Please disable your Ad Blocker to better interact with this website.

Connect with us

Crime

Watch as this Starbucks Customer confronts drive-thru cashier Who Stole Her Credit Card Number for $200

Published

on

From The Blaze

A Starbucks employee who allegedly used a customer’s credit card information to buy groceries was confronted by that customer at work — and on camera.

Elizabeth Becerra of Victorville, California, was with her brother in the Starbucks drive-thru  when they recorded the video, which was later uploaded to YouTube, the Daily Mail reported.

“We’re going to get even. That’s what we’re going to do,” Becerra says, before pulling up to the window, where she confronts the alleged thief.

In the video, Becerra informs the worker that there is video of her using the card to make a $212 purchase at the grocery store chain, Ralph’s. Becerra then says that police are on their way to the store.

“You took a copy of my f***ing card the other day on New Year’s Day. You know what you did,” Becerra berates the employee. “You took a copy of my f***ing card while you said you were going to go get receipt paper.”

The employee admitted to taking the action and offered an apology.

“I’m so sorry, ma’am. I’m sorry that I took money from you and your kids. I’m sorry that you had to come here. I’m sorry that this is inconvenient for you,” the worker says.

Becerra, however, wasn’t having it, despite the worker insisting that she is a “good child.”

“I really do go to school. I’m 19. I play soccer,” the worker says.

Becerra then tells the worker that she plans on filing charges against her.

The worker pleads with Becerra not to take legal action, to which the clearly upset customer responds, “You went through the $212. You come to Starbucks to get coffee, not to get robbed.”

A representative for Starbucks confirmed that the employee no longer works for the company, and condemned the behavior as “completely unacceptable.”

A military wife captured the moment she confronted a Starbucks employee for making a copy of her credit card and spending $200 at a local grocery store… who then admitted to the theft.

Juana Martinez, 25, and her brother arrived at the drive-thru at Starbucks in Lakewood, California, where the mother-of-three then accused the barista of taking her credit card details on New Year’s Day.

She tells the 19-year-old cashier that she was caught on camera trying to buy groceries with the stolen card details – and the young worker immediately admits her crime and begins apologizing profusely.

Martinez, whose children are aged two, five and six, told Daily Mail Online that due to the theft, she was unable to pay her rent.

She explained that both she and her husband, who is in the military and has been stationed in Lakewood work hard to provide for their children.

‘That was our rent money,’ she said. ‘My husband is in the military and I go to school. We both work our butts off to bring home money, I guess that’s why it hit me harder.’

Martinez added that the Starbucks worker had taken her card with her when she claimed to need more receipt paper and was gone for around a minute. But when she returned, she did not have receipt paper, Martinez added.

‘I’ve worked in retail, you don’t take someone’s card for that long. She came back and was really nervous.’

Martinez added that the following day, she received a text message about the transaction at the grocery store. When she called, an employee there described the woman who attempted to buy the groceries.

‘He said she was very suspicious,’ Martinez added. ‘He described her and I knew it was the girl from Starbucks.’

Martinez confirmed to Daily Mail Online that she has reported the incident to police.

The video, which her brother Brian Espinoza, posted on YouTube on Sunday, quickly went viral and has had nearly 150,000 views since.

The clip starts with Martinez’s brother asking her what she’s going to say to the cashier. She replies: ‘We’re gonna get even, that’s what we’re gonna do.’

She adds: ‘I’m going to say, I hope them $212 were worth it of groceries yesterday because I filed a f****** police report and your corporate already knows about it.’

As they approached the drive-thru window, the cashier greets Martinez and hands her the order along with her credit card.

Martinez tells her: ‘So we got you on camera yesterday at Ralph’s for $212, so just know that the cops are coming up here.

‘They recorded your a** and everything. You took a copy of my f****** card the other day on New Year’s Day. You know what you did.’

The cashier was shocked and immediately apologized, but she insisted that she admit what she had done.

‘So what are you sorry about? That you took f**king money from me and my kids? What are you sorry about?’

The cashier responds: ‘I’m sorry that I took money from you and your kids. I’m sorry that you had to come up here. I’m sorry that this is inconvenient for you.

‘I am a good child. I swear I am really good. I really do go to school. I’m 19. I play soccer.’

Martinez asked her how she even made a copy of her card and the cashier admits she ‘took the numbers actually’.

