Please disable your Ad Blocker to better interact with this website.

Connect with us

Culture

Mike Rowe Just Sizzled Flag Burning Anti-American Students “Don’t Accept Federal Aid If You’re Anti-America”

BOOM! Mike Rowe lays down the HEAT! Suck it up, buttercups!

Published

on

Mike Rowe is the host of the television show Dirty Jobs. He’s never one to mince words, much like many other anti establishment conservatives.

On Wednesday he addressed Hampshire College’s final decision to cease flying the American flag. Breitbart reports he also commented on the burning of the flag by students at American University. It was all to protest the election of Donald Trump.

The best part of his entire speech was when he pointed out the hypocrisy of it all. Most notably, he pointed out that despite the fact that these millennial college students are going to extreme measures to protest Donald Trump’s election they have no problem taken students loans from the he government whose flag they are burning.

Speaking of Hampshire President Jonathan Lash he said they should educate students,

about the undeniable fact that no country on the planet affords its citizens more liberty than this one.”

Rowe emphases how ridiculous it was for the school to allow students to pay for their tuition with,

federal dollars provided by the same government whose flag was no longer suitable to fly at his school.”

Watch Rowe go off.

A larger excerpt from his interesting speech can be read below,

As I dropped one of those giant round ice cubes into a tumbler of Whistle Pig, I couldn’t help but wonder if President Lash was unaware that billions of people around the world are routinely subjected to horrific levels of racism, misogyny, and bigotry that far exceed any injustice in modern-day America. Furthermore, I was curious to know if President Lash really believed that removing our flag is a better way to assuage the fears of his frightened students, than simply educating them about the undeniable fact that no country on the planet affords its citizens more liberty than this one? Finally, I found myself wondering as to why the President of Hampshire College would allow his students to pay for their tuition with federal dollars – federal dollars provided by the same government whose flag was no longer suitable to fly at his school.

We the People are enabling schools like Hampshire to sell a liberal arts degree for approximately $250,000. With $1.3 trillion dollars of student debt currently on the books, I found myself thinking how nice it would be to hear a more persuasive argument from those who will happily take money from a country whose flag they despise.

I turned the channel, and watched another group of students dance around another pile of burning flags at another expensive university. I couldn’t tell where they were, but occurred to me that wherever they were – it probably wasn’t a trade school. To my knowledge, no one has ever burned a flag at a trade school.”

Rowe has a valid point. All this whining, crying, now protesting achieves absolutely nothing and is the height of liberal snowflake hypocrisy. If you are going to talk the talk you better be able to walk the walk. It is nothing more than armchair liberalism.

They will stand up and scream from the mountain tops but they are not willing to do anything tangible to achieve the change they so desperately want. The little they are doing is a disgrace to the very country they take money from.

FOLLOW us on Facebook at Freedom Daily!

Join the conversation

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse.

Culture

BREAKING NEWS About What ALL Of Trump’s Accusers Got This Week – This Is Disgusting!

This is Sick & Trump is Pissed!

Published

on

The political landscape in Washington is littered with the carcasses of the political aspirations of many a disgraced politician. Scandals, especially sex scandals, are some of the worst PR that a politician can get, and everyone knows it. That’s why it’s a tactic commonly used by the opposition of anyone that is sustainable to such an allegation (which is almost everyone) and sadly not always true.

It didn’t take long after President Trump arrived on the political scene for the rumors to start flying, aided, in part, by the fact that the President had a very public affair decades ago, and has been married 3 times. The self-same people who are all about the freedom of consenting adults to do what whatever they wish, with whomever they wish, jumped on the prudish bandwagon post haste.

President Trump survived the allegations of scandal, with the only thing anyone ever proved that he did wrong was some less than polite talk caught on tape by a reporter. While those comments might not be what you’d want to hear in mixed company, it was hardly on par with scandals that have gotten far less attention. The point to this being that the American people heard the accusers out, and decided to elect him anyway, however that’s just not enough.

Red State is now reporting that the accusers have organized and are out for their pound of flesh, despite their lack of evidence, and vague references to incidents that happened a fuzzy amount of time ago. And if that’s not enough to make you doubt the political hit that’s been called out on the President, we’ve discovered that these women are being funded by some pretty scary people to come forward with their stories.

The piece outlines that these women, from all sorts of backgrounds, with varying stories, are all being brought together by a 501(c)(3) organization called Brave New Films. This is a company that creates documentary videos. If you’re wondering what types of films this company has put out, here’s a list, brought to you by Red State:

“Stand Up, Senate! The President-elect is a hypocrite.

Protect Public Education – Stop Betsy DeVos!

Indivisible: A Practical Guide For Resisting The Trump Agenda

GETTING DONALD TRUMP OFF NBC’S SNL

They claim to be non-partisan, but it doesn’t really sound that way, does it?”

