Please disable your Ad Blocker to better interact with this website.

Connect with us

Politics

Trump FINALLY Let Traitor McCain Have It After Catching Him In The Act With What He Did Behind His Back

John Cena is in the House! BOOM!

Published

on

President Donald Trump took to Twitter Saturday morning and gave Arizona Senator John McCain an awesome shellacking for his opposition to the latest Republican attempt to repeal and replace Obamacare.

The President said Senator McCain was convinced by Democrats and celebrities to let down his best friend Sen. Lindsey Graham.

Graham authored the proposed bill, which although far from perfect, would manage to repeal the individual and employer mandates.

The bill would also end the Medicaid expansion that 31 states and Washington, D.C., took advantage of under Obamacare and overhaul the funding for traditional Medicaid.

If this last-ditch effort bill doesn’t pass then Obamacare will collapse on its own and something tells me the ones who are going to get the blame for it aren’t the charlatans like Barack Hussein Obama or Nancy Stretch Pelosi who said we had to pass the bill to know what’s in it, but probably the very Republicans who are the ones actually trying to repeal it, but who can’t because 3 of their RINO, or Republican In Name Only, senators are impeding them.

Senator John McCain calls himself a “Maverick.” Senator, constantly going against your promises and against your very own party doesn’t make you a so-called “Maverick,” it just makes you a traitor to his party and constituents.

The people of Arizona voted you in so you could “Repeal and Replace” Obamacare. You ran on this promise and you have been repeating this slogan since 2010. But when you have a chance to at least remove a few of the reasons Obamacare is such a burden on folks like myself, you side with Democrat voice pieces such as Jimmy Kimmel.

NPR Reports:

These GOP Senators Could Block Republicans’ Obamacare Repeal

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell needs 50 of the chamber’s 52 Republicans to vote for a bill that aims to repeal most of the Affordable Care Act and drastically reshape the Medicaid system. McConnell’s office is planning to bring the bill up for a vote next week.

Latest GOP Effort To Replace Obamacare Could End Health Care For Millions

Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., has made clear that his vote is unattainable on the latest and last-ditch proposal by GOP Sens. Lindsey Graham of South Carolina and Bill Cassidy of Louisiana to roll back key pillars of Obamacare and convert Medicaid to a capped, block grant system.

“The problem I have with this current bill is it basically keeps the Obamacare spending, keeps the Obamacare taxes — most of them — and then actually just redistributes the money from Democrat states to Republican states,” Paul told NPR’s Ari Shapiro on All Things Considered. “So I don’t think this really fixes the problem, nor does it honor our pledge to repeal Obamacare.”

President Trump voiced his frustration with Paul on Twitter on Wednesday morning. “Rand Paul is a friend of mine but he is such a negative force when it comes to fixing healthcare. Graham-Cassidy Bill is GREAT! Ends Ocare!” he tweeted.

But Paul says there is no amount of minor tweaks to Graham-Cassidy that will change his mind, characterizing it plainly as “a really crappy bill.”

That leaves room for just one additional GOP defection or the bill will meet the same fate as the previous three failed attempts to dismantle President Barack Obama’s health care law.

The bill’s sponsors are betting that every Republican senator who voted for the last Senate bill in July will vote in favor this time. The early reception to the latest bill has been generally positive. No Democrats or independents are prepared to support the bill.

The focus remains on three familiar names in the health care debate: Arizona Sen. John McCain, Maine Sen. Susan Collins and Alaska Sen. Lisa Murkowski. All three GOP senators voted against the Senate’s health care bill in July, with McCain casting the decisive vote to derail the legislation.

Here are the undecided senators’ stated concerns with the current legislation:

Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz.
McCain has taken issue more with the process than the substance of the legislation. He has hammered Republicans for ditching “regular order” and ramming a bill through that has major consequences for tens of millions of Americans and the U.S. economy without hearings or any input from Democrats. McCain previously indicated he wouldn’t vote for any health care bill that wasn’t the product of “regular order,” but things change. For starters, Arizona GOP Gov. Doug Ducey endorsed Graham-Cassidy this week. McCain has indicated his governor’s opinion would weigh heavily on his vote. The bill is also co-authored by Lindsey Graham, one of McCain’s closest political allies in the Senate.

