Please disable your Ad Blocker to better interact with this website.

Connect with us

Culture

Well, Well, Well, The Truth Finally Comes Out About Who Spearheaded The Steelers Anthem Protest

No one saw this coming!

Published

on

There appears to be a big beef brewing between wide receiver Antonio Brown and Ben Roethlisberger. The sideline tiff they had over the weekend during the Week 4 game against the Ravens is said to have been about Roethlisberger not throwing Brown the ball that would have given him a touchdown. However, rumors indicate the disagreement goes much deeper than that and hits on a much more controversial issue. It all apparently stems from the recent National Football League protests against the National Anthem. Brown has reportedly been fighting with Roethlisberger since the head quarterback vociferously fought for the team to stay off the field and in their locker room during the national anthem in Week 3. The week where they lost to the Bears in Chicago. When Brown tossed a cooler in Baltimore it is alleged that this is where his frustration stemmed from.

CBS reported the following on the ordeal,

“”Roethlisberger spearheaded a decision to reverse course and have the players remain in the tunnel rather than on the sidelines as originally intended, which was the topic of an emotional team meeting the following day. During that meeting, sources said, Brown expressed his displeasure with how Roethlisberger and others handled the matter, and there was some lingering resentment through the week. “Sources said Brown has felt strongly the urge to kneel in protest during the anthem, but the Steelers have been in unison standing or remaining off the field during the playing of it. Sunday, when the quarterback did not throw to him early in the game, when he was wide open for a possible TD, Brown took it personally and believed it was related to his recent dispute with Roethlisberger, according to the sources, which led to his sideline blow-up.””

After Brown’s outburst he tweeted on social media an apology for his behavior.

Mike Tomlin, the coach for the Steelers, said the following about Brown’s actions during a press conference after the game,

““It doesn’t need to happen. It shouldn’t happen. Hopefully, he learned a lesson through that. A.B. is a competitor, we all know that. It aids him, it aids us. He has to control [his emotions]. If not, it can work against him, it can work against us. Those are lessons you learn along the way.””

While quarterback Roethlisberger, whom he had the alleged disagreement with, also spoke to reporters at 93.7 The Fan and said the following,

“I don’t know [if] he needs to react that way. He’s superhuman on the football field, and when that [sideline behavior] happens it almost brings him back to being a mere mortal, if you will. Because it gets in his head and it just messes with all of us a little bit. I’m not trying to call AB out. I just think this is causing a distraction that none of us really need.”

Despite Brown’s outburst, he is considered a formidable opponent on the field. He had 30 catches for 388 yards as well as a touchdown through 4 of his games during this season. A season which has just barely begun and he was held to 4 catches for 34 yards against the Baltimore Ravens. Brown also chose to publicly comment on his quarterback publicly making comments about his outburst. He told ESPN.com the following,

“It’s not about me. It’s about the Steelers,” Brown said, via ESPN.com. “We all make mistakes as players. Sometimes I might miss a read. I don’t see Ben throwing me under the bus if I drop the ball or if I run the wrong route or didn’t get my depth. I don’t see him kicking the cooler. It’s no excuse for my behavior. I’m glad [Roethlisberger] did what he did. He called me out. As a general of our team, he has every right to call anything out. … I’m just grateful we have a great leader who’s forgiving and accommodating and willing to talk to me.”

The whole idea of staying in the locker room during the National Anthem seems odd. What exactly is the purpose? You are not kneeling so you are not supporting the protestors but by not coming out you also are not supporting the flag, our country, and the veterans who fought for this country and our freedom. In reality, they are taking the path of least resistance but by taking no stance they are. As the saying goes, if you stand for nothing, you will fall for everything. That certainly appears to be the case with the Steelers.

If you are not going to kneel what is the point of doing anything other than standing for the anthem and putting your hand over your heart? There is no point behind putting your fist up or your hand on your teammates’ soldier. It is all baseless and pointless and by constantly reporting on it the mainstream media is giving these athletes their fifteen minutes of fame they so desperately desire.

Share if you think everyone should stand for the national anthem!

FOLLOW us on Facebook at Freedom Daily!

Join the conversation

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse.

Culture

One Word Explains SJWs Attempt To Change Our Culture

Chuck Yarling

Published

on

2017 is definitely the year that social justice warriors (SJWs) have been active in removing Confederate statues and anything else they seem to think should be removed from our sights. Indeed most people are unaware that it actually started in June of 2015 right after the Charleston, S.C., shooting. It was there that Dylan Roof murdered nine African Americans in their church during their service.

Since then, cities across the country began removing monuments and memorials related to the Confederacy on public property. It seemed that these social justice warriors believed these things glorified white supremecy and memorialized a government whose founding principle was the perpetuation and expansion of slavery.

Needless to say these idiots jumped on the Confederate flag too. However, everyone who did so were totally unaware (history-deficient, ill-informed, stupid?) that the flag to which they referred, with the crossed blue banners containing stars was not the Confederate flag but a battle flag of the northern Virginia. Everyone with a little historical knowledge learned that the “real” flag had the “Stars and Bars”. There is a difference, doncha know?

