Please disable your Ad Blocker to better interact with this website.

Connect with us

Politics

OMG! Watch The Fascist Obama Admin Attempting to FORCE Their Agenda On The People of North Carolina (VIDEO)

Attorney General Janet Lynch argued May 9 that any one person’s desire to choose a male or female “gender identity” is more important than Americans’ right to sexual privacy

Published

on

Attorney General Janet Lynch argued May 9 that any one person’s desire to choose a male or female “gender identity” is more important than Americans’ right to sexual privacy in shared public facilities, such as bathrooms and school locker rooms. 

“This action is about a great deal more than just bathrooms,” Lynch declared Monday, as she announced a lawsuit against a compromise sexual privacy bill in North Carolina that sets a clear rule for when people can use bathrooms reserved for the other sex. Lynch did not offer any alternative rule in her speech, but instead made an open-ended claim that a person’s choice of “gender identity” overrules communities’ sexual privacy rules.

This is about the dignity and respect we accord our fellow citizens and the laws that we, as a people and as a country, have enacted to protect them – indeed, to protect all of us. And it’s about the founding ideals that have led this country – haltingly but inexorably – in the direction of fairness, inclusion and equality for all Americans.

This unprecedented federal power-grab over the nation’s civic culture — and of the nation’s toilets and bathrooms, K-12 locker rooms and showers, and of retail stores’ changing rooms — is likely intended to boost progressive anger and political action before November 2016.

That’s partly because some progressives view the issues of “transgender rights” — more accurately, the right to choose a “gender identity” — as a matter of fundamental fairness to a tiny minority. As few as 1 in every 2,400 Americans want to live and dress like members of the opposite sex, according to a study of the 2010 census.

But Lynch is also risking a huge rebuke from the public, which is increasingly opposed to the forced removal of single-sex bathrooms and K-12 facilities and retail changing rooms.

On Monday, North Carolina Gov. Pat McCrory rejected Lynch’s demand that he discard the state’s sexual privacy law, and he called on business groups and the U.S. Congress to reject President Barack Obama’s campaign to create a new legal right to “gender identity” via agency policy statements, not by laws passed in Congress.

“Our nation is dealing with a very new complex and emotional issue — how to balance the expectations of privacy and equality in one of the most private areas of our lives, restrooms, locker rooms or public shower facilities,” McCrory said in a May 9 press conference.

“Right now, the Obama administration is bypassing Congress by attempting to rewrite the law and set basic restroom policies, locker room policies and even shower policies for public and private employers across the country, not just in North Carolina,” he said.

With a defensive lawsuit, “I anticipate our own legislature, other private sector entities from throughout the United States, and possibly other states, to  join us in seeking that clarification,” he said.”It is time for the U.S. Congress to bring clarity to our national anti-discrimination provisions,” he added.

On Fox New’s Sunday May 8 show. McCrory described Obama’s gender policy as bullying. “There is no clear [federal] identification or definition of gender identity… It’s the federal government being a bully.”

McCrory is getting support from mainstream groups. “If the White House can dictate the bathroom policies of America, what could possibly be beyond their reach? … The governor rightly asserts that the Obama team can’t simply rewrite a 50-year-old law [against sex discrimination] to suit their agenda,” said a statement from the Family Research Council.

Obama and Lynch are pushing their claim for a “gender identity” right by targeting the compromise law in North Carolina that defines when people can use the bathroom reserved for the other sex.

That law, the Public Facilities Privacy & Security Act, or HB2, says people can use the single-sex facilities reserved for the sex marked on their birth certificates. That law preserve sexual privacy for adults, teenagers and children in single-sex bathrooms and showers and locker rooms. But it is also a compromise because it allows people to use bathrooms designated for the opposite sex if they first change the sex on their birth certificates.

Under a 2005 state law, people can change their legal sex once they’ve undergone medical procedures.

(b) A new certificate of birth shall be made by the State Registrar when …

(4) A written request from an individual is received by the State Registrar to change the sex on that individual’s birth record because of sex reassignment surgery, if the request is accompanied by a notarized statement from the physician who performed the sex reassignment surgery or from a physician licensed to practice medicine who has examined the individual and can certify that the person has undergone sex reassignment surgery.

