Please disable your Ad Blocker to better interact with this website.

Connect with us

Politics

Obama Took His New Air Force One When Elected, But Look What Trump Just Said About His New Jet On Order!

Obama would NEVER do this!

Published

on

Barack Obama’s Presidency has been expensive, to say that least. Our national debt is going to top an astonishing $20 trillion by the time he’s out of office, and he’s happy to spend taxpayer money on anything…. including himself.

Obama’s annual Christmas  vacation to Hawaii with his family in 2015 cost taxpayers nearly $5 million, according to LawNewz. Trump isn’t even going to be taking a presidential salary while he’s in the Oval Office.

Before he took office, Boeing created a new Air Force One for Barack Obama and they were going to do the same thing for Trump, until he discovered that it came along with a $4 billion price tag. He wasn’t too happy with that.

No President has ever done what he did next. As the Political Insider reported:

President-elect Donald J. Trump has made reining in wasteful government spending one of his top priorities and it appears he has found his latest target: the Department of Defense.

Taking to Twitter Tuesday morning, Trump blasted Boeing’s massive Air Force One contract with DoD, calling the $4 billion price tag “out of control” and suggesting the deal should be cancelled altogether:

Here are Trump’s other comments on the matter, as he told to reporters:

“The plane is totally out of control. It’s going to be over $4 billion for Air Force One program and I think it’s ridiculous. I think Boeing is doing a little bit of a number. We want Boeing to make a lot of money, but not that much money.”

Agreed! After Obama racked up $20 trillion in debt, you’d think the average person wouldn’t care about racking up the debt any additional $4 billion. It’s about time we have a President who realizes that it does make a difference.

Islam

1 Week After Muslim Tried To Take Over Southwest Flight With SICK Demand, Look Where She Ended Up

This is why we need the ban!

Published

on

Today, authorities have identified the Muslim woman who was forcibly removed from a Southwest Airlines plane in Baltimore on Tuesday as “Anila Daulatzai.” A professor at Harvard none the less! 

Once this “religion of peace” disciple got on the plane and saw there were two small dogs on board, she told the flight crew that she had a life-threatening allergy to dogs. Yeah, right “Allergies.” But she conveniently had no documentation to prove her medical condition. So she was then asked to leave the plane.

At that point, Daulatzai refused, so the flight’s captain called Maryland Transportation Authority Police, and its officers came on board to forcibly remove her.

Reports later said the dogs on the flight included one small pet and one service animal. If you have a life-threatening allergy to those dogs why would you refuse to vacate the place?

Sadly, Southwest Airlines apologized for police having to drag Daulatzai off the flight at Baltimore Washington International Airport that was headed to Los Angeles. She was still rightly charged with disorderly conduct and released on her own recognizance after appearing in court.

Via Heavy.com:

“The Los Angeles Times reported that Anila Daulatzai “was taken into custody and charged with disorderly conduct, failure to obey a reasonable and lawful order, disturbing the peace, obstructing and hindering a police officer and resisting arrest.” She is from Baltimore, the newspaper reported. According to the Los Angeles Times, the airline’s spokesman contends that Daulatzai “demanded an EpiPen and was uncooperative,” adding, “We do not have or administer shots.”

According to the Harvard website, “Currently Anila Daulatzai is teaching a graduate-level seminar course titled ‘Talibanization’ and its other. This course does not focus on the history of the Taliban movement (or movements described as ‘Taliban-like’), but more importantly on the performative nature of the term ‘Talibanization’. The course explores what deploying the term enables, particularly in the highly militarized contexts of the United States, Afghanistan and Pakistan.”

The site adds, “In particular, the course explores how formations of liberalism, feminism, and secularism give life to a term like ‘Talibanization’, and the violence that is enabled and justified by its deployment.””

The Gatestone Institute Reports:

Muslims Declare Jihad on Dogs in Europe

A Dutch Muslim politician has called for a ban on dogs in The Hague, the third-largest city in the Netherlands.

Islamic legal tradition holds that dogs are “unclean” animals, and some say the call to ban them in Holland and elsewhere represents an attempted encroachment of Islamic Sharia law in Europe.

This latest canine controversy — which the Dutch public has greeted with a mix of amusement and outrage — follows dozens of other Muslim-vs-dog-related incidents in Europe. Critics say it reflects the growing assertiveness of Muslims in Europe as they attempt to impose Islamic legal and religious norms on European society.

The Dutch dustup erupted after Hasan Küçük, a Turkish-Dutch representative on The Hague city council for the Islam Democrats, vehemently opposed a proposal by the Party for the Animals (Partij voor de Dieren) to make the city more dog friendly.

According to a January 28 report in the Amsterdam-based newspaper De Telegraaf, Küçük counter-argued that keeping dogs as pets is tantamount to animal abuse and he then called for the possession of dogs in The Hague to be criminalized.

