Please disable your Ad Blocker to better interact with this website.

Connect with us

Politics

Obama is PISSED OFF! Texas Judge SHREDDED This Obamacare Executive Order! It’s Finally Happening!

Just kill it already! This mandate needs to be shredded and done away with forever.

Published

on

Thank God for Texas! A judge in the Lone Star State has officially (if temporarily) blocked Obama’s Executive Order that mandates doctors provide for transgender care. It was set to go into force today, but it was stopped cold and surely pissed Obama off. The unconstitutional rule would have forced doctors to provide procedures for gender transitions, regardless of moral or religious objections. There must be a lot of physicians out there today breathing a huge sigh of relief.

The Becket Fund, which is representing Texas, Wisconsin, Nebraska, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Arizona and Mississippi along with the Franciscan Alliance and several other religiously affiliated organizations, is proclaiming that the ruling ensures that doctors won’t be forced into going against their best medical judgement or violate their religious beliefs. Looks like most of the sane judges out there are in Texas these days.

From Reuters:

The judge also ruled that plaintiffs were likely to prevail in court on their claim that the new policy infringes on the rights of private healthcare providers under the Religious Freedom Restoration Act.

As explained in O’Connor’s 46-page opinion, the plaintiffs argued that the new regulation would “require them to perform and provide insurance coverage for gender transitions and abortions, regardless of their contrary religious beliefs or medical judgment.”

The same judge issued a similar court order in August blocking a separate Obama administration policy that would have required public schools, over the objections of 13 states, to allow transgender students to use restrooms of their choice.

It was not immediately clear whether the Obama administration, which has just 20 days left in office, would seek to appeal the latest injunction.

White House spokeswoman Katie Hill decried the ruling.

“Today’s decision is a setback, but hopefully a temporary one, since all Americans – regardless of their sex, gender identity or sexual orientation – should have access to quality, affordable health care free from discrimination,” she said.

“The government has no business forcing private doctors to perform procedures on children that the government itself recognizes can be harmful and exempts its own doctors from performing,” said Becket Fund senior counsel Lori Windham. “Today’s ruling ensures that doctors’ best medical judgement will not be replaced with political agendas and bureaucratic interference.” She’s absolutely right on this. This whole thing is sheer politics and absolutely reprehensible.

Doctors and insurers who refused to comply with this monstrous mandate were looking down the barrel of hefty fines and losing their Medicare and Medicaid reimbursements. It would put them out of business. The administration wrote in its final ruling that the requirement is consistent with the way other federal agencies are treating transgender people, referring to guidance from the Department of Education this year that schools should allow students to use the bathroom that corresponds to their gender identity, not biological sex. The Supreme Court plans to hear challenges to that policy next year and will have something to say about that.

Explaining the lawsuit, Judge Reed O’Connor wrote, “Plaintiffs claim the Rule’s interpretation of sex discrimination pressures doctors to deliver healthcare in a manner that violates their religious freedom and thwarts their independent medical judgment and will require burdensome changes to their health insurance plans on January 1, 2017.” The states and nonprofits in the healthcare lawsuit allege that the regulation violates the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) — which sets the rules for federal government rule-making — and the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA). O’Connor found that the plaintiffs had standing to bring the lawsuit because they “have presented concrete evidence to support their fears that they will be subject to enforcement under the Rule.”

This mandate needs to be shredded and done away with forever. With President-elect Trump being sworn in on the 20th, let’s hope that more judges will come to their senses and do the right thing here. It is a massive violation of Constitutional rights. Not to mention it is morally abhorrent, just like Obama.

trans-bathroom-sign

FOLLOW us on Facebook at Freedom Daily!

Jeff was the national rally organizer to free Marine Sgt. Tahmooressi from the Mexican prison, chairman emeritus of Ross Perot’s Reform Party of California, and a former candidate for governor. Jeff is editor-in-chief at Freedom Daily. He wrote for former Hollywood talent agent & Breitbart contributor, Pat Dollard, and headed up his 30 person research team. Mr. Rainforth also wrote for the Wayne Dupree Show. Jeff is single & says he is not gay.

Join the conversation

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse.