But Lynch and her progressive allies seems to oppose any test, rule, limits or definition on a person’s freedom to pick their “gender identity,” such as North Carolina’s compromise birth-certificate guideline. In fact, progressive education officials in Oregon have just released regulations that says teachers should comply with ‘gender identity’ choices by minors in K-12 schools, and even hide the information from the parents.

Lynch is so opposed to the birth-certificate guideline in North Carolina’s privacy and security bill that she mischaracterized the 2005 law in her Monday press conference to hide the birth certificate compromise. She said, misleadingly, that,

The North Carolina General Assembly passed House Bill 2 in special session on March 23 of this year. The bill sought to strike down an anti-discrimination provision in a recently-passed Charlotte, North Carolina, ordinance, as well as to require transgender people in public agencies to use the bathrooms consistent with their sex as noted at birth, rather than the bathrooms that fit their gender identity.

The phrase, “as noted,” implies that people cannot change their legal sex, and it hides the existence of the right to change the legal sex on birth certificates.

Lynch talked about the right to privacy, but only to complain that single-sex facilities can create privacy problems for people who are using facilities designated for the opposite sex.

The privacy and security bill “placed North Carolina in direct opposition to federal laws prohibiting discrimination on the basis of sex and gender identity. More to the point, they created state-sponsored discrimination against transgender individuals, who simply seek to engage in the most private of functions in a place of safety and security – a right taken for granted by most of us,” she complained.

Lynch’s uncompromising demand may be intended to maximize the emotional and political impact on progressives before the 2016 election, many of whom are backing Sen. Bernie Sanders’ demands for an economic revival after eight lackluster years of Obama’s economy.

But Obama, Lynch and many progressives, are eager to portray any effort by a majority of nation’s population of 310 million Americans to protect their sexual privacy as merely crude “discrimination” against the less-than-one-percent of Americans who want to pick their own “gender identity.”

So Lynch used her May 9 press conference to portray North Carolina as a racist swamp for passing the popular compromise law that protects people’s privacy and safety in shared single-sex facilities.

This is not the first time that we have seen discriminatory responses to historic moments of progress for our nation. We saw it in the Jim Crow laws that followed the Emancipation Proclamation … State-sanctioned discrimination never looks good in hindsight. It was not so very long ago that states, including North Carolina, had signs above restrooms, water fountains and on public accommodations keeping people out based upon a distinction without a difference. We have moved beyond those dark days, but not without pain and suffering and an ongoing fight to keep moving forward.

Left-wing sex-related advocacy groups are cheering Obama’s transgender policy. For example, the the Human Rights Campaign, a D.C.-based group that seeks to increase the status of gay and lesbians, declared “North Carolina has the unfortunate distinction of becoming the first state in the country to enact a law attacking transgender students.”

Many progressives — and corporate executives — are eager to change the subject from the economy by launching a war against Americans’ sexual-privacy.

For example, an April 29 article in Slate.com was headlined, “Two Visions of the Gender Police State to Come If Bathroom Panic Continues,” which described supporters of sexual-privacy as “nanny-state bigots behind this almost authoritarian legislation … [are] ugly as sin.” Similarly, the Huffington Post portrayed McCrory’s pro-privacy policy as “Standing Athwart the Bathroom Door,” as if his support of single-sex facilities is just the same as opposition to public education for racial minorities.

Via Breitbart

Join the conversation

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse.

Politics

BREAKING!! SHE Was a Spy In The WHITE HOUSE The ENTIRE TIME!! BUSTED!!!

GET HER TRUMP!!!

Published

on

Sources say that former White House staffer and The Apprentice Contestant Omarosa Manigault-Newman may have taped confidential West Wing conversations and now has fears she may be the next one called to testify in special counsel Robert Mueller’s FBI witchhunt.

Sources added that the soon-to-be former assistant to President Donald Trump and director of communications for the White House Office of Public Liaison has held exploratory meetings with several high profile attorneys for potential representation in case such a request does happen. Although Omarosa did resign from her White House post last month, her last day is this Saturday.

