Please disable your Ad Blocker to better interact with this website.

Connect with us

Crime

Muslim Refuses To Remove Headscarf In Bank, Gets WRONG Teller Who Figured Out What She’s Hiding

WE KNEW IT!

Published

on

Up until recently, businesses in the United States have had the right to refuse service to anyone that they wanted to and for any reason that they wanted to. Some put up signs, but in general, it’s the proprietors prerogative to serve who he wanted. Some even put up signs i.e. “no shirt no shoes no service” or something similar. That’s more of a friendly warning as to the general standards that a store might want to keep, but basically, it’s up to whoever owns an establishment to decide how they wanted to run their business. And if you don’t like it, you can take your business elsewhere.

Recently, it has become a big issue when bakers didn’t want to make a cake for a gay marriage, and the issue arose about who has to serve whom, and under what conditions. Our old friend Political Correctness rose up and decided to tell us what freedoms would be taken away, and sadly many people listened to him.

The most pressing concern of many businesses, especially institutions dealing with money, is, of course, safety. They have rules about what you can bring in, and what you can wear. This is presumably because of what it might be concealing. That was the case with a credit union in Washington, where a young lady got it into her head that she was being discriminated against because when she broke the rules about how they would serve her, she was asked to comply.

This is what her Facebook post read:

“I went into Sound Credit Union in Kent, Wa to pay my bill as normal. The video above will show the discrimination that I faced today. I am a black Muslim woman and was observing Jummah, so I had my hood on. The teller asks me to ‘take off my hood’. In order to adhere to their policy, I ran outside to get my hijab. When I came back, two men before me were served with no issues, but both were wearing hats. Then I confronted the teller and he told me ‘it should be no issue, let me get my supervisor for permission,’. Instead of seeking a resolution, she chose to do this…watch the video.
I never want this to happen to anybody and NOBODY should ever be treated this way. Thank you.”

Via Q13 Fox:

“KENT, Wash. — It’s a possible case of discrimination. A Seattle-area woman claims she was refused service at a credit union because of the religious garments she was wearing.

It happened Friday at the Sound Credit Union in Kent.

Jamela is a black Muslim woman. She didn’t want to go on camera or talk specifically about what happened, but she did give us permission to show the video she recorded of what took place inside that bank Friday.

According to Jamela’s Facebook post, it all started when she was told by a teller to “take off her hood,” which she says she did, to abide by their policy.

She was wearing her religious garments that day.

She claimed two men were served before her and both of them were wearing hats.

So she then asked to speak to the supervisor there, and that’s when it seems things quickly got out of hand.

Jamela said she believes, in this case, she was discriminated against.

On Sunday, she said she is still very shaken up by this whole experience.

She said she does want this to happen to anybody, and nobody should ever be treated this way.

The bank has since made a statement:

‘We looked into the situation and agree that we did not handle it well. We want to express our deepest apology to the person involved. As a result, we are looking at our procedures and training and will make changes to make sure that a situation like this never happens again. It is clear our training needs to include more empathy and sensitivity to all cultures, because as a credit union we believe in equal treatment of all people.'”

What happened was that the employees were scared and worried that if she wasn’t obeying the rules, she might have a more devious reason. This is a financial institution that might have quite a few people wanting to rip it off. It’s sad that they not only can’t enforce the rules that they themselves posted, so plainly for all to see, but also that the employees have to live in fear of a PR nightmare, instead of protecting themselves.

The young lady in question seemed so irate that there were people who were let to have their ball caps on and were still served, but that argument doesn’t even pass the straight face test. In order to conceal something in a ball cap, you’d just about have to have a collapsable skull. So barring an alien invasion or a visit from the bionic man at the credit union, I doubt there’s much to fear there. And saying that a business has to treat everyone the same would be like saying that because Starbucks gives away free drinks to cops, they must give a free one to me as well. No, it’s their choice to decide not only what they do, but who they do it to, and how it’s done. If you don’t like it, you’re welcome (no, encouraged) to take your business elsewhere.

(Source: Q13 Fox)

FOLLOW us on Facebook at Freedom Daily!

We deliver meaningful conservative American news that is not your normal agenda based Beltway bull.

Join the conversation

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse.

Crime

Liberals Help Their New Muslim Neighbors Move In Next Door – Get Sick Thank You ‘Gift’ For It

TRUMP NAILED IT!

Published

on

When one liberal family discovered that Syrian refugees were being placed in their neighborhood they jumped into action. The family put together a generous care package of sorts to welcome their new neighbors. However, the family and other neighbors nearby quickly changed their tune horrified by how they were “repaid”.