Politics

FBI Supervisor Just Confessed Covert Order Obama Admin Instructed Agents To Do With Hillary Clinton – DRAIN THE SWAMP!

Heads need to roll over this!

Published

on

Reports are now starting to become known that Republican lawmakers had said they had heard additional stories about political bias and interference within the FBI on the eve of the much-awaited testimony which was given by FBI Director Christopher Wray this past Thursday.

Republican Congressman from Florida, Ron DeSantis stated Wednesday that he had interviewed a recently retired FBI supervisor who advised him of the fact that he was ordered by Deputy Director Andrew McCabe not to call the 2012 Benghazi attack an act of terrorism in order to not affect the outcome of the 2012 election between President Barack Hussein Obama and the Republican Candidate Mitt Romney. He added that the agent had found the instruction concerning because his unit had gathered undisputable evidence showing that a senior al Qaeda leader had indeed planned out and directed the attack.

He also made very clear the fact that the information had been given to then President Obama, but instead of doing what an American President should do and take steps to stop it, he decided to ignore the information which resulted in the death of our Ambassador and three Navy Seals.

Allen West Reports:

FBI is STILL protecting Hillary; makes SHOCK decision on emails

The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) is a component of the U.S. Department of Justice, the key word being justice. However, we must begin to ask ourselves, if we’re honest, whether there are two definitions of justice in America?

I’m not talking about the politicized progressive, socialist “social justice” rhetoric. I’m referring to a simple understanding of the rule of law, and the blind prosecution of those who violate it. When gazing upon Washington, D.C., and the FBI, it appears that the swamp wins again.

As reported by Townhall.com,

The FBI has denied a Freedom of Information Act request seeking a series of emails belonging to former Democrat presidential candidate, Hillary Clinton. In their rejection of the request, the FBI cited a “lack of public interest” for their decision.

A lack of public interest?

Like the American people, other than those chuckleheads at liberal progressive media outlets, are interested in “Russian collusion”? Let me understand something: Hillary Clinton was the secretary of state of the United States, and somehow her emails, which are the property of the American people, are deemed to not be of “public interest”?

How can it be that a government official can destroy tens of thousands of emails, computer hard drives and communications equipment and, well, it’s just fine? I suppose the new normal is that everyone that has a top-level security clearance can have a non-secure computer server in their personal residence and transmit classified information of the government of the United States on said server?

Doggone it, why did I have to undergo all those annual handling-of-classified-information briefings and sign forms of responsibility for those years in the Army? Oops, forgot, justice is different for “deplorables” and those not part of the American elite class.

There are some who can openly admit to Russia that they’ll have more “flexibility” after reelection … and that’s not deemed improper collusion or even questioned. Some can conduct a uranium deal with Russians and get personal financial benefit … and that’s not collusion and isn’t to be questioned.

We have individuals who abandoned Americans to die and then lied about it — but don’t question that. As a matter of fact, according to some, this is also “not of public interest.” No, it’s just not in the interest of those elites who sneer and look down their noses at the common American serf.

Just look at the elites who are showing such utter disdain toward the people of Texas and their suffering from storm Harvey. We’ve seen the cartoons from Politico and France’s Charlie Hebdo, along with the insidious and disgusting claims by the progressive, socialist Left seeking to leverage Harvey as a case for climate change.

And let’s not forget the University of Tampa professor who tweeted that this was “karma” for the people in Texas for voting for Donald Trump. At least he got justice by getting fired, but some liberal institution will hire him and welcome him with open arms. And by the way, just a little factoid: Harris County (Houston) voted overwhelmingly for Hillary Clinton.

We must realize that anyone who committed one-tenth of the actions of Hillary Clinton would be charged, tried and sentenced. How can we live in a country where there are two levels of justice?

And I haven’t even brought up Rep. Debbie Wasserman-Schultz and her obstruction of justice in the case of her IT worker, who made millions of dollars from taxpayer funds. She sought to withhold his computer hardware — which doesn’t belong to her, but to the American people.

In this case, too, I suppose, there’s a “lack of public interest.” Who are the people at the FBI making this determination?

