Please disable your Ad Blocker to better interact with this website.

Connect with us

Immigration

Something Very Strange Just Happened To Massive Muslim Population In U.S. Overnight

This will make you feel Good! Real good!

Published

on

Only eight months into his presidency and Donald Trump has already made America a bit greater again.

Only 913 refugees were admitted into the United States during the month of August. Making it the first time the monthly flow has dropped below one thousand in 15 years. The smallest number of monthly admissions since October 2002. Sad to see 9/11 wasn’t enough of a wake-up call for our leaders. 

Of the total of 913 refugees admitted during the month of August, 551 were Christians, with the biggest groups including 185 Pentecostalists from Ukraine and 53 Baptists, also from Ukraine. A largely smaller group of 220 were Muslims, including 48 Sunnis from Iraq and 47 from Syria. The remaining 142 were unaffiliated or from other minor religions which included 43 Buddhists and 36 Hindus who were mainly from Bhutan.

According to the State Department Refugee Processing Center, if you compare these numbers to the numbers from January 2017, 49 percent of admitted refugees were Muslims and 40 percent were Christians. Over the months since the Trump inauguration, the number of Muslims admitted has greatly decreased while the proportion of Christians has gotten a lot bigger. I guess that’s the difference between having a president named Donald J. Trump as compared to one named Barack Hussein Obama or even George W. Bush.

Fox News Reports:

Trump travel ban: Supreme Court reinstates key parts of executive order

In a victory for the Trump administration, the Supreme Court on Monday lifted key components of an injunction against President Trump’s proposed ban on travel from six majority-Muslim nations, reinstating much of the policy and promising to hear full arguments as early as this fall.

The court’s decision means the justices will now wade into the biggest legal controversy of the Trump administration — the president’s order temporarily restricting travel, which even Trump has termed a “travel ban.”

Protesters wave signs and chant during a demonstration against President Donald Trump’s revised travel ban, Monday, May 15, 2017, outside a federal courthouse in Seattle. A three-judge panel of the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals heard arguments Monday in Seattle over Hawaii’s lawsuit challenging the travel ban, which would suspend the nation’s refugee program and temporarily bar new visas for citizens of Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria and Yemen.

“Today’s unanimous Supreme Court decision is a clear victory for our national security,” Trump said in a statement. “…As President, I cannot allow people into our country who want to do us harm. I want people who can love the United States and all of its citizens, and who will be hardworking and productive.”

He added: “My No. 1 responsibility as commander in chief is to keep the American people safe. Today’s ruling allows me to use an important tool for protecting our Nation’s homeland.”

The court made clear that a limited version of the policy can be enforced immediately with a full hearing to come in the Fall.

“An American individual or entity that has a bona fide relationship with a particular person seeking to enter the country as a refugee can legitimately claim concrete hardship if that person is excluded,” the court wrote. “As to these individuals and entities, we do not disturb the injunction. But when it comes to refugees who lack any such connection to the United States, for the reasons we have set out, the balance tips in favor of the government’s compelling need to provide for the Nation’s security.”

U.S. President Donald Trump signs an executive order to impose tighter vetting of travelers entering the United States, at the Pentagon in Washington, U.S., January 27, 2017. The executive order signed by Trump imposes a four-month travel ban on refugees entering the United States and a 90-day hold on travelers from Syria, Iran and five other Muslim-majority countries.

The justices decided to review the broader constitutional issues over executive authority on immigration with oral arguments to be held in the fall.

Trump has been incensed since his original executive order, signed on Jan. 27, was partially blocked by a federal court.

“What is our country coming to when a judge can halt a Homeland Security travel ban and anyone, even with bad intentions, can come into U.S.?” Trump tweeted on Feb. 4.

He added on Feb. 11: “Our legal system is broken!”

In early March, Trump issued a revised executive order — which also had key provisions blocked by federal courts.

Trump has been spoiling for the Supreme Court to take up the case and eager to get it out of the hands of what he sees as more liberal appellate judges.

Four days after signing the original ban, Trump nominated Neil Gorsuch to fill the Supreme Court seat vacated when Antonin Scalia died. Gorsuch, who has since been confirmed, is largely seen as a conservative, originalist justice in the Scalia mold and could help Trump claim an even more definitive victory after arguments.

“The government has made a strong showing that it is likely to succeed on the merits – that is, that the judgments below will be reversed,” wrote Justice Thomas, supported by Alito and Gorsuch. “The Government has also established that failure to stay the injunctions will cause irreparable harm by interfering with its ‘compelling need to provide for the Nation’s security.’”

At issue is whether the temporary ban violates the Religion Clauses of the First Amendment, the Due Process Clause of the Fifth and 14th Amendments, and the ban on nationality discrimination in the issuance of immigrant visas contained in a 65-year-old congressional law.