Reports confirm she has met with Harvey Weinstein’s former attorney Gloria Allred’s daughter, Lisa Bloom and former Bill Cosby lawyer Monique Pressley, among many others. With a list like this nothing good can come of what this woman will have to say.

A recent unconfirmed report from Life & Style Weekly claimed Manigault-Newman could get upward of $10 million for a tell-all book deal about her time in the White House working with the president.

 

Both the White House and Manigault-Newman did not respond to requests for comment.

Via Fox News:

“Omarosa trying to lawyer up, may have secretly taped White House conversations

President Trump’s former spotlight-seeking staffer Omarosa Manigault-Newman might have secretly recorded private conversations in the White House, The New York Daily News reported Friday.

Manigault-Newman, who abruptly left the White House last year, purportedly “loves” to record meetings and has been lawyering up. She’s held several exploratory meetings with high profile attorneys in recent weeks, including Harvey Weinstein’s former attorney Lisa Bloom and former Bill Cosby lawyer Monique Pressley, the paper reported.

“Everyone knows Omarosa loves to record people and meetings using the voice notes app on her iPhone,” a source told the Daily News. “Don’t be surprised if she has secret audio files on everyone in that White House, past and present staffers included.”

Though White house Chief of Staff John Kelly personally told the former “Apprentice” star that her stint in the White House had come to a close last month, her official last day is Saturday.

Rumors immediately surfaced at the time that Manigault-Newman was dragged out of the White House by Secret Service in a dramatic reality-tv kind of way though the Secret Service has denied those claims.

“Our only involvement in this matter was to deactivate the individual’s pass which grants access to the complex,” the U.S. Secret Service said in a statement.

Fox News sources said Manigault-Newman was given the news of her termination in the White House Situation Room, a subterranean space under the West Wing where electronic and recording devices must be surrendered at the door.

“Where are the pictures or videos?” Manigault-Newman questioned at the time. “If I had confronted John Kelly, who is a very formidable person, it would garner someone to take a photo or a video.”

However, the nature of the Situation Room’s restrictions mean that neither Manigault-Newman nor anyone else would have been able to record her conversation with Kelly even if they had wanted to.

However, a recent ban on personal cell phones in the White House, which came after Michael Wolf’s tell-all book about Trump, was related to Manigault-Newman’s habit of recording conversations, the paper reported.

The Daily News also says the 43-year-old believes she may become a “fixture” in FBI special counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation into allegations of collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia. Several Trump staffers have already been questioned or subpoenaed on the matter.

During her stint at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, Manigault-Newman worked as an assistant to the president and director of communications for the White House Office of Public Liaison, working on outreach to various constituency groups. In that role, she enjoyed a close relationship with Trump and even held her April wedding at Trump’s D.C. hotel.

She purportedly drew the ire of Kelly and other senior staffers when she brought a 39-person bridal party to the White House for a photo shoot.

“Certainly I had more access than most, and people had problems with that,” she said on “Good Morning America.” “People have problems with my 14-year relationship with him.”

Anyone who saw this woman in The Apprentice knows she could be bad news and not to be trusted. There was no valid reason for President Trump to have brought her into his administration. Just like on The Apprentice, she was excellent at getting things done and shutting people down when they went in another direction, but she had no issue whatsoever backstabbing anyone who got in her way, and even those who didn’t. Although it made for some great TV someone like this doesn’t translate well into an atmosphere where loyalty is a must, and President Trump should have known this.

Please share if you want to see Omarosa go away.

FOLLOW us on Facebook at Freedom Daily!

Continue Reading

Politics

BREAKING News From DC!!! They Just Tried To Take Out TRUMP!!!

SEND THEM TO GITMO!!!

Published

on

Democratic Congressman Al Green from the great state of Texas took it upon himself to bring forth articles of impeachment against President Donald Trump Friday morning. Although six Democrat congressmen had already previously listed many charges against the president in December articles, including obstruction of justice, a violation of the Constitution’s foreign emoluments clause, a violation of the Constitution’s domestic emoluments clause, undermining the federal judiciary process and undermining the press.

