Please disable your Ad Blocker to better interact with this website.

Connect with us

Crime

Protesters And Supporters Of Donald Trump Trade Blows At Chicago Rally – VIDEO!

Published

on

Watch protesters and supporters of Donald Trump trade blows at a campaign rally in Chicago

Posted by Sky News on Friday, March 11, 2016

Scumbag BLM and Bernie Sanders protesters get violent at Trump’s Chicago rally. The rally was canceled out of concern for safety.

Jeff was the national rally organizer to free Marine Sgt. Tahmooressi from the Mexican prison, chairman emeritus of Ross Perot’s Reform Party of California, and a former candidate for governor. Jeff is editor-in-chief at Freedom Daily. He wrote for former Hollywood talent agent & Breitbart contributor, Pat Dollard, and headed up his 30 person research team. Mr. Rainforth also wrote for the Wayne Dupree Show. Jeff is single & says he is not gay.

Join the conversation

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse.

Crime

BREAKING! Trump Pulls Off MAJOR UPSET! They Are PISSED…THIS IS SO HUGE!!!

Published

on

President Donald Trump has been on a winning streak ever since taking off for his first overseas trip as Commander-in-Chief. He returned home to business as usual for the leader of the most powerful nation in the world, who is also on a mission to block our borders from unwelcome refugees and illegals. He didn’t miss a beat returning to his duties.

The president was recently presented with an incredible surprise of who could be paying for one of his most important campaign promises and you won’t believe who just came up as the most unlikely financier. The only thing that’s been holding America’s safety and security back is the ability to fund it, which could soon not be a problem any longer and fulfill a long overdue need much quicker than originally thought.

The fight over who will foot the $12-$15 billion to fund Trump’s U.S.-Mexico border wall is no longer an issue after one person could be forced to pony up the bill for it under the most ironic of circumstances. News is breaking right now from one of the most outspoken advocates of the border wall outside of President Donald Trump, who just dropped a bomb to solve the funding problem with one simple solution.

The money for the wall is already in America’s possession, we just need to get permission to use it now and the one who it belongs to has no say in the matter. You could call Senator Ted Cruz the best problem-solver with devising the perfect solution to get moving on one of Trump’s biggest and most important campaign promises.

Breitbart reports:

“Senator Ted Cruz (R-TX) introduced a bill calling for the use of $14 billion seized from cartel drug lord Joaquin ‘El Chapo’ Guzman to be used to pay for the President’s border wall between the U.S. and Mexico.”

It makes perfect sense since one of the world’s largest drug cartel leaders benefitted by the billions in an open border. Now that he’s in custody, it’s only fair that the “blood money” in holding go to good use against Chapo’s cause and Cruz is a genius for proposing this idea.

“Fourteen billion dollars will go a long way toward building a wall that will keep Americans safe and hinder the illegal flow of drugs, weapons, and individuals across our southern border,” Senator Cruz said, as was reported by Breitbart Texas who received a statement from the senator’s office on the matter. “Ensuring the safety and security of Texans is one of my top priorities.”

The entire objective of the border wall is to dramatically slow the flow of drugs and crime into America through avenues established by El Chapo. His forfeited drug money fortune will “offset the wall’s cost and make meaningful progress toward achieving President Trump’s stated border security objectives,” Cruz’s statement continued.

The bill, appropriately dubbed the Ensuring Lawful Collection of Hidden Assets to Provide Order (EL CHAPO), was introduced by Cruz on Tuesday and with any luck will get a lot of conservative support. Of course, liberals are greatly against the idea of a wall, preaching for breaking down walls of communication rather than building them. This Utopian idea can’t and won’t work as El Chapo proves with his billions of dollars and thousands of lives lost to his enterprise.

“The U.S. Government is currently seeking the criminal forfeiture of more than $14 billion in drug proceeds and illicit profits from El Chapo, the former leader of the Sinaloa drug cartel who was recently extradited to the U.S. to face criminal prosecution for numerous alleged drug-related crimes, including conspiracy to commit murder and money laundering,” Cruz stated, Breitbart reports.

Breitbart Texas’ Ildefonso Ortiz reports that “As part of the agreement with Mexico, Guzman will not face the death penalty in the U.S. for his crimes.” This makes the money usage even better since he has to live holed up in a jail cell for the rest of his life and know what all of his money is being siphoned into. Just because the kingpin is out, doesn’t mean that his cartel network is, which is still in operation breaching our border. It couldn’t be better than to make their boss pay for the wall that’s needed because of him and shut the whole drug and crime funnel down for good.

Continue Reading

Crime

It’s Official! The Court Just Ruled Against It – Riots Are About To ERUPT In New York!