The left has been claiming for years that the refugees that have been entering our country are just seeking acceptance. No matter how many times conservatives warn liberals the true intentions of refugees, it continues to fall on deaf ears. Liberals do not want to accept the fact that Muslims are not ones to assimilate or coexist with anyone not Muslim. Instead of liberals placing facts over emotions they continue to do whatever they can to appease these barbarians. Though no matter what these liberals do to makes these Muslim refugees happy it always takes a brutal turn.

A prime example of this would be what happened to a family in Canada. The liberal family decided that they would welcome Syrian refugees with open arms in their Hamilton, Ontario neighborhood. This family and many of their neighbors believed all the hype that the media had said about refugees. So, one year ago the neighborhood community embraced the Syrian refugees only to be left terrified.

Rebel Media’s Faith Goldy conducted an interview with a woman who was an eye-witness to the events in the Hamilton neighborhood. Andrea explained how the neighborhood naively accepted the left’s propaganda on how wonderful the Syrian refugees were. The neighborhood families all donated money to provide the new family with bicycles, furniture, and garden supplies. However, as the warm feelings of being neighborly quickly subsided after the Syrian family began to assault the local children.

Andrea explains that when she was in her home she heard a loud ruckus outside of her home. When she looked outside that was when she discovered that the Syrian children were hurling stones and bricks at the Canadian children. Andrea then went on to say that she witnessed the eldest of the Syrian children who is around 16, pick up what appeared to be a shovel and attempt to beat one of the children’s father. While that was happening the other Syrian children were throwing bricks at the Canadian neighbors too. But, that is not even the most disturbing part of this entire story.

Andrea said that while all this was happening she noticed the Syrian mother hurry outside. Thinking that the Syrian mother was attempting to intervene and bring her children inside she felt relieved. However, the Syrian mother picked up a brick herself and HURLED it at a 13-year-old boy in the scuffle. The young boy managed to escape the violent fray with only a minor injury but this should have never happened.

Faith Goldy interviewed the young boy who was injured and he confirmed that the mother threw the brick. So, when the neighbors called the police about the horrific assault they were stunned by their response. Even though there were multiple witnesses to this brutal beat down the police failed to arrest anyone in the Syrian family.

The father of the boy who was injured, who does not want to be named, says that this is not the only time there has been violence. The father and other people in the neighborhood have said that the Syrian children have chased the Candadian children down the alleyway with bricks and hammers. Andrea confirms in the interview that the Syrian children are incredibly violent. She says that they often tear furniture apart and then beat each other with the broken pieces.

The father of the victim is so upset by law enforcement’s response that he has decided to build a wall around his own home. The victim’s father raised his fence and also constructed concrete barricades around his home to protect his children. And, I cannot say that I do not blame him one bit.

Goldy wanted to speak to the Syrian family about the violent incident and was shocked by their response. The Syrian family admitted that their children did throw the bricks and stones, but the mother denied being a part of it. However, when Goldy asked what they thought about their current living situation they chose to complain. In fact, the Syrian father and mother said that they preferred Lebanon and Syria to Canada. Why they do not go back to their perfect home should not come as any surprise. You see, these people are leeches and will live off the taxpayer’s money with no problem. If the Canadian government were to cut off their welfare checks these people will scurry back where they came from.

In my humble opinion, I truly believe that the liberal plan is to bankrupt modernized countries. They have flooded the borders with refugees and then they all go onto welfare that is, of course, provided by the people. Eventually, they will run out of other people’s money which they can then usher in a single payer system and the masses. The end game is control and unless we get these communists out of office they will continue to bankrupt us all.

H/T [ The Rebel Media ]

FOLLOW us on Facebook at Freedom Daily!

Continue Reading

Crime

Woman With Damning Pictures Hillary Didn’t Want Out Was Found Dead By Insane Incident

HER SKELETONS ARE CRAWLING OUT!!

Published

on

Another day and another dead body with a connection that cannot be ignored as Hillary Clinton’s body count seems to be on the rise once again, after a brief reprieve of no sudden, mysterious casualties. The latest is possibly the most shocking yet in the truly startling trail of dead bodies that keep accumulating around this crooked woman with major secrets she’s desperate to keep hidden no matter who has she has to kill off to ensure it. The latest victim was added to the list of Clinton casualties after it was discovered what photos she had that exposed the scandalous couple but unfortunately for the Clintons, copies of those pictures still exist, even after the victim in them has perished.

In what was originally reported as a freak and unfortunate house fire is far more mysterious than is being said, based on who is now dead in their own home. Before the deceased was a victim of a residential fire, she was allegedly a victim of something else and has photos to prove it, which are now coming back to haunt the  Clintons after another dead body tied to them now has proof of one of Bill’s biggest secrets. This latest alarming incident sure seems like a convenient excuse to cover up a connection to the couple whose names always seems to come up in random tragic events like this.