Sen. Susan Collins, R-Maine
Collins has all but announced that she will vote “no” on Graham-Cassidy. She has criticized the process, calling for bipartisan solutions to health care problems, and has taken issue with the proposal that may be worse for Maine than the status quo. She made a point this week to tell reporters that the proposal could be devastating to Maine’s rural hospital system. Unlike many Senate Republicans, there is no indication Collins’s “no” vote has hurt her politically back home. If anything, she was lauded by constituents and local press for her opposition in the face of great party pressure.

Sen. Lisa Murkowski, R-Alaska
Murkowski is the most inscrutable of this trio. She has been avoiding reporters and has not weighed in publicly on the bill. GOP leaders, the Trump administration, and Graham and Cassidy are working hard to secure Murkowski’s vote. Like Collins, she has deep concerns about what reduced Medicaid spending could mean for her home state and its unique health care needs. Politically, Murkowski also received a wave of positive response back home for her “no” vote over the summer, so the political pressure is different for the independent-minded Murkowski. The absolute necessity of her vote, however, also gives Murkowski a lot of leverage to ask for whatever changes she wants to make to the bill.

Senators are racing up against a Sept. 30 deadline. That is the end of the fiscal year and when special budget rules expire that protect the health care bill from a Democratic filibuster. Until then, Republicans can pass it with 50 votes, plus a tiebreaking vote from Vice President Pence, instead of the customary 60 votes necessary to overcome objections to a piece of legislation.

If the Senate can pass a bill, it still needs to head to the House for approval. Graham told reporters this week that House Speaker Paul Ryan has given him assurances that the House can pass Graham-Cassidy.

With just days left on the clock, Republicans say they are the closest they have come to date to fulfilling their campaign promises to undo the Affordable Care Act.

While you, Senator McCain fight an awful fight in one of the best hospitals in the world, people like myself go without health care altogether because once Obamacare hit we just couldn’t afford our premiums anymore, roughly 5 million of us.

But it’s OK, Senator, you are “Royalty” and we don’t matter, we know the drill. And in case you wonder why we proudly elected a brash outsider such as Donald Trump as our president, just look in the mirror “Maverick.”

Please share if you want Senator John McCain to just go away!

FOLLOW us on Facebook at Freedom Daily!

Al ran for the California State Assembly in his home district in 2010 and garnered more votes than any other Republican since 1984. He's worked on multiple political campaigns and was communications director for the Ron Nehring for California Lt. Governor campaign during the primaries in 2014. He has also held multiple positions within his local Republican Central Committee including Secretary, and Vice President of his local California Republican Assembly chapter. While also being an ongoing delegate to the California Republican Party for almost a decade.

Join the conversation

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse.

Crime

El Chapo’s Cash Won’t Be Used On Trump’s Wall So Look Who Showed Up With $21 Bil For It Overnight

Published

on

President Donald Trump was recently presented with an incredible surprise of who could be paying for one of his most important and expensive campaign promises when Texas Senator Ted Cruz proposed a bill to use $14 billion seized from notorious drug lord Joaquin ‘El Chapo’ Guzman. The ingenious and perfectly ironic funding source for this important safety feature was met with as many road blocks as the idea for the wall itself. As quickly as that idea was shot down, a surprise financier showed up overnight with the approximately $21 billion needed to foot the bill and you won’t believe where it came from.

The only thing that’s been holding America’s safety and security back is the ability to fund the 40-foot tall wall that’s expected to stretch approximately 1,000 miles along the U.S. – Mexico border. Although the lengthy construction process is already underway, it could be finished much quicker than originally thought after having solved one of the biggest challenges it has faced to date.

