Please disable your Ad Blocker to better interact with this website.

Connect with us


Watch: Hilarious Video Shows How Hillary’s Fake Accents Have Changed Through The Years



From Arkansas Southerner to North-East New Yorker, Hillary has always managed to keep her accents evolving in order to win elections.

It seems like Hillary Clinton is always running for public office.

And when it comes to running a campaign, being personable is not something that comes naturally to Clinton. In a new video by Bloomberg News, Clinton’s accents from the 1980’s all the way up until now are documented as they have frequently changed while she’s running for office.

Take a look at her accent evolution:

Via Biz Pac Review

During her tenure in politics, Hillary Clinton has shifted between several distinct versions of American English. This is not terribly unusual. President Barack Obama has been known to change his pronunciation according to region and audience. But the thing about Clinton is that she’s been in the game for so long, and has had so many different jobs and lived in so many different places, that her various accents wind up mapping her career.

Hillary Clinton has started faking a Southern drawl to speak to Southerners, just as she did during her last presidential run eight years ago.

Washington Examiner

The tactic drew chuckles, derision and not a little resentment when she tried it in 2007 and 2008. But she was back at it again in Alabama on Saturday, putting on a heavy twang to express her contempt for Republicans.

With Bernie Sanders narrowing her lead or overtaking her in early caucus and primary states of Iowa and New Hampshire, Clinton is hoping for a “Southern firewall,” and her itinerary of upcoming events reveals a determination to set it ablaze quickly. She wants to win in South Carolina and then in the many Southern states holding primaries on “Super Tuesday,” where Sanders is polling much worse.

That could mean a lot more of these type of videos, capturing her speaking in a voice she did not learn during her childhood in Illinois and schooling in New England.

Clinton was a resident of Arkansas for nearly two decades, but the distinction between the accent she used in official Washington, or globe-trotting as secretary of state, and the one she used campaigning at the event in Alabama can be stark.

“You know, when my husband became president thanks to a lot of you in this room, I remember after that election in ’92, him saying to me, ‘It’s so much worse than they told us,'” Clinton told the crowd in Hoover, Ala. “The debt in our country has been quadrupled in the prior 12 years, the deficits had exploded. So he had to roll up his sleeves and work hard.”

Clinton might chalk up the difference to the energy and the in-the-moment nature of stump speeches. Still, the difference between those events and her regular speaking voice can be surprising.

Jeff was the national rally organizer to free Marine Sgt. Tahmooressi from the Mexican prison, chairman emeritus of Ross Perot’s Reform Party of California, and a former candidate for governor. Jeff is editor-in-chief at Freedom Daily. He wrote for former Hollywood talent agent & Breitbart contributor, Pat Dollard, and headed up his 30 person research team. Mr. Rainforth also wrote for the Wayne Dupree Show. Jeff is single & says he is not gay.

Join the conversation

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse.


BOMBSHELL! Hillary Tarmac SECRET Revealed! This is HUGE!!! LOCK THEM UP NOW!!!

They Tried To Hide It But It’s Out Now!



New information is continuing to come out regarding the now infamous Tarmac Meeting between the serial rapist and former President Bill Clinton and the Barack Hussein Obama administration Attorney General Loretta Lynch.

But what is indeed the most alarming part of this whole ordeal is the FBI’s reaction to the leaking of this clandestine meeting to the public. Agency leadership wasn’t even a tab bit concerned about how they should respond the meeting between Lynch and Clinton or how it would look considering Crooked Hillary was at that time under a full investigation by the FBI?

You would think the FBI would be concerned about the optics of this matter, but It will come as a surprise to some, not many at this point after everything we’ve learned in the past few months, that the FBI was actually more concerned about where the leak came from than about what actually went down on that tarmac. All they were concerned about is finding who within the FBI leaked the information about the meeting to the press and making that person pay.

As Katie Pavlich reported at Townhall, the FBI released a series of emails yesterday afternoon where we learn more details about the Department of Justice’s response to the information leak of the now infamous secret meeting between Lynch and Clinton.

The dates on the emails range from July 1-3, 2016. On July 5, 2016, FBI Director James Comey announced former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton would not face criminal charges for mishandling classified information. Interesting dates, don’t you think?

Since the Clintons have always treated the American people like idiots Bill said at the time that he, and Lynch, only spoke only about their grandchildren, but since we know perfectly well the former Attorney General isn’t Bill Clinton’s type, the only possible answer to this tarmac meeting is Bill was trying to get Hillary off the hook.

Via Newsweek:


After news broke about an airport meeting between former Attorney General Loretta Lynch and former President Bill Clinton in the midst of last year’s presidential campaign, the FBI scrambled to identify the source who leaked details about the encounter and discipline him or her, according to emails released on the FBI website on Friday.

