Please disable your Ad Blocker to better interact with this website.

Connect with us

Politics

OPRAH’S Presidential HOPES CRUSHED!!! HELL YEAH…THEY FOUND IT!!

Published

on

It has now been confirmed that the 2020 Democrat Party frontrunner, Oprah Winfrey attended a secret meeting with Globalist George Soros and other Globalist billionaires to discuss a plan to depopulate the world!

The 2009 meeting which took place in downtown Manhattan was organized by Bill Gates who is one of the evilest individuals alive who seems to have taken it upon himself to promote the evils of overpopulation in our world. In fact, the meeting was so secret that the billionaires’ aides were told to treat it as a “security briefing.” Attendees also included the late David Rockefeller, Warren Buffett, Ted Turner and Michael Bloomberg, in addition to Oprah and Soros.

The meeting was kept secret out of fears the media might portrait it as an “alternative world government,” which isn’t far from the truth given the speculation that Oprah will soon attempt a White House run backed by the very billionaires who attended the meeting, including the Sith Lord himself, George Soros.

It’s rumored that at the prior meeting attendee Ted Turner actually proposed cutting the world population to around 250 million people. That means a 95% decrease that would require a major nuclear war or a virus pandemic, unlike the black plague.

Will This Photo Sink an Oprah Winfrey 2020 Candidacy Against Donald Trump?

Oprah Winfrey’s Golden Globes speech Sunday night inspired calls for her to run for president in 2020, and on Monday, sources confirmed she is serious about such an endeavor.

One photo might have the ability to sink her candidacy, however. Winfrey posed while kissing the notorious Harvey Weinstein. (Weinstein has been credibly accused by more than 50 women of using his position in Hollywood to force them to have sex with him in order to help their careers.)

Winfrey dressed in black, symbolizing her support for the “Time’s Up” movement, an offshoot of the #MeToo movement against sexual assault. She became the first black woman to receive the Cecil B. DeMille award for “outstanding contributions to the world of entertainment.” In her acceptance speech, she emphasized breaking down racial and gender barriers to success, and championed the cause of women who claim to be victims of sexual assault.

“So I want all the girls watching here, now, to know that a new day is on the horizon!” Winfrey declared. “And when that new day finally dawns, it will be because of a lot of magnificent women, many of whom are right here in this room tonight, and some pretty phenomenal men, fighting hard to make sure that they become the leaders who take us to the time when nobody ever has to say ‘Me too’ again. Thank you.”

Her speech did not get caught up on politics, but used soaring rhetoric to set the stage for hope of an era after sexual assault, when every American regardless of race or sex is able to reach the heights of society. It was truly inspiring, and the Golden Globes audience burst into a standing ovation for it on Sunday night.

On Monday, two of Winfrey’s friends told CNN Money that she is “actively thinking” about a run in 2020, and has been considering such a candidacy for months. She has not made up her mind, one source emphasized.

“The Handmaid’s Tale” Cast and Producer Say They’ve Joined the “Resistance” Against Trump
There has already been some chatter about Oprah! For President. After Sunday’s speech, Winfrey’s longtime partner Stedman Graham told a Los Angeles Times reporter that a run is not out of the question. “It’s up to the people. She would absolutely do it,” Graham reportedly said.

Winfrey’s openness to a presidential campaign seems predicated on the success of Donald Trump. “The Oprah Winfrey Show” has given the Winfrey near universal name recognition, a strong political tool Trump used to great effect. As Reese Witherspoon said, “There’s only one person whose name is a verb, an adjective, and a feeling. And that is Oprah.” One might add that Trump enjoys that same distinction…

Winfrey endorsed Barack Obama in 2008 and Hillary Clinton in 2016. During the Clinton campaign, she said of a female president, “America, it’s about time that we made that decision.”

In an interview with Bloomberg’s David Rubenstein in March, Winfrey seemed to take Trump’s lack of political experience as a suggestion that she could also run for president without such experience.

