Please disable your Ad Blocker to better interact with this website.

Connect with us

Politics

OMG! Watch The Fascist Obama Admin Attempting to FORCE Their Agenda On The People of North Carolina (VIDEO)

Attorney General Janet Lynch argued May 9 that any one person’s desire to choose a male or female “gender identity” is more important than Americans’ right to sexual privacy

Published

on

Attorney General Janet Lynch argued May 9 that any one person’s desire to choose a male or female “gender identity” is more important than Americans’ right to sexual privacy in shared public facilities, such as bathrooms and school locker rooms. 

“This action is about a great deal more than just bathrooms,” Lynch declared Monday, as she announced a lawsuit against a compromise sexual privacy bill in North Carolina that sets a clear rule for when people can use bathrooms reserved for the other sex. Lynch did not offer any alternative rule in her speech, but instead made an open-ended claim that a person’s choice of “gender identity” overrules communities’ sexual privacy rules.

This is about the dignity and respect we accord our fellow citizens and the laws that we, as a people and as a country, have enacted to protect them – indeed, to protect all of us. And it’s about the founding ideals that have led this country – haltingly but inexorably – in the direction of fairness, inclusion and equality for all Americans.

This unprecedented federal power-grab over the nation’s civic culture — and of the nation’s toilets and bathrooms, K-12 locker rooms and showers, and of retail stores’ changing rooms — is likely intended to boost progressive anger and political action before November 2016.

That’s partly because some progressives view the issues of “transgender rights” — more accurately, the right to choose a “gender identity” — as a matter of fundamental fairness to a tiny minority. As few as 1 in every 2,400 Americans want to live and dress like members of the opposite sex, according to a study of the 2010 census.

But Lynch is also risking a huge rebuke from the public, which is increasingly opposed to the forced removal of single-sex bathrooms and K-12 facilities and retail changing rooms.

On Monday, North Carolina Gov. Pat McCrory rejected Lynch’s demand that he discard the state’s sexual privacy law, and he called on business groups and the U.S. Congress to reject President Barack Obama’s campaign to create a new legal right to “gender identity” via agency policy statements, not by laws passed in Congress.

“Our nation is dealing with a very new complex and emotional issue — how to balance the expectations of privacy and equality in one of the most private areas of our lives, restrooms, locker rooms or public shower facilities,” McCrory said in a May 9 press conference.

“Right now, the Obama administration is bypassing Congress by attempting to rewrite the law and set basic restroom policies, locker room policies and even shower policies for public and private employers across the country, not just in North Carolina,” he said.

With a defensive lawsuit, “I anticipate our own legislature, other private sector entities from throughout the United States, and possibly other states, to  join us in seeking that clarification,” he said.”It is time for the U.S. Congress to bring clarity to our national anti-discrimination provisions,” he added.

On Fox New’s Sunday May 8 show. McCrory described Obama’s gender policy as bullying. “There is no clear [federal] identification or definition of gender identity… It’s the federal government being a bully.”

McCrory is getting support from mainstream groups. “If the White House can dictate the bathroom policies of America, what could possibly be beyond their reach? … The governor rightly asserts that the Obama team can’t simply rewrite a 50-year-old law [against sex discrimination] to suit their agenda,” said a statement from the Family Research Council.

Obama and Lynch are pushing their claim for a “gender identity” right by targeting the compromise law in North Carolina that defines when people can use the bathroom reserved for the other sex.

That law, the Public Facilities Privacy & Security Act, or HB2, says people can use the single-sex facilities reserved for the sex marked on their birth certificates. That law preserve sexual privacy for adults, teenagers and children in single-sex bathrooms and showers and locker rooms. But it is also a compromise because it allows people to use bathrooms designated for the opposite sex if they first change the sex on their birth certificates.

Under a 2005 state law, people can change their legal sex once they’ve undergone medical procedures.