The meeting between Lynch and Clinton took place in June 2016, while the FBI was investigating Hillary Clinton’s use of a private email server. Bill Clinton boarded Lynch’s plane while it was on the tarmac at Phoenix’s Sky Harbor International Airport. The following month, then-FBI Director James Comey announced the bureau would not recommend that the Department of Justice pursue charges in the email probe. Comey has testified before Congress that Lynch asked him to refer to the probe as a “matter,” a request that made him feel “queasy.”

Related: What will Loretta Lynch tell Russia investigators?

Keep Up With This Story And More By Subscribing Now

The internal emails show that on June 29, 2016, a senior spokeswoman for the Justice Department emailed her counterparts at the FBI to flag articles that were starting to appear about the meeting. In the email, the spokeswoman, Melanie Newman, described the encounter as “a casual, unscheduled meeting.” She provided talking points, which are redacted in the released version.

That same day, multiple FBI officials sent links about the story to Comey, who responded to one email, “Got it, thanks sir.” Also on those email chains were FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe, whom President Donald Trump and others have accused of a pro-Clinton bias because his wife received money for a political campaign from entities associated with Virginia Governor Terry McAuliffe, a Clinton ally; and Peter Strzok, who was removed from special counsel Robert Mueller’s team because of text messages critical of Trump. Strzok oversaw the Clinton email investigation.

But after Observer published an article containing additional details about the encounter, citing an anonymous “security source” who had been present, the FBI and Justice Department moved from damage control to discussions about identifying the source and punishing that person, the emails show. At the time, the publisher of Observer was Jared Kushner, Donald Trump’s son-in-law and one of his senior advisers.

On December 15, the FBI released documents related to the so-called tarmac meeting in Phoenix between former Attorney General Loretta Lynch, pictured here on June 20, and former President Bill Clinton.

On July 2, a person whose name is redacted in the FBI release wrote to a bureau employee about the Observer article. The employee, whose name is also redacted, responded, “I agree with your assessment about the source, which in reading the article, I believe was one of the local PD officer [sic] assisting with one of the two motorcade [sic] there on the Tarmac. Either way, they should have never offered any type of opinion or details of what did or didn’t happen, as this is the most principle and basic tenant of executive protection.”

The FBI employee added, “Unfortunately, this article is a breach in security protocol and I am addressing it with the Phoenix division to make certain that they pursuit [sic] this and identify the source of the breach.”

The next day, an undisclosed FBI employee, presumably the same person from the earlier email, wrote to several colleagues, “I believe that the source quoted in this article is one of the local Phoenix LEO’s. Needless to say that I have contacted the Phoenix office and will contact the local’s [sic] who assisted in an attempt to stem further damage.”

An FBI employee responded, “This article is infuriating.” Another FBI person wrote in response, “You think there will be a need for non-disclosure agreements in the future?” A colleague wrote back, “That might not be a bad idea, given the circumstances.” All of their names are redacted.

Another FBI employee whose name is redacted responded to the email about the article, “We need to find that guy and bring him or her before a supervisor.” A colleague responded, “I’m trying to find out thru [sic] the PX STL. Hopefully, we will find out and at the very minimum, make sure he never works on any detail.”

Republican lawmakers and at least two of Trump’s lawyers have called for a special counsel to investigate the handling of the Clinton emails probe. Several congressional committees are also looking into that subject, as is the Justice Department inspector general.

Both Lynch and Clinton still maintain the chance meeting, which Clinton waited for 30 minutes on that tarmac to have, was only by chance.

Please share if you want to get to the bottom of this mess….

FOLLOW us on Facebook at Freedom Daily!

Continue Reading



Revenge Is So SWEET!!!



Alabama Republican Senatorial hopeful Roy Moore is keeping the dream alive for supporters in the hotly contested Alabama Senate race against Democrat Doug Jones. Moore told his base the ‘battle is not over’ despite President Donald Trump and others calling on him to concede. Moore lost to Jones on Tuesday night by some 20,000 votes – 650,436 votes, or 48 percent, to 671,151, or 50 percent.

Moore is not ruling out asking for a recount in his failed bid for the U.S. Senate though but that does not mean it will happen or even be allowed in this instance.

Moore sent a fundraising email to supporters asking for contributions to his “election integrity fund” so he could investigate reports of voter fraud, telling supporters – “I also wanted to let you know that this battle is NOT OVER!”.

On Tuesday Jones was announced as victorious by about 20,000 votes, or 1.5% according to unofficial returns. But Moore has not yet conceded the heated Alabama race to fill the seat that previously belonged to U.S. Attorney General Jeff Sessions. Moore has refused to concede the race to Jones, saying he will wait until all provisional and military ballots are counted and the race is certified.

Moore told supporters that the race was “close” and some military and provisional ballots had yet to be counted. Those are expected to be counted next week. Moore has also said his campaign is collecting “numerous reported cases of voter fraud” to send to the secretary of state’s office.