Published

on

For the past year, the left has been doing their best to undermine President Trump with their devious schemes to oust him from office. Between the fake Russian collusion story and women parading on national media news outlets with tales of sexual misconduct from decades ago, the left is doing their best to keep hatred for Trump alive. Now, the courts have stepped in and handed down an epic ruling in President Trump’s favor that will surely have the hateful left fuming with anger.

One bone of contention the left has with President Trump is his tweeting on the social media platform Twitter. These special snowflakes are continually complaining that Trump is mean with his comments and that he just needs to stop and start acting presidential. To prove just how much these whiny liberals despise Trump’s tweeting habits, they have gone to extraordinary lengths to silence him. There have been groups of liberals sent to report Trump’s Twitter account as hate speech and even a petition created to suspend his account.

However nothing these liberals have tried has worked, but that has not stopped one butthurt woman to try and go for broke. During the presidential campaign last year, Republican strategist Cheryl Jacobus sued Donald Trump for defamation for comments he made in the midst of a heated Republican primary. Jacobus alleged in her complaint that the Trump campaign tried to recruit her in May 2015, even attempting to entice her with the prospect of a post-campaign job at Fox News. Jacobus didn’t join the presidential campaign, and after a brief amount of time, she appeared on the liberal news network CNN to publically criticize the Trump campaign.

Shortly after her appearance on CNN, Trump logged onto Twitter and set the record straight about Jacobus which apparently hurt her feelings. In the tweets that caused this special snowflake to melt Trump stated Jacobus ‘begged us for a job. We said no and she went hostile.’ A second Trump tweet stated, ‘Turned her down twice and she went hostile. Major loser, zero credibility.’”

So, instead of Jacobus walking away and letting it go, she didn’t and filed a frivolous lawsuit demanding $4 million in damages. Well, on Tuesday Jacobus received the sad news that her little suit was not a success after a panel of five judges in a New York appeals court upheld the decision of the lower court.

Here is more from The Daily Caller:

A New York appeals court ruled that you cannot collect damages for defamation if President Donald Trump insults you over Twitter.

The decision was made after Republican strategist Cheryl Jacobus accused the president of sending a “virtual mob” to attack her after she went on national television and questioned whether he was fit for office. In response, Trump called her a “real dummy!”, “major loser” and claimed she “begged” him for a job on his campaign, despite her insistence that she didn’t.

Jacobus was seeking $4 million in damages against Trump. Her lawyer, Jay Butterman, said Tuesday was “not a happy day for democracy”.

A five-judge panel reached the verdict Tuesday in Manhattan, agreeing with New York Judge Barbara Jaffe who defended Trump’s “intemperate tweets” as protected by the First Amendment, despite chastising them as intending to “belittle and demean.”

The appeals court wrote that Trump’s tweets were “too vague, subjective and lacking precise meaning” to qualify as defamatory and were protected speech.

Tuesday’s decision will likely give comfort to the president’s legal team, who are currently fighting a different lawsuit from a former “The Apprentice” contestant who contends that a tweet calling her sexual assault allegation a lie also qualifies as defamation.

This is fantastic news for Trump and the American people since these liberals are doing whatever they can to silence the opposition. The left has control of the news media, Hollywood, and even social media platforms and they use this power to silence those they don’t agree with their progressive agenda.

Just because someone does not like what someone writes on social media does not give them the right to sue them for defamation. In today’s day in age of technology and social media, you have to have a thick skin to deal with what people say on the internet, especially if you are in the public spotlight. Jacobus went on national television and criticized the Trump campaign, and she did not think that they would have something to say back?

Well, she was wrong, and now the whole world knows it.

SHARE IF YOU THINK THE COURTS RULING WAS CORRECT AGAINST THIS WHINY LIBERAL?

 

 

Continue Reading

Crime

BREAKING! He Just Tried To Take Down Trump For $200,000… THIS IS HUGE!!!

Someone needs to go to prison for this!

Published

on

Things are about to get very interesting in the constant fight to drain the DC swamp!

Former Fox News host Bill O’Reilly while on the Glenn Beck radio show on Friday revealed details of what he said was sick and disgusting efforts to attack President Trump’s reputation in order to get him to resign from the office of the president.

He also highlights the fact that this newly uncovered information raises serious doubts about the motives behind new allegations that have been made against himself which caused him to lose his job at Fox News.

O’Reilly added that currently, investigators which are working for him uncovered an audio recording of a prominent “unnamed” NeverTrump movement Attorney offering an unidentified woman $200,000 to file bogus sexual harassment charges against the then-presidential candidate Donald Trump.