And ever since the Roof killing spree, Confederate stuff has been removed from the sight of mankind to distant places. So what’s going on here? It’s called presentism: (more…)

Continue Reading

Culture

BREAKING NEWS: Grammy Winner Has SICK FANTASY To MURDER Trump’s Daughter

Published

on

The President’s family has always been open to attacks by people who are willing to go below the belt. Especially when it comes to his wife and children. It is truly disgusting. But the person who has been targeted the most is by far his oldest daughter Ivanka Trump who serves with her husband as an advisor to the President in the White House.

One person who seemingly attacked Ivanka Trump was rapper Eminem. He joined the ranks of entertainers such as Whoopi Goldberg and Joy Baier of the View, a morning talk show, in his attacks on the First Daughter. His recently released album that came out Friday shows exactly what his true feelings about Ivanka really are.

The Conservative Tribune reported,

In a track released on his new album, “Revival,” the now 45-year-old rapper calls Trump “Aryan,” and says it’s “time to bury him, so tell him to prepare to get impeached.” He then continues his lewd, hate-filled lyrics by describing a “murder fantasy” of the president’s daughter, Ivanka Trump.

“Donald Duck’s on as the Tonka Truck in the yard
But dog how the f*** is Ivanka Trump in the trunk of my car
Gotta get to the bottom of it to try to solve it
Must go above and beyond, ’cause it’s incumbent upon
Me, ’cause I feel somewhat responsible for the dumb little blonde girl
That motherf****n’ baton twirler that got dumped in the pond”

Ivanka and President Trump weren’t the only members of the family to get a shout out on the record. Melania was next, as he rapped about making a pass at her.

“Ivanka, stiff arm her
While I’m hittin’ on Melania
And this song’s for all ya.”
Real classy, Eminem.

Of course, the entertainment industry is eating all of this up like candy. While the actual music is getting mixed reviews, The 405 calls the Trump bashing “admirable.”
Here’s the grand hypocrisy of all of this, though. In an interview with the New York Times, Eminem takes a play right out of the liberal handbook and describes himself has “tolerant.”

One of the grand pillars of liberal hypocrisy is when liberals claim to be “tolerant,” claim conservatives need to be more tolerant, but will absolutely rip anyone who disagrees with them. So, Eminem, I have a question for you. Why aren’t you more “tolerant” of President’s Trump agenda? If you really are the “tolerant” guy you claim to be, why are you rapping about murdering people you disagree with?

But even more than this, the double standard in the mainstream media is absolutely obvious through this new album. Eminem talks about putting Ivanka’s body in the trunk of his car, but where is the media outrage? There is none. Could you imagine if a country Western singer wrote a song about tossing Sasha or Malia Obama’s body in the trunk of his car? To be fair, it would probably be a truck, but I digress. The despicable words spouted by this rapper are absolutely sickening. Many liberals will try and make the case that this album is just “art,” and that we just don’t understand true art.”

Families of the President have always been considered to be off limits and now should be no different. Yet Democrats and liberals have attacked Barron and Ivanka to name a few the most. So clearly it is not an attacking presidential families problem it is an attacking liberal presidential families problem. It is ok to attack when the President is Republican but you can’t attack when the President is a Democrat. It’s a total double standard. There should be a universal standard held by all and everyone. Attacks of a kind against the President’s family are never acceptable and will never be tolerated.

The Hill reported,

A spokesman for Ivanka Trump didn’t immediately return ITK’s request for comment. The song is reminiscent of past tracks from Eminem, including “Kim” and “’97 Bonnie and Clyde,” in which he rapped about murdering his then-wife. On another “Revival” song, Eminem boasts about making a pass at first lady Melania Trump. Eminem expressed frustration in a radio interview last month that Trump hadn’t responded to his freestyle or earlier taunts.

“I feel like he’s not paying attention to me,” Eminem said. “I was kinda waiting for him to say something, and for some reason, he didn’t say anything.” It’s far from the first time an entertainer has skewered the president in a gruesome manner.

Earlier this year, comedian Kathy Griffin created a firestorm after posing for a photo depicting a decapitated Trump. First lady Melania Trump called the snapshot “disturbing,” and questioned Griffin’s mental health. Griffin apologized, but later retracted her apology. Last month, Snoop Dogg shared an album cover that showed him standing over Trump’s dead body.”

The latest album release attacking Ivanka is just another example of how our society has been degraded. Share if you agree that this type of musical interpretation and attack against the First Family is unacceptable.

FOLLOW us on Facebook at Freedom Daily!

Continue Reading

Culture

Urgent ALERT: Top Christmas Gift DEADLY… Get Rid Of It NOW!!!

It’s already too late for some kids…

Published

on

Each year we have that different toy that every kid wants and is sold out everywhere, but this year that toy might come with serious consequences.

