Please disable your Ad Blocker to better interact with this website.

Connect with us

Crime

Watch Liberals Force Their Sick Gender Manipulation On These Young School Boys — Parents Get BRUTAL Payback!

And people wonder why kids are so messed up these days

Published

on

Stories like this are the exact reason I will never send my kids to a daycare unless I had no other choice. One Oklahoma mother said her four-year-old son was forced to kiss another boy during a perverted game of ‘spin the bottle’ at his daycare.Footage of the incident was shared on Snapchat.

Dominique Green, the mother of the four-year old in Ardmore, Oklahoma, stated that the adults put in charge of the children’s well-being at Little Angels Daycare forced her son to kiss another boy.

3c1b721800000578-4118436-image-m-113_1484339386029The episode and events that followed after were so traumatic for her son that it forced Green to put him through counseling.
Footage of the incident, which took place a few months ago, was uploaded to Snapchat by one of the daycare employees, Green told reporters.

‘I’m standing up for these children because somebody needs to,’ Green said in an interview.

Sadly she wasn’t even the one who discovered the video, her friend was the one who initially alerted her to the video.

Green’s friends said:

‘She told me “You know, I don’t know if you’re going to like this video. You know, it’s really bad.”
3c1b724400000578-4118436-image-a-114_1484339466801
The clip reveals a small group of children seated around a blue table, with a caption that flashed across the screen during the kiss suggesting that her son was being encouraged to kiss the other boy. Although it was unclear exactly who was encouraging it, it was obvious that the voice belonged to an adult.

You would think that after the mother complained to the daycare owner something would have been done, but the owner merely sloughed her concerns off as if nothing happened.

The owner said:

“Well, I looked at it, and I don’t see anything wrong.” “So, from then on, she said I blew it out of proportion by calling the daycare.”This infuriated Green even more so, she took matters into her own hands.

She filed a complaint with the Department of Human Services, the investigation found that the daycare worker acted inappropriately, to say the least, and that discipline was warranted.

It’s sickening for a mother to have to watch that, then they tell her that she is overreacting?

While I am not a business owner myself, common sense leads me to assume that you never tell a customer paying for your services that they are OVERREACTING.

Jeff was the national rally organizer to free Marine Sgt. Tahmooressi from the Mexican prison, chairman emeritus of Ross Perot’s Reform Party of California, and a former candidate for governor. Jeff is editor-in-chief at Freedom Daily. He wrote for former Hollywood talent agent & Breitbart contributor, Pat Dollard, and headed up his 30 person research team. Mr. Rainforth also wrote for the Wayne Dupree Show. Jeff is single & says he is not gay.

Join the conversation

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse.

Crime

Sarah Sanders Just Got Last Laugh On SICK Chelsea Handler Who Trashed Her – Here’s Where She’s Headed

Published

on

Vapid and vile Chelsea Handler strikes again! There is literally nothing off limits for this disgusting foul-mouthed leftist looney.  Though I guess is having actor and comedian Jason Biggs urinate on her face is fair game, it is very difficult to imagine anything that would be. Biggs is best known for playing Jim Levenstein in the American Pie comedy series.

Handler equates the ocean to a “human toilet” remarking – “I don’t care about urine” except it was on your FACE before it went into the ocean. Handler was, in fact, laughing hysterically as it was happening. When asked about WHY the act of someone urinating on her face was so hilarious, Handler stated – “To me, it’s funny that somebody could be that rude to another person, and so that made me really happy.”

This is the same woman that recently labeled White House Press Secretary, Sarah Huckabee Sanders as a ‘harlot’ and a ‘trollop’. Sanders is a Christian married mother of three children. Married to the same man and all three children have the same father.  Seems Handler might need a dictionary along with counseling for that strange attraction to having her face urinated on.

So it looks like nasty Chelsea is heading DOWN! Just like the rest of these disgusting bullies.

She also referred to Sanders’ face as a “big, fat biscuit” that resembles a man’s in a spoof video depicting her filming a makeup tutorial on YouTube. Fortune Feimster who bills herself as a comedy writer plays Sanders’ and shows a step-by-step tutorial on how to apply make-up….errr something.

Feimster applies moisturizer all over her face and then snottily claims –

“Right now my skin is dry. It’s like Puerto Rico before that one rainy day they had. Put it all over your face. My face is a big, fat biscuit.”

She then picked up a bottle of foundation, making a ridiculously, racist comparison between the make-up, the founding of America, and the Founding Fathers, stating –

 “This is foundation and just like the foundation of America, it’s Republican, it’s strong, and it’s white.”