None of these accusations have any basis in kind of reality. Green described the president as a racist and a bigot on Friday, which he said is further proof of the divisiveness of the Trump White House. House lawmakers voted to postpone the impeachment effort for up to two legislative days, as the debate to avert a government shutdown rages in the Senate.

They can postpone all they want. The truth is that they have nothing going on and they know it.

Is Congressman Green wrong? President Trump is not a racist or a bigot. He was not ever called that during very his long career. He’s in his early 70’s and the first time he was called racist was when he began defeating Republican candidates for the Presidency. Democrats utilize the “racist” tactic as a means of battling right-wing believers.  If being racist was illegal then Obama may have been in prison years ago for purveying, indirectly, hatred towards white people, particularly police officers. President Trump is putting Americans first, and that doesn’t necessarily require someone to be racist, it just means they love their country, and ALL of the wonderful, beautiful, legal people who contribute, pay taxes and work hard.

The Democrat party faces an uphill battle with the impending release of the FISA memo. It’s understandable that they desperately grasp at straws to deflect from the fact that it was their party, Barack Hussein Obama, and his Secretary of State Hillary Clinton who may be tried for treason against our great nation.

 

 

Time Reports:

Critics would need to settle on one argument

The Constitution states that a president can be impeached if convicted of “treason, bribery or other high crimes and misdemeanors.” Those looking to impeach Trump would need to show he has done something that falls into one of those categories — which requires more evidence.

While treason and bribery are defined by the Constitution and by federal law, “high crimes and misdemeanors” is a less specific charge. Gerhardt said the framers intended it to refer to “political crimes,” including abuses of power or other offenses against the United States. “They don’t have to be technically criminal things — things for which someone could go to prison — but they do have to reach a certain level of seriousness,” he said.

Some of Trump’s critics have argued that his business dealings are in violation of the Constitution’s Emoluments Clause, which prohibits the President from accepting gifts from foreign leaders or governments. Others, including Waters, have argued that the ties between Russia and Trump’s team are signs of wrongdoing. Christopher Peterson, a University of Utah law professor, maintains that the Trump University lawsuits provide grounds for impeachment and thinks there’s already a “fairly solid” case to be made.

But for Trump’s opponents to realistically pursue impeachment, they would likely need to focus on investigating one offense and making a specific, formal accusation of wrongdoing.

There would need to be more evidence
Right now, arguments for impeachment are resting on potentially flimsy claims. 

While there are mounting questions about potential coordination between Trump’s campaign and Russian interests, no concrete conclusions have been reached.

“So far there hasn’t been a clear smoking gun,” Peterson said.

The House would need to decide there are grounds for impeachment
Impeachment proceedings begin in the House of Representatives, where lawmakers can introduce an impeachment resolution or a resolution authorizing an investigation into whether grounds for impeachment exist. If a House committee determines that there are grounds for impeachment, a resolution with a formal accusation of misconduct is presented to the full House for a vote.

In order to impeach a president, that resolution must pass the House by a simple majority. When the President’s own party has control of Congress — as Republicans do now — that’s a difficult bar to clear. If a vote were to take place today, when there are five vacancies in the House, all 193 Democrats and 23 Republicans would need to vote for impeachment in order for it to pass.

“Impeachment is always difficult. It’s designed to be difficult,” Gerhardt said. “That’s the nature of the process, the nature of the constitutional design.”

Only two presidents in U.S. history have been impeached: Clinton in 1998 on charges of lying under oath to a federal grand jury, and Andrew Johnson in 1868 on charges of violating the Tenure of Office Act by firing the Secretary of War. 

The Senate would need to find the President guilty
In order to actually be removed from office, the President must then be convicted by a two-thirds vote in the Senate.

An impeachment trial could backfire. During Clinton’s impeachment proceedings, public opinion of Republicans fell, while Democrats and Clinton experienced a surge. When asked whether they wanted Clinton or the GOP “to have more influence over the nation,” Americans were evenly split between the two in September 1998, according to a CNN/USA Today/Gallup poll. But by the time Clinton was impeached in December of that year, the gap had widened significantly. While 60% said they wanted Clinton to have more influence, just 31% said the same for the GOP.

The proceedings also had the unintended effect of sending Clinton’s approval ratings to an all-time high.”