Moore told supporters Tuesday night –

“Realize when the vote is this close, it’s not over and we still got to go by the rules about this recount provision. It’s not over, and it’s going to take some time. 

Alabama Secretary of State John Merrill says it is unlikely that the last-minute ballots will change the outcome of the election or even trigger a recount.  The margin must be under 0.5% in order to trigger an automatic recount and in this instance, the state would pay for it roughly to the tune of a cool $1 million in taxpayer money. The results of Alabama’s Senate race will be certified between Dec. 26 and Jan. 3 after counties report their official totals.

Merrill stated –

“I know a lot of people would say it’s never over until it’s over, but the margin of victory for Doug Jones at this particular time looks like a very difficult amount of votes to overcome as the remaining votes that are out there to be counted next week begin to be considered at the local level.”

Merrill has also stated his office has investigated reports of voting irregularities, but have not discovered any that have been proven factual in nature. President Trump has endorsed Jones’ win, calling to congratulate him as well as calling on Moore to concede the race.

If Jones’ margin of victory ends up being more than 0.5% then things get a little dicier for a recount option.

According to

Alabama’s election handbook spells out several offices that are not included in state laws for contesting elections: lieutenant governor, U.S. senator, and U.S. representative.

There are other provisions, however, that indicate a candidate or political party could request a recount.

Who might challenge Doug Jones in 2020?

“It’s our contention the votes can be recounted,” John Bennett, Deputy Chief of Staff for the Secretary of State’s office told “We contend that authority is there.”

Bennett said, however, that the office will not make a determination on a recount until after the ballots are certified.

“We’re not at that point,” he said.

If Moore is allowed to request a recount, it will be at his expense and that could be considerable.

Merrill told Fortune the cost of recount would be between $1 million and $1.5 million and the total amount must be put up when the request is made. Moore’s most recent financial report showed he had about $636,000 cash on hand.

It’s also unlikely the Alabama Republican Party – which backed Moore even after the national GOP temporarily suspended its support – would be willing to help fund a recount.

Alabama Republican Party Chairman Terry Lathan issue a statement after Jones’ win saying “the race is over.”

“While we are deeply disappointed in the extremely close U.S. Senate election results, with our candidate Judge Roy Moore, we respect the voting process given to us by our Founding Fathers,” Lathan said.


It is important to note that Merrill and others are missing that there were some rather significant irregularities in the Jones/Moore Senatorial election in Alabama as just even a cursory search of the internet reveals.

According to mainstream left-leaning Newsweek, thousands of felons registered to vote in this Senatorial election.

Thousands of felons may have registered to vote in the weeks leading up to the Alabama Senate election on Tuesday, in which Democrat Doug Jones pulled off a surprise victory. 

Pastor Kenneth Glasgow, who spearheaded the effort, said on the November 27 registration deadline that at least 5,000 to 10,000 people statewide had registered that month.

“I’ve got people all over the state registering people,” Glasgow, who is president of The Ordinary People Society (TOPS) advocacy group, told at the time. “With my TOPS branches in Tuscaloosa, Birmingham, Montgomery, Enterprise, Dothan, Abbeville, Geneva, Gordon, Bessemer, we have a lot.”

But according to Merrill, that’s not worth noting??

Then there was the eleventh-hour court order that gave election officials the green light to NOT preserve electronic ballot records which would form the basis for any recount effort in the first place.

According to the left-leaning Guardian

A court in Montgomery, the state capital, issued an injunction on Monday afternoon ordering election officials around the state to preserve digital images of the ballots cast by Alabama voters in the hard-fought contest between controversial Republican Roy Moore and Democrat Doug Jones.

Then there was the enthusiastic volunteer that announced to one and all that people came from “all over the country” to Alabama to vote for Jones.

It certainly seems like there is more than ample evidence of potential skewing of election results especially in light of the disproven 40-year-old allegations of sexual impropriety levied against Moore just 30 days before election day.  He himself had been in the public eye for more than 40 years with no hint of such allegations. Yet all of sudden here they come standing beside Gloria Allred. One victim was traced directly to the Democratic party, another was called out by her own stepson, one has an ax to grind due to Moore representing her mother in a contentious child custody case, and yet a third admitted to forging Moore’s signature in her yearbook.

This whole thing smells to me. What do you think? Does this whole thing sound fishy to you? Does Alabama need a recount? Sound off in the comments and let us know what you think!

FOLLOW us on Facebook at Freedom Daily!

Continue Reading


Obama DEMANDED It! 5 Boxes of Classified Documents GONE! Here’s What They Tried To Hide



Newly-revealed documents obtained by Conservative watchdog group Judicial Watch reveal ever more of the dastardly deeds of former Secretary of State, two-time presidential loser, Hillary Clinton and her sidekick, Huma Abedin.

