Please disable your Ad Blocker to better interact with this website.

Connect with us

Culture

Racist NAACP Members Just Blew A Gasket After What Cowboys Owner Ordered Black NFL Players To Do

Published

on

The NFL national anthem protests reached a fever pitch after President Trump stated that players who kneel during the anthem should be fired. Instead of these anti-American players reevaluating their tactics, they only dug their heels in even further and upped the ante. Over the last several weeks, the players continued to kneel claiming that they were protesting to raise awareness about racial oppression and police brutality in America. However, as ratings continued to drop, sponsors pulling their ads and fans selling their tickets, NFL owners have begun to rethink allowing their players to keep their disrespectful protest.

Dallas Cowboys owner, Jerry Jones is the first to announce punishment for players who kneel during the anthem. Of course, this has sent the NAACP into a meltdown claiming that Jones’ threat was unconstitutional and that he has no right to impose such a punishment. Jones’ has fired back stating that this is a “workplace” issue and that he is in fact, well within his rights to require his team to stand during the national anthem.

Here is more from Sports Day:

The National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) issued a response to Jerry Jones on Tuesday after the Cowboys owner said he’d sit players who don’t stand for the national anthem.

“This is not an issue about our flag, this is an issue about police brutality, racism, and the ability of members of the NFL whose communities are disproportionately impacted by police misconduct to peacefully say enough,” said NAACP interim President and CEO Derrick Johnson. “This is not simply a Black issue due to the number of white people also killed by police, but we know historically that when justice occurs for African Americans, all other members of our society benefit as well.”

Jones was the first NFL owner to declare that players will be disciplined for protesting during the anthem when he did so Sunday after the Cowboys’ loss to the Green Bay Packers. He said Tuesday that his intention is to remove the Cowboys from the debate.

“I want them [the players] to have the ammunition to tell anybody that asks them to do anything otherwise or demonstrate during that period of time, that ‘I don’t get to play if I do that,'” Jones said. “This is a workplace issue. I don’t want there to be any misunderstanding as to where I want the personnel of the Cowboys to be when we’re at the No. 1 workplace we have, which is the field and the sideline on gameday. I want to do everybody a service, as I should in leading the team, and let’s be really clear about what our expectations are.”

The NAACP’s senior director of corporate affairs said Jones not only is being insensitive toward his players, but also he’s violating their constitutional rights.

“Jerry Jones’ comments are more than tone-deaf, more than misinformed and misguided – they are a public commitment by an NFL owner to violate his players’ Constitutional right to free speech – one of the principles on which our nation was founded,” said Tony Covington, the NAACP’s Senior Director of Corporate Affairs at the NAACP. “They are proof that athletes like Colin Kaepernick who have quietly and peacefully used their platform to protest violence against communities of color do so at their own peril.”

Covington spent five seasons in the NFL in the 1990s, including four as a safety for the Tampa Bay Buccaneers.

Jones disputed claims that he wasn’t sensitive to his players’ concerns.

“I have a complete NFL career establishing beyond reproach I back the players,” he said Tuesday in an interview with 105.3 The Fan. “One of my criticisms of my time in the NFL is that I’m too supportive of the players. … There’s no way anybody could say I’m not supportive of players and their issues. This time, the Cowboys and what’s best for the Cowboys, this time what’s best for the flag…that’s going to be the priority over all the other issues.”

The owner also isn’t violating constitutional rights as long as he’s addressing the players’ conduct in the workspace, First Amendment legal expert Chad Baruch told SportsDay.

“He’s a private employer so he’s free to make any rules he wants that infringe on free speech,” Baruch said. “He’s totally unconstrained legally.

“[The First Amendment] protects your right to have opinions against government intrusion, not to exercise that right at work.

“Having said that, all of us should be very wary of a world where employers make employment decisions based on political beliefs. All of us can understand in the long run why that might not benefit society. But that’s a values issue, not a First Amendment issue.”

The NAACP is so off base with their assessment of this entire situation, and you would think that people with law degrees would be aware of that. As previously stated, the Dallas Cowboys is a private organization, and the owner can impose whatever rules he desires on his team. The First Amendment only protects these players from the government retaliating against them such as throwing them in jail or censoring them.

It does not mean that these players are free from consequences from their employer if they break a rule. For instance, if Jones requires these players to wear a pink tutu during practice, that is his team rule and they need to abide by it. These players are not obligated to stay with this team and are free to leave and search for employment that is better suited to their belief system.

It seems that these players forget that it is Jerry Jones who signs their checks and if they don’t like it well, there’s the door. Maybe a few players need to receive a pink slip to be reminded of their place in the world and realize they are replaceable by others who would more than happy to play in the NFL and stand for the national anthem.