According to its website, the Islam Democrats [ID] party is “founded on the Islamic principles of justice, equality and solidarity. ID is a bottom-up response to the large gap between the Muslim and immigrant communities and local politics…ID focuses on the political awareness within the Muslim and immigrant communities. Awareness about the need to organize, but also the need for mutual support.”

Paul ter Linden, who represents the Dutch Freedom Party (PVV) on The Hague city council, responded to Küçük by saying: “In this country pet ownership is legal. Whoever disagrees with this should move to another country.”

Dutch political commentators believe Küçük’s declarations are a provocation designed to stir up the Muslim population in The Hague. Muslims — who now make up more than 12% of the city’s population of 500,000 — view dogs as ritually unclean animals and Küçük’s call for a ban on them is a sure vote-getter, they say.

The incident in Holland follows dog-related controversies in other European countries.

In Spain, two Islamic groups based in Lérida — a city in the northeastern region of Catalonia where 29,000 Muslims now make up around 20% of the city’s total population — asked local officials to regulate the presence of dogs in public spaces so they do not “offend Muslims.”

Muslims demanded that dogs be banned from all forms of public transportation including all city buses as well as from all areas frequented by Muslim immigrants. Muslims said the presence of dogs in Lérida violates their religious freedom and their right to live according to Islamic principles.

After the municipality refused to acquiesce to Muslim demands, the city experienced a wave of dog poisonings. More than a dozen dogs were poisoned in September 2011 (local media reports here, here, here, here and here) in Lérida’s working class neighborhoods of Cappont and La Bordeta, districts that are heavily populated by Muslim immigrants and where many dogs have been killed over the past several years.

Local residents taking their dogs for walks say they have been harassed by Muslim immigrants who are opposed to seeing the animals in public. Muslims have also launched a number of anti-dog campaigns on Islamic websites and blogs based in Spain.

In Britain, which has become “ground zero” for Europe’s canine controversies, blind passengers are being ordered off buses or refused taxi rides because Muslim drivers or passengers object to their “unclean” guide dogs.

In Reading, for example, one pensioner, a cancer sufferer, was repeatedly confronted by drivers and asked to get off the bus because of his guide dog. He also faced hostility at a hospital and in a supermarket over the animal.

In Nottingham, a Muslim taxi driver refused to carry a blind man because he was accompanied by his guide dog. The taxi driver was later fined £300 ($470).

In Stafford, a Muslim taxi driver refused to carry an elderly blind couple from a grocery store because they were accompanied by their seeing-eye dog.

In Tunbridge Wells, Kent, a blind man was turned away from an Indian restaurant because the owner said it was against his Muslim beliefs to allow dogs into his establishment.

In London, a bus driver prevented a woman from boarding a bus with her dog because there was a Muslim lady on the bus who “might be upset by the dog.” As the woman attempted to complain, the doors closed and the bus drove away. When a second bus arrived, she again tried to embark, but was stopped again, this time because the driver said he was Muslim.

Also in Britain, police sniffer dogs trained to spot terrorists at train stations may no longer come into contact with Muslim passengers, following complaints that it was offensive to their religion.

A report for the Transport Department advised that the animals should only touch passengers’ luggage because it is considered “more acceptable.” British Transport Police still use sniffer dogs — which are trained to detect explosives — with any passengers regardless of faith, but handlers are now more aware of “cultural sensitivities.”

Sniffer dogs used by police to search mosques and Muslim homes are now being fitted with leather bootees to cover their paws so that they do not cause offense.

Critics say the complaints are just another example of Muslims trying to force their rules and morals on British society. Tory MP Philip Davies said: “As far as I am concerned, everyone should be treated equally in the face of the law and we cannot have people of different religious groups laying the law down. I hope the police will go about their business as they would do normally.”

Meanwhile, Muslim prisoners in Britain are being given fresh clothes and bedding after sniffer dogs search their cells.

The inmates say their bedclothes and prison uniforms must be changed according to Islamic law if they have come anywhere near dog saliva. Government rules mean prison wardens must hand out replacement sets after random drug searches to avoid religious discrimination claims.

The dogs have also been banned from touching copies of the Islamic holy book the Koran and other religious items. Prisoners are handed special bags to protect the articles.

In Scotland, the Tayside Police Department apologized for featuring a German shepherd puppy as part of a campaign to publicize its new non-emergency telephone number. The postcards are potentially offensive to the city’s 3,000-strong Muslim community.

In Norway, Gry Berg, a blind woman, was denied entry into four taxis in the center of Oslo because she was accompanied by her guide dog.

In France, Marie Laforêt, one of the country’s most well-known singers and actresses, appeared in a Paris courtroom in December to defend herself against charges that a job advertisement she placed discriminated against Muslims.

