The number of leaks within the government as of late has been extraordinarily high. So bad even that the Justice Department and State Department are considering charging those individuals who were caught partaking in those actions. President Trump has not been too happy with these latest revelations. Many government officials, as well as citizens, have been arguing that it is treasonous and threatens national security to reveal such details.
Now, two government officials from the Obama administration are calling for other government officials to turn their backs on the current administration. Apparently, they were upset with the way that Special Counsel Robert Mueller is being treated. Thus, former Director of the CIA John Brennan, as well as former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, are calling for pushback against the Trump administration should Mueller get fired.
Brennan reportedly said the following,
“I think it’s the obligation of some executive branch officials to refuse to carry that out. I would just hope that this is not going to be a partisan issue. That Republicans, Democrats are going to see that the future of this government is at stake and something needs to be done for the good of the future.”
The Daily Dose said the following concerning this recent development and they share a similar opinion that many others do,
“Essentially, the two former Obama appointments and agents of the Deep State are setting the stage for a coup against President Trump. This entire Russian conspiracy debacle has been a set up from the very beginning. The Deep State has been planning this coup since Trump won the Republican nomination.
Even the meeting between Donald Trump Jr. and the Russian lawyer may have been a set up by the Democrats to justify a warrant to spy on then-candidate Trump. The Russian lawyer was granted special access to the country by Obama’s Attorney General, Loretta Lynch, despite having an expired visa. The translator in attendance at the meeting was an employee of Obama’s state department. The meeting planted the seeds of doubt about Russian collusion, offering the Deep State the cover they require.”
When Brennan made the comments that he did he was side by side with Clapper and he expressed his complete confidence that Mueller could get the job of the bipartisan investigation done. Furthermore, he indicated that if Mueller were fired that he hoped both Democrats and Republicans would stand by him and hold the President accountable.
After Brennan spoke Clapper said the following,
“I’m an old school, Cold War warrior and all that — so I have, there’s truth in advertising, great suspicions about the Russians and what they do. A lot of this to me had kind of the standard textbook tradecraft long deployed by Russians. It would have been a really good idea maybe to have vetted whoever they were meeting with.”
When asked about Trump’s comparison of the intelligence community to Nazi Germany Clapper said the following,
“I couldn’t let that reference pass. That was a terrible, insulting affront, not just to me or John, we get paid the big bucks, but I’m talking about the rank and file, men and women, patriots and intelligence community — that was completely inappropriate and over the top — I had to do something about it. I think the men and woman in the intelligence community will continue to convey truth to power, even if the power doesn’t necessarily listen. I was kind of hopeful that after he got rid of the two chief Nazis, John and me, then maybe things would’ve improved.”
— TruNews™ (@TruNews) July 25, 2017
Clapper went on to discuss the so called controversial dossier. He noted that the President had asked him to put out a statement where he rebutted the information inside the dossier which he refused to do and continues to refuse to do. The dossier which was eventually proven to be false alleged there was evidence of a connection between Russia and the President.
Whether Clapper and Brennan are telling the truth is irrelevant. Their clear bias against the President because of their work for the former President is so clear that it makes them look as though they cannot be impartial. Perception is reality, no matter how sparkling clean they may be, they reak of partiality.
The left’s attempt to try and tear down the Trump administration is nothing more than unpatriotic. The President should be held accountable for his actions. As every President should. However, some want to destroy President Trump more than they want to see the United States of America succeed. This is disgusting and it is hurting our country and dividing us further and further apart. We must work to ensure this does not happen by educating ourselves to the facts and not just the distorted narrative that the mainstream liberal media believes in, unfortunately.
FOLLOW us on Facebook at Freedom Daily!
Join the conversation
Desperate Kaepernick Just Used Everything He Had To Take Trump Down – Now He’s REALLY In Trouble
Wow..he really embarrassed himself this time!
Cop-hating third-string quarterback Colin Kaepernick is still unemployed and he’s still scamming Americans. He spent all summer with his Muslim girlfriend and outspoken radio host Nessa Diab pushing his fake sob story about the NFL being a “racist organization” for not hiring him, where even enlisted the assistance of the NAACP to push the ridiculous narrative.
Despite leading the 49-ers to a historic season franchise loss last year, Kaepernick still wants to blame his unemployment on the NFL rather than facing the harsh reality that no one wants him because he’s simply a crappy football player. Over the weekend, Kaepernick lawyered up and filed a grievance against the NFL and President Trump, claiming that there’s a massive “conspiracy” between the 32 NFL teams and Trump to keep him off the field. But just 12 hours after filing the paperwork to blame others for his woes, Kaepernick just got hit with even more embarrassing news that’s sending his peanut gallery of whining fans into a collective meltdown this week.