“It’s clear you don’t need government experience to be elected president of the United States,” Rubenstein said. Winfrey backed up his comment saying, “I thought, ‘Oh gee, I don’t have the experience, I don’t know enough.’ And now I’m thinking, Oh. Oh!'”

Winfrey has previously said she is not considering a run, but this chatter might encourage her to jump in the race.

If Oprah Winfrey does run, she will have to explain her long-time working relationship with Weinstein. It is ironic that a champion of the #MeToo and “Time’s Up” movements against sexual assault has worked so closely with the man whose sordid past effectively launched the #MeToo movement.

Indeed, British actress Kadian Noble said Weinstein used his relationship with Oprah Winfrey to seduce her into having sex with him. When asked directly about Weinstein, Winfrey deflected the question, speaking about sexual assault as an endemic issue overall.

What did Oprah Winfrey know, and when did she know it? Did she merely work with Weinstein because he was in a position of influence? Did she overlook his sordid actions for her own career success? Was she an enabler? Is it acceptable for the first black woman to receive the Cecil B. DeMille award to have worked with a man accused of long-time sexual assault?

Winfrey may look tempting to the Left at the moment, but these are important questions. Especially if Winfrey tries to attack Trump on the sexual assault allegations against him, Americans will demand an explanation of her relationship with Weinstein.

Oprah Winfrey and Harvey Weinstein at the 20th Annual Screen Actors Guild Awards at The Shrine Auditorium on January 18, 2014 in Los Angeles, California.

I know many people on the right are laughing this morning as they learned elitists at the Golden Globes last night floated the idea of Oprah Winfrey challenging President Trump in 2020. But we should all take it very seriously. Let us not forget, she is a black woman, who survived sexual abuse and has no issue whatsoever exploiting that fact. And we know very well our society suffers from an acute case of white guilt, and now with the #metoo movement, who knows what kind of globalist idiot the American people might decide to elect.

Please share if you agree Oprah Winfrey should be nowhere near the White House…

FOLLOW us on Facebook at Freedom Daily!

Al ran for the California State Assembly in his home district in 2010 and garnered more votes than any other Republican since 1984. He's worked on multiple political campaigns and was communications director for the Ron Nehring for California Lt. Governor campaign during the primaries in 2014. He has also held multiple positions within his local Republican Central Committee including Secretary, and Vice President of his local California Republican Assembly chapter. While also being an ongoing delegate to the California Republican Party for almost a decade.

Join the conversation

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse.

Politics

BREAKING!! He Got MASSIVE Reward And Planned To Use It ALL To END Obama!

Published

on

For the past eight years, Barack Obama did everything humanly possible to further the cause of Islam and take care of his Muslim buds. Over the last several weeks, hardcore evidence emerged about how Obama had worked hand-in-hand with ISIS to send massive amounts of weapons to their terror group, with our pilots returning home from war saying they were grounded continuously from doing airstrikes on ISIS. As we learn definitively that Obama was indeed the “father of ISIS,” in a startling turn of events, we are now learning of how Obama’s life was nearly ended while in office, after top terrorists within ISIS decided to turn on their beloved leader suddenly.

Obama must have thought it was a good idea to help all of his Muslim brothers by allowing them into the country unvetted and unchecked. However, Obama’s plan went awry after new reports have come forward that one Muslim man named Abdurasul Hasanovich Juraboev from Uzbekistan who went into the country through the Diversity Visa Lottery Program had pledged to murder Obama or commit a massive terror attack in New York City to prove his allegiance to ISIS.

Now, if you don’t remember what the Diversity Visa Lottery Program was here is a brief reminder. This program that liberals love to push on the American people, allows foreigners to come into the United States on a NON-merit basis. What this means is that 50,000 randomly-selected foreigners with no ties to anyone in the country are granted entry, and the only requirement is that entrants must be adults with a high school diploma or two years of work experience. The “winners” that are chosen are allowed to bring spouses and their children into the country.