It’s was the same when we watched former FBI Director James Comey make a determination in the case of Hillary Clinton that was outside his scope of duties. Where is the special prosecutor looking into the secret conversations of Bill Clinton and then-Attorney General Loretta Lynch on a tarmac in Arizona?

Where was the special prosecutor for Benghazi, Fast and Furious and Hillary Clinton’s uranium deal with Russia? Where is a special prosecutor looking into who’s funding the black-clad domestic terrorist organization Antifa? Don’t try and blow sunshine up my butt and not tell me they aren’t a subversive organization enacting violence and destroying property … masked and hooded thugs aren’t allowed in America.

Then again, the Democrat party started one white-hooded and masked group, previously; looks like they just changed colors, but the objective is still coercion, intimidation and violence. Somehow, I suppose that investigating Antifa “lacks public interest.”

Justice is no longer blind; it peeks out to see who’s being investigated and, if they’re part of the elite class, they get a pass. At the same time, those not belonging to this accepted class are told to obey and succumb to selected enforcement — kinda like sanctuary cities, counties and states who place the lives of Americans at the mercy of criminal illegal aliens. That’s what the new face of justice looks like.

Bradley Manning can be set free, but Army First Lieutenant Clint Lorance remains imprisoned. The former is a traitor who released more than 700,000 pieces of classified information. The latter stood, faced and killed the enemy. You tell me who’s making the decisions on what’s “justice”?

So, Bradley Manning and Hillary Clinton expose classified information, but can just laugh it off and continue to walk freely because someone determined that there was a “lack of public interest” in their criminal activities. I find it truly disconcerting that, much like the Roman god Janus, justice in America has two faces.

This whole effort comes just days after President Trump took to Twitter to lash out at the FBI and their corruption. Trump was rightly angered by the news that an FBI official who had been working with special counsel Robert Mueller had sent anti-Trump and pro-Hillary Clinton texts to his girlfriend. Mueller was then forced to remove the married FBI agent from his team. Who are these people who we have working at the FBI?

President Trump and his political allies, which includes Congressman DeSantis have made the case that the FBI has taken a much more forceful approach when investigating President Trump than they did when Crooked Hillary Clinton was being probed for her use of a private email server set up in her guest bathroom while she was secretary of State.

Please share if you agree the FBI needs to be investigated and disbanded…

FOLLOW us on Facebook at Freedom Daily!

Continue Reading

Politics

Nobody Noticed What Happened 1 Year Ago From The Exact Day Trump Made Jerusalem Decision – Obama FURIOUS!

Trump got the last laugh!

Published

on

President Trump controversially “provoked” the Muslim community across the world by declaring what US policy has always claimed – Jerusalem is the capital of Israel. Just a short five months ago, the Senate passed a bill voting 90–0 that Jerusalem would be recognized as Israel’s undivided capital. Yet it has actually been the law since the passing of the Jerusalem Embassy Act of 1995 where the United States documented their plan to move its embassy to the Israeli capital of Jerusalem.  Yet former Presidents Bill Clinton, George W. Bush, and Barrack Obama collectively spent more than 21 years appeasing Palestine by NOT fulfilling the rule of law.

President Trump’s historic announcement on Jerusalem is of even larger significance when one considers the timing of the announcement itself. Around the same time last year, former President Barrack Obama freely stabbed Israel in the back. Back in 2011, Obama began to insert himself, and America by extension into the escalating tensions between the nations of Israel and Palestine. Obama began to slowly but surely show preference, taking sides with Islamic terrorists rather than Israel – our strongest and most consistent ally in the Middle East.

Obama publicly urged the nation of Israel to simply hand over many of their Holy Sites, along with half of Jerusalem to radical Islamic organizations – places considered significant not only to the Jewish people but to Christians as well such as the Wailing Wall, The Temple Mount, Old Jerusalem, the tomb of Jesus Christ, and the Via Dolorosa. For those that do not know, the Via Dolorosa is the street in the Old City of Jerusalem that Jesus walked on the way to his crucifixion.