Federal appeals courts in Virginia and California in recent weeks have ruled against the administration. A majority of the 4th Circuit appeals court cited then-candidate Donald Trump’s campaign statements proposing a ban “preventing Muslim immigration.”

The White House, on the other hand, frames the issue as a temporary move involving national security. A coalition of groups in opposition call the order blatant religious discrimination, since the six countries involved have mostly-Muslim populations: Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria and Yemen.

A major sticking point for the justices will be navigating how much discretion the president really has over immigration. Courts have historically been deferential in this area, and recent presidents dating back to Jimmy Carter have used their discretion to deny entry to certain refugees and diplomats — including those from nations such as Iran, Cuba and North Korea.

A 1952 federal law — the Immigration and Nationality Act, passed in the midst of a Cold War fear over Communist influence — historically gives the chief executive broad authority.

“Whenever the president finds that the entry of any aliens or of any class of aliens into the United States would be detrimental to the interests of the United States, he may, by proclamation, and for such period as he shall deem necessary,” Section 212 (f) of the law states, “suspend the entry of all aliens or any class of aliens as immigrants or non-immigrants, or impose on the entry of aliens any restrictions he may deem to be appropriate.”

In his opinion, Thomas criticized the majority for the compromise nature of Monday’s ruling, indicating he would have allowed the order to be enforced in full. Thomas said he feared “the Court’s remedy” would inspire a flood of new litigation.

“Today’s compromise will burden executive officials with the task of deciding — on peril of contempt — whether individuals from the six affected nations who wish to enter the United States have a sufficient connection to a person or entity in this country,” Thomas wrote. “The compromise also will invite a flood of litigation until this case is finally resolved on the merits, as parties and courts struggle to determine what exactly constitutes a ‘bona fide relationship,’ who precisely has a ‘credible claim’ to that relationship, and whether the claimed relationship was formed ‘simply to avoid §2(c)’ of Executive Order No. 13780.”

I have to admit, having been brought to this great nation at the age of 2 by my parents, Legally and through the front door, what President Trump has done so far to this nation fills me with pride and joy.

About damn time we had a president who cares about the people inside our borders more than those outside who are willing to break the law to come here. Or who claim refugee status to come here as a Trojan Horse and then refuse to assimilate into this huge melting pot which is the United States of America.

Please share if you agree with the Travel Ban….

FOLLOW us on Facebook at Freedom Daily!

Al ran for the California State Assembly in his home district in 2010 and garnered more votes than any other Republican since 1984. He's worked on multiple political campaigns and was communications director for the Ron Nehring for California Lt. Governor campaign during the primaries in 2014. He has also held multiple positions within his local Republican Central Committee including Secretary, and Vice President of his local California Republican Assembly chapter. While also being an ongoing delegate to the California Republican Party for almost a decade.

Join the conversation

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse.

Government Intel

BREAKING!! Pence Just Made MAJOR Announcement About Border Wall That NOBODY Saw Coming

HECK YEAH!! GO TRUMP!

Published

on

One of President Donald Trump’s biggest campaign promises that has yet to come to fruition is the much-anticipated border wall that’s been met with a lot of leftist opposition for it and delayed due to endless hurdles to have to cross. The question of if construction will happen or when it will within his first term has recently come up after funding arguments between the U.S. and Mexico have persisted, with neither side backing down. Now, Vice President Mike Pence had just come forward with a shocking announcement that has taken the entire country by complete surprise.

After news first broke last week about possible funding for the wall coming from a single ironic source, the reality of a tightly secured border with a barrier going up between the U.S. and Mexico became a sudden reality. Senator Ted Cruz proposed a bill calling for all “$14 billion seized from cartel drug lord Joaquin ‘El Chapo’ Guzman to be used to pay for the President’s border wall between the U.S. and Mexico,” according to Breitbart, as we previously reported.

Although the bill is absolutely genius and solves the biggest issue in building the wall, it has yet to pass and chances are unlikely it will since defiant liberals have a say in it. However, where there is a will, there is a way, and Americans know they can count on Trump to find it which leads us to today’s unexpected announcement.

Perhaps proposing this funding idea inspired others to generously pitch in, should it not go through. Leave it to our current administration to make this happen and not disappoint on this anticipated promise, or wait for liberals to deny the opportunity to fund it with El Chapo’s seized drug money. Mike Pence announced today on Twitter: “We achieved the largest increase in border security funding in 10 yrs, w/ enough money to make a down payment on the border wall.”

The good news didn’t end there, he had more a few minutes later on Twitter that was sure to brighten Americans’ day. “This budget bill, under @POTUS‘ leadership, also includes important health care resources for our great coal miners,” he Tweeted. A few minutes later, he announced that “There is no long-term bailout for the insurance companies that the Democrats wanted to subsidize the badly failing Obamacare.” He made one final statement, ending on a solid note, before closing his flurry of financial statements.