“Building ‘a big, beautiful wall’ on the Southern border was Trump’s signature promise during his campaign, winning him support from advocates for hard-line immigration reform,” Politifact reported.

Original estimates for the cost of this project came in at $12 to $15 billion, however, Bernstein Research, who calculates total building cost believes it could actually come in somewhere around $15 billion to $25 billion. The Department of Homeland Security agrees, estimating a specific $21.6 billion price tag for this massive project, according to Politifact. While that total is in excess of the $14 billion taken from El Chapo upon his arrest, the financing problem could soon be solved if Alabama Senator Luther Strange gets his way.

Strange went on Fox News’ Tucker Carlson to discuss his idea of where this much-needed wad of cash could come from right now, and it’s as ironic as using drug money to pay for it. Those who want immigrants in this country don’t seem to have an issue with paying for them to be here, so they should be okay with footing the bill to keep them in their country.

Strange explained to Tucker that the funds should come directly from so-called Sanctuary Cities who don’t follow the law. In essence, this would be a fine for going against the President, not cooperating with local police, refusing to turn immigrants in, and worst of all, actually preventing people from fairly bidding on the border wall. Sanctuary cities like San Francisco, California punish their citizens for participating in bidding on the construction of the wall by banning them from doing any other work in the city. This is not a democracy, it’s a dictatorship decided by liberals and since they aren’t stopping, Strange wants them to pay for the wall that’s already written into law.

The Senator’s simple solution is that cities who refuse to comply with the nation’s law aren’t going to get the money that they expect from the government because it’s going to go to building the wall. It makes perfect sense to not reward bad behavior with cash that could be used to ensure the rule of law which our nation is built on. Sanctuary Cities don’t make their own rules and can’t expect other people to pay for it when it goes against what the president has already set. Rather than defunding these defiant cities, divert the funding and let their laws be the country’s gain.

Along this same line of logic that Strange presented, costs of this wall could also be met it America stopped or slowed the flow of funding to Mexico. It only makes sense to use the money being sent over the border for the barrier between us since we’re also trying to block Mexican citizens from entering America illegally.

This isn’t about keeping good people out and prevent people from wanting to seek a better life and the American dream, it’s only about preventing those from entering the wrong way and wreaking havoc, compromising citizen’s safety, and sapping off our resources. If it’s important to become a law-abiding American citizen and reap the rewards of living in this country, there’s an immigration to follow to prove those intentions.

The next best thing to using a drug lord’s seized money earned from abusing our border is to make Sanctuary Cities pay for it. They can’t make their own laws to harm people and force other people to pay for it too.

Continue Reading

Featured

FBI Raided Wasserman-Schultz’s House After She’s Tied To Dead Body On Beach – Make Unbelievable Find

Published

on

Ever since Trump got into office, liberals continue to prove how far they’re willing go in order to bury their dirty secrets. Members of the DNC will simply kill off whoever stands in the way of their agenda, as evidenced by the body of lawyer Beranton J. Whisenant Jr. washing up on a Florida beach back in May. As Wasserman-Schultz’s continues to be investigated for her possible role in the man’s murder since Whisenant Jr. was set to expose Wasserman-Schultz’s fraud and visa case in Florida, now the former DNC chair has another nightmare on her hands after what the FBI just found after conducting a massive raid at her home.

Body of Beranton J. Whisenant Jr. washed up on a beach back in May right before set to expose Debbie Wasserman Schultz’s scandal

Several months back, a highly-disturbing Muslim spy ring was discovered at the White House, led by 3 brothers who were hired by Wasserman-Schultz to do IT work for Congress. The 3 Muslim brothers, Abid, Imran and Jamal Awan, were busted for stealing top secret information from Congressmen’s laptops, and then copying it to an external hard drive outside of the White House. Since the bust, a criminal investigation by U.S. Capitol Hill law enforcement has been underway, although no arrests have yet to be made. Now we’re learning startling information of how Wasserman-Schultz is not only helping these Muslim terrorists get away with their crimes, but has been keeping the seized hard drives at her home so she could later give the top secret stolen intel back to the Muslims! The Daily Caller reported:

“Pakistani-born Imran Awan, long-time right-hand IT aide to the former Democratic National Committee (DNC) Chairwoman, has since desperately tried to get the hard drives back, the individual told The Daily Caller News Foundation’s Investigative Group.