The cashier desperately asks her not to press charges and offers to give her the money back.

Pleading that she was unable to get the money, Martinez cut her off and says: ‘You went through the $212. You come to Starbucks to get coffee, not to get robbed.’

Martinez’s brother posted the video on social media, writing: ‘My sister went to Starbucks one day and noticed the cashier taking longer than normal with her card.

‘A few days later a couple hundred dollar transaction was taken out of her account. She didn’t want to accuse anyone until she knew for sure.

‘She noticed the cashier right away since she goes there regularly. She had to make a stop there and embarrass her life before reporting it to the police.

‘I almost feel bad for the girl but she robbed the wrong person. Keep an eye out folks, even if it’s at your friendly neighborhood Starbucks.’

A spokesman for Starbucks confirmed to Daily Mail Online that the employee no longer works for the company.

He said: ‘We were extremely troubled to learn of this incident and are working directly with the customer to address this situation.

‘This experience is completely unacceptable, but is by no means indicative of the otherwise outstanding customer service that we provide our customers daily. We value our customers’ trust and have internally taken immediate steps to address and respond to this issue.

‘I can confirm that this partner (employee) no longer works for Starbucks.’

Join the conversation

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse.

Crime

BREAKING NEWS Out Of Alabama! Roy Moore Was RIGHT – Let The Riots Begin!

Published

on

Alabama has found themselves the home of the most hotly debated Senatorial election in decades. The special election to replace newly appointed Trump cabinet member Jeff Sessions took a dark turn when women came out of the woodwork to accuse Republican candidate Roy Moore of sexual impropriety.

Both sides of the political aisle were very interested in this election because of the slim majority that rules the Senate right now. President Trump made a point of telling the people of Alabama how important to his agenda Moore’s right-leaning vote would be, and Obama supported Doug Jones, telling his fans that anything is better than another Republican in Washington.

The results of Tuesday’s special election were close, with Jones being declared the winner by 1.5% of the vote. With the law requiring that the winner have a margin of at least half a percent, even a few thousand votes could have invalidated the results. Because of that close margin, and an acute awareness of what Democrats are willing to do to win, Moore wasn’t ready to give up right away, and it turns out he was right.

In the hours following Jones being declared the winner, not only did the news come out that the state of Alabama hadn’t even counted their military votes, but other snapshots of voter fraud started to emerge. Multiple news outlets started to cry foul after what started as a suspicion see,ed to be confirmed by individuals bragging about committing voter fraud. InfoWars posted a video of individuals at a Jones rally, bragging about coming from out of state to vote for “their boy”:

“Claims of voter fraud in Alabama are swirling after a man was caught on camera appearing to reveal that supporters of Democrat Doug Jones ‘came from different parts of the country’ to vote for him.

The clip was captured by Fox10 News after it was confirmed that Jones had defeated Republican Roy Moore.

Asked, ‘Why are you excited to see this victory?,’ the man responds, “Because we came here all the way from different parts of the country as part of our fellowship and all of us pitched in to vote and canvas together and we got our boy elected!'”

It’s unclear whether the individual is referring to people being transported in to campaign for Jones or to actually vote for him, which would be illegal.”

It’s hard to say what would be more likely, that these people would come from all around the country, just to carry signs and show their support, or that they would justify any means necessary to keep Moore from getting into office.  Regardless, many think that it’s plenty to warrant an investigation. Preferably one that would take place before Jones is officially sworn into office, which is already being hurried by nervous Democrats.

“’Even the girl next to him knows that he has let the cat out of the bag,’ commented one Twitter user.

The clip is going viral, with one version having racked up almost 300,000 views on Facebook.

Roy Moore is continuing to refuse to concede the election, commenting, ‘In this race, we have not received the final count to include military and provisional ballots. This has been a very close race and we are awaiting certification by the secretary of state.’

If Moore reduces Jones’ 1.5 percentage advantage to within 0.5% after the military ballots have been counted, this will trigger an automatic recount which will be paid for by the state government.”

Ironically, when the election was still unsure, liberals were themselves saying that the results were unfair. Prissy Holly of Freedom Daily reported just hours after the results came in on the myriad of excuses that liberals had in the chamber to say that the results were unfairly going toward Moore. Just one example is an old standby; white supremacy:

“In the article, the website asserted that ‘white supremacy’ was preventing black citizens from being able to take to the polls, that no doubt got the black populace fired up just in time to go cast their votes for Jones before the race ended. Here’s a short excerpt of their ridiculous story, where they claimed that ‘white supremacists’ were requiring ‘poor blacks’ from being able to vote because they were required to show an ID.