Former 49ers second string quarterback Colin Kaepernick lawyered up over the weekend, and has now filed a grievance claiming all 32 NFL teams conspired to keep him off the field.
Kaepernick, and his attorney — celebrity lawyer Mark Geragos — say that all 32 team owners conspired together to deny him a spot in professional football, even though Kaepernick walked away from a one-year option on his contract with the 49ers, and hasn’t been an asset to any football team since 2013.
NFL owners, the complaint says, “have colluded to deprive Mr. Kaepernick of employment rights in retaliation for Mr. Kaepernick’s leadership and advocacy for equality and social justice and his bringing awareness to peculiar institutions still undermining racial equality in the United States.” Kaepernick contends that it’s a “statistical impossibility” that he has not, so far, obtained gainful employment as a professional football player.
In his complaint, Kapernick also went straight after President Trump, alleging that the President is in on this conspiracy to keep him out of the NFL. Via Daily Wire:
“The complaint also alleges that President Donald Trump, the “executive branch of the United States government” is at the heart of the collective agreement; Kaepernick claims that he’s been out of work in “response to coercion and calculated coordination from the Executive Branch of the United States government.”
According to the Federalist Papers, Kaepernick’s latest tantrum will not be going anywhere, as his ridiculous claims completely lack any sort of evidence whatsoever. The Federalist Papers reported:
Colin Kaeperneck’s latest accusations against NFL owners of collusion do not meet the NFL’s Collective Bargaining Agreement’s conditions for burden or proof.
“Collusion occurs when two or more teams, or the league and at least one team,” Sports Illustrated explained in March, “join to deprive a player of a contractually earned right. Such a right is normally found in the collective bargaining agreement signed by a league and its players’ association. For example, the right of a free-agent player to negotiate a contract with a team cannot be impaired by a conspiracy of teams to deny that a player a chance to sign.”
According to the CBA, the fact that NFL teams have declined to offer Kaepernick a contract does not prove collusion. Furthermore, a free agent’s “playing skills” do not represent evidence for collusion.
ESPN says that Kaepernick’s grievance is vague and unconvincing, blaming President Donald Trump for coercing NFL owners into withholding offers. ESPN reports:
The NFL’s collective bargaining agreement, which governs such disputes, makes clear that the failure to sign a player is not in itself enough to prove collusion. Instead, it must be combined with evidence that teams entered into an agreement, express or implied, to bar the player’s employment.
Here’s the relevant wording of the CBA’s “burden of proof” for collusion:
“The failure by a club or clubs to negotiate, to submit offer sheets, or to sign contracts with restricted free agents or transition players, or to negotiate, make offers, or sign contracts for the playing services of such players or unrestricted free agents, shall not, by itself or in combination only with evidence about the playing skills of the player(s) not receiving any such offer or contract, satisfy the burden of proof set forth …”
[…] But his grievance, filed by attorney Mark Geragos, does not provide any specific evidence of an agreement to collude. It vaguely references NFL general managers who have cited “directives from NFL owners to not let Kaepernick so much as practice with an NFL team.” It also accuses owners of submitting to the demands of President Donald Trump, whom it terms “an organizing force” in squashing what has become a weekly protest among at least some NFL players.
Nice try, Kaepernick. Looks like it’s back to the drawing board in to find an accusation that will stick. As of now, it looks like Kaepernick’s position of playing left couch-seat cushion for the rest of the season will be a permanent one.
BREAKING: FBI Just Confirmed Comey Is GUILTY After Damning Admission He Made About Hillary
This is Major!
For the past couple years, the American people have wanted the truth about Hillary Clinton and the emails she deleted on her private server.
Clinton has claimed for quite some time that these emails were not relevant even though the evidence proved differently.
So, the case of Hillary Clinton’s emails began to fade away, but then at the last minute the investigation was opened, and the American people believed that justice would finally be served.
Former FBI Director James Comey took the case pledging to get to the bottom of these emails and if Hillary Clinton broke any laws. However, shortly after the investigation commenced, it all ended with Comey declaring that he could find no wrongdoing regarding Hillary Clinton and the deleted emails.
A year later, documents were released showing that Comey had already decided that Clinton was innocent before even concluding the email investigation.
