Please disable your Ad Blocker to better interact with this website.

Connect with us

Government Intel

TREASON: Obama DECEIVED Congress and American People on IRAN NUCLEAR PACT

Published

on

 

Obama continues to play word games in his utter contempt for us. Obama says Iran is not “living up to the spirit of the agreement.” What absolute nonsense. It was so obvious from the beginning that Iran had no intention of living up to any Faustian bargain with Obama.

Obama lied. The Obama administration knowingly deceived the American people. At the last minute, the Obama administration caved, changed the resolution, and lifted the prohibition of ballistic missile launches.

Further, Iran continues to violate the agreement by sending massive weapons arsenals to those fighting the US-led coalition in Yemen.

This “deal” is a bloody nightmare.

“Congress Investigating Obama Admin Deception on Iran Nuke Deal,”  by Adam Kredo, WFB, April 4, 2016:
Sources: Admin misled lawmakers about terms of deal

Congress is investigating whether the Obama administration misled lawmakers last summer about the extent of concessions granted to Iran under the nuclear deal, as well as if administration officials have been quietly rewriting the deal’s terms in the aftermath of the agreement, according to sources and a formal notice sent to the State Department.

The concerns come after statements from top officials last week suggesting that Iran is set to receive greater weapons and sanctions relief, moves that the administration had promised Congress would never take place as White House officials promoted the deal last summer.

“When multiple officials—including Secretary Kerry, Secretary Lew, and Ambassador Mull—testify in front of Members of Congress, we are inclined to believe them,” Rep. Mike Pompeo (R., Kan.) told the Washington Free Beacon.

“However, the gap between their promises on the Iran nuclear deal and today’s scary reality continues to widen. We are now trying to determine whether this was intentional deception on the part of the administration or new levels of disturbing acquiescence to the Iranians,” Pompeo said.

Congress is believed to be investigating what insiders described to the Free Beacon as a range of areas in which administration officials may have understated the breadth of concessions made to the Islamic Republic when trying to persuade lawmakers to sign off on the final deal.

Multiple disputes have surfaced in the last week.

In one dispute, congressional leaders are concerned that the administration no longer considers recent Iranian ballistic missile tests a “violation” of United Nations Security Council Resolution 2231, which codifies the nuclear deal.

Top administration officials including Secretary of State John Kerry vowed to Congress that Iran would be legally prohibited from carrying out ballistic missile tests under the resolution.

Samantha Power, the U.S. ambassador to the U.N., shifted course last week, refusing to call recent Iranian launches a “violation” in a letter she signed criticizing those launches.

A second dispute centers around recent statements from Treasury Department officials suggesting that the administration is now set to grant Iran non-nuclear sanctions relief, including indirect access to the U.S. financial system, weeks after top Iranian officials began demanding this type of sanctions relief.

Top administration figures, including Treasury Secretary Jack Lew, had promised Congress that years-old restrictions barring Iran from accessing the U.S. financial system in any way would remain in place even after the nuclear deal.

But new concerns have raised alarm bells among lawmakers, who fear that the administration will ease longstanding restrictions on Iran.

Kerry “and other administration officials assured the American people and Congress that UNSCR 2231 still allowed the U.S. to respond to dangerous actions, like these, from the Iranians,” Reps. Pompeo, Peter Roskam (R., Ill.), and Lee Zeldin (R., N.Y.) wrote in a letter last week to the State Department.

“While many lawmakers, ourselves included, are certain that Iran’s latest tests violate UNSCR 2231, your decision to cease labeling the launches a violation is alarming,” they wrote. “We are troubled by reports that the administration is stifling voices within its ranks for stronger action against Iran—putting the JCPOA and political legacy above the safety and security of the American people.”

The United States backed down in recent days from its claim that the ballistic missile tests violate the deal. The United States now says that they are “inconsistent with” promises made by Iran while the deal was being negotiated.

“This seeming American refusal to name these Iranian tests as violation is in direct conflict the administration’s earlier commitments,” the lawmakers wrote.