Courtroom sketch of Abdurasul Hasanovich Juraboev.

So, when Juraboev got his golden ticket to America, he didn’t use it wisely but chose to make plans to murder the former President of the United States.

As they say, there is no honor among thieves.

Here is more from CNS News:

Juraboev, a national of Uzbekistan, was admitted to the United States as a diversity visa lottery recipient in 2011,” said a report issued jointly this week by the Department of Justice and Department of Homeland Security.

Three years later in 2014 — according to an Oct. 25, 2017, sentencing letter that then-Acting U.S. Attorney for the Eastern District of New York Bridget Rohde sent to U.S. District Judge William Kuntz — Juraboev “first came to the attention of the government with his online postings on an Uzbek-language social media website.”

The website, according to the U.S. attorney, “propagated ISIS’s ideology and called for its Uzbek-speaking audience to join ISIS.”

On Aug. 8, 2014, Juraboev, then about 24 years old, went to this site and posted an alarming message.

“Greetings!” he wrote. “We too wanted to pledge our allegiance and commit ourselves while not present there. I am in USA now but we don’t have any arms. But is it possible to commit ourselves as dedicated martyrs anyway while here?

“What I am saying is, to shoot Obama and then get shot ourselves, will it do?” Juraboev said.

“That will strike fear in the hearts of the infidels,” he said.

The FBI filed a complaint and affidavit on Feb. 24, 2015, seeking the arrest of Juraboev and two others.

Law enforcement, it turns out, had tracked Juraboev’s website posting to an IP address associated with “a residence in Brooklyn.” Agents went there on Aug. 15, 2014, and interviewed him.

“First, Juraboev acknowledged that he wrote and posted the above-referenced message on (the website), which he characterized as the Uzbek-language site of ISIL,” said the FBI affidavit.

“Juraboev also stated his belief in ISIL’s terrorist agenda, including the establishment by force of an Islamic caliphate in Iraq and Syria,” said the affidavit. “Juraboev further stated that he would like to travel to Syria to engage in violence on behalf of ISIL ‘if Allah wills,’ but currently lacked the means to travel there.

“In addition,” said the affidavit, “Juraboev stated that he would harm President Barack Obama if he had the opportunity to do so, but currently does not have the means or an imminent plan to do so.”

On Aug. 18, 2014, “law enforcement agents” again interviewed Juraboev at his residence.

“While admitting that he does not like President Obama because of his role in killing Muslims through his support of Israel and the recent bombing of ISIL,” the affidavit said of this second interview, “Juraboev stated that he would not kill President Obama because of ill will towards him, but rather because of ‘Allah.'”

“He added that, if ISIL ordered him to kill President Obama, he would do so,” the affidavit said.

“Juraboev noted,” the affidavit said, “that if he received an affirmative or positive response from ISIL to the above-referenced posting on (the website), he would kill President Obama.

“Juraboev added,” the affidavit said, “that he would also plant a bomb on Coney Island if he were so ordered by ISIL.”

In her sentencing letter to Judge Kuntz, Acting U.S. Attorney Rohde summarized this same interview with Juraboev and cited a written statement he gave to law enforcement officials that day.

“In this statement,” the U.S. attorney said, “the defendant reiterated his allegiance to ISIS (‘I also want to fight and sincerely become a martyr under the Islamic Caliphate against the polytheists and infidels. … I gave pledge to Islamic State’) and his intention of killing President Obama (‘Even if that person is Obama.!’) if commanded to do so by ISIS (‘If I get a command from the Islamic Caliphate’).”

He was arrested in February 2015 after he “purchased a ticket to Turkey, from which he intended to go to Syria and join ISIS.

Now, none of us agree with Obama or his policies, and this proves beyond a reasonable doubt, we were always right. These people have no desire to assimilate into our country and its culture, but rather destroy it and everyone in its path. If Obama honestly thought that he would not be a target for these people, he was sorely mistaken and maybe will rethink some of his poor decisions.