‘Alabama has a long history of suppressing the votes dating back at least to 1901 when the state passed a new constitution whose main purpose was to deny African Americans the right to vote,’ they whined. ‘In 2011, the Republican-controlled state legislature passed a law that all voters must have a photo ID, which immediately disenfranchised many rural and poor Blacks.'”

Alabama has been sending Republicans to Washington for a very long time, and Roy Moore, despite the allegations leveled against him, has been a much loved Republican for a very long time. If you’re still doubtful that Democrats would do anything to win, then you might want to check and see if there is any sand in your ears. And if you know that they would, you’re just not sure if they did, maybe an investigation into these claims would clear all of that up.

No one wants the will of the people to be carried out more than a real conservative, we just want to make sure it’s the people who live in Alabama, not whoever was paid to show up and cast a vote.

[H/T: InfoWars]

Continue Reading

Crime

BREAKING! Trump Pulls Off MAJOR UPSET! They Are PISSED…THIS IS SO HUGE!!!

Published

on

President Donald Trump has been on a winning streak ever since taking off for his first overseas trip as Commander-in-Chief. He returned home to business as usual for the leader of the most powerful nation in the world, who is also on a mission to block our borders from unwelcome refugees and illegals. He didn’t miss a beat returning to his duties.

The president was recently presented with an incredible surprise of who could be paying for one of his most important campaign promises and you won’t believe who just came up as the most unlikely financier. The only thing that’s been holding America’s safety and security back is the ability to fund it, which could soon not be a problem any longer and fulfill a long overdue need much quicker than originally thought.

The fight over who will foot the $12-$15 billion to fund Trump’s U.S.-Mexico border wall is no longer an issue after one person could be forced to pony up the bill for it under the most ironic of circumstances. News is breaking right now from one of the most outspoken advocates of the border wall outside of President Donald Trump, who just dropped a bomb to solve the funding problem with one simple solution.

The money for the wall is already in America’s possession, we just need to get permission to use it now and the one who it belongs to has no say in the matter. You could call Senator Ted Cruz the best problem-solver with devising the perfect solution to get moving on one of Trump’s biggest and most important campaign promises.

Breitbart reports:

“Senator Ted Cruz (R-TX) introduced a bill calling for the use of $14 billion seized from cartel drug lord Joaquin ‘El Chapo’ Guzman to be used to pay for the President’s border wall between the U.S. and Mexico.”

It makes perfect sense since one of the world’s largest drug cartel leaders benefitted by the billions in an open border. Now that he’s in custody, it’s only fair that the “blood money” in holding go to good use against Chapo’s cause and Cruz is a genius for proposing this idea.

“Fourteen billion dollars will go a long way toward building a wall that will keep Americans safe and hinder the illegal flow of drugs, weapons, and individuals across our southern border,” Senator Cruz said, as was reported by Breitbart Texas who received a statement from the senator’s office on the matter. “Ensuring the safety and security of Texans is one of my top priorities.”

The entire objective of the border wall is to dramatically slow the flow of drugs and crime into America through avenues established by El Chapo. His forfeited drug money fortune will “offset the wall’s cost and make meaningful progress toward achieving President Trump’s stated border security objectives,” Cruz’s statement continued.

The bill, appropriately dubbed the Ensuring Lawful Collection of Hidden Assets to Provide Order (EL CHAPO), was introduced by Cruz on Tuesday and with any luck will get a lot of conservative support. Of course, liberals are greatly against the idea of a wall, preaching for breaking down walls of communication rather than building them. This Utopian idea can’t and won’t work as El Chapo proves with his billions of dollars and thousands of lives lost to his enterprise.

“The U.S. Government is currently seeking the criminal forfeiture of more than $14 billion in drug proceeds and illicit profits from El Chapo, the former leader of the Sinaloa drug cartel who was recently extradited to the U.S. to face criminal prosecution for numerous alleged drug-related crimes, including conspiracy to commit murder and money laundering,” Cruz stated, Breitbart reports.