In a later interview to Newsmax, Bill O’Reilly urged the person who has the tape in their possession to hand it over to the U.S. attorney, because his investigative team believes there are at least three separate crimes on the audio tape. O’Reilly went on to say that President Trump has been made aware of the tape but for some unknown reason, he is sitting on the information. Even though he has a very powerful Attorney General who, if he wanted to, could prosecute the whole movement and end this.

Fox News Reports:

Jeff Sessions should never have accepted the position of Attorney General of the United States. His leadership has proven unproductive and ineffectual.

There are two reasons for this.

First, he deceived President Trump by concealing his intent to recuse himself from the federal investigation into Russia’s meddling in the 2016 election. Hours after he was sworn in, Sessions began setting his recusal in motion by meeting with Department of Justice officials to discuss stepping aside from the probe. Failing to disclose such a material matter to the president was an egregious betrayal.

Trump was reportedly disgusted and angry with Sessions when he learned of the recusal – rightly so. “If he was going to recuse himself, he should have told me prior to taking office, and I would have picked someone else,” said Trump at a news conference. The president was entitled to know the truth, but Sessions actively hid it from him. Sessions’ deception deprived him of Trump’s confidence and trust which are essential to the job of Attorney General. This ethical impropriety renders him unfit to serve.

Second, Sessions appears either incapable or incompetent. He has resisted producing the documents relevant to the anti-Trump dossier which were subpoenaed by the House Intelligence Committee. He has failed to appoint a special counsel to reopen the case against Hillary Clinton for likely violations of the Espionage Act in the use of her email server, obstruction of justice for destroying 33,000 emails under congressional subpoena, and potential self-dealing for profit through her foundation. The evidence is compelling.

Moreover, Sessions has taken no action to investigate the unmasking of Trump aides during intelligence surveillance by the Obama Administration. Evidence continues to mount that the incoming president was spied upon for political reasons. Transition officials were unmasked, perhaps illegally. And in one case, the unmasking was leaked to the media which is a crime. Yet Sessions is twiddling his thumbs.

And why hasn’t Sessions investigated the possible criminal conduct of James Comey? The fired FBI Director appears to have falsely testified before Congress, stolen government documents, and leaked them to the media.

Jeff Sessions may have been a fine Senator, but he has proven to be a feckless Attorney General. He should resign. But before he does, he can attempt to rectify the wreckage he has wrought by initiating several necessary criminal investigations and/or appointing a special counsel to do so.

James Comey

Comey was asked, under oath, by the House Judiciary Committee if he decided not to pursue criminal charges against Hillary Clinton before or after he interviewed her. He testified, “After.”

Yet, a document uncovered by the Senate Judiciary Committee belies his testimony. A full two months before the FBI ever interviewed Clinton and her top aides, Comey drafted a statement exonerating Clinton. Absent some extraordinary explanation, it appears that Comey’s investigation of Clinton was nothing more than a charade and that he may have lied under oath. If it can be proven, it would constitute the crime of perjury under 18 USC 1621 or a false statement under 18 USC 1001.

This document establishes persuasive evidence that Comey predetermined that Clinton would not be charged. What prosecutor writes a statement absolving a suspect before the evidence is fully gathered, especially from the principal witnesses? No prosecutor I know of. Unless, of course, the fix was in. Unless someone instructed him to protect Clinton or he decided to do it all on his own with a presidential election hanging in the balance.

Either way, it might well constitute obstruction of justice. It is a felony to interfere with a criminal investigation. It is also illegal to use your public office for a political purpose, if that is what Comey was doing.

But Comey’s misconduct and potential illegality don’t stop there. As FBI Director, he converted government documents to his own personal use and leaked at least one of them to the media. As FBI Director, he crafted seven presidential memorandums which are government property, took them into his personal possession when he was fired, and then conveyed one or more of them to a friend for the sole purpose of leaking them to the media. Under 18 USC 641, this could be a crime.

Under no circumstances were these memos “personal,”, as Comey claims. They were authored during the course and scope of his employment, composed on a government computer, shared with government employees, and pertained directly to meetings with the president that were central to his job as FBI Director.

Under the Federal Records Act, they are government records. This is indisputable, regardless of what Comey and his lawyers allege. They know this because Comey signed an “Unauthorized Disclosure Agreement” promising that, under penalty of legal action, he would not disseminate workplace documents. If the facts are as stated, he should be prosecuted under the Privacy Act.

Finally, four of the seven memos were “classified,” according to the FBI. If Comey conveyed any of them to an outside source, this would constitute an Unauthorized Removal of Classified Documents (18 USC 1924) or a violation of the Espionage Act (18 USC 798) under which Clinton should have been charged when Comey was FBI Director. The irony is lost on no one. Yet, Sessions appears to have taken no action.