Although these accusations haven’t been proven, a mother has taken to Facebook to warn fellow parents not to buy Hatchimals bath bombs products for their kids this Christmas season after her young daughter was left with what appears to be first-degree chemical burns all over her body.

Jennifer Renee who lives in Baton Rouge, Louisiana, posted what appears to be very disturbing pictures of her daughter Willow’s painful looking injuries on Facebook last week. The pictures were of her daughter’s distressing chemical burn injuries after using the Hatchimals Bath Bomb toy. She went on to claim her child sat in the bath for what was only 30 to 45 seconds when her skin became inflamed, red, and painful to the touch.

The mother later confirmed on her Facebook page that her daughter Willow had been diagnosed as having suffered a chemical burn and not an allergic reaction as she previously had suspected.

She then proceeded to call the company who produces this product, Spin Master and later revealed that the batch number is being investigated and will “likely” be recalled because of previous complaints.

This Young Girl Got A Serious Chemical Burn From A Bath Bomb via the Daily Mail:

A representative for Spin Master, which owns the Hatchimals brand, has responded with a statement: “Spin Master has been looking into the matter with the manufacturer and licensee to whom we license the Hatchimals brand. Safety is our top priority and we are deeply saddened to learn of the girl’s injuries. At this point, Global Brands Group has not found any indication of a product defect or manufacturing issue. Additionally, the product formulation has been subject to stringent safety testing and meets all industry standards.”

The Global Brands Group, the Hatchimals distributer, also provided a statement after reviewing the case: “Global Brands Group takes the safety of our products very seriously. We manufacture and ship millions of bath bombs and body washes, and have rigorous processes in place around development and testing, as well as all aspects of production. After careful review, we are confident our Hatchimals bath products are, in fact, safe. However, it is recommended that consumers be mindful of any adverse reactions they may have based on personal allergies or sensitivities.
The Spin Master representative who emailed us alleges that Jennifer Renee’s statement that an FDA expert responded to her specific accusations (in the photo posted by her on Facebook) is false, and that the photographed statement is unclear, and possibly taken out of context. We have reached out to the FDA consumer officer and will update this story as we learn more.

Kids aren’t looking for a fancy claw-footed bathtub with bubbles that are perfectly fluffed just so for the ‘gram — they’re just in there to get clean and get out. But many parents avoid potential temper tantrums around bath time by filling the water with washable soap crayons and fizzy balls of soaps that turn into toys. Sadly, it’s not always suds and smiles, as we learned from one mother who just issued a warning against a bath toy that allegedly gave her daughter a serious chemical burn.

In the case of Jennifer Renee and her daughter Willow, it was a Hatchimal that took bath time from fun to frightening. The Wonderball of bath bombs, a Hatchimal (like, hatching animals) looks like a giant egg, and it that dissolves on contact with water, “hatching” to reveal a “mystery surprise” (usually a plastic animal charm or figurine). Although, for Jennifer and Willow, the real surprise in the Hatchimal was burning pain.

Thursday, Jennifer posted her cautionary story on Facebook, claiming that she dropped a Hatchimal soap toy into Willow’s bath, and less than a minute after touching the water, Willow suffered red chemical burns all over her skin.

“PSA! Do NOT buy this for your children!” she wrote next to the split image of the Hatchimal product box and Willow’s burned hand. “Followed directions on package and placed in her bathtub,” Jennifer’s post continued. “Thought it would be fun for her because there was a toy inside. After being in the water 30-45 seconds she stated her skin was hurting, upon looking she has received a chemical burn from a KIDS BATH BOMB. (no she was not holding it and she has used multiple different kinds of bath bombs and never had this reaction) Just a warning people.”

After taking Willow to see a doctor to asses the reaction, Jennifer updated her post, explaining that the doctor ruled the irritation a chemical burn, more than just a simple adverse skin reaction. A chemical burn, as dermatologist Josh Zeichner explains it to us, is “a general term that refers to an allergic irritation reaction in the skin;” the common causes of the skin allergies of this type, include certain fragrances, preservatives, and dyes.

And in the case of the burning Hatchimal, Julie M. Barrows, a consumer safety officer from the Office of Cosmetics and Colors sector of the FDA, allegedly responded to Jennifer’s post, saying Willow’s reaction was likely caused by the D&C Red No. 33 dye. She reportedly explained in her note to Jennifer that the red dye is categorized as suitable for “externally applied cosmetics” (think: lipstick), but it “may not be used for bath products.

I am not saying this woman is a liar. But if there were previous complaints wouldn’t you think this wouldn’t be the first time we would have heard about this? I very much doubt Spin Master, who has a spotless safety record and produces millions of these products would have kept quiet all this time and risk multiple lawsuits instead of immediately recalling the product before more children were affected by whatever is in these toys that are causing the burns.

Please share if you want to get to the bottom of this issue….

Continue Reading

Latest Articles

Trending