And now, the FBI confirmed this is exactly what happened.
The records show that back on May 2, 2016, James Comey sent an email to Deputy Director Andrew McCabe, chief of staff and senior counselor James Rybicki, and general counsel James Baker. In the subject line of this particular email read “midyear exam,” and even though the email has been deemed unclassified, the majority of this communication has been redacted.
What the entire email says is anyone’s guess, but it cannot be right considering that James Comey found Hillary Clinton innocent before completing the investigation into these deleted emails.
Here is more from Newsweek:
In documents it released on Monday, the FBI confirmed that former FBI Director James Comey drafted a statement about the conclusion of the Hillary Clinton email investigation months before interviewing Clinton.
On Monday, the bureau also released a response to the May 2 email. Rybicki sent the response, dated May 16, 2016, to several colleagues: Peter Strzok, Jonathan Moffa, Baker, Trisha Anderson and E.W. Priestap. He copied McCabe and David Bowdich, the associate deputy director. In the email, which is marked “unclassified,” Rybicki wrote, “Please send me any comments on this statement so we may roll into a master doc for discussion with the Director at a future date. Thanks, Jim.”
The FBI titled the release “Drafts of Director Comey’s July 5, 2016, Statement Regarding Email Server Investigation.” That title refers to a press conference Comey held in which he said the bureau had completed its investigation into Clinton’s use of a personal email system and that it would not be recommending that the Department of Justice pursue charges, though Clinton had been “careless.” The bureau interviewed Clinton on July 2, 2016.
The release confirms information that Senator Chuck Grassley, chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, and Senator Lindsey Graham, a member of that committee, disclosed in a letter to new FBI Director Christopher Wray in August. The senators wrote that they had learned from interview transcripts released by the Office of the Special Counsel that Comey had drafted the statement in advance. (That office is separate from the efforts of Justice Department special counsel Robert Mueller.) The Senate Judiciary Committee is reviewing Comey’s conduct as director and President Donald Trump’s firing him in May.
FBI and Justice Department analysts are divided on whether Comey violated rules or broke with tradition by drafting the statement prior to interviewing Clinton and other witnesses. “To me, this is so far out of bounds it’s not even in the stadium,” Chris Swecker, who retired from the FBI in 2006 as assistant director for the criminal investigative division and acting executive assistant director for law enforcement services, previously told Newsweek. “That is just not how things operate…. It’s built in our DNA not to prejudge investigations, particularly from the top.”
Ron Hosko, who served as an assistant director at the bureau under Comey until 2014, has told Newsweek that drafting statements is not unusual, but only if the drafts remain internal and avoid coming to conclusions. “When you have a significant case that is in the public domain and certainly in the public’s interest, in the public’s eye, I think that it could be expected that both the FBI and the prosecutors that they’re working with are beginning to draft a statement of facts that could be used later, as the case is developing,” he said. “I think the content of the statement is going to be important. Did it purport to essentially acquit her actions way prematurely, or was it simply a running statement of what they knew?”
But Matthew Miller, a former spokesperson for the Justice Department, tweeted in September, “The decision is never ‘made’ until the end, even when there’s a 99% chance it is only going to go one way.”
It appears that Former FBI Director James Comey needs to be brought in and questioned by the acting FBI Director Andrew McCabe for this email. There is no reason that Comey should have made any early judgments about the Hillary Clinton case before concluding a thorough investigation.
However, this is the Clintons, and they have a long history of committing criminal deeds without any consequences. Hopefully, that will change soon and justice will finally be served once and for all.
Share if you want Hillary to be locked up for her crimes!
FOLLOW us on Facebook at Freedom Daily!
It’s Official! Traitor Repub About To Deliver Impeachment Against Trump – Here’s SICK Reason Why
Time to get rid of all these America-haters!
Despite the usual support given to a President by his own party, a few of the Republicans serving on Capitol Hill today are less than supportive of President Trump. Maybe it stems from his lack of willingness to play ball with their usual antics or perhaps they would have had a problem with anyone that wasn’t an establishment puppet, but the results are the same; the President is fighting against two parties in Washington.
One might expect a little push back on the unconventional issues that the President wants to address, like making Mexico pay for their own wall. Americans love the idea, but many politicians see it as unreasonable. That’s tough luck for them, considering it’s what the President and the American people want, however, what we didn’t expect when we elected our lawmakers is that they would try to stab us in the back and remove the man we sent to the White House.