As the nuclear deal was being negotiated, Kerry informed Congress that, under the deal, Iran would be “restrained from any … work on missiles.” Other administration officials at the time made also clear that such tests “would violate” the agreement.

The administration has recalibrated its stance in recent days in the wake of several recent ballistic missile tests by Iran. Officials are no longer claiming that these tests violate the deal.

“In opposition to this testimony, administration officials have recently told the press that UNSCR 22231 was ‘drafted/structured in a way to appeal to Iran’s sensitivities,’” the lawmakers write.

Mark Dubowitz, executive director for the Foundation For Defense of Democracies (FDD), told the Free Beacon that the administration is redefining the terms of the nuclear deal.

“The Obama administration is involved in yet another sleight of hand on sanctions relief as well as the status of U.N. missile sanctions,” Dubowitz sai. “This is very familiar to those who tracked the Iran nuclear talks and recall the many ways in which broken commitments were justified and redlines were abandoned.”

Iranian allies on the U.N. Security Council, mainly Russia, have defended the missile tests, arguing that resolution 2231 has only “called upon” Iran to refrain from these tests.

Russian Ambassador Vitaly Churkin recently stated that the newest U.N. resolution governing the nuclear agreement only suggests that Iran stop test firing missiles.

“A call is different from a ban so legally you cannot violate a call, you can comply with a call or you can ignore the call, but you cannot violate a call,” Churkin was quoted as saying. “The legal distinction is there.”

Congressional critics have dismissed the argument and are pressing on the Obama administration to stand up to Iran’s defenders.

“The Kremlin’s absurd legal argument after Iran’s March tests that ‘legally you cannot violate a call’ would essentially allow the Iranian regime to do anything it wants to further develop its ballistic missile program,” the lawmakers wrote in their letter.

“Russia’s refusal to punish Iran, combined with its veto and China’s veto on the Security Council, will continue to prevent any real international effort to respond to Iranian infractions.”

Meanwhile, Iranian officials have said in recent days that they are preparing to expand the country’s ballistic missile program.

“We have always said we will continue with developing our defense capacity and the defense equipment has nothing to do with chemical weapons,” Iranian Foreign Minister Javad Zarif stated on Twitter. “The missiles are only for defensive purposes and we have not invaded any country, neither we will do so in the future.”

Other Iranian officials have also said the ballistic missile tests have nothing to do with the nuclear agreement.

A bipartisan delegation of lawmakers in Congress has expressed opposition to an Obama administration plan to grant Iran sanctions relief outside the purview of the nuclear deal.

This new relief is reported to include access to the U.S. dollar and American financial markets. Lawmakers have expressed anger over the proposal, citing past comments from administration officials who claimed this would never take place under the deal.

Via Pamela Geller

Join the conversation

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse.

Government Intel

BREAKING!!! TRUMP Just Announced It!! IT’S OPENING!!!

HELL YEAH!!!

Frank Lea

Published

on

The embassy planned to open in Jerusalem just had a date change. It was reported that the embassy will now open in 2019, ahead of schedule, as was stated by Vice President Mike Pence. It was initially supposed to take several years to open an embassy in Jerusalem, but now they believe it will be open by the end of 2019. What was originally a 3-4 year plan has now been effectively cut in half if all goes as planned. This is a great announcement by Trump and Pence.

President Donald Trump and Mike Pence have faced scrutiny over the decision to open an embassy in Jerusalem. They faced some minor backlash over recognizing Jerusalem as Israel’s capital, but they also endured a lot of support in the decision that has been called controversial.

During the address to the Israeli parliament, Mike Pence had to defend the decision because it’s reportedly condemned by numerous Palestinians and some of their Arab associates.

NY Daily News reports:
Vice President Mike Pence says the United States will open its embassy in Jerusalem next year, ahead of schedule. In an address to the Israeli parliament on Monday,

Pence defended the controversial decision to recognize Jerusalem as Israel’s capital, which has been condemned by the Palestinians and their Arab allies.