H/T [News One]

FOLLOW us on Facebook at Freedom Daily!

Liberty Belle is a libertarian and provocateur who believes in freedom and liberty for all Americans. As a passionate journalist, she works relentlessly to uncover the corruption happening in Washington, while exposing politicians and individuals who wish to do us harm. Liberty’s legendary ability to piss off liberals and get to the bottom of corruption makes her an extremely dangerous foe to all the easily-triggered snowflakes out there.

Join the conversation

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse.

Culture

Starbucks New ‘Holiday’ Cup Was Just Released And Instantly The LGBTQ Community Is Cheering What It Says

Now they’ve gone too far!

Published

on

Holiday cheer comes in many different forms, but if you’re one of the roughly 150 million Americans who consume an amount of caffeine that would constitute a dependency, that cheer is going to have to come with a double shot of espresso if it’s going to get the job done. Beginning in the early 70s Americans have been enjoying the fact that Starbucks has streamlined the process of feeding our addiction, keeping the masses happy and caffeinated.

The love affair between Americans and the left coast coffee company began crumbling, however, when the alt-left bias of the corporation became more evident. At one point the leadership even insinuated that they didn’t want those who proclaim themselves to be non-homosexual to be their customers. But because we’re a tolerant people, most of us just took our caffeine with a side of First Amendment and moved on with our lives.

Unfortunately, the militantly pro-LGBTQ company has pushed their agenda a little too far this year. While many anxiously awaited what would be on the holiday cup, they, of course, used it as a political platform. Fox News reports that the coffee conglomerate held dear by so many is now put a gay couple holding hands on the cup that will be held by so many this holiday season.

“Starbuck’s newest holiday cups are getting second looks after a Buzzfeed article suggested that they might be ‘gay.’

Starbucks 2017 holiday cups photographed on Monday, October 23, 2017. (Joshua Trujillo, Starbucks)

The cups feature a busy print of holiday favorites like mittens, presents and Christmas trees, and above the logo, two unseen people are holding hands.

Since the cups launched in October, however, people have taken to Twitter with hypotheses that the androgynous hands may belong to a pair of lesbians.

The idea may have sprung up from a video campaign Starbucks launched, advertising the return of the holiday cups. In the video, two women are seen standing at a table holding hands. The campaign claims, ‘The holidays mean something different for everyone.'”

It’s pretty damning evidence seen in the video. A video that the company didn’t have to put out, we might add. The cup could have stood on its own and let people make what they will of the artistic rendering of the hands, but they had to make it very clear that that particular couple was the one whose hands were being zoomed in on.

Not one for subtly, they also seem to have gotten some major LGBTQ groups on board with their program.

“Many Twitter users seem [sic] to have jumped to the same conclusion about the hands, with one person writing, ‘We’re loving @Starbucks’ new festive ad with a lesbian couple.’”

Critics, meanwhile, are also responding to new hypotheses about the cup, with one on Twitter writing, ‘The new Starbucks cup has [a] lesbian couple on it. Rom 1:26 ‘because of this, God gave them over to shameful lust’…’

Another called for a boycott, saying, ‘This Year’s Starbucks Holiday Campaign Features a Lesbian Couple,’ followed by the hashtag #BoycottStarbucks.

Starbucks has not confirmed the legitimacy of these suspicions, but did respond positively to a tweet applauding them on their ‘Christmas campaign … featuring lesbians.’”

You’ll notice in the above tweet that they’re actually calling it a “campaign.” It makes one wonder what they’re actually campaigning for, considering that gay rights have been an established thing for quite some time now. Maybe they’re campaigning to make sure that everyone who has objections has to be quiet about it from now on.

“Buzzfeed has, meanwhile, asserted the hypothesis is fact.

As the Buzzfeed article writes, ‘While people who follow both Starbucks holiday cup news and LGBT issues celebrated the video, the ordinary Starbucks customer probably didn’t realize the cup might have a gay agenda.’

Before following with, ”I can attest to the lesbianism of The Hands,’ my gay BuzzFeed colleague said upon careful inspection.’

In an emailed statement from the coffee chain, the company neither confirms nor denies the allegations.

‘Each year during the holidays we aim to bring our customers an experience that inspires the spirit of the season, and we will continue to embrace and welcome customers from all backgrounds and religions in our stores around the world,’ the statement reads.

Starbucks has faced criticisms over their holiday cups before. In 2015 and 2016, people claimed the monochromatic red cups weren’t holiday enough.”