Image result for obama turns over holy sites

Israel did not comply. Obama tried again in December 2013, again urging Israel to hand over the holiest of holy sites in Christendom and Judaism to radical Islamists. Israel again ignored Obama and his ridiculous demands. Then on Christmas Day 2016, Obama revealed his alliances for one and all to see – if there was any doubt – effectively signing over Christian and Jewish holy sites to radical Muslim groups and then adding insult to injury the Obama administration helped write the UN draft resolution! Obama then put the nail in the coffin using the United Nations Security Council resolution to sign these holy sites over to these groups.

Fast forward just one year after Obama’s despicable and treacherous move, America now has a new president – Donald Trump who controversially “provoked” the Muslim community across the world by declaring what US policy has always claimed – Jerusalem is the capital of Israel. Just a short five months ago, the Senate under President Trump’s leadership passed a bill voting 90–0 that Jerusalem would be recognized as Israel’s undivided capital. Nevermind, it has actually been the law since the passing of the Jerusalem Embassy Act of 1995 where the United States documented their plan to move its embassy to the Israeli capital of Jerusalem.  Yet former Presidents Bill Clinton, George W. Bush, and Barrack Obama collectively spent more than 21 years appeasing Palestine by NOT fulfilling the rule of law and Obama himself effectively attempt to give away the farm to radical Muslims.

Image result for linda sarsour

Naturally, the Muslim world lost their collective minds. Of note, leftist darling, self-proclaimed activist, and terrorist sympathizer Linda Sarsour quite literally flipped out all over social media, proclaiming to one and all via Twitter –  is not the capital of Israel no matter how many times Trump says it. He doesn’t speak for me.

Sarsour went into a longer more detailed tirade on Facebook where she raged and seethed, stating –

 “I don’t care how many times he says it. Jerusalem is NOT the capital of Israel. We should all be OUTRAGED by the reckless, ill-informed decision made today by this dangerous man. We should also QUESTION anyone who is seen as moderates/liberals who are applauding this decision because it tells me a few things: you never cared about a peaceful resolution to the Israeli Palestinian conflict, you are NOT invested in any resistance to this administration if you are standing with this misogynistic, racist, bigot now. 
How am I feeling? OUTRAGED. How else am I feeling? Unapologetically Palestinian because the Palestinian people are a resilient, strong people and Palestine will inevitably be free – the question has never been if, it’s when. A matter of time.  
This president DOES NOT and WILL NOT ever represent me. I will never be blinded by my own self-centeredness to applaud a decision that I may agree with and forget that you just aligned yourself with a racist bigot against the majority of the international community. UNACCEPTABLE.
#FREEPALESTINE”

The Muslim argument to President Trump’s decision to move the U.S. embassy to Jerusalem thereby giving Palestine authority over East Jerusalem is flawed at best.  Many argue that if Palestine were handed East Jerusalem exclusively that somehow magically peace would be possible, effectively ignoring the true and professed aims of the PLA. The PLA is the Palestine Liberation Army and they were set up as the military wing of the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) at the 1964 Arab League summit held in Alexandria, Egypt, with the mission of nothing more than fighting Israel.

The PLA wants nothing more than to claim the entirety of the nation of Israel as their own.  They proclaimed JUST that message when Jordan and therefore Palestinian Muslims retained control of East Jerusalem until 1967. During this period Jewish people were not allowed any access whatsoever to any Jewish holy sites up to and including the Wailing Wall.  Even today the Jewish people are only allowed to enter the Temple Mount on specific Palestinian sanctioned times through one of only ten gates.  The Jewish people are even barred from praying there as to do so triggers terrorist attacks.  The site is considered so holy by the Jewish people that many Rabbis bar people from entering it at all, as to enter it in their mind would corrupt its sanctity. Conversely, Muslims are freely able to roam Jewish sites at will. Israelis are entirely restricted from any and all Muslim holy sites.  Simply walking through East Jerusalem as a Jewish person is seen as a provocation by Palestinian Muslims.

FOLLOW us on Facebook at Freedom Daily!

Continue Reading

Crime

BREAKING NEWS: Rogue FBI Agent Just Explained How ‘Corrupt’ Agents Tried To Take Trump Out – His Life Is Now In Danger

This is bad!

Published

on

Who would have thought just one short year ago that ground zero for the Globalist Deep State and the DC Swamp was the FBI?