“After years of partisan bickering and gridlock, this budget bill is a clear win for the American people.”

In just over his first 100 days in office, Trump managed to get the biggest increase in border security funding than we saw within the last decade — which was mostly due to the gridlock the country was in because of the Barack Obama era. He received $1.51 billion to secure our border and finally get a solid start on it, which we can now see could happen in his first term after even conservatives were rightfully concerned that it wouldn’t.

This doesn’t solve all of the financial issues in building the wall, but it’s far better than anything Obama ever did. Now, if Senator Cruz’s bill would pass to free up El Chapo’s billions for this wall, the country would be much safer sooner.

Continue Reading

Featured

BREAKING NOW: Karma Just Stormed Chuck Schumer’s House! He’s Afraid For His LIFE!

HE’S GETTING A TASTE OF HIS OWN MEDICINE!

Published

on

Democrat Senior United States Senator in New York, Chuck Schumer, is the reason the government went on lockdown this week because he wanted more money for illegals than he did for our military. The shutdown was resolved when he folded like a cheap suit after acting as the hero for these so-called “Dreamers” who ended up with nothing after Schumer cost active military several days of pay. It was a loss on all accounts for his stupid statement and now he’s paying for it in a personal way with who just stormed his New York City house. He had it coming!

When liberals and illegals don’t get what they want they have only one reaction. Schumer is feeling the full wrath of that now as Trump gets the last laugh.

The Washington Post reports:

In the hours after U.S. senators struck a deal to end the government shutdown Monday, scores gathered near the U.S. Capitol to protest what they saw as the Democrats’ decision to abandon the “dreamers,” young undocumented immigrants who were brought to the United States illegally as children or overstayed their visas.

One by one, the demonstrators called out the names of Democrats who voted with Republicans to end the shutdown, shouting, “Shame!”

On Tuesday, a group of about 100 protesters gathered again, rallying in Upper Senate Park and then heading to lawmakers’ offices to demand the vote on immigration legislation that Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) has vaguely promised.

Those protests continue now into the dark and have also taken a turn down Schumer’s street where he lives in New York City, which isn’t coincidental. They thought he was going to be the guy to give them what he wanted, but he caved and now they’re showing him one of the reasons Trump is so strong on immigration. They aren’t here to work, they overstayed their visas, and don’t want all the freebies of living in our free country to be taken away.

Breitbart was there live to show the “Dreamers” storming Schumer’s personal residence. He can advocate for them all he wants, thinking that there’s no threat of having to face the consequences of his deplorable decisions for American citizens. However, now he’s getting the perfect dose of karma.

‘Dreamers’ Storm Chuck Schumer’s Home in NY

Posted by Breitbart on Tuesday, January 23, 2018

The Post continues:

Walter Barrientos, of the immigrant rights organization Make the Road New York, said his group and those aligned with it have sponsored actions in New York as well as in downtown Washington, holding rallies and vigils in Manhattan and at the home of Senate Minority Leader Charles E. Schumer (D-N.Y.), who led the shutdown effort but then backed down over the weekend.

“Dreamers” and their advocates gather near the U.S. Capitol on Monday to declare their frustration at the reopening of the federal government without protections for immigrants.

“We are planning on being relentless in our pressure for the next two weeks,” Barrientos said. “We can’t allow him to fail us again.”

Since the Trump administration announced in September that it would phase out the Obama-era Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program, immigrants and their advocates have protested, flooded congressional offices and been arrested in acts of civil disobedience, all in an effort to force a vote on legislation that would allow dreamers to stay legally in the United States.

Senate Democrats, led by Schumer, forced a government shutdown last week, refusing to support a last-minute spending bill if it did not include protections for dreamers.

But by Monday, after a weekend of Republican claims that Democrats had “prioritized illegal immigrants over American citizens,” senators from swing states were telling Schumer that their stance could hurt them, badly, in November’s midterm elections.

The Democrats then accepted a deal they had rejected Sunday — agreeing to reopen the government as long as McConnell said “it would be my intention” to consider immigration legislation in coming weeks.

There are multiple competing efforts in both chambers of Congress to determine what such legislation would say, however. And even if a bill allowing dreamers to stay passed the Senate, it could face an uphill battle in the more conservative House.

“Senators who voted today for the promise of a symbolic vote on the Dream Act are not resisting Trump — they are enablers,” Cristina Jiménez, executive director and co-founder of United We Dream, the nation’s largest immigrant-youth-led organization, said Monday. “Republicans played games too, holding the Dream Act hostage and pitted the safety of immigrant youth against children’s health care, proving their cruelty to the world.”

Schumer needs to let all his Dreamer friends in, take his own advice and see how that ends up. If it’s good for America then he should open up his own home and prove it. Stand by your Socialistic convictions and share your wealth, better than taxpayers being taxed.