While Starbucks might not be claiming the sexuality of the hands on their now infamous cup, the LGBTQ community is ready to claim it for them, and just that is enough to make you want to throw out even the sweetest of PSL’s.

What this cup says is that the company, like many others, has pledged their allegiance, and it’s to those of confused sexual orientation. And if that’s something you want to support, it’s your right to do so. No one here is looking to tell you what to do, we’re just looking to inform you so that you can make your own decision. With that being said, there seems to be no room for doubt that this cup, as with almost every corporate decisions that Starbucks makes, is a slap in the face of traditional values, and supporting of the progressive liberal agenda.

So feel free to drink up, but just know that every time you shell out your hard earned money for an overpriced cup of coffee, you’re supporting something. Make sure it’s something that you want for your kids.

[H/T: Fox News]

Continue Reading

Culture

Blacks Take Over School – Force Whites To Pay For Slavery In Disgusting Way With Their Urine

Published

on

Thanks to Obama’s race-baiting antics over the past 8 years, we now have full-fledged race war raging in our country as white people are being savagely attacked and persecuted simply for the color of their skin. Liberals are making matters even worse in recent months, as they’re now actively pushing for segregation, as “black only” restaurants, graduation ceremonies, and campus housing is being established, as leftist loons continue make all whites “pay reparations” for 5% of the population owning slaves 200 years ago. But now a group of rabid black racists have completely overrun a publicly-funded college in Washington State, and what they’re forcing whites to do as a way to “pay for slavery” is so vile, it will make you convinced who the true racists in our country truly are.

Over the past several weeks, Evergreen College in Olympia, Washington, has been making headlines after a series of disgusting videos surfaced of the terror that black students and liberals were inflicting on white students and teachers. You might recall the story about a month ago where black students organized a “day without whites” on campus where they were forcibly removing whites from campus, going from building to building in gang-sized elements screaming alarming racist-filled tirades into white people’s faces, demanding that whites immediately vacate the campus. Here’s a clip below if you’re not familiar with what happened:

But disturbingly, a “day without whites” was just the beginning of these domestic terrorists’ complete takeover, thanks to the university president George Sumner Bridges (who is a rabid liberal himself) continuing to let black supremacists completely overrun the school.  Now it’s being widely reported that whites are now unable to to the bathroom without having a black liberal escort, in what sounds like a page straight out of a 1930’s Nazi-era story. Watch the clip starting at 3:22 for the part about the bathrooms. 

“It essentially sounded like you were being held hostage there,” the interviewer says to one white person on campus. “If you were going to go to the bathroom you had to go with two escorts. Is that true?”

There is absolutely nothing being done to stop these rabid black supremacists who continue to take out their vile and disgusting hatred and rage onto white faculty members and white students. White professor Bret Weinstein, who was cruelly targeted by a horde of about 50 blacks and liberals who ambushed his classroom, recently spoke out about what he was forced to endure, as the liberal media continues to praise this disgusting act on whites as “social progress” being made, as they continue to label this reverse racism as “reparations” that must be made for whites owning slaves 200 years ago. In a recent interview with Wallstreet Journal, Weinstein discussed how he was viciously targeted.

“Racially charged, anarchic protests have engulfed Evergreen State College, a small, public liberal-arts institution where I have taught since 2003. In a widely disseminated video of the first recent protest on May 23, an angry mob of about 50 students disrupted my class, called me a racist, and demanded that I resign. My ‘racist’ offense? I had challenged coercive segregation by race. Specifically, I had objected to a planned ‘Day of Absence’ in which white people were asked to leave campus on April 12.”

“There is a huge difference between a group or coalition deciding to voluntarily absent themselves from a shared space in order to highlight their vital and under-appreciated roles . . . and a group or coalition encouraging another group to go away,” I wrote. “On a college campus, one’s right to speak—or to be—must never be based on skin color.”

Could you imagine the outrage of black students at a college were being held hostage and prevented from going to the bathroom without a white escort? Why does a double standard exist in our country? Why is Harvard University allowed to hold a separate graduation ceremony for blacks and no one bats an eye? How is it that separate housing is being established just for blacks at Colorado State University and this type of segregation is deemed acceptable in our country? Or a cafe on campus where whites are completely banned from eating at, as is the case at The American University in Washington D.C.?

It’s absolutely outrageous what is going on in our country. Whites are being victimized, demonized, discriminated against, segregated, bullied, terrorized, and now unable to use the freaking bathroom, all while liberals continue to assert this is some how “civil rights progress.” Martin Luther King Jr. must be rolling around in his grave right now as what he fought, bled, and died for is literally being flushed down the toilet by these rabid blacks and liberals, who have no freaking idea what being an American even truly means.