One year into Trump’s presidency and the left wing complaints continue. The leftists often refuse to accept the President and move on to more productive things. Please share if you want this anti-Trump movement end and people can be more productive in politics.

FOLLOW us on Facebook at Freedom Daily!

Continue Reading

Politics

BREAKING: THIS IS IT! They’re About To Be Exposed!!!

TSUNAMI OF INFORMATION!!!

Published

on

Tom Fitton from Judicial Watch echoes statements he made on the Fox News program “Hannity” last week. He warned that a “tsunami of information” exposing “Obama, Clinton and their ties to Deep State scandals,” will soon be released and there will be no going back from letting the hands of justice take their course. It seems like the deep state is getting blasted on all fronts these days.

Judicial Watch also announced that a federal judge had ordered the State Department to speed up the release Hillary Clinton’s 72,000 pages of email records. Although these emails were expected to be released in 2020 after the presidential election, they now have a release date of September 28th, 2018. This is before the midterm elections. This is huge.

Sara Carter, who is an investigative reporter, recently confirmed to Fox News host Sean Hannity that the Inspector General’s report on the emails will be released sometime in January, but now believes the deadline may have been quietly pushed back.

 

Via Judicial Watch:

“Judicial Watch: Court Orders State Department to Speed Up Production of Clinton Email Records
JANUARY 11, 2018

State Department Must Complete Review and Release of 72,000 Pages of Records by September 28

(Washington, DC) – Judicial Watch today announced that a federal court judge ordered the State Department to speed up processing and production of former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s emails. U.S. District Court Judge James E. Boasberg recently ordered the State Department to complete processing the remaining documents that were recovered by the FBI in its investigation into Clinton’s illicit email server by September 28, 2018. The Court’s latest order accelerates State’s production rate which would have continued until 2020.

Last year, the FBI uncovered 72,000 pages of documents Clinton attempted to delete or did not otherwise disclose. The State Department had been processing the documents at a rate that would have required Judicial Watch and the American people to wait until at least 2020 to see all the releasable Clinton material.

Prior to the FBI investigation, Clinton repeatedly stated that the 55,000 pages of documents she turned over to the State Department in December 2014 included all of her work-related emails. In response to a court order in another Judicial Watch case, she declared under penalty of perjury that she had “directed that all my emails on clintonemail.com in my custody that were or are potentially federal records be provided to the Department of State, and on information and belief, this has been done.” Clinton failed to turn over at least 627 emails in that 55,000-page production, further contradicting a statement by Clinton that, “as far as she knew,” all of her government emails had been turned over to department.

Judge Boasberg’s November 30 order came in a Judicial Watch Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit filed on May 6, 2015, (Judicial Watch v. U.S. Department of State (No. 1:15-cv-00687)) seeking:

All emails sent or received by former Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton in her official capacity as Secretary of State, as well as all emails by other State Department employees to Secretary Clinton regarding her non-“state.gov” email address.

The court also ordered the State Department to identify and explain the basis for all documents withheld in full from both the 55,000 pages of emails turned over by Clinton and the 72,000 pages of records recovered by the FBI which have been processed thus far by April 6, 2018.”

Gateway Pundit‘s Jim Hoft also reported that the Department of Justice turned over some of the 1.2 million documents requested by lawmakers this past week. The documents are related to the Obama Justice Department’s activities during the 2016 election where the Top Secret FISA Memo is now pointing to the fact that the Obama administration did, in fact, try to tamper with our election process in favor of Crooked Hillary Clinton.

According to several other news sources, Congressman Nunes and the House Intel Committee reviewed all FBI and DOJ docs on the dossier including the FISA apps. So we can now say the whole puzzle is finally coming together. Let’s hope Barack Hussein Obama and Crooked Hillary Clinton pay for their crimes and we show the whole world that lawlessness won’t be tolerated in the United States of America.

Please share if you want to see Obama and Crooked Hillary behind bars.

FOLLOW us on Facebook at Freedom Daily!

Continue Reading

Latest Articles

Subscribe to our newsletter

Become An Insider! Sign up for our free email newsletter, and we'll make sure to keep you in the loop on the top breaking news of the day.

Trending