(b) A new certificate of birth shall be made by the State Registrar when …

(4) A written request from an individual is received by the State Registrar to change the sex on that individual’s birth record because of sex reassignment surgery, if the request is accompanied by a notarized statement from the physician who performed the sex reassignment surgery or from a physician licensed to practice medicine who has examined the individual and can certify that the person has undergone sex reassignment surgery.

But Lynch and her progressive allies seems to oppose any test, rule, limits or definition on a person’s freedom to pick their “gender identity,” such as North Carolina’s compromise birth-certificate guideline. In fact, progressive education officials in Oregon have just released regulations that says teachers should comply with ‘gender identity’ choices by minors in K-12 schools, and even hide the information from the parents.

Lynch is so opposed to the birth-certificate guideline in North Carolina’s privacy and security bill that she mischaracterized the 2005 law in her Monday press conference to hide the birth certificate compromise. She said, misleadingly, that,

The North Carolina General Assembly passed House Bill 2 in special session on March 23 of this year. The bill sought to strike down an anti-discrimination provision in a recently-passed Charlotte, North Carolina, ordinance, as well as to require transgender people in public agencies to use the bathrooms consistent with their sex as noted at birth, rather than the bathrooms that fit their gender identity.

The phrase, “as noted,” implies that people cannot change their legal sex, and it hides the existence of the right to change the legal sex on birth certificates.

Lynch talked about the right to privacy, but only to complain that single-sex facilities can create privacy problems for people who are using facilities designated for the opposite sex.

The privacy and security bill “placed North Carolina in direct opposition to federal laws prohibiting discrimination on the basis of sex and gender identity. More to the point, they created state-sponsored discrimination against transgender individuals, who simply seek to engage in the most private of functions in a place of safety and security – a right taken for granted by most of us,” she complained.

Lynch’s uncompromising demand may be intended to maximize the emotional and political impact on progressives before the 2016 election, many of whom are backing Sen. Bernie Sanders’ demands for an economic revival after eight lackluster years of Obama’s economy.

But Obama, Lynch and many progressives, are eager to portray any effort by a majority of nation’s population of 310 million Americans to protect their sexual privacy as merely crude “discrimination” against the less-than-one-percent of Americans who want to pick their own “gender identity.”

So Lynch used her May 9 press conference to portray North Carolina as a racist swamp for passing the popular compromise law that protects people’s privacy and safety in shared single-sex facilities.

This is not the first time that we have seen discriminatory responses to historic moments of progress for our nation. We saw it in the Jim Crow laws that followed the Emancipation Proclamation … State-sanctioned discrimination never looks good in hindsight. It was not so very long ago that states, including North Carolina, had signs above restrooms, water fountains and on public accommodations keeping people out based upon a distinction without a difference. We have moved beyond those dark days, but not without pain and suffering and an ongoing fight to keep moving forward.

Left-wing sex-related advocacy groups are cheering Obama’s transgender policy. For example, the the Human Rights Campaign, a D.C.-based group that seeks to increase the status of gay and lesbians, declared “North Carolina has the unfortunate distinction of becoming the first state in the country to enact a law attacking transgender students.”

Many progressives — and corporate executives — are eager to change the subject from the economy by launching a war against Americans’ sexual-privacy.

For example, an April 29 article in Slate.com was headlined, “Two Visions of the Gender Police State to Come If Bathroom Panic Continues,” which described supporters of sexual-privacy as “nanny-state bigots behind this almost authoritarian legislation … [are] ugly as sin.” Similarly, the Huffington Post portrayed McCrory’s pro-privacy policy as “Standing Athwart the Bathroom Door,” as if his support of single-sex facilities is just the same as opposition to public education for racial minorities.

Via Breitbart

Join the conversation

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse.

Politics

Liberal City Just Gave NASTY Gift To Every Sex Offender Just 1 Week Before Kids Coming Knocking For Candy

This is horrific!

Published

on

Halloween is just around the corner, and if you are a parent, you most likely have a young child just chomping at the bit ready to go trick or treating. They have their costume all picked out, and their bucket prepared to be filled to the brim with sweet treats from neighbors and friends, and not a worry in the world. However, leave it to liberals to shatter that sense of security with their latest attack on the innocent and pure, and it could not be at the worst time.