Breitbart Texas’ Ildefonso Ortiz reports that “As part of the agreement with Mexico, Guzman will not face the death penalty in the U.S. for his crimes.” This makes the money usage even better since he has to live holed up in a jail cell for the rest of his life and know what all of his money is being siphoned into. Just because the kingpin is out, doesn’t mean that his cartel network is, which is still in operation breaching our border. It couldn’t be better than to make their boss pay for the wall that’s needed because of him and shut the whole drug and crime funnel down for good.

Continue Reading

Crime

It’s Official! The Court Just Ruled Against It – Riots Are About To ERUPT In New York!

Published

on

For the past year, the left has been doing their best to undermine President Trump with their devious schemes to oust him from office. Between the fake Russian collusion story and women parading on national media news outlets with tales of sexual misconduct from decades ago, the left is doing their best to keep hatred for Trump alive. Now, the courts have stepped in and handed down an epic ruling in President Trump’s favor that will surely have the hateful left fuming with anger.

One bone of contention the left has with President Trump is his tweeting on the social media platform Twitter. These special snowflakes are continually complaining that Trump is mean with his comments and that he just needs to stop and start acting presidential. To prove just how much these whiny liberals despise Trump’s tweeting habits, they have gone to extraordinary lengths to silence him. There have been groups of liberals sent to report Trump’s Twitter account as hate speech and even a petition created to suspend his account.

However nothing these liberals have tried has worked, but that has not stopped one butthurt woman to try and go for broke. During the presidential campaign last year, Republican strategist Cheryl Jacobus sued Donald Trump for defamation for comments he made in the midst of a heated Republican primary. Jacobus alleged in her complaint that the Trump campaign tried to recruit her in May 2015, even attempting to entice her with the prospect of a post-campaign job at Fox News. Jacobus didn’t join the presidential campaign, and after a brief amount of time, she appeared on the liberal news network CNN to publically criticize the Trump campaign.

Shortly after her appearance on CNN, Trump logged onto Twitter and set the record straight about Jacobus which apparently hurt her feelings. In the tweets that caused this special snowflake to melt Trump stated Jacobus ‘begged us for a job. We said no and she went hostile.’ A second Trump tweet stated, ‘Turned her down twice and she went hostile. Major loser, zero credibility.’”

So, instead of Jacobus walking away and letting it go, she didn’t and filed a frivolous lawsuit demanding $4 million in damages. Well, on Tuesday Jacobus received the sad news that her little suit was not a success after a panel of five judges in a New York appeals court upheld the decision of the lower court.

Here is more from The Daily Caller:

A New York appeals court ruled that you cannot collect damages for defamation if President Donald Trump insults you over Twitter.

The decision was made after Republican strategist Cheryl Jacobus accused the president of sending a “virtual mob” to attack her after she went on national television and questioned whether he was fit for office. In response, Trump called her a “real dummy!”, “major loser” and claimed she “begged” him for a job on his campaign, despite her insistence that she didn’t.

Jacobus was seeking $4 million in damages against Trump. Her lawyer, Jay Butterman, said Tuesday was “not a happy day for democracy”.

A five-judge panel reached the verdict Tuesday in Manhattan, agreeing with New York Judge Barbara Jaffe who defended Trump’s “intemperate tweets” as protected by the First Amendment, despite chastising them as intending to “belittle and demean.”

The appeals court wrote that Trump’s tweets were “too vague, subjective and lacking precise meaning” to qualify as defamatory and were protected speech.

Tuesday’s decision will likely give comfort to the president’s legal team, who are currently fighting a different lawsuit from a former “The Apprentice” contestant who contends that a tweet calling her sexual assault allegation a lie also qualifies as defamation.

This is fantastic news for Trump and the American people since these liberals are doing whatever they can to silence the opposition. The left has control of the news media, Hollywood, and even social media platforms and they use this power to silence those they don’t agree with their progressive agenda.

Just because someone does not like what someone writes on social media does not give them the right to sue them for defamation. In today’s day in age of technology and social media, you have to have a thick skin to deal with what people say on the internet, especially if you are in the public spotlight. Jacobus went on national television and criticized the Trump campaign, and she did not think that they would have something to say back?

Well, she was wrong, and now the whole world knows it.

SHARE IF YOU THINK THE COURTS RULING WAS CORRECT AGAINST THIS WHINY LIBERAL?

 

 

Continue Reading

Latest Articles

Trending