The only way we will be able to get our country back on track is by taking a harder stance against terrorism and stricter immigration policies. Once that is accomplished, we can get our country back on track once again.

H/T [ The Gateway Pundit]

FOLLOW us on Facebook at Freedom Daily!

Continue Reading

Crime

BREAKING NEWS! Obama Let Them In The White House!!! THIS IS TREASON!

Published

on

In a new shocking, but not completely surprising report which came out early this morning, we can now confirm that the two brother team Democrat IT aides from the terrorist sympathizing nation of Pakistan made deliberate and unauthorized access to House servers while actually fooling staff by pretending to be members of Congress.

The aides in question are the same which former Democrat Party Chairwoman and Florida Congresswoman Debbie Wasserman Shultz has been busy defending for over a year now. Imran Awan, his Ukrainian-born wife Hina Alvi and brothers Jamal and Abid Awan. And to add to this mess we know can also confirm that after a lengthy internal investigation House Democrat leadership lied about their findings to members of Congress as they claimed the incident was “solely a matter of theft,” and not actual espionage.

Representative Debbie “Blabbermouth” Schultz employed the infamous Awan brothers and paid them over $4 million dollars during the course of their employment. Some of that amount was actually paid after they were accused of breaching House servers, which can, of course, lead us to surmise that the extra money could have been hush money paid by the Democrat Party in order to hide something they didn’t want the public to get a hold of.

Via The Daily Caller:

House Report Concluded Pakistanis Made ‘Unauthorized Access’ To Congressional Servers

House investigators concluded that Democratic IT aides made unauthorized access to congressional servers in 2016, allegedly accessing the data of members for whom they did not work, logging in as members of Congress themselves, and covering their tracks, according to a presentation summarizing the findings of a four-month internal probe.

Their behavior mirrored a “classic method for insiders to exfiltrate data from an organization,” and they continued even after orders to stop, the briefing materials allege. There are indications that numerous members’ data may have been secretly residing not on their designated servers, but instead aggregated onto one server, according to the briefing and other sources. Authorities said that the entire server was then physically stolen.

When acting on the findings, Democratic leadership appear to have misrepresented the issue to their own members as solely a matter of theft, a comparison of the investigators’ findings with Democrats’ recollections and a committee’s public statement shows, leading 44 Democrats to not conduct protective measures typically taken after a breach — including informing constituents whose personal information may have been exposed. (A list of the involved members is below.)

The presentation, written by the House’s Office of the Inspector General, reported under the bold heading “UNAUTHORIZED ACCESS” that “5 shared employee system administrators have collectively logged into 15 member offices and the Democratic Caucus although they were not employed by the offices they accessed.”

It found indications that a House “server is being used for nefarious purposes and elevated the risk that individuals could be reading and/or removing information” and “could be used to store documents taken from other offices.” The server was that of the House Democratic Caucus, a sister group of the DNC that was run at the time by then-Rep. Xavier Becerra.

The aides named are Imran Awan, his wife Hina Alvi, his brothers Abid and Jamal, and his friend Rao Abbas, Pakistani-born aides whose lives are filled with reason for concern. Abid’s Ukranian wife Natalia Sova and Haseeb Rana were also involved in the Awans’ activities but departed the House payroll prior to the investigation.

One systems administrator “logged into a member’s office two months after he was terminated from that office,” the investigative summary says.

While the rules could have been violated for some innocuous purpose, the presentation indicates that is unlikely: “This pattern of login activity suggests steps are being taken to conceal their activity.”