For years, the liberal agenda has been targeting children and their innocence, and they aren’t stopping anytime soon. It should not have to be said, but adults are supposed to be the ones that protect children from the evils of the world, but that is not how the liberal agenda works. These sick and twisted liberals have promoted lifting safeguards in public schools by allowing teachers to instruct them on sex education, minimized parental roles, and sexualized them in popular television shows and magazines. 

Now, there has been a push to normalize pedophilia employing the same methods that progressives used with the LGBT community in the past. These nasty liberals are attempting to equate adults who have sexual relations with other consenting adults on the same level as a pedophile seeking to engage in sexual relations with a child. But, before that can be done they must remove roadblocks that protect these innocent children, and it looks like that is being done in one California city.

Just a week before Halloween, Simi Valley City council voted to repeal a law that would protect children from sex offenders. You see, in the past sex offenders were not allowed to participate in giving out candy, decorating their home, or enticing children on Halloween in any way. In fact, these sick individuals were to have all outdoor lighting turned off from 5 pm to midnight so that children did not come to their doors.

However, these liberal city council members caved to lawsuits citing that this law infringed on sex offenders rights, so they did away with it instead of fighting to protect the innocent. 

Here is more from Blue Lives Matter:

The Simi Valley City Council voted on Monday to repeal a law that was put in place to protect children from sex offenders.

The city council says that their decision was based on their belief that the ordinance wouldn’t stand up against a lawsuit which was filed against the city and police department.

The ordinance specifically targeted registered sex offenders and was meant to keep young children away from them on Halloween.

Under the ordinance, registered sex offenders were prohibited from answering their doors to trick-or-treaters, according to CBS Los Angeles.

The ordinance also prohibited them from decorating the outside of their homes, which could attract children, and they were required to have their outdoor lighting off from 5 PM to midnight on Halloween.

With the ordinance gone, no law prohibits sex offenders from attracting trick-or-treaters to their house.

The law was initially passed in 2012, but the city has since seen two lawsuits defending sex offenders’ right to give candy to children.

Janice Bellucci, the executive director of the Alliance for Constitutional Sex Offense Laws, filed the latest lawsuit to stand up for sex offenders.

With no clear path to victory for the city, they saw no choice but to eliminate the law.

The lawsuit against the city will now be dismissed.

Nobody had been cited under the ordinance since it was enacted in 2012.

The city is now adopting a new strategy to protect children from the sex offenders.

Mike Harris with Ventura County Star reports that Mayor Bob Huber said the news plan is “a very proactive way to approach the protection of our children. We’ll be sending the link to the Megan’s Law site for our residents to locate and therefore avoid going to homes of registered sex offenders.”

Huber, who is an attorney, is the one who initially created the now-repealed ordinance but said that the courts had been striking down similar ordinances for years, and that requires them to change their strategy.

Only 97 of the city’s 165 registered sex offenders will be listed. The site excludes offenders of certain sex crimes, such as indecent exposure.

It is unfathomable to hear that anyone in their right mind would argue that sex offenders have any rights after they denied someone theirs by force. These sex offenders may have done their time in prison, but they are in no way rehabilitated and should not be allowed to interact with young children no matter what their crime was.

Children need to be protected, and if the city is not going to step up and make sure that happens, then parents are going to need to be more active in their children’s lives. We live in a time where it is evident that the progressive left has infiltrated many government offices and they are not in the business of protecting family values, and that won’t change until we vote them out.

H/T [Blue Lives Matter]

FOLLOW us on Facebook at Freedom Daily!

Continue Reading

Politics

Special Gun Club Just Started With FULL Support From Libs For SICK Reason – Here’s What They’re Training For

This isn’t good!

Published

on

Over the last eight years, the Obama administration has been fanning the flames of division by creating fear and panic in the LGBT community and other minority groups. So, it was no wonder that when Donald Trump was elected as president that the minority communities would fear the change of power from Democrat to Republican.