The 72-year-old Laforêt had placed an ad on an Internet website looking for someone to do some work on her terrace in 2009. She specified in the ad that “people with allergies or orthodox Muslims” should not apply “due to a small Chihuahua.”

Laforêt claimed that she made the stipulation because she believed the Muslim faith saw dogs as unclean.

The case was taken up by an anti-discrimination group called the Movement against Racism and for Friendship between Peoples (MRAP), which lodged a complaint against Laforêt.

Laforêt’s lawyer said his client “knew that the presence of a dog could conflict with the religious convictions of orthodox Muslims. It was a sign of respect.” But Muslims rejected her defense.

Allergies my hind end! And who are these professors who are indoctrinating our young?

This woman is once again doing what Muslims do best. They come to our freedom loving nation, take advantage of the naiveness we show towards them, and impose their satanic values on the rest of us. The people on that plane needed to be removed from the flight because little miss Islam follows a religion that states that dogs are dirty but goats are ok.

It’s not illegal to bring a small dog with you on a plane, especially if it’s a service dog. After all, dogs have never hijacked or flown any of our planes into our buildings.

Please share if you agree Southwest was correct to have this woman removed from the plane!

FOLLOW us on Facebook at Freedom Daily!

Continue Reading

Featured

The New York Times Just Interviewed Jimmy Carter – Libs HATE Him Now For What He Said About Trump, LOL!

Trump is cheering & so are we!

Published

on

Ever since the election, Democrats have been in full meltdown mode as their standard-bearer, Hillary Clinton, lost to a man who had never held office before. They’ve screamed impeachment, Russian collusion, and of removing President Trump for “incompetence” via the 25th Amendment.

Over 90% of mainstream media’s coverage of Trump, has been negative.

Every day, liberals screech how Trump is destroying America, while FACTS show the stock market at an all-time high, jobless claims the lowest since 1973, ISIS is all but defeated, and the entire UN Security Council voted to impose crippling sanctions on our enemy, North Korea. We could go on & on, but the point is, the nation is thriving under President Trump, and he’s only been in office for a little over nine months. Yet Democrats still screech. Well, all but one, apparently.

The New York Times recently interviewed former President, Jimmy Carter.

Carter, a Democrat, and well known as the worst president in U.S. history (until Obama came along) had some interesting words about President Trump, Russia, the election, and Hillary Clinton. He didn’t exactly tow his party’s line in the interview, and, libs are surely sh-tting their collective pants in horror.

Carter, at 93, apparently feels he’s old enough now to… wait for it…

Tell the Truth!

Truth, not being one of the Democratic Party’s strong points, is strange to hear coming from one of its own, but today, it’s happening.

Prepare to have your socks blown off. Here’s what Carter had to say.

Via The Daily Wire:

At 93, Jimmy Carter is cutting loose.

The former president sat down with The New York Times recently and chatted about all kinds of subjects. The Times decided to play up the fact that Carter — one of the worst presidents in U.S. history — would love to go over to North Korea as an envoy.

But the Times is steadily proving how out of touch it is, and how it no longer seems to actually “get” what real news is.

Here are some major highlights from the interview:

1. The Russians didn’t steal the 2016 election.

Carter was asked “Did the Russians purloin the election from Hillary?”

“I don’t think there’s any evidence that what the Russians did changed enough votes — or any votes,” Carter said.

So the hard-left former president doesn’t think the Russians stole the election? Take note, Capitol Hill Democrats.

2. We didn’t vote for Hillary.

Carter and his wife, Roselyn, disagreed on the Russia question. In the interview, she “looked over archly [and said] ‘They obviously did'” purloin the election.

“Rosie and I have a difference of opinion on that,” Carter said.

Rosalynn then said, “The drip-drip-drip about Hillary.”

Which prompted Carter to note that during the primary, they didn’t vote for Hillary Clinton. “We voted for Sanders.”

3. Obama fell far short of his promises.

Barack Obama whooshed into office on pledges of delivering “hope and change” to the country, spilt [sic] by partisan politics.

He didn’t. In fact, he made it worse.

“He made some very wonderful statements, in my opinion, when he first got in office, and then he reneged on that,” he said about Obama’s action on the Middle East.

4. Media “harder on Trump than any president.”

A recent Harvard study showed that 93% of new coverage about President Trump is negative.

But here’s another shocker: Carter defended Trump.

“I think the media have been harder on Trump than any other president certainly that I’ve known about,” Carter said. “I think they feel free to claim that Trump is mentally deranged and everything else without hesitation.”

5. NFL players should “stand during the American anthem.”

Carter, who joined the other four living ex-presidents on Saturday for a hurricane fundraiser, put his hand on his heart when the national anthem played — and he has a strong opinion about what NFL players should do, too.