A second presentation shows that shortly before the election, their alleged behavior got even worse. “During September 2016, shared employee continued to use Democratic Caucus computers in anomalous ways:

Logged onto laptop as system administrator
Changed identity and logged onto Democratic Caucus server using 17 other user account credentials
Some credentials belonged to Members

The shared employee did not work for 9 of the 17 offices to which these user accounts belonged.”
The investigation found “possible storage of sensitive House information outside the House … Dropbox is installed on two Caucus computers used by the shared employees. Two user accounts had thousands of files in their Dropbox folder on each computer.” Using Dropbox is against House rules because it uploads files offsite.

The Washington Post referenced the presentation in July, and quoted a House source who claimed that the server was full of the Awan children’s “homework” and “family photos.” The presentation offers reasons to doubt that. “Based on the file names, some of the information is likely sensitive,” it reads.

The statements of numerous Democrats indicate that the Democratic staff of the House Administration Committee and other House officials may have withheld information about cybersecurity breaches from members who employed the suspects, and appear to have misled them about the basic nature of the investigation.

“This is the first I’ve heard about that,” said Missouri Democratic Rep. Emmanuel Cleaver — who employed almost every member of the Awan group — of cybersecurity issues.

“The only thing I’m aware of is that he’s being charged with bank fraud,” Democratic Rep. Joaquin Castro, who employed Jamal and is a member of the intelligence committee, told TheDCNF. “Do you have evidence that there’s anything more than a bank investigation? If someone’s given you a document to that effect, please give it to me.”

In early February, House Sergeant-At-Arms Paul Irving, Chief Administrative Officer Phil Kiko, and Jamie Fleet, the Democratic staff director of the Committee on House Administration, summoned affected chiefs of staff to a meeting to announce that the family was being banned from the network. Republican staff was not present, and the briefers omitted all mention of the cybersecurity component that appears to comprise the most dangerous part of the findings, according to numerous Democrats’ accounts.

On Feb. 3, 2017, Committee on House Administration Chairman Gregg Harper and Ranking Member Robert Brady issued the sole official statement about what they called “the ongoing House theft investigation.”

“House Officials became aware of suspicious activity and alleged theft committed by certain House IT support staff,” the statement read. “An internal investigation determined that a number of House policies and procedures had been violated. This information was turned over to the United States Capitol Police and their investigation is ongoing. These employees have also been blocked from accessing House systems. All offices impacted have been contacted. No further comment will be issued until the investigation is complete.”

But that internal investigation’s most notable findings — in fact, the second presentation didn’t even mention theft — concerned credible evidence of a cyber-breach, and at the time of the announcement, the most recent incident of theft consisted of the disappearance of a server that was evidence in a cybersecurity probe, several authorities said.

There is no scenario where the access was appropriate because House members are not allowed to accept services from people not on their payroll and employees are not permitted to log in to servers of members for whom they do not work. The presentation notes that such House polices are codified in law.

But nearly a year later, there have been no criminal charges related to House IT. Two of the suspects were indicted for bank fraud in July after prosecutors said they transferred money from the House bank to Pakistan and tried to flee the country.

There are strong indications that many of the 44 members’ data — including personal information of constituents seeking help — was entirely out of those members’ possession, and instead was stored on the House Democratic Caucus server. The aggregation of multiple members’ data would mean all that data was absconded with, because authorities said that entire server physically disappeared while it was being monitored by police.

An IT aide told TheDCNF that colleagues deployed to clean up after the Awans’ firing discovered that in many offices, computers were set up to be nothing more than “thin clients” that were portals to an outside computer. “They were using terminal servers, your desktop is projected to you” from a computer in a different location.

The presentation — though its language is at times opaquely technical — found remote sessions that remained active for months at a time. The House commonly uses Citrix remote sessions that allow someone’s computer screen to show the contents of a different computer, but its security precautions ordinarily cause them to disconnect after just a few minutes. Virtual Private Networks can also make a server’s hard drive appear to be local to a computer.

A House committee staffer close to the probe told TheDCNF that “the data was always out of [the members’] possession. It was a breach. They were using the House Democratic Caucus as their central service warehouse.”