Shortly after Trump was sworn in, the mainstream media continued to feed that unsubstantiated fear which eventually turned into paranoia. Now, these minority groups are in an utter state of paranoia and are busy arming themselves, and it only gets worse from there.

The liberal agenda has been hard at work for the better part of the last decade dividing Americans by sex, gender, and race to create chaos. While the majority of this division can be attributed to Barack Obama, the mainstream media is equally culpable for the spread of misinformation.

During the presidential campaign, the mainstream media was busy brainwashing minority groups into believing that when Trump was elected, he would round begin to round up individuals in the LGBT community and ship them to concentration camps and openly discriminate other minorities. While that can not be further from the truth, these individuals believed it and now feel that they are fighting for their survival.

In an ironic embrace of the Second Amendment, these members of the LGBT community have begun to take up arms for an impending war. 

Radicalized members of these minority groups have popped up all over the country, and it doesn’t appear it will end anytime soon. For instance, membership in the Pittsburgh chapter of the Pink Pistols, an LGBTQ-oriented gun group with branches nationwide, grew significantly after last November’s presidential election and then again after a member of Antifa was killed during a counter-protester in Charlottesville this past summer.

While there is no argument with anyone in America arming themselves for protection, it is quite another when it is in the spirit of fear and vengeance.

Here is more from AP concerning the increase in LGBT members looking for violent solutions to their political woes. 

The former pacifist pumped a shotgun at the firing line.

Lore McSpadden never touched a gun before the Trigger Warning Queer & Trans Gun Club started this past year. Now McSpadden is among the shooters routinely yelling, “Pull!” and blasting at clay pigeons angling over a mowed field near Rochester.

Trigger Warning members are anxious about armed and organized extremists who seem increasingly emboldened. Their response has a touch of symmetry to it: They started a club to teach members how to take up arms.

“It’s a way to assert our strength,” said Jake Allen, 27, who helped form the group. “Often, queer people are thought of as being weak, as being defenseless, and I think in many ways this pushes back against that. And I want white supremacists and neo-Nazis to know that queer people are taking steps necessary to protect themselves.”

Trigger Warning members meet once a month to shoot still targets and saucer-shaped pigeons. The 18 dues-paying members are all LGBTQ, many just learning about guns.

“I identified as a pacifist really through most of my life,” said McSpadden, 37, who has attended a self-defense seminar and now owns a 20-gauge shotgun.

On a recent evening, their instructor showed novices how to pull a .22-caliber rifle snugly to their shoulders and how to aim slightly ahead of a moving target. Members cheered when shooters shattered a pigeon or hit a bulls-eye.

The light mood belies the apprehension that led to group’s creation this past winter amid a year marked by politically tinged violence ranging from scuffles at protests to a violent clash of white supremacists and counter-protesters in Charlottesville, Virginia.

Zora Gussow recalls a dismal time earlier this year when she began talking to Allen about taking on “the gaping hole in the knowledge of people on the left” about firearms.

“I grew up afraid of guns,” Gussow said. “The first time I was near a gun in a house, it was of one of my friend’s, and I basically jumped back. And that feels dangerous to me in a society where there are so many guns.”

A dozen shooters in a field in upstate New York does not exactly represent a vanguard of a newly armed left. But the group is not alone. Allen said there is another Trigger Warning chapter in Atlanta and he has received inquiries from people in about 10 other cities.

This unfounded fear in the LGBT community just goes to show you how powerful the mainstream media is in their reach to create as much division as they possibly can in an already fractured country. Of course, if anyone listened to the misinformation spouted by these significant news networks daily, they would believe that Trump and conservatives were out to get them and come to the conclusion that they need to fight back.

If any violence does occur in this country between fellow Americans, the blood is on their hands, and they should be held accountable. 

H/T [DownTrend]

FOLLOW us on Facebook at Freedom Daily!

Continue Reading

Crime

Elizabeth Warren At Center Of SICK New Sex Scandal After Nasty Skeleton Comes Crawling Out Of Her Closet

This is disgusting!