However, according to The Hill, that’s exactly what some of our elected officials are doing. At least two Republicans are working to impeach the President that we fairly elected:
“Rep. Steve Cohen (D-Tenn.) in an interview on Sunday said at least one Republican is considering supporting articles of impeachment against President Trump.
‘I have one Republican that has said he is looking at it, he’s considering it,’ Cohen said on ‘MSNBC Live.’ ‘I have other Republicans, just like Sen. Bob Corker suggested, who have told me on a constant basis that they know this man is not balanced, he is not capable of continuing to lead us.’”
According to Cohen, more than just a few of the establishment lackeys in Washington aren’t a fan of our current President, these two are just spearheading the push for what they all really want.
“Cohen said those Republicans will ‘privately tell you, by their words and by their expressions, that they would like to see an end’ to Trump’s presidency.
‘But the Republican base is still supportive of Trump. That’s who’s strong in their primaries, and politically, they can’t come out and say it,’ Cohen told host Alex Witt.”
So, to recap, our representatives don’t like the POTUS, and they can’t speak out against him for fear of not getting re-elected, but they’re going to support a push to remove him from office – even though they know it’s not what their constituents want. If that’s not a direct violation of what they’re sent to Washington to do, I don’t know what is.
“Cohen announced in August he would introduce articles of impeachment against Trump based on his comments following the deadly violence at a white supremacist rally in Charlottesville, Va.
One of Green’s articles of impeachment states that Trump ‘is fueling an alt-right hate machine” that’s causing “immediate injury to American society.’
Another states that Trump engaged in ‘perfidy’ by falsely claiming that he lost the popular vote to Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton because millions of people voted illegally in the 2016 presidential election.
However, Green didn’t force a vote on the articles of impeachment, saying he wanted his colleagues and the public to be able to view them first.”
So to translate that from political speak into layman’s terms; the Democrats have been trying to pull this impeachment crap as a publicity stunt for months, but it’s just been them acting like Democrats and objecting to a Republican President who’s getting things done.
It’s time that lawmakers across both houses of Congress and both political parties consider the fact that perhaps he’s not fueling “alt” anything, maybe he was elected because he mirrors the actual values that middle-class Americans, also called the silent majority, feel are important.
To that end, Jerry Falwell, the President of Liberty University has a name for the traitors and a plan to fix the problem. In an interview on “Fox & Friends Weekend,” Falwell explained why he coined the phrase “Fake Republicans.”
“I think there are several Republicans in the Senate who pretended to be conservative Republicans . . . and they really don’t share the same values,” he said.
“And I think if they will get out of the way and honor the values that they ran on, keep the promises that they made to their constituencies when they ran, I think Donald Trump has the potential to be the greatest president since Abraham Lincoln.”
He added voters needed to “find candidates who are not professional politicians.”
“I think it’s time for the political class to go,” he declared. “I think they need to find people who have been successful in other fields like Donald Trump was and elect them next year, primary these guys out of there. I think that’s the only way it’s going to be solved.”
Yes, that solution would mean a huge upset in Washington, but it might be the only solution that will get the job done. We see what can happen when just the President is replaced with a real person with a real understanding of budgets and business. Who knows what this country could do if the entire Republican population of government were real people who understood real problems. That would be a huge step toward making America great again.
Share if you’re ready to see Republicans support President Trump!
FOLLOW us on Facebook at Freedom Daily!
Featured2 years ago
BREAKING: Top US Admiral Fired For Questioning Obama Purchase Of Mansion In Dubai
US2 years ago
VA Tries to Confiscate Disabled Vet’s Guns, Stopped by Citizens and Sheriff Standing Guard
Crime2 years ago
BOMBSHELL: Rancher LaVoy Finicum Shot and Killed by Feds While he was laying face down in the street
Crime2 years ago
Two White Men Doused With Gasoline And Set On Fire Near Baltimore. Media Censored Story (VIDEO)
Islam2 years ago
WATCH What This Frenchman Pulls on A Group of Muslim Migrants When They Tried Attacking Him (VIDEO)
Crime2 years ago
BREAKING: Muslim Teen Refugee Charged With MURDER For Beating 97-Yr-Old WWII Veteran To Death
Freedom2 years ago
BREAKING: Here’s What’s inside Obama’s Unconstitutional Gun Ban Legislation of 2016
Crime2 years ago
Another 41 Muslim “Refugees” in U.S. Arrested on Jihad Terror Charges