It appears that the group responsible for the coordination of President Trump’s character assassins is far from impartial. And it’s understandable that those who don’t like someone, especially a politician might look for something that would tarnish his reputation. But that leads us to the question; what people are behind this? The organization has got to be organized by someone.

“One of Brave New Films’ donors is Open Society Foundations, a leftist organization whose founder and chairman is George Soros, who has given “over $32 billion to fund the Open Society Foundations, which work in over 100 countries around the world.”

The things they’re alleging came before Brave New Films got ahold of them, however.

And they were called liars long before this Soros connection to the documentary makers was uncovered.”

So what is it exactly that these women want? Their timing seems to be very convenient, considering that it corresponded quite perfectly with the President once again calling on the American people to trust his endorsement of Senatorial candidate Roy Moore, who was also accused of some of the same things. It also appears to be the next wave of attack, after the Russia collusion story stopped sticking after a year of beating the same dead horse.

The Guardian reports that the woman only wants one thing, the same thing the left always wants; another investigation into President Trump:

A group of women who have accused Donald Trump of sexually inappropriate behavior on Monday demanded that Congress open an investigation.

The women, Samantha Holvey, Rachel Crooks and Jessica Leeds, first came forward during the 2016 presidential election. Crooks and Leeds have accused Trump of unwanted kissing and groping. Holvey says Trump barged into a Miss USA dressing room while he was a part owner of the beauty pageant.

More than a dozen women have accused Trump of sexual assault and several more have accused him of sexually inappropriate behavior. Trump has denied all such claims and the White House has said all women making allegations against the president are lying.

‘Let’s try round two,’ Holvey said on Monday, appearing on NBC’s Today show with Megyn Kelly. ‘The environment’s different, let’s try again.’

Hours later, at a press conference at the Lexington Hotel in New York, Holvey said lawmakers should extend the same scrutiny to Trump they did to Al Franken, the Minnesota senator who faced an ethics investigation before he resigned his seat over claims of groping and unwanted kissing.”

No, the President shouldn’t be immune to investigation, and he’s proved that he’s not, time and again as the Democrats hurl scandal after scandal at him, trying to get something to tarnish his administration, and nothing sticks. These allegations are especially difficult to quantify, because of the vague nature of the stories being brought forward. While any unwanted advance is something that people should avoid at all costs, these accusers seem to be intentionally acting like they were assaulted when apparently, by their own accounts, if they’d said “no” it all would have ended.

“Now I have matured, I think I would say, ‘Woah, no,’ but at the time I was younger and I was a little shocked,” Huddy told compoundmedia.com. “I thought maybe he didn’t mean to do it, but I was kind of making excuses.”

Accusing someone of something so they lose because of past misconduct is just about the oldest trick in the book, but it’s still working. We as the voters have to pay attention and figure out whose story we can trust. These situations usually come down to money, so if we figure who stands to make the most money, we will probably get to the bottom of it. And with that in mind, let’s remember who is going to rise to stardom, and who is giving their salary away.

[H/T: Red State, The Guardian]

FOLLOW us on Facebook at Freedom Daily!

Continue Reading

Culture

BREAKING News From NYC – Judge Jeanine ATTACKED! This Is OUTRAGEOUS!

She needs our help right now!

Published

on

Judge Jeanine Pirro has always been a voice of reason against the corruption in Washington D.C. and the liberal lies. For instance, just earlier this week, Judge Jeanine railed against the “corruption and lawlessness” running rampant in the FBI and Department of Justice that is working hard to ruin President Trump’s administration. Of course, the left is not so keen on being publically outed for their misdeeds which is why they are working doubly hard to bring down the tough-talking judge a peg or two with this latest attack.

Judge Jeanine has been a long time advocate for conservative issues and shedding light on the disgusting deeds of the left only to be continually viciously attacked. The left in their quest to stay in power and to hide their corruption will do whatever it takes to silence the opposition even if that means twisting the truth.

And, that is what is occurring now when a Black Lives Matter activist has sued Judge Jeanine for, get this, slandering his name.

The case started back in 2016 over the fatal shooting of Alton Sterling in Baton Rouge, Louisiana. The incident sparked outrage for the militant Black Lives Matter group, claiming that the police murdered an innocent black man in cold blood. The violent group quickly came together to protest the supposed injustice of Sterling’s death with riots and protests in the streets of Louisiana.

During these protests, one police officer was injured and sued Black Lives Matter activist DeRay Mckesson for instructing his followers to behave violently. Sadly, the case was dismissed as the judge presiding over the case ruled that Black Lives Matter was a social movement that could not be sued. Also, the judge stated that the police officer who brought the suit did not correctly explain how Mckesson incited violence.

