accepted that this is the case with the FDA and it’s acceptance and encouragement of any and every vaccine that big drug companies crank out as something that the American people need. Many have doubts and fears about some of the new vaccines being touted as the biggest advancements in health for the human race in the past millennia.

This is an especially troubling issue where it concerns the flu vaccine. Not only are the drug companies who have the government in their substantial back pockets just guessing what strain of flu will affect us this year, but there is virtually no accountability if they get it wrong. Top that off with the fact that if someone works in the healthcare industry, they are usually required to get the shot (that may or may not work) in order to keep their jobs.

All of that would probably be acceptable if the shots were: a) proven to work most of the time, and not proven to cause a serious decrease in overall health. However, recent information, even from former proponents of the flu vaccine, contradict that. Multiple news agencies, including InfoWars  have been reporting that the same states who have the highest numbers of flu vaccination are also the states with the biggest decline in health and wellness, overall:

“In a Daily Beast opinion piece on December 15, Paul Offit—one of the vaccine industry’s most strident ambassadors—puzzles over a seeming contradiction.

How, Offit wonders, could the state of Mississippi, which has ‘the worst overall health in the nation,’ have used standout efficiency” to achieve over 99.4% vaccine coverage in kindergartners? Rather than seriously investigate this apparent enigma, Offit presents his ready-made answer and reveals his article’s true purpose. According to Paul Offit, Mississippi’s high vaccination rates are due to the state’s 1979 decision to make the government—rather than parents—the primary vaccine decision-maker for children.

Reflecting on the Mississippi Supreme Court’s 1979 elimination of that state’s religious exemption to vaccination, Offit applauds the Court’s position, stating, “If a parent harbors a religious belief that contradicts a basic tenant [sic] of modern medicine…the state has a right to protect the child from the irresponsible acts of the parent.” Offit—though a parent himself—tells readers that the state-determined “duty” to vaccinate supersedes other parental rights. In short, Offit appears to believe that coercion is the name of the game, openly admitting that he disapproves of the 47 states that still allow parents in the U.S. to take religious, moral or personal beliefs into account when making vaccine decisions on behalf of their children.

‘The worst health in the nation’

According to the comprehensive state-by-state health rankings that Offit cites, Mississippi has remained squarely at the bottom of the nation’s overall health rankings for decades (Figure 1). The low ranking correlates, in part, with the state’s poverty statistics: one-third of Mississippi’s children live in poverty (the highest percentage of any state), and 87% of the state’s Medicaid enrollees are children. But from birth on, scattered health statistics suggest that Mississippi’s children and adolescents face other physical and mental health challenges as well. To cite some examples from the available data:

  • Mississippi’s infant mortality rate is more than twice as high (8.8 deaths per thousand live births) as New Hampshire’s (4.2 per 1000), which is the U.S. state with the highest health ranking. The percentage of low birthweight babies in Mississippi is also high—11.4% versus 6.9% in New Hampshire.
  • Asthma-related emergency department visits and hospital discharges are higher for children ages 0-4 than for any other pediatric or adult age group.
  • The obesity rate for Mississippi high school students (18.9%) is significantly higher than the national average (13.9%) and has been increasing steadily since 2001.
  • A study that examined Medicaid recipients in Mississippi who received services related to autism spectrum disorder (ASD) in 2007 found that 88% were age 21 or younger (1170/1330). Most young Medicaid recipients with ASD were on psychotropic medications (62% of 10-and-under children and 75% of youth in the 11-21 age group). On average, over the one-year study period, each young Medicaid recipient with ASD had twelve (< 10 years old) to sixteen (ages 11-21) psychotropic drug claims.
  • Mississippi’s high school students are significantly more likely than the nation’s high schoolers to attempt suicide (12.7% versus 8.6%), and the percentage has doubled since 2001. The percentage of Mississippi students making a suicide plan has increased by 45% since 2011.

Avoiding the obvious question

Despite juxtaposing two critical pieces of health information about Mississippi’s children—high vaccine coverage and poor health rankings—Offit does not ask the obvious elephant-in-the-room question: Could one have something to do with the other? Clearly, factors such as poverty and nutrition are one set of influences on health status, but vaccines—potent immune-system-stimulating medical interventions administered repeatedly, both prenatally and from birth—must be considered as another influence. Mississippi’s medical practitioners and Offit are shirking their ethical responsibilities by denying vaccines’ ability to trigger adverse health outcomes, including death.

Researchers who are less disingenuous than Offit have plausibly linked many of the above-listed health conditions (asthmaobesity, ASD and other neurodevelopmental disorders and infant mortality) to vaccines. ASD, in turn, has been associated with disrupted circadian rhythms, which appear to be linked to increased risk of suicide attempts in adolescents also have reported suicide as an outcome of devastating HPV vaccine damage. None of these associations should come as a surprise, given that vaccines intentionally tamper with normal immune system functioning and also contain unsafe aluminum adjuvants and/or other toxic ingredients such as thimerosal and formaldehyde.”

Vaccines are a huge hot-button issue, and whether you believe that any of those things really could happen to anyone who receives these shots, there is certainly enough evidence to make it worth some doubt and research.

No parent should ever fear that their child will be taken away if they’re unsure about a medical treatment. At a minimum, it should be up to an individual, or their parent, to choose whether to take the risks involved in the preventative treatment.

FOLLOW us on Facebook at Freedom Daily!

Continue Reading

Latest Articles

Trending