The Daily Mail reports:

As more and more women line up to tell their stories about sex with Bill Clinton – both consensual and forced – there is one who is unable to relive the details of her alleged affair.

Penthouse Pet Judi Gibbs died in a mysterious house fire in 1986 amid rumors that she had pictures that proved she and the then-Governor of Arkansas had been regular sex partners.

And even now, 30 years after she died alongside her much-older other lover, doubts remain about how and why Gibbs and her long-time beau Bill Puterbaugh met their grizzly deaths.

But now DailyMail.com has pieced together the life and death of Judi Gibbs, telling for the first time how the auburn-haired woman from a pin-prick of an Arkansas town managed to bed the man who went on to be one of the most powerful men in the world.

And the question remains unanswered: Was Judi Gibbs killed because Bill Clinton and his advisers feared the affair was about to become public?

“I have always been convinced that Bill Clinton was responsible for the fire, but I have no proof,” Gibbs’ older sister Martha, who still lives in Sims, Arkansas, told DailyMail.com. “And what would happen if I had proof – you can’t touch those people.”

At the time of her death, Gibbs was 32 and living with 57-year-old developer Puterbaugh in a large isolated home a quarter-mile drive opposite a tiny airport outside Fordyce, Arkansas. 

Their bodies were both found in the huge master bedroom. They died of smoke inhalation.

Puterbaugh’s son, Randy, who followed him into the real estate business, tells a similar story to Martha Gibbs, even though the two have not spoken since the days following the double death.

“There are so many pieces of the puzzle.” Puterbaugh said. “‘I believe it is a possibility that Bill Clinton was involved in their deaths. I know I wish I had hired my own private investigator but I didn’t, so I guess I will never know.”

Judi Gibbs

When so many people around and connected the Clintons in a number of ways that could be bad for them have been found dead, it can’t be coincidental. It’s time to start taking a closer look at all of these cases, both current and digging up those from the past, where there are probably far more mysterious deaths than what’s come up recently. MailOnline pointed this fact out with alarming facts that Democrats insists on ignoring to save the Clintons from indictment they deserve.

Many people around the Clintons have died in unusual circumstances over the years, leading conspiracy theorists to claim they could be connected. 

As DailyMail.com reported earlier this year, five deaths in a six-week span between June 22 and August 2 this year had connections to the former first family.

‘I’m not saying the Clintons kill people. I’m saying a lot of people around the Clintons turn up dead,’ Larry Nichols, who worked with the former First Family before turning against them, told DailyMail.com.

And the names of Judi Gibbs and her lover Bill Puterbaugh could be added to that list.

Of all of the recent allegations of sexual misconduct by politicians and people in Hollywood, the biggest predator Bill Clinton who will never face the consequences of his actions. More importantly, Hillary Clinton never seems to be able to escape scandal and as long as she’s a free woman, rather than being locked up where she belongs, she will be continued to be questioned in everything that she has any kind of connection to.

Continue Reading

Crime

BREAKING!! Obama in Full PANIC After They Found EVERYTHING He Tried To Hide!

LOCK THEM ALL UP NOW!!

Published

on

What is happening in our country right now feels like it would be a perfect script to for a blockbuster thriller movie for this summer. The main actors would discover a massive government coverup, expose it, and then we would follow them through numerous plot twists across the country before there was the obligatory happy ending of the actors falling in love leaving it all behind to live in seclusion.

However, this isn’t a Hollywood script this is real, and with each passing day, we learn more about Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton’s traitorous dealings while in the White House, and it appears we are not even close to being done.

As the mainstream media continues to claim that Russian agents helped steal the election away from Hillary Clinton into the American people’s head more evidence emerges that this entire narrative is one giant cover-up of the actual crime concerning Hillary Clinton’s emails.

A new report from former assistant U.S. attorney Andy McCarthy reveals just the extreme lengths that Barack Obama and his corrupt administration went through to ensure that Hillary was not indicted over her the email scandal so she could protect Obama’s legacy. McCarthy pens in his recent article for National Review every step the previous corrupt administration went through, and they might have got away with the perfect crime, but November 8. 2016 did not go as they had planned.

McCarthy lays out how it was in fact not the FBI or the Department of Justice’s decision to pass on indicting Clinton, but in fact, it was Obama’s call since he used a pseudonymous email account to communicate with Clinton on her non-secure email.