Continue Reading

Immigration

HILARIOUS!! Black Bro GOES OFF On DACA & Liberal Lawmakers! (VIDEO)

HE PUT THEM IN THEIR PLACE!

Frank Lea

Published

on

An African American took the mic and wowed the crowd as he stood up for every American. He voiced his opinion against DACA and sanctuary cities, and the audience gave him a round of applause each time he made an excellent point that real Americans agree with. A cranky old liberal lawmaker lady tried silencing the speaker after he made so many good points. Thankfully, he didn’t back down. He put her in her place. That’s how it is in California! If you have an opinion that’s not liberal, then they try to hush you up. They don’t want you to speak. They don’t want your more logical views being heard by the masses because they risk losing Democrat votes. More importantly, they don’t want people of color to talk like a Republican or even a centrist who’s weighing their options before making a decision.

The liberal lawmakers in California couldn’t contain this man as he hit a grand slam with each point he smashed into the liberal lawmakers. He was respectful, based on fact, and the crowd was behind him. That’s exactly why and when the liberal lawmaker lady jumped in to try and put a muzzle on him like he’s a dog. The sad truth about California comes out in this video. The liberal lawmakers don’t want people of color speaking up and fighting back.

DACA is a strain and the majority of recipients don’t offer anything productive to America. Sanctuary cities cause people to get hurt, and every Democrat who supports them has blood on their hands.

He starts off strong with expressing that he doesn’t want his tax money spent on illegal immigrants. He reminds people that he’s the one who lives in the neighborhoods being ruined by DACA and sanctuary citizens who provide drugs to the citizens.

He then reminds the liberal lady that her brother was a “one-termer” and if she’s not careful, then she will be too.

Next, a black mother who is homeless calls out the lawmaker for helping the illegal immigrants instead of helping Americans. She called her out for assisting illegal immigrants because the citizens are being thrown on the streets. She then mentions how the illegals attacked her son. A man who sounds like a puppet tries to silence her.

After that, a Latina woman stands up and fights back against illegal immigrants. She points out that we cannot afford to help illegals with our tax dollars. She reminds them that she became a citizen the legal way and that California taxpayers are funding illegal activity.

Another Latina woman stands up and fights back against the lawmakers. She reminds people to look at the Constitution. She tells them that 30% of Hispanics voted for Trump. She asked the liberal lawmakers what part of “illegal” don’t they understand?

The last person to speak is an immigrant from Honduras. They discuss the trouble with sanctuary cities and how it’s a strain on our economy and country.

Sanctuary City: Los Angeles

Sanctuary Cities exist to protect criminals from the law. PERIOD. Now the common people in Los Angeles are fighting back! Do you think it's time for Trump to END them for good?

Posted by SubjectPolitics on Saturday, June 24, 2017

Clash Daily had more to say about this:

“Here’s a guy who lives in ‘the hood’, who went before his government to testify, and he is making his case for why California’s whole approach to sanctuary cities and unlimited immigration is not just wrong, it’s dangerous and immoral.

He goes down a long list of all the things we’re not supposed to admit about the criminal aliens (since people are ‘sensitive’ to the term ‘illegal immigrants’) that are being massively imported to his neighborhood.

He tells you about the cocaine, and about the fake ID’s, and about all kinds of fake-ness.

“And if Mr Trump would allow us, I’d organize some brothers and we’d put all your asses under some citizens’ arrest who are illegal”

He starts pointing around the room at elected officials. You I like. I like your decisions. Your daddy was great. Your brother was a one-termer, and if you don’t watch yourself, you’ll be a one-termer. He Loves Catherine Barber, but just don’t be with that bullcrap.”

California has a lot of problems. It’s one of the most talked about states in the country, but not for good reasons. They brainwash kids with an LGBT material in schools. They allow people to give others HIV purposely and it’s not a felony. They accept illegal immigrants like they’re collecting baseball cards. They hoard criminals in sanctuary cities so they can watch victims be raped, mugged, and robbed without being deported by ICE. What is this? A horror story or the state of California?

California has become one of the worst states in the country and it’s finally time that the level-headed citizens speak out, fight back, and continue to be heard.

It’s sad that these old white liberal lawmakers who live in nice neighborhoods, drive nice cars, and probably have the latest expensive phone are trying to silence the minorities.

You thought Democrats cared about minorities? That’s only if they have your vote. If you’re a minority and not voting Democrat, then you’re just another person they don’t care about.

AMERICA FIRST!

FOLLOW us on Facebook at Freedom Daily!

Continue Reading

Latest Articles

Subscribe to our newsletter

Become An Insider! Sign up for our free email newsletter, and we'll make sure to keep you in the loop on the top breaking news of the day.

Trending