Pence says the administration will advance its plan in the coming weeks and the embassy will open by the end of 2019. Previous estimates had been the move would take three or four years.

The Palestinians claim Israeli-annexed east Jerusalem as their capital. They say the U.S. cannot be a mediator after the decision and have pre-emptively rejected any peace plan presented by the Trump administration.

Mike Pence faced hecklers from Arab lawmakers of the Israeli parliament at the start of his address. The hecklers were involved in a brief scuffle and then removed from the room so the Vice President could continue speaking uninterrupted. The conflict was caught on camera and posted to YouTube by the Associated Press.

The speech took place at the Knesset. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu was present. He stood and gave a round of applause as the protesting lawmakers were forced out of the house.  The troublemaking lawmakers were holding signs stating that Jerusalem was the capital of Palestine.

Haaretz provided further information:

“Ayman Odeh, the head of the Joint List, Israel’s Arab coalition party, called Pence “a dangerous man with a messianic vision that includes the destruction of the entire region.”

After Tuesday’s protest, Odeh said the act was “a strong and legitimate protest against the Trump-Netanyahu regime, against an extreme right that glorifies racism and hate and speaks of peace as lip-service but does anything in its power to further push away peace. Our protest today at the Knesset was done in the name of all citizens opposing the occupation and dreaming of peace.”

Mike Pence had called for peace with Israel and the Palestinians. Pence wanted people at the table talking, not disrupting the event and hindering progress.  The Vice President believes that dialogue is the key to creating a peaceful environment, but that discussion cannot happen when angry protesters cause chaos and ruin things like they always do. Pence was explicitly quoted as saying “peace can only come through dialogue.”

The protesting lawmakers had a chance to be in a room with leadership and have their words heard through peaceful conversation. They refused to be calm and communicate with adults. Instead, the pushed their protest forward and rambled on like children speaking gibberish. They moaned, groaned, and were sent out for a “time out.”

Protesters always forget that those watching them don’t ever take them seriously. Protesters are problems. They are immature and destructive. Protesters shout so loud that people often can’t understand what they’re saying. Or, what they’re saying doesn’t make much sense.

Protesters must realize that what they do turns everyone OFF from listening. When you try to force your message upon people, then people naturally don’t want to hear it. If the information is presented as an option for people to explore, then perhaps people will listen. To be violent, forceful, and chaotic by choice means people lose respect for those protesting. It’s no wonder the protesters are always so angry – no one’s listening.

Maybe if they changed their method of delivery to one that is more respectful, adult-like, and coherent, then perhaps people could finally engage in that peaceful dialogue that Pence suggested.

FOLLOW us on Facebook at Freedom Daily!

Continue Reading

Government Intel

HUGE BREAKING NEWS!!! MASSIVE RAID Just NOW!!! They IGNORED Him!!

HELL YEAH! GO TRUMP!! NOT ON OUR WATCH!!!

Published

on

Time is up! The U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency is finalizing plans to raid California and detain at least 1,500 illegal immigrants who broke into the country. The idea is to begin the raid in San Francisco and travel to numerous other cities, which I will not mention. The expected number of arrests reached upwards of 1,500. President Donald Trump warned mayors and governors about being a sanctuary city or state, and now Trump is allowing ICE to do their job. ICE has not announced the date of the raid, nor should it be published, as that would provide illegal immigrants to flock to other states in hopes to seek refuge from the consequences of breaking into a country.

President Trump has warned local leaders numerous times about being host to illegal immigrants, especially criminals. Those who oppose will criticize Trump for allowing ICE to do their job, but those in disagreement should remember that former President Obama had deported more than 2.5 million illegal immigrants. Obama’s nickname was “deporter in chief.” President Trump is not close to attaining a nickname until he meets or beats Obama’s deportation numbers, and Trump has a very long way to go until that’s a possibility.