It’s now being reported that “our own” FBI used the bought and paid for by the Democrat Party and the Crooked Hillary Clinton campaign fake Russian Dossier on then Candidate Donald Trump to justify the wiretapping of Trump Tower. President Trump tweeted in back in March of 2017 that he believed the Obama administration and their operatives ordered the wiretapping of Trump Tower during the heated 2016 presidential election. The FBI replied by taunting him to provide proof, proof which might have come this week.

During FBI Director Christopher Wray’s testimony this past Thursday before the House Judiciary Committee, he had a very interesting back and forth with Florida Republican Representative Ron DeSantis that may have contained a major revelation as to the validity of President Trump’s claim. DeSantis asked Wray if the discredited Trump-Russia dossier was actually used as the basis for obtaining a wiretap warrant under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act to spy on Trump, members of this campaign and family? Wray refused to answer the question as to not perjure himself.

The Canada Free Press Reports:

Guess who says the FBI used the fake Trump dossier to justify opening the Russia investigation

Let’s make sure we’re caught up here: We know that in 2016, the FBI launched an investigation into whether the Trump campaign was in cahoots with the Russian government to influence the election. And we know that as part of this investigation, the FBI convinced a FISA court to wiretap Trump campaign manager Paul Manafort.

Remember when Trump said Obama had Trump Tower wiretapped, and everyone said Trump was making it up? Manafort lives in Trump Tower. Trump was telling the truth.

But the more important question is whether the FBI used bogus information to persuade the FISA court to approve the wiretap. We’ve been speculating here for some time that the now-infamous Trump dossier prepared by former British spy Christopher Steele – which has been widely discredited – was a part of the FBI’s case for the wiretap of another Trump advisor, Carter Page – possibly a significant part.

Is that true?

Last night we told you the Hillary campaign helped pay for the creation of the dossier. Now we have a named source saying on the record that the FBI did indeed connect the dossier to the larger Russian investigation, and that source is Hillary Clinton. Quoting from her awful book What Happened (you lost):

In the summer of 2016, according to the Washington Post, the FBI convinced a special Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court that there was probably ause to believe that Trump advisor Carter Page was acting as a Russian agent, and they received a warrant to monitor his communications. The FBI also began investigating a dossier prepared by a well-respected British spy that contained explosive and salacious allegations about compromising information the Russians had on Trump.
Note how Hillary makes reference to all this as if she had nothing to do with it. Classic. When she wrote the book, she obviously didn’t know it would later become public knowledge that her campaign helped pay for the dossier, so she probably figured she could pretend to be disinterested third party simply making reference to something in the news. Lucky for her not many people will read her vomit-inducing book. Unlucky for her, you now know this part is in there.

You think the Democrats are still happy they insisted on starting this Russia investigation?

So did the FBI uses the dossier to justify the FISA request? If it was part of what they were investigating, why wouldn’t they? If they took it as seriously as Hillary claims, it would make no sense to withhold it when you’re trying to make the case you’ve got reasonable cause to wiretap a target.

Better question: At what point did the FBI realize the dossier was crap? Or did they know all along?

Because if they used a fake dossier to justify the wiretaps of Page and Manafort, that means a Democrat administration was wiretapping top officials of a Republican presidential campaign on false pretenses. That’s worse than Watergate, because you’re not only bugging your opponent, you’re also corrupting law enforcement to help you get away with it.

And if that’s what happens, it’s not only Hillary who’s complicit. It’s Obama too. His presidency is over, thank God, but he could still be held criminally accountable for this if it’s shown he knew about it or, worse yet, directed it on Hillary’s behalf.

You think the Democrats are still happy they insisted on starting this Russia investigation?

As we can now see the FBI is corrupt to the core. And paid with our own tax dollars. The whole institution needs to be investigated, and some people need to go to prison over this. Then we have to take a long hard look at the option that maybe the whole thing needs to be disbanded and replaced with an organization which will work within the law. Seems like the FBI, for years now, has been more concerned about the rights of foreign nationals than those if American Citizens who pay their salaries.

Please share if you agree the FBI needs to be investigated and disbanded….

FOLLOW us on Facebook at Freedom Daily!

Continue Reading

Latest Articles

Trending