“All 5 of the shared employee system administrators collectively logged onto the Caucus system 5,735 times, an average of 27 times per day… This is considered unusual since computers in other offices managed by these shared employees were accessed in total less than 60 times,” the presentation reads.

That, too, may imply that dozens of members’ data was all in one place — on the Caucus’s server instead of in members’ possession. The apparently constant access by the entire crew, even their friend Rao Abbas, also doesn’t jive with The Washington Post’s claim that they were using it as a family computer for homework and photos.

With the basics of the probe hidden from members, Democrats appear to have vocally painted an inaccurate picture of what the report alleges occurred, pointing to the current criminal charges instead of the House’s investigation while not taking any steps to protect potentially compromised data.

Rep. Ted Lieu of California, who employed Abid Awan and is a member of the foreign affairs committee, said as far as he was concerned it was a simple issue of bank fraud.

“The staffer that I used, there was no allegation,” he told a TV station. “If you look at the charge of the brother, he was charged with bank fraud… that has nothing to do with national security.”

Prosecutors contend in court filings that they committed bank fraud and tried to flee because they found out about the already-existing investigation into their House activities.

Becerra’s House Democratic Caucus knew about problems and tried to stop them, according to the presentation, but the suspect defied him. Based on other members’ accounts, Becerra does not appear to have warned other offices that might have been affected.

“The Caucus Chief of Staff requested one of the shared employees to not provide IT services or access their computers,” the investigative briefing reads. “This shared employee continued.” Then, as police monitored the server as a primary piece of evidence, they discovered in January that it was taken from under their noses and replaced with a different computer.

Let’s hope since there is proof now, we can finally put this case to rest and people like Debbie Wasserman Schultz can make themselves comfortable in a prison cell for years to come. But as we have come to expect out of our judicial system that most certainly won’t be happening anytime soon. We know all too well by now that if you have money and the right connections you are above the law, especially if you are a “well-meaning” Liberal.

Please share if you want to see all involved in this case behind bars…

FOLLOW us on Facebook at Freedom Daily!

Continue Reading

Politics

President Trump Signs An Executive Order To Combat Veteran Suicide

Chuck Yarling

Published

on

On January 9, 2018, President Trump signed an Executive Order (EO) entitled, “Presidential Executive Order on Supporting Our Veterans During Their Transition From Uniformed Service to Civilian Life” This EO is designed to combat veterans suicide that is prevalent among servicemembers during the time they are adjusting to a new life outside the military.

Here are five important attributes of this EO.

• #1: It identified that the largest number of suicides of our military personnel occur within the first year during their transition from military to civilian life.

• #2: It is during this time that the rate of veterans suicide is two times higher than the overall rate for service members.

• #3 Care may be provided at VA or by a private facility, depending on wait times where you live. This section re-enforces the Veteran’s Choice Act of 2017 which allows

Any veteran who lives 40 miles or more from the closest VA medical facility, or who faces a 30-day or more wait time, can seek out treatment from a private facility and the VA will handle the payment.

• #4: All service members leaving the military will receive screening for mental health issues for one year.

and

• #5: Implementation of the EO is being made at the highest levels of the administration via the Secretary of Defense, the Secretary of Veterans Affairs, and the Secretary of Homeland Security.At the meeting, Secretary of Veterans Affairs David Shulkin, remarked,

“Currently, 40 percent of those servicemembers had coverage in the VA to get mental health. Now 100 percent will have that coverage, and it’s the full array of services that the Department of Defense and the Department of Veteran Affairs will be able to provide in terms of mental health coverage.”

This EO is excellent news for transitioning servicemembers. Indeed, it will help make their future in the civilian workforce a success.

FOLLOW us on Facebook at Freedom Daily!

Continue Reading

Latest Articles

Subscribe to our newsletter

Become An Insider! Sign up for our free email newsletter, and we'll make sure to keep you in the loop on the top breaking news of the day.

Trending