A high-level congressional source, speaking on condition of anonymity because of the sensitivity of the probe, confirmed that the FBI has joined what Politico previously described as a Capitol Police criminal probe into ‘serious, potentially illegal, violations on the House IT network’ by Imran and three of his relatives, who had access to the emails and files of the more than two dozen House Democrats who employed them on a part-time basis.”

During the raid, Capitol Police seized smashed computers and hard drives from Wasserman-Shultz’s home that had previously belonged to the Muslim IT administrator. It’s not clear whether Wasserman-Shultz had smashed the devices as a way to destroy evidence or bury her ties to the Muslim terrorists, but the former DNC congresswoman is no doubt in serious legal trouble after being in possession of the items during the raid. The Daily Caller went on:

“Capitol Police have also seized computer equipment tied to the Florida lawmaker.

Awan’s younger brothers, Abid and Jamal, his wife, Hina Alvi, and Rao Abbas, Imran’s best friend, are also under investigation. There have been no arrests in the case.

There is also evidence of financial schemes that extend beyond the Capitol Police’s purview and may expand to Pakistan, where Imran spends significant portions of the year.”

It’s unbelievable to comprehend why Wasserman-Schultz would commit treason against the United States by aiding and abetting our enemies, but many are beginning to suspect that the Muslim brothers have been blackmailing members of Congress with whatever information they stole from the Congressmen’s laptops. “Congressional aides also feared politicians were being blackmailed by the Pakistani IT suspects in security breach,” The Gateway Pundit reported.

Fox News anchor Maria Bartiromo was the first person to break the story about the Muslim brother spy ring at the White House, where she discussed exactly what’s at stake now that America’s secrets are now in the possession of these Muslim IT workers, all who have ties with the Muslim Brotherhood and had for months been funneling our secrets to possible terrorists outside the United States, thanks to Wasserman-Schultz.

“They [the Muslims] were barred from computer networks at the House of Representatives on Thursday because they accessed Congressmen and Congress people’s computer networks unauthorized,”  Bartiromo began. “At a minimum they were fired. At a minimum we know that they accessed computers unauthorized and they did so in foreign intelligence, foreign affairs and intelligence committees….  they were getting very important information, government information. They accessed these computers.

It’s highly disturbing how all of the DNC’s scandals keep pointing straight back to Debbie Wasserman-Schultz. Her antics began during the election as she was busted for helping Hillary Clinton rig the primary election against Bernie Sanders. After being fired and removed as the DNC chair, not only is Wasserman-Schultz now being tied to the murder of Beranton J. Whisenant Jr. who was investigating her for her fraud and visa case in Florida, but now she’s been caught red-handed for trying to destroy computers and hard drives directly tying her to Muslim Brotherhood terrorists at the White House! All Muslims that SHE hired to “do IT work!”

Share this story and help expose this corruption! This is absolutely sick!

 

Continue Reading

Politics

The Anti-American NFL Just Made A SICK Move For ALL FELONS Just To Piss Off Trump

More proof they hate America!

Published

on

The anthem protest controversy with the National Football League still remains a problem, leaving the organization at the forefront of the news. Despite their unnecessary involvement in the political arena with their protests, they have inserted themselves yet again in another political firestorm.

The League as a whole has endorsed the bipartisan Sentencing Reform and Corrections Act. It is Senator Chuck Grassley, a Republican from Iowa, and Senator Dick Durban, a Democrat from Illinois, who introduced this legislation. A plethora of other Senators have thrown their support behind the bill such as Senator Lee, Senator Feinstein, and Senator Brooke.