Published

on

The United States Senator from Massachusetts, far left wing  Elizabeth “Pocahontas” Warren, is now jumping on the bandwagon and joining the growing chorus of women sharing their experiences about sexual harassment in the wake of allegations against the sick pervert, Hollywood mogul Harvey Weinstein.

The Massachusetts Democrat shared a story from when she was a “baby law professor” during a videotaped interview session with three other female senators that aired Sunday on NBC’s “Meet The Press.”

Senator Warren says in the interview that a senior faculty member had asked her to stop by his office one day. When she did, he slammed the door and “lunged” at her. He then chased her around a desk, trying to get his hands on her. She claims she managed to avert the situation and conveniently only told her best friend about the incident. She later goes on to explain that speaking out is a way to show solidarity and say it isn’t the victim’s fault.

If this story is indeed true and not just a fabrication to get ahead in politics, like when she said she was a Native American in order to get a teaching job, then it’s awful that all these things are happening to these women, even a lying hack like Senator Warren.

Via DownTrend:

I’m not going to say this is a lie, weirder things have happened, but, come on. Massachusetts Senator Elizabeth Warren claims the she was sexually harassed by a colleague when she was a law professor. In fact several democrats have come forward to claim victimhood at the hands of evil men. Democrats turned a blind eye to serial rapist Bill Clinton and sexual predator Harvey Weinstein for decades, but suddenly it’s trendy on the left to be outraged by something they have tolerated and encouraged for so long.

Meet the Press reached out to all 21 female Senators to get their stories about sexual harassment and only got 4 (all democrats), most of whom weren’t harassed at all. Missouri Senator Claire McCaskill told this story when she was seeking advice from a male state lawmaker about getting her bill passed:

“I cautiously approached the very powerful speaker of the Missouri House of Representatives. He looked at me and paused and he said, ‘Well, did you bring your kneepads?’ I do think he was joking, but it was shocking that he would make that joke to a colleague,” said McCaskill.

Okay, even McCaskill thinks that guy was joking so let’s call this first one BS; she wasn’t harassed.

Next, North Dakota Senator Heidi Heitkamp talked about how a male law enforcement official said something to her after she made some sort of an effort to curb domestic violence:

“He put his finger in my face and he said, ‘Listen here, men will always beat their wives and you can’t stop ‘em,’” said Heitkamp.

That might be “mansplaining” but it’s not close at all to sexual harassment. So far these ladies are 0 for 2.

Hawaii Senator Mazie Hirono had the least credible sexual harassment story by claiming men have asked her out on dates:

“I’ve been propositioned by teachers, by my colleagues, and you name it,” Hirono said.

0 for 3, which brings us to Elizabeth Warren who said a colleague once invited her to his office:

“He slammed the door and lunged for me. It was like a bad cartoon. He’s chasing me around the desk, trying to get his hands on me. After several rounds, I jumped for the door and got out and I went back to my office and just sat and shook and thought: ‘What have I done to bring this on?’” Warren said.

Warren also mentioned that she kept this attempted attack to herself, which adds zero credibility to her story.

Maybe this did happen, but Warren looks a sissy little boy, so I doubt it. Then again, some dudes have very weird fetishes. If I had to venture a guess, I’d say that Warren’s colleague was just trying to play “Cowboys and Indians” and she misinterpreted it. If it happened when she was a law professor, that’s back when she was pretending to be a Native American princess. It seems cultural appropriation really does have a price.

MSN Reports:

Screenwriter Scott Rosenberg says he knew all about Harvey Weinstein — and so did everyone else

We’ve heard a lot of people in recent days swear that they didn’t know Harvey Weinstein was a serial sexual harasser whose behavior, beyond boorish, was sometimes criminal. Screenwriter Scott Rosenberg, the Needham native whose first two movies, “Things to Do in Denver When You’re Dead” and “Beautiful Girls,” Weinstein produced, is not one of those people.