The sweeping raid starting in California will target the illegal aliens. However, it’s the criminals who are most likely the most sought after. In particular, the ICE agents will be delighted to arrest violent illegal immigrants. The violent offenders who are illegal aliens may pose a threat to ICE agents, and there could be a battle to detain the suspects. There could be an all-out war, shootout, or gang fight as ICE runs through the ruined land of California. Detaining and deporting the proven illegal immigrants who are violent is essential because it returns California to a safer haven for legal residents. Unfortunately, some residents in California believe in the sanctuary city/state concept, but they won’t be supporters for long if their child was a rape or murder victim at the hands of an illegal immigrant with a violent tendency.

The Federalist Papers Project shared more on the raid:
“Trump and the Justice Department have bristled at the fact that state and local sanctuary laws around the country are not only unconstitutional but they interfere with the goal of cracking down on illegal immigration.

The operation, sources say, will target people who have been previously identified for deportation – including those who have been served with final deportation orders and those who are criminal illegal aliens.

That 1,500 is a low target and this number could rise as they come across other immigrants – called “collateral arrests.”

This would be the first large-scale targeting of illegal immigrants in California since Gov. Jerry Brown signed legislation enacting a statewide “sanctuary state” law.

Acting director of Immigration and Customs Enforcement Thomas Hogan said that California “Better hold on tight.” He said the federal government will not permit California to be “a sanctuary state for illegal aliens,” and would have no choice but to “conduct at-large arrests in local neighborhoods and at worksites, which will inevitably result in additional collateral arrests, instead of focusing on arrests at jails and prisons where transfers are safer for ICE officers and the community.”

California Senator Dianne Feinstein was not happy when she learned about the ICE raid. She believes immigrants may be targeted in the raids only because they live in California and Trump may be attempting to make a point about his sanctuary city warnings. Feinstein also noted that “the administration is carrying out its enforcement actions to make a political point and not based on the security of the country.” Feinstein is incorrect. The point of a massive scale ICE raid is to gather criminals and deport them if necessary. Some of the offenders might have a violent history and removing them instantly makes any city a little bit safer than it was the day before. Due to America’s weak prison system that doesn’t do much to reform criminals into productive citizens, the offenders who were violent before may often repeat their previous actions. How many times do people get out of prison and go right back in?

If the criminal is an illegal immigrant, then they should be deported to their homeland.

The Federalist Papers Project mentioned that immigration officers would be called in from other parts of the country. The extra manpower will be useful if a gunfight or violence breaks out during a round-up of illegals.

Critics will have very harsh words for President Trump and him allowing ICE to do their job, but critics can be silenced by reminding them that Obama deported over 2.5 million from America. That number is more prominent than many major American cities. Imagine waking up, and your entire city is empty. It’s like Will Smith in “I Am Legend,” and you’re the only person left. I suppose the violent creatures hiding in run-down buildings could be the remaining violent illegal immigrants who hid from ICE. That’s how many people Obama deported, and Trump is nowhere close to that number.

The concept of a sanctuary city would be acceptable if it refused to protect violent criminals. If an illegal alien was caught doing a victimless crime, like jaywalking or something silly, then their punishment could be discussed. Someone like that could be placed on probation and in the path to citizenship. Their probation would include a stipulation where one violation is instant deportation. The violent illegal immigrants would be immediately deported. Then again, would it be worth taxpayer money to keep them in jail, THEN deport them? Some violent criminals who get deported may not ever face punishment in their homeland. They might return to America, illegally, sooner than we know.

The sanctuary city concept needs to be eliminated. If it’s not removed, then it needs should be reworked so that violent offenders are not protected. We cannot protect drug dealers, murders, and rapists any longer. Sanctuary cities protect the wrong people and leave the American citizens at risk.

FOLLOW us on Facebook at Freedom Daily!

Continue Reading

Government Intel

Obama’s Private Jet Grounded After Where He Was Caught Trying To Sneak Into

BUSTED!!!

Published

on

Now that we have your attention with a wonderful Obama conspiracy of him “sneaking into America through Alaska”, here’s what’s really happening.