Former spokesman for President Bill Clinton who’s now in a similar position for NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell said the following concerning the NFL’s statement,

We felt that this was an issue over the last months, as we have continued to work with our players on issues of equality and on issues of criminal justice reform, that was surfaced for us, and we thought it was appropriate to lend our support to it.”

This particular piece of legislation would change life sentences to three-time drug felons to a new 25-year term. As well, it amends the Controlled Substances Act and would impose a mandatory minimum of only five years rather than ten. In addition to this, it seeks out other alternatives to prison for offenders that are nonviolent, for example, home confinement.

Despite the broad support it has received, this bill was introduced in a former Congress but never came before the House because of detractors such as now Attorney General Jeff Sessions who was a Senator at the time & he did not support the bill. But now the tides have turned and it has been introduced in the 115th Congress.

The text of the bill asks the attorney general to create,

a strategic plan for the expansion of recidivism reduction programming and productive activities.”

The Washington Post reported,

On Capitol Hill, spokesmen for the two main sponsors of the criminal justice bill, Sens. Charles E. Grassley (R-Iowa) and Richard J. Durbin (D-Ill.), declined to comment about the timing of the NFL’s endorsement or whether it was intended to quell the heated debate over the players’ continued protests. Both said they welcomed the NFL’s support.

But a spokesman for Grassley added that the NFL had not coordinated with the bill’s congressional sponsors in advance of its decision. In the meantime, no other sports league has signed on. A spokesman for the NFL Players Association did not immediately return a call for comment about whether the football players’ union would also endorse the bill.

In Congress, it is not clear whether the NFL’s endorsement will help the bill’s chances of passing. The legislation has already earned the support of some influential groups from across the political spectrum, including the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, the American Civil Liberties Union, the Charles Koch Institute and Americans for Tax Reform.”

The article continued,

Although the Trump administration has not taken a position on the bill, the legislation directly challenges Sessions’s new policy on sentencing, which he laid out in a memo to federal prosecutors earlier this year. In that memo, Sessions instructed them to seek charges “that carry the most substantial guidelines sentence, including mandatory minimum sentences” — leading many to interpret the directive as the start of a new war on drugs. Sessions has said that his order was meant to focus on hardened criminals. Nonetheless, the policy is a course change from the Obama administration’s effort to avoid pursuing charges that would result in long prison sentences for certain low-level crimes.”

Despite the widespread bipartisan support, the NFL choosing to get involved in the political arena has been abnormal. With the exception of the last few years, people in the NFL have not really been politically active raising the question of whether they should be or not.

Breitbart reported,

Despite looking to move on from national anthem kneelers and corral back disgusted fans, the NFL, this time willingly, tethers itself to a political issue completely unrelated to football, perhaps as the owners’ quid to the pros’ quo of ceasing the money-draining sideline pregame protests. The league announced the endorsement of the act on Monday. On Tuesday, owners and players meet to discuss the protests. Attempts to inject politics into the playing field resulted in massive numbers of fans clicking away or off on Sunday afternoons over the last two seasons. Credit Suisse cited tanking NFL ratings for lowering its earnings expectations for CBS on Monday. Earlier this month, the Wall Street outfit similarly pointed to “weak” football ratings as the reason for revising downward a forecast of earnings for Twenty-First Century Fox.”

The purpose of music and sports is to bring people together. People who ordinarily disagree and cannot find common ground, through sports and music, are able to. Yet by the NFL injecting themselves in the political arena, they are causing the exact opposite of that.

In a time more than ever when we need to be united it is imperative that we have an outlet like professional sports to bring this country together. However, professional athletes have proven time and time again they do not agree. Which is sadly unfortunate.

Perhaps with this latest move, the NFL should be renamed the National Felons League.

Join the “Support our Vets – Boycott the NFL & their Sponsors” Facebook page by liking it, and Share if you’re boycotting the NFL and the companies that support them! 

FOLLOW us on Facebook at Freedom Daily!

Continue Reading

Latest Articles

Trending