Handler and Feimster continue in their unfunny spoof belittling and demeaning Sanders and being as crass and revolting as they possibly can be joking about transgenders and sex toys –

“Grab ya a beauty blender. Now, this is a beauty blender right here. It may look like a butt plug, but it’s not. Stick a beauty blender up your butt once, shame on me. Stick a beauty blender up your butt twice, it’s a shame I didn’t think of that sooner. I used to not know what foundation was, but our great president was kind enough to take me to a Sephora and he said to the employee, ‘Hey, you see that fellow over here? Make him a woman.’”

This was followed by Feimster glopping on blush and bronzer looking more like a 5-year-old child who got into their mother’s make-up, rather than Sander’s polished and put together look in real life.

Handler, by contrast, poses essentially attempts to live the topless version of the Dr. Suess classic Green Eggs and Ham. Like Sam I Am, Handler will go topless on a house, with a mouse, in a box, or near a fox.  She will go topless here or there. She will do it anywhere! Handler claims she is challenging Instagram’s nudity guidelines by posting photos and videos of herself minus her shirt over the past two years, in her “Free the Nipple” campaign baring her boobs for all over social media.

January 2015: Chelsea went topless, this time riding a camel, in Jerusalem.

As a result of Handler’s continued and unrelenting attacks against Sanders, many have taken to social media to give Handler a taste of her own nastiness.  Actor James Woods moved in with a kill shot on Saturday morning referring to Handler as a “human urinal.”

Woods tweeted a video of  Handler being urinated on in the now infamous incident with Biggs.  The tweet included the caption, “This person berates the character of  on a daily basis.” 

Handler also revealed to US Weekly recently about having not one but TWO abortions at the age of 16 through American taxpayer-funded abortion giant Planned Parenthood, who is currently under investigation by the Department of Justice and the FBI for the illegal selling of human remains and fetal tissue. Handler wrote about murdering her children in an essay for Playboy magazine’s “Freedom” issue.  She proclaims she would not be where she is today if she had not had the right to choose.
Choose what? To be the mother of two dead children so you could live your life free from the consequences of your actions? Free to be a vile, despicable individual that loves having her face urinated on?

In keeping with Handler’s apparent love for urine she also filmed herself on the toilet in India while there filming for her soon-to-be canceled Netflix series. Wearing a traditional gold embroidered tunic and trousers Handler nursed a scrape on her knee while clutching a tampon.

Worse for wear: On Monday night Chelsea Handler shared a Snapchat as she sat on the toilet after suffering a scrape in India
“Lovely and classy” individual isn’t she?

FOLLOW us on Facebook at Freedom Daily!

Continue Reading

Crime

Oprah’s SICK Sex Secret Out And Completely DEMOLISHED Her Chances Of Running Against Trump In 2020

Published

on

And another one bites the dust!

A British actress named Kadian Noble has just accused the talk show queen and left-wing Obama supporting hack, Oprah Winfrey of failing to warn her about Harvey Weinstein’s sexual deviancy. In fact, Oprah went as far as to tell Noble to speak with him to “advance her career.”

Noble claims that Winfrey also told her that she could trust Weinstein and even heavily praised the serial rapist and sexual molester alongside former supermodel Naomi Campbell knowing full well that he would sexually assault her if she met with him in private.

In the lawsuit, Noble accuses The Weinstein Company of violating federal sex trafficking laws by “benefiting from, and knowingly facilitating, the venture in which Harvey Weinstein traveled in foreign commerce to recruit or entice female actors into forced or coerced sexual encounters on the promise of roles.” Along with the help of Oprah who is supposed to be a champion for women and who herself has said she was sexually assaulted in the past.

ABC News Reports:

British actress Kadian Noble claims Harvey Weinstein assaulted her in Cannes hotel room, files lawsuit for sex trafficking

An aspiring British actress tearfully described Tuesday how Harvey Weinstein in 2014 made her stand in front of a bathroom mirror and forced her to perform a sex act while pretending to be interested in her career.

Interested in Harvey Weinstein?

Add Harvey Weinstein as an interest to stay up to date on the latest Harvey Weinstein news, video, and analysis from ABC News.
Harvey Weinstein Add Interest
Kadian Noble has become the 86th woman to publicly accuse the disgraced movie mogul of sexual assault. Noble is not only suing Weinstein; she’s going after him as an alleged sex trafficker.

In her lawsuit, she accuses The Weinstein Company of violating federal sex trafficking laws by “benefiting from, and knowingly facilitating, the venture in which Harvey Weinstein traveled in foreign commerce to recruit or entice female actors into forced or coerced sexual encounters on the promise of roles.”