Former President Obama was on a recent trip to Asia and flew home. Flying home, to America, from Asia, usually requires people to land somewhere on America’s west coast. This is totally normal. Obama landed in Alaska, presumably on a private flight, wearing a polo shirt and some pants – totally the outfit you were when you’re sneaking into a country. Then Obama took selfies with a baby and it went viral. Literally, everyone on the Internet probably saw the picture and knew that Obama was in Alaska because that’s exactly what people do when they sneak into the country, right?

So let’s just squash that rumor while we’re ahead. Obama was not sneaking into the country. Since when is it considered “sneaking into America” when someone is a citizen here? That’s called “going home” if you have half of a brain and at least a quarter of that half works. That’s right, all it takes is 1/8th of a working brain to know the conspiracy theorists on this one are idiots. Going home is not sneaking in. If Obama wanted to sneak anywhere, he could probably do it. Let’s not be liberally stupid, change our genders, and think this is a sneak in. Mexicans sneak in because they don’t live here. Obama flew in, went viral, and is flying home.

Now that’s not the truly big deal. The real story here, which many outlets are ignoring, and which many conspiracy theorists hit the nail in the head on, is this – Obama is meeting with Eric Holder and Nancy Pelosi to headline a fundraiser for the National Democratic Redistricting Committee (NDRC). People think the meeting will try to figure out ways that they can realign the political districts in hopes to benefit the Democratic party so they can take back any districts they lost to Republicans. That’s actually pretty normal. I’m quite certain that redistricting will be a goal anytime you lose your districts to the opposite team. That’s not even the real shimmery part of this shiny tin hat story.

The real juice of the beef is that this meeting might extend beyond the talks of redistricting. This might really be the beginning of defeating Republicans in 2020. We don’t know if Trump will run for reelection in 2020, but the Democrats need to do something to win. They failed miserably in 2016 and got crushed by right-wing enthusiasts who were sick of the whining, the political correctness, the lame protesting, the inability for people to know their gender, and the fact that most liberals are losers. People had enough of them and America fought back. Americans were tired of dealing with crybabies.

This is Obama’s first walk into politics since January and some theorists believe this is the start of the Democrat’s plan to defeat Republicans and take down President Trump. Slim chance considering the left can’t meme nor can they do anything remotely intelligent. Their ammo box is filled with crying, violent protesting, and getting offended by everything. Mix in a few gay dance parties if you really want to.

Maybe it was secret and someone blew the lid off it. Did Trump expose the meeting? I’m not really sure, but it seems like most news outlets know about it. Like I said, don’t fall for the “OMG Obama is having secret meetings” when the meetings are talked about by mainstream news.

Sources state that Obama will headline a fundraiser for the NDRC, which is the National Democratic Redistricting Committee. He’s meeting Holder and Nancy Pelosi, perhaps to talk about the NDRC, or maybe even other things. This meeting is set to take place in Washington, DC. This is also Obama’s first waltz back into politics since about January, 2017. He clearly had a good few months off, now he’s jumping back into politics, possibly to get a three year head start on helping Democrats regain control of the White House in 2020. Yeah, no chance for that. We’re going to vote like there’s no tomorrow to make sure liberals don’t ruin the country any further.

Eric Holder, Nancy Pelosi, and Barack Obama are only missing their fellow dingbats, Maxine Waters and Hillary Clinton. Maybe if Hillary Clinton wasn’t busy selling “Nasty Woman” t-shirts on Twitter, then she would have time to go to the meeting. Or maybe she wasn’t invited. She lost once, so why would Democrats want her back? Low blow? Maybe, but selling or promoting t-shirts for Samantha Bee or Planned Parenthood kind of warrants a silly low blow joke.

FOLLOW us on Facebook at Freedom Daily!

Continue Reading

Latest Articles

Subscribe to our newsletter

Become An Insider! Sign up for our free email newsletter, and we'll make sure to keep you in the loop on the top breaking news of the day.

Trending