Through the course of a lawsuit filed in response to the failure of the Department of Justice to respond to a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request for all forms authorizing the removal of “personal papers and non-record materials,”, Judicial Watch has obtained records demonstrating the swamp is as just as deep as we have long suspected, and likely a whole lot deeper. The duo was allowed to remove highly sensitive documents not made readily available to the public.

Judicial Watch received the records on Thursday in response to a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request that sought all DS-1904 forms completed by or on behalf of Former Secretary Hillary Clinton, Former Chief of Staff Cheryl Mills, Former Deputy Chief of Staff Huma Abedin, and Former Deputy Chief of Staff Jacob Sullivan.

Hillary and Huma were permitted to remove both electronic and physical records, under the guise of the claim “they were ‘personal’ materials and ‘unclassified, non-record materials,'” of which included files of Hillary’s calls and schedules. While not classified, these documents carry a special notation that they were not to be made public under the normal FOIA process. The special notation was included as part of an addendum signed by Clarence N. Finney Jr., then-director of the Office of Correspondence and Records, who reviewed the records.

Image result for huma and hillary

The Obama State Department allowed former Hillary while she served in her former capacity of Secretary of State and Huma Abedin in her capacity as Hillary’s top aide to remove call logs, scheduling documents and files described as “Muslim Engagement” from government premises by labeling the records “private.” These newly obtained records also show that Huma was directly authorized to remove five different boxes of “physical files” that include documents described as “Muslim Engagement.”

Also among the recent discoveries revealed by these most recent documents is the revelation that Hillary removed the physical file of “the log of the Secretary’s gifts with pictures of gifts.” This could and very likely would further expose just how deeply involved in “pay for play” the State Department was under Hillary’s leadership.  It would also likely further expose the Clinton Foundation and the Clinton Global Initiative along with Hillary herself, causing the whole Clinton house of cards to tumble down. But will Attorney General Jeff Sessions address? Or will he continue to ignore is the question…

As a result of these findings, Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton is demanding answers.  He said in a statement –


“”We already know the Obama State Department let Hillary Clinton steal and then delete her government emails, which included classified information but these new records show that was only part of the scandal. These new documents show the Obama State Department had a deal with Hillary Clinton to hide her calls logs and schedules, which would be contrary to FOIA and other laws.”

Electronic records Clinton was allowed to remove:

  • Copy of “daily files.”
  • Non-record copy of a log of calls the Secretary made since 2004.
  • Official and personal copy of the Secretary’s “call grid” which is a running list of calls she wants to make.

Physical records Clinton was allowed to remove:

  • 16 boxes of personal schedules from 1993-2008 (prior to her becoming Secretary of State).
  • 29 boxes of miscellaneous public schedules ranging from her time as FLOTUS all the way up to her appointment at the State Department.
  • 1 box of personal reimbursable receipts.
  • 1 box of personal photos.
  • 1 box personal schedule.
  • Personal correspondence.
  • Daily file binders.
  • Gift binders.
  • Gifts (actual).
  • Topic binders.

Electronic records Abedin was allowed to remove:

  • Outlook contacts.

Physical records Abedin was allowed to remove (5 boxes):

  • Travel Records
  • Muslim Engagement Documents
  • Newspaper Articles
  • Gift Archive Binder
  • FLOTUS “Courtesy Storage/Box Content List” Binder
  • CODEL Trips Binder
  • Menu Cards & Table Arrangement Binder
  • Personal Event Planner (2001 thru 2011)

Image result for huma and hillary

Judicial Watch states of the documents –

 “The originals of some Clinton documents were retained, such as the call logs and schedules. For other records, including material that predates Clinton’s tenure, there is no indication that a copy was made. The most significant of these are her personal correspondence and gift binders, which could reflect Clinton Foundation and Clinton Global Initiative ties.”

After this latest bombshell revelation Fitton demands to know the obvious question – “When are the American people going to get an honest investigation of the Clinton crimes?”

The United States government has known for more than thirteen years that the mission of Muslim Brotherhood was and is to destroy Western civilization from within by their own hands.  As a result, no rational thinking person that loves America should have or would have allowed these Sharia-supremacists anywhere near our government if we hoped to retain our republic.

So, the question begs to be asked in 2012 when then-Rep. Michele Bachmann and four of her colleagues asked the State Department demanded answers about the ties its Deputy Chief of Staff, Huma Abedin, had with the jihadist Muslim Brotherhood, why were her concerns not given careful scrutiny? Why was Bachmann instead vilified as an “Islamophobe” while those very valid questions were left unanswered?

With this latest revelation from  Judicial Watch, inquiring minds now want to know – did Huma actually enable the Muslim Brotherhood’s infiltration demonstrating yet another betrayal of our national security by Hillary Clinton and her merry band on sycophants?


Continue Reading

Latest Articles