H/T [intellectualtakeout.org]

 

 

Continue Reading

Culture

This Is The Sick New Protest NFL Players Have Planned For ‘Racist’ Thanksgiving Day Games After They See Who’s Showing Up

This will piss you off!

Published

on

Thanksgiving is fast approaching and in case you didn’t have any family controversy to keep you livid this holiday season, your friends over at the National Football League will, of course, do something infuriating to disrupt your holiday. This year, the already failing sports league is further damaging their reputation by retaliating against one of their own teams.

Apparently, the current National Anthem protest that has dug the NFL into an almost unrecoverable hole is being combined with a grievance that the social justice warriors were wining about previously. That being the name of Washington’s team. The Redskins were at the center of a controversy over their name and if it was disrespectful to the Native American population in the United States.

The most recent objection is to the fact that the Redskins will be hosting a Thanksgiving day game, which some consider to be some sort of sick joke. If we assumed that the majority of Americans even cared about football anymore (which their ratings would say that we don’t) it seems like the anniversary of making friends with the Native Americans would be a great thing to celebrate. However, according to Fox News Insider, that’s just not how it’s being viewed by those fellow Americans who can find offense at anything:

“A writer for The Nation magazine criticized the NFL for putting the Washington Redskins game on primetime on Thanksgiving.

Dave Zirin wrote that the ‘R*dskins’ name is a ‘slur, a name that exists mainly because of genocide and displacement.’

‘It’s as if NFL owners, by having Washington host this game, are having their own private joke,’ Zirin wrote, adding ‘a league that celebrates racial slurs can never be an engine for social change.’

Washington fan Juan Williams, who said he also finds the name offensive to Native Americans, asked the panel their thoughts on the story.

‘Doesn’t matter what you call them, they’re going to lose anyway,’ Philadelphia native and Eagles fan Jesse Watters remarked.”

Watters remark is probably the most accurate assessment that could be made. Not only do many predict that they will lose the game, everyone in the NFL is losing on a much grander scale lately. The NFL has completely PC’ed itself out of an audience by alienating anyone who possesses even a modicum of patriotism.

Maybe some of the former NFL fans would have been open to hearing about any problems actual Native Americans had about the name “Redskins” if it had been the American Indians who were making the complaints, but at this juncture, it’s a moot point. In fact, the same Fox interview pointed out that a recent study showed that about 90 percent of Native Americans didn’t find the name “Redskins” offensive at all.

However, what many do find offensive is what the teams have planned for the Thanksgiving game. Whether prompted by the Holiday shake-up, or as a flailing attempt to try an appease the disgruntled ex-fans who are still boycotting all things NFL, the league is considering keeping the teams inside their lockers for the National Anthem. Daily Mail reports that this is not the response to the boycott that the President or the people wanted, and President Trump let them know about it:

“Donald Trump ramped up his battle with the National Football League on Wednesday, tweeting his frustrations about national-anthem protests before 6 o’clock in the morning from the confines of his Florida Mar-a-Lago resort.

‘The NFL is now thinking about a new idea – keeping teams in the Locker Room during the National Anthem next season. That’s almost as bad as kneeling!’ the president wrote. 

‘When will the highly paid Commissioner finally get tough and smart? This issue is killing your league!’

Trump was referring to a Washington Post report on Tuesday that outlined a possible new league policy being privately debated by NFL team owners.”

'When will the highly paid Commissioner finally get tough and smart?' the president wrote in a jab at Roger Goodell; 'This issue is killing your league!'

‘When will the highly paid Commissioner finally get tough and smart?’ the president wrote in a jab at Roger Goodell; ‘This issue is killing your league!’

Various players and teams have stayed in their locker rooms before games this year, emerging only after the National Anthem is played in order to avoid the decision of whether or not to stand.

Most recently, Trump slammed Oakland Raiders running back Marshawn Lynch for continuing to sit for The Star Spangled Banner, despite standing for the Mexican anthem before a game on Sunday.

Lynch’s latest protest took place on Sunday before the Raiders played the New England Patriots at Azteca Stadium in Mexico City.” 

President Donald Trump said Wednesday morning on Twitter that the NFL shouldn't enact a policy requiring players to remain in their locker rooms while the National Anthem is played

The NFL should never have found itself in this predicament in the first place. Professional sports is where people go to try and avoid thinking about any heavy issues of the day, but because of the disrespect of the players, those issues invaded a once worry free refuge. When it’s ceased to be politics-free, it ceased to be popular.

[H/T: Fox News Insider, Daily Mail]

FOLLOW us on Facebook at Freedom Daily!

Continue Reading

Trending