And, here is when it goes from bad to worse.

Judge Jeanine read this absurd ruling when she appeared on “Fox & Friends” which enraged Mckesson stating that the judge put his life in danger, and slandered his name.

You just cannot make this stuff up folks.

Here is more from New York Daily News:

Fox News host Jeanine Pirro smeared Black Lives Matter activist DeRay Mckesson by claiming he directed violence against a Baton Rouge police officer in 2016, according to a lawsuit filed Tuesday.

The defamation case Mckesson filed in Manhattan Supreme Court stems from Pirro’s commentary about a protest over the fatal police shooting of Alton Sterling, a black man, on July 5, 2016. Mckesson, 32, had attended a protest over the shooting and was arrested, but charges against him were dismissed — and he and about 185 other protesters later settled a suit against the Baton Rouge police for $136,000.

An anonymous police officer filed a separate suit, alleging he was hit in the face by a rock a protester threw. The protester, the cop said, was incited by Mckesson. The cop named Mckesson and “Black Lives Matter” as defendants.

On Sept. 28, a federal judge in Louisiana tossed the officer’s suit, ruling that Black Lives Matter was a social movement that could not be sued. The judge also ruled the cop failed to explain how Mckesson allegedly incited the violence.

Black Lives Matter a social movement, can’t be sued, judge rules

Enter Pirro.

“In this particular case, Deray Mckesson, the organizer, actually was directing people, was directing the violence,” Pirro said on “Fox and Friends” after the judge had ruled.

“You’ve got a police officer who was injured, he was injured at the direction of DeRay Mckesson, DeRay Mckesson walks away with a hundred thousand dollars, for an organization that is amorphous, we got a problem in this country.”

Mckesson said Pirro’s comments have endangered his safety and seeks damages to be determined at trial.
“I was found not guilty & I didn’t direct any violence. In fact, I was protesting the violence of the police. Stop lying,” he tweeted at Pirro.
Pirro has said on Twitter she was relying on paragraphs from the cop’s lawsuit during her appearance. But Mckesson says she wrongly described them as “facts.”

“Pirro made these false statements of fact on the highest viewed morning cable show in the country, ‘Fox & Friends,’ which reaches over 1.7 million viewers,” Mckesson’s suit reads. “These statements of fact are false, and were either known to be false by Defendant Pirro or were made with reckless disregard for whether they were true.”

Fox News said it will fight the suit.

Deray Mckesson

And, this is how the left uses our own courts against us to silence those that are merely stating the facts of a case.

Mckesson only got off of this charge on a technicality not that he was innocent of wrongdoing. We have all witnessed how this group behaves and uses violence to achieve their goals, and that has not changed just because they want it to. The left will continually do what they can to silence the truth, and that is why even though we are battle weary we must push forward and fight with facts.

It is great to see that Fox News and Judge Jeanine are not bending to the bullying tactics of the left and I hope that they win this case for all of us.

H/T [Mediaite]

FOLLOW us on Facebook at Freedom Daily!

Continue Reading

Culture

BREAKING NEWS About Anti-Trump San Francisco Judge – Prison Life Is Going To HURT

He had it coming!

Published

on

Every policy that President Donald Trump tries to implement for American’s safety, is not only met with a great deal of resistance from the left but also from defiant judges who block his progress. We saw this several times with Trump’s travel ban from terrorist-tied countries and now we’re seeing it with regards to so-called Sanctuary cities. Judges are disguising their clear liberal bias as judicial rulings and now tensions over this illegal immigrant issue have put America at the breaking point, edging on a civil war. However, one prominent appeals court judge who ceremoniously struck down Trump’s travel ban in a clear act of defiance just met his own demise.

When liberal Judge Alex Kozinski wasn’t busy flipping the proverbial bird at our president with his defiant decisions, he was hiding something much worse from his pretentious perch on the stand. Turns out, Kozinski had a lot of secrets under that black robe of his and now they all just came back to haunt him under the most shocking circumstances.

This new movement that is sweeping the nation taking aim at holding powerful men accountable for sexual harassment, misconduct, and assault has now named a prominent Liberal jurist as a serial harasser. It’s now being reported that six former far left liberal Ninth Circuit clerks and externs are now saying that the liberal Judge Alex Kozinski subjected them to sexual comments and unwelcome situations.

One of the former Kozinski clerks, Heidi Bond, who was his clerk between 2006 and 2007 has gone on the record with allegations that on multiple occasions the judge summoned her alone to his chambers in order to show her pornography which was unrelated to any case before the judge. He then asked if the images turned her on. Bond recounts at least three different instances of being shown porn by her boss and says the experiences were shocking. She has also written an extremely disturbing first-person account of her experiences of clerking for Judge Kozinski where she also details Kozinski isolating her from her co-clerks to discuss his sexual history.