“I think they ought to find a different way to object, to demonstrate,” he said. ” I would rather see all the players stand during the American anthem.”

Is that crazy or what?! The former president, a Democrat, almost sounds like a booster for Trump!

Carter, of course, comes from an earlier time in our history when politics weren’t so caustic & we didn’t have the likes of BLM Dem reps Maxine Waters & Frederica Wilson screaming that the president & a 4 star Marine general are racist.

Democrats could surely learn from Carter’s tone & willingness to concede to the truth, but I highly doubt they will anytime soon!

Dems now just have to stew in their own pot, knowing that one of their own basically just told them all to shut the f*ck up! LOL!

Share this if you think Dems should listen to Carter more often!

By Jeff Rainforth
Like Jeff on Facebook

Continue Reading

Politics

NFL Race Baiters Are PISSED After What Every Living President Just Did To Them – Then Ted Cruz Makes Them All Pay

This will make you cheer!

Published

on

Over the last several months, NFL players have continued their disgusting antics on the field by kneeling during the national anthem. These arrogant players claim that they are protesting police brutality and racial oppression in America all while cashing million dollar checks. However, while these NFL players have had the support of the liberal mainstream media and other race baiters around the country, every living president in America just publically humiliated them, and then Senator Ted Cruz spikes the proverbial football in the end zone.

This past summer, our country was hit by a series of national disasters that could test even the strongest faith in a person. Shortly after the eclipse in August, the Texas coast was walloped by Hurricane Harvey that caused unprecedented flooding in the Houston. Then soon after that massive storm, Hurricane Irma made her way through the Carribean leaving a path of destruction before slamming into the Florida Keys and the west coast of Florida. Soon after Irma left, Hurricane Maria made her way through the Carribean again before making landfall in Puerto Rico virtually decimating the already ravaged country.

Donations from good samaritans all over the country have been pouring in to help the storm-ravaged areas, but these Americans are still suffering. So, to help these people a hurricane relief concert was planned to raise money for all the victims affected by these horrific storms. This past Saturday night, the charity concert was held in the Reed Arena at Texas A&M University and featured a slew of musical performances.

In attendance were all five living presidents in a rare appearance along with a taped message of President Trump, but that is not what ticked off the race baiters in the NFL. When the national anthem began to play not one former president kneeled, but all stood except for wheelchair-bound former President George H.W. Bush.

Here is more from CNN:

Members of an exclusive club made a rare joint appearance Saturday.

All five living former US Presidents took part in a benefit concert in Texas to raise money for hurricane relief efforts, while President Donald Trump appeared in a taped video message to the concertgoers.
Former Presidents Barack Obama, George W. Bush, Bill Clinton, George H.W. Bush and Jimmy Carter attended Saturday night’s event, named “Deep From the Heart: The One America Appeal,” at Reed Arena at Texas A&M University in College Station.
Trump planned his taped message to hail the resiliency of the American people following the devastation of this year’s deadly hurricanes and wildfires. In it, he calls the effort of his predecessors “tremendous.”
“To Presidents Jimmy Carter, George H.W. Bush, Bill Clinton, George W. Bush and Barack Obama, Melania and I want to express our deep gratitude for your tremendous assistance,” Trump says in the message. “This wonderful effort reminds us that we truly are one nation under God, all unified by our values and our devotion to one another.”

How much do you want to bet that those race baiters around the country were pretty upset seeing Barack Obama and Bill Clinton standing for the national anthem? But, if you thought that seeing Obama and Clinton standing for the anthem would anger the left you can be sure that what Senator Ted Cruz posted on Twitter will send them over the edge.

“Everyone stood as one for national anthem at @TAMU with 5 ex-Presidents for hurricane relief. God bless! @AmericaAppeal.”

After Senator Cruz sent this tweet out on Twitter, it appeared that many on the social media giant agreed with his sentiment. Here is a sampling of some of those who found Cruz’s tweet to be a pretty darn close “in your face moment” to those who kneel during the anthem.

Seeing the former presidents standing together in unity during a time of great tragedy should send a clear message to the race baiters in the NFL. No matter what their political differences are, these men all came together to show unity in a country that is still recovering from the natural disasters over the last several months. If these NFL players want to protest or draw attention to perceived racial inequality or police brutality they are more than welcome do it on their own time, but leave it off the field. Maybe by seeing the former presidents standing together with President Trump and couple that with Senator Cruz’s words, these NFL players will learn a valuable lesson, but let’s not hold our breath on that.

H/T [BizPac Review]

Join the “Support our Vets – Boycott the NFL & their Sponsors” Facebook page by liking it, and Share if you’re boycotting the NFL and the companies that support them! 

FOLLOW us on Facebook at Freedom Daily!

Continue Reading

Latest Articles

Trending