Before he resigns, Sessions must open a full investigation and convene a grand jury to determine whether criminal charges should be brought against Comey. In the alternative, he can appoint a second special counsel to investigate the case. The current special counsel, Robert Mueller, is a long-time friend, ally and mentor to Comey. Mueller is not likely to include Comey in his current investigation, even though he has authority to do so under the directive he received.

Hillary Clinton

The case against Clinton is, by now, self-evident. She stored 110 emails containing classified information on her home computer server, an unsecured and unauthorized place. It is a crime to mishandle classified information under the Espionage Act.

Yet Comey misinterpreted the criminal statute by claiming Clinton did not “intend to violate the law.” This is not the legal standard, as any knowledgeable lawyer will tell you. The standard is whether she committed intentional acts, such as intentionally setting up her personal server and knowingly using it for her work documents, including classified materials. Clinton clearly intended to do these things.

Regardless, the law under 18 USC 793 requires only “grossly negligent” behavior. Here, Comey insisted Clinton was “extremely careless.” However, the two terms are synonymous under the law. Indeed, there is a frequently used jury instruction which explains that gross negligence is extremely careless behavior. So, in essence, Comey was admitting Clinton violated the law, although he twisted the statute to conclude otherwise.

There is strong evidence that Clinton obstructed justice. All of her emails were under a congressional subpoena. She was required to preserve and produce every single one of them. She did not. Instead, she deleted roughly 33,000 emails in defiance of the subpoena and cleansed her server of any incriminating evidence. Destruction of evidence under a lawful subpoena constitutes obstruction. Under the law, it is no excuse to claim that some of the emails were personal in nature.

Growing evidence suggests that Clinton used her office as Secretary of State to confer benefits to donors and foreign governments in exchange for financial contributions to her foundation and cash to her husband. If proven, it would support various crimes of corruption.

It has been reported that Clinton helped UBS avoid the IRS. Thereafter, Bill Clinton got paid $1.5 million and the Clinton Foundation received a ten-fold increase in donations by the bank. It has also been reported that Clinton’s state department approved billions of dollars in arms sales to several nations whose governments gave money to the Foundation.

And then, there is the infamous Uranium One deal. After the State Department under Clinton signed off on the U.S. sale of one-fifth of our nation’s uranium production capacity to the Russians, millions of dollars from Russian sources connected to the Kremlin began to flow to the Clinton Foundation, and Bill Clinton received $500,000 for a speech in Moscow. Coincidence? Or criminal “pay-to-play?”

In his confirmation hearing, Sessions promised to recuse himself from any matter involving Hillary Clinton. Therefore, before he resigns, Sessions must appoint a special counsel to reopen the Clinton investigation and decide anew whether criminal charges are merited.

Susan Rice

In March, the former National Security Adviser to President Obama insisted she “knew nothing” about Trump transition officials swept up in surveillance at the end of the Obama administration. Her statement was not true, and not the first time Rice conjured a false narrative. When confronted with evidence to the contrary, she admitted she knew of the incidental collection and, further, she is the one who requested that names be unmasked.

If Rice or UN Ambassador Samantha Power or any other person requested the unmasking of names for a reason other than national security, it is a crime. And so too is the leaking of those names to the media which clearly occurred. Under the Hatch Act, it is against the law for a public official to use his or her office for a political purpose.

Congress is vigorously investigating Rice and others. Yet Sessions seems detached and unconcerned. As the nation’s top lawyer, he is duty-bound to pursue such a substantial breach of intelligence operations.

Before he resigns, Sessions should launch a criminal investigation into the unmasking of names or appoint a special prosecutor to do the same.

Jeff Sessions either wittingly or unwittingly bungled his confirmation hearing, which led to the recusal that is said to have angered Trump and alienated the AG from the president. Regardless, Sessions’ performance as Attorney General ever since has been notable only for a series of failures to act when action is demanded.

The moment the President of the United States no longer has confidence in his Attorney General, it is time for him to submit his letter of resignation. But first, Sessions can restore integrity to the Department of Justice and salvage his own tattered reputation by taking aggressive action against Comey, Clinton and Rice.

Then he should quietly bow out.

Let’s be honest here. Attorney General Jeff Sessions turned out to be the wimpiest Attorney General in our lifetimes. Every time something important comes up he wimps out and recluses himself. Like a turtle hiding inside its shell while the wolf walks by. President Trump needs to replace him with someone like Eric Holder or Loretta Lynch, who would protect President Barack Hussein Obama in the White House whether he was right or wrong, without even question. Jeff Sessions doesn’t have President Trump’s back and he needs to go asap.

Please share if you agree Attorney General Jeff Sessions needs to resign….

FOLLOW us on Facebook at Freedom Daily!

Continue Reading

Latest Articles

Trending