What this boils down to is that Obama knew that he exchanged classified emails with Hillary and never disclosed it which places Obama in an awkward position, and we are not referring to being in a backseat of a Volkswagon. If Hillary Clinton were indicted for criminally handling emails then so would Obama, and of course, he could not have that on his record which put into motion the most significant cover-up we have ever seen.

It all started back in March 2015, when the New York Times broke the story about Hillary Clinton and her private server. John Podesta who as you know was an advisor to Hillary and also served as her campaign manager saw the scandal hit the mainstream press, and quickly emailed a Clinton buddy and Cheryl Mills, a top State Department aide to tell them that the email exchanges between Obama and Hillary should not be disclosed.

Podesta wrote in his email that the exchanges between Obama and Clinton should be “held” back from the public because of executive privilege. Soon after those emails were sent out, Obama appeared on national television with his first lie of the scandal saying that he learned about it “the same time everybody else learned it through news reports.”

Obama’s lie to the public set off a domino effect behind the scenes where Clinton aides sprung into action to help keep this scandal under wraps. McCarthy explains that it was at this point that Obama stepped in to help with the deceiving the American people by sealing all communications he had with Clinton through email.

“Obama had his email communications with Clinton sealed. He did this by invoking a dubious presidential-records privilege. The White House insisted that the matter had nothing to do with the contents of the emails, of course; rather, it was intended to vindicate the principle of confidentiality in presidential communications with close advisers. With the media content to play along, this had a twofold benefit: Obama was able (1) to sidestep disclosure without acknowledging that the emails contained classified information, and (2) to avoid using the term “executive privilege” — with all its dark Watergate connotations — even though that was precisely what he was invoking.

Note that claims of executive privilege must yield to demands for disclosure of relevant evidence in criminal prosecutions. But of course, that’s not a problem if there will be no prosecution.”

That following year, Obama again appeared on national television to explain why Hillary Clinton should not be prosecuted for her email “matter” since she did not intend to harm national security.

Then just a few short weeks later, Comey began drafting Clinton exoneration letters before he even interviewed key witnesses, and then began to refer to the investigation as a “matter” so it could match Hillary Clinton’s campaign language since how could they prosecute anyone if there was no investigation.

Soon after, Bill Clinton met with Attorney General Loretta Lynch on a tarmac in Phoenix, Arizona, for a private meeting which McCarthy touches on.

“On July 1, amid intense public criticism of her meeting with Bill Clinton, Attorney General Lynch piously announced that she would accept whatever recommendation the FBI director and career prosecutors made about charging Clinton.

We get to the infamous FBI agent, Peter Strzok and his text messages to his mistress Lisa Page. In a message that Page sent to Strzok said, “This is a purposeful leak following the airplane snafu,” since Lynch already “knows no charges will be brought.”

The very next day on July 2, Hillary Clinton sits down with Strzok in an FBI interview which is documented below.

Everything in this very intricate dance of corruption was perfectly planned right up to Comey’s press conference on July 5, 2016, where he announced he would not pursue criminal charges against Hillary Clinton because she did not intend to break the law.

How does Comey know her state of mind? At any rate, McCarthy then goes on to mention that the missing text messages from Strzok and Page are right around this time where these two traitorous love birds address the revisions Comey made to protect Clinton and Obama’s email exchanges.

The draft, dated June 30, stated:

“We also assess that Secretary Clinton’s use of a personal email domain was both known by a large number of people and readily apparent. She also used her personal email extensively while outside the United States, including from the territory of sophisticated adversaries. That use included an email exchange with the President while Secretary Clinton was on the territory of such an adversary. [Emphasis added.] Given that combination of factors, we assess it is possible that hostile actors gained access to Secretary Clinton’s personal email account.”

McCarthy also adds:

“On the same day, according to a Strzok–Page text, a revised draft of Comey’s remarks was circulated by his chief of staff, Jim Rybicki. It replaced “the President” with “another senior government official.”

This effort to obscure Obama’s involvement had an obvious flaw: It would practically have begged congressional investigators and enterprising journalists to press for the identification of the “senior government official” with whom Clinton had exchanged emails. That was not going to work.”

When Comey made his announcement about Hillary Clinton all references to Obama had been scrubbed, and they were all protected.

It was a perfect crime and they may have gotten away with it, but then President Trump was elected, and all their careful planning was destroyed. Maybe this is where the Russian collusion narrative originated as a distraction from the possible crimes of leftists.

Is this why the Deep State is acting so erratically?

H/T [The Daily Wire]

FOLLOW us on Facebook at Freedom Daily!

Continue Reading

Latest Articles

Subscribe to our newsletter

Become An Insider! Sign up for our free email newsletter, and we'll make sure to keep you in the loop on the top breaking news of the day.

Trending