The Washington Post Reports:

Judge Alex Kozinski of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit, pictured in 2003. Six women — all former clerks or externs in the 9th Circuit — alleged to The Washington Post in recent weeks that Kozinski, now 67, subjected them to a range of inappropriate sexual conduct or comments.

A former clerk for Judge Alex Kozinski said the powerful and well-known jurist, who for many years served as chief judge on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit, called her into his office several times and pulled up pornography on his computer, asking if she thought it was photoshopped or if it aroused her sexually.

Heidi Bond, who clerked for Kozinski from 2006 to 2007, said the porn was not related to any case. One set of images she remembered was of college-age students at a party where “some people were inexplicably naked while everyone else was clothed.” Another was a sort of digital flipbook that allowed users to mix and match heads, torsos and legs to create an image of a naked woman.

Bond is one of six women — all former clerks or more junior staffers known as externs in the 9th Circuit — who alleged to The Washington Post in recent weeks that Kozinski, now 67 and still serving as a judge on the court, subjected them to a range of inappropriate sexual conduct or comments. She is one of two former clerks who said Kozinski asked them to view porn in his chambers.

In a statement, Kozinski said: “I have been a judge for 35 years and during that time have had over 500 employees in my chambers. I treat all of my employees as family and work very closely with most of them. I would never intentionally do anything to offend anyone and it is regrettable that a handful have been offended by something I may have said or done.”

Kozinski provided the statement after The Post called and emailed a spokesman with a detailed list of the allegations this story would include. After the story posted online, the judge told the Los Angeles Times, “I don’t remember ever showing pornographic material to my clerks” and, “If this is all they are able to dredge up after 35 years, I am not too worried.”

When Bond was clerking, Kozinski was on the precipice of becoming chief judge for the 9th Circuit — the largest federal appeals court circuit in the country, handling cases for a large swath of the western United States as well as Hawaii and Alaska. The other people who alleged that Kozinski behaved inappropriately toward them worked in the 9th Circuit both before and after her, up to 2012.

Bond said she knew that she was to come to the judge’s office when her phone beeped twice. She said she tried to answer Kozinski’s inquiries as succinctly and matter-of-factly as possible. Bond was then in her early 30s and is now 41.

If the question was about photoshopping, Bond said, she would focus on minor details of the images. If Kozinski asked whether the images aroused her, Bond said, she would respond: “No, this kind of stuff doesn’t do anything for me. Is there anything else you need?” She said she recalled three instances when the judge showed her porn in his office.

“I was in a state of emotional shock, and what I really wanted to do was be as small as possible and make as few movements as possible and to say as little as possible to get out,” Bond said.

Bond, who went on to clerk for the Supreme Court and now works as a romance novelist writing under the name Courtney Milan, and another clerk, Emily Murphy, who worked for a different judge on the 9th Circuit and is now a law professor, described their experiences in on-the-record interviews. The other four women spoke on the condition that their names and some other identifying information not be published, out of fear that they might face retaliation from Kozinski or others.

Kozinski, who served as the chief judge on the 9th Circuit from 2007 to 2014, remains a prominent judge, well known in the legal community for his colorful written opinions. His clerks often win prestigious clerkships at the Supreme Court.

Murphy, who clerked for Judge Richard Paez, said Kozinski approached her when she was talking with a group of other clerks at a reception at a San Francisco hotel in September 2012. The group had been discussing training regimens, and Murphy said she commented that the gym in the 9th Circuit courthouse was nice because other people were seldom there.

Kozinski, according to Murphy and two others present at the time who spoke to The Post, said that if that were the case, she should work out naked. Those in the group tried to change the subject, Murphy and the others present said, but the judge kept steering the conversation toward the idea of Murphy exercising without clothes.

“It wasn’t just clear that he was imagining me naked, he was trying to invite other people — my professional colleagues — to do so as well,” Murphy said. “That was what was humiliating about it.”

Murphy, who was 30 at the time of the incident and is now 36, provided The Post with a 2012 email showing that she told a mentor about what had happened at the time. Two of Murphy’s friends who were present at the time of the encounter, speaking on the condition of anonymity, also confirmed her account.

Now that’s sick, but then again, what else can we expect from a judge from the infamous 9th circuit court who is known for its radical far left agenda leanings. No wonder the 9th circuit wants Muslims Refugees in this nation, they act the same way their judges act.

It seems that for every right-wing leaning man who is accused of sexual misconduct there are at least 100 liberal men accused of the same, or worse. This whole time all these institutions where being run as brothels and not one person in the outside world even knew. They tell us how to think and what is and isn’t moral while at the same time their stench of immorality is off the charts.

Please share if you agree this Judge needs to be in prison…

Continue Reading

Trending