In an epic Facebook post Monday to some of his followers, Rosenberg insisted everybody who came into contact with Harvey Weinstein knew — maybe not about the rapes alleged by some women — but certainly about a “pattern of overly-aggressive behavior that was rather dreadful. We knew about the man’s hunger; his fervor; his appetite. There was nothing secret about this voracious rapacity; like a gluttonous ogre out of the Brothers Grimm. All couched in vague promises of potential movie roles.”

Rosenberg describes Weinstein’s behavior as “reprehensible,” but he also has had it with what he calls the “current flood of sanctimonious denial and condemnation that now crashes upon these shores of rectitude in gloppy tides of [expletive] righteousness.”

Rosenberg claims many of the denials are coming from people who did, in fact, know.

“Because I was there. And I saw you. And I talked about it with you,” writes Rosenberg. “You, the big producers; you, the big directors; you, the big agents; you, the big financiers. And you, the big rival studio chiefs; you, the big actors; you, the big actresses; you, the big models. You, the big journalists; you, the big screenwriters; you, the big rock stars; you, the big restaurateurs; you, the big politicians. I saw you. All of you. God help me, I was there with you.”

So why didn’t he say something? Do something? The options were few, Rosenberg writes.

“What would you have had us do? Who were we to tell? The authorities? What authorities? The press? Harvey owned the press. The Internet? There was no Internet or reasonable facsimile thereof. Should we have called the police? And said what? Should we have reached out to some fantasy Attorney General Of Movieland? That didn’t exist,” he writes. “Not to mention, most of the victims chose not to speak out. Aside from sharing the grimy details with a close girlfriend or confidante. And if they discussed it with their representatives? Agents and managers, who themselves feared The Wrath Of The Big Man? The agents and managers would tell them to keep it to themselves. Because who knew the repercussions? That old saw ‘You’ll Never Work In This Town Again’ came crawling back to putrid life like a re-animated cadaver in a late-night zombie flick.”

Rosenberg acknowledges that being a friend of Weinstein’s had benefits — and they were substantial.

“Hell, Harvey once took me to St. Barth’s for Christmas. For 12 days! I was a broke-a** kid from Boston who had never even HEARD of St. Barth’s before he booked my travel. He once got me tickets to the seven hottest Broadway shows in one week. So I could take a new girlfriend on a dazzling tour of theater. He got me seats on the 40-yard-line to the Super Bowl, when the Patriots were playing the Packers in New Orleans. Even got me a hotel room, which was impossible to get that weekend,” Rosenberg writes. “He gave and gave and gave and gave. He had a monarch’s volcanic generosity when it came to those within his circle. And a Mafia don’s fervent need for abject loyalty from his capos and soldiers.”

But ignoring Weinstein’s misdeeds had serious consequences, Rosenberg writes.

“We were willing to overlook what the Golden Goose was up to, in the murky shadows behind the barn . . . And for that, I am eternally sorry. To all of the women that had to suffer this . . . I am eternally sorry . . . Their courage only hangs a lantern on my shame. And I am eternally sorry to all those who suffered in silence all this time. And have chosen to remain silent today.

“So, yeah, I am sorry. Sorry and ashamed,” he writes. “Because, in the end, I was complicit.

I didn’t say [expletive]. I didn’t do [expletive]. Harvey was nothing but wonderful to me. So I reaped the rewards and I kept my mouth shut. And for that, once again, I am sorry. But you should be sorry, too.”

What really irks me the most about this whole mess is how everyone knew Weinstein was a sick pervert and sexual predator but still were very ready and willing to his money. In fact, a spokeswoman for Elizabeth Warren put out a statement last week claiming that Warren will be donating the $5,000 in contributions she received from Weinstein for her 2012 senate campaign to charity.

Why are all these Democrats taking all this money from this sicko if everyone always knew what he was into? Then again, they all think of former President Bill Clinton as some kind of God!

Please share if you are sick of the double standards of the left….

FOLLOW us on Facebook at Freedom Daily!

Continue Reading

Latest Articles

Trending