According to Noble’s lawsuit, it was “common practice” of Weinstein and “well-known” to his brother Bob Weinstein that Harvey Weinstein would travel abroad and to different states to recruit, solicit and entice young female actresses with promises of film roles only to then use force, fraud or coercion to engage them in sex. She is seeking damages under U.S. sex trafficking laws.

At a press conference today in New York, Noble addressed Harvey Weinstein directly: “You completely misused the gift that you have to create magic in this world to absolutely take advantage of people.”

Her lawsuit claims Harvey Weinstein asked her to his Le Majestic hotel room in Cannes in 2014 “to review her reel with her and discuss further steps in securing the role he had previously targeted for her.”

Once there, the lawsuit said Harvey Weinstein “began massaging Kadian and then gripped her shoulders.”

The lawsuit claims Harvey Weinstein told Noble that for “audition purposes” she needed to walk up and down the room for him, which she did.

Annabella Sciorra and Daryl Hannah join dozens making accusations against Harvey Weinstein
Uma Thurman hits Harvey Weinstein in emotional post: ‘You don’t deserve a bullet’
NYPD says it has enough evidence to arrest Harvey Weinstein for rape
Harvey Weinstein then allegedly called an unnamed Weinstein Company producer in the United States and put him on the phone with Noble, the lawsuit said. The Weinstein Company producer allegedly told Noble that she needed to be “a good girl and do whatever he wished,” and if she did, then “they would work” with her further, the lawsuit said.

Harvey Weinstein then allegedly pulled her closer and groped her breasts. She resisted, exclaiming, “No, Harvey, no,” the suit said.

However, at the same time, Noble felt compelled to comply with Harvey Weinstein’s demands because of the tangible and intangible benefits he offered to advance her career, according to the suit.

Weinstein allegedly pulled Noble into the bathroom and told her to relax while he gripped her firmly. He then started to rub her breast and buttocks, according to the suit. Noble allegedly told him to stop and tried to leave the bathroom, but Weinstein blocked her exit, according to the suit.

Weinstein then pulled down Noble’s shirt and forced his leg between her legs, and rubbed her genitals and began masturbating, the suit said.

Noble again implored him to stop, and struggled against him physically, trying to escape the bathroom, according to the suit. Weinstein then continued to sexually assault her, the suit said.

A representative for Harvey Weinstein said in a statement, “Mr. Weinstein denies allegations of non-consensual sex. Mr. Weinstein has further confirmed that there were never any acts of retaliation against any women for refusing his advances.”

Neither a representative for Bob Weinstein nor The Weinstein Company immediately respond to ABC News’ request for comment.

After hearing this victim’s allegations who knows if Orpah said she was a sexual assault survivor just to get ahead in her own career and win points with her audience because they perceive her as a “victim.”

Now keep in mind that everyone in Hollywood knew Weinstein’s habits. It was what they referred to as an “Open Secret.” Even his own company had written in his contract that everytime this sleazebag was accused of sexual assault he would have to pay his own company a fine. And this contract wasn’t secret. Everyone who was in the industry was aware of this fact.

This man and the people who covered for him all those years are the worst humanity has to offer. I don’t know what kind of world they live in but let’s just all be thankful we aren’t a part of it. Like my Mother always says, All that glitters isn’t gold!

Please share if you agree Weinstein and all his accomplices need to be in prison….

FOLLOW us on Facebook at Freedom Daily!

Continue Reading

Crime

Judge Who Struck Down Trump’s Muslim Travel Ban Just BUSTED In Sleazy Sexual Scandal With Disturbing Twist

Published

on

Isn’t it grand seeing the Swamp drain its self?

This new movement that is sweeping the nation taking aim at holding powerful men accountable for sexual harassment, misconduct, and assault has now named a prominent Liberal jurist as a serial harasser. It’s now being reported that six former far left liberal Ninth Circuit clerks and externs are now saying that the liberal Judge Alex Kozinski subjected them to sexual comments and unwelcome situations.

One of the former Kozinski clerks, Heidi Bond, who was his clerk between 2006 and 2007 has gone on the record with allegations that on multiple occasions the judge summoned her alone to his chambers in order to show her pornography which was unrelated to any case before the judge. He then asked if the images turned her on. Bond recounts at least three different instances of being shown porn by her boss and says the experiences were shocking. She has also written an extremely disturbing first-person account of her experiences of clerking for Judge Kozinski where she also details Kozinski isolating her from her co-clerks to discuss his sexual history

The Washington Post Reports:

Prominent appeals court Judge Alex Kozinski accused of sexual misconduct

Judge Alex Kozinski of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit, pictured in 2003. Six women — all former clerks or externs in the 9th Circuit — alleged to The Washington Post in recent weeks that Kozinski, now 67, subjected them to a range of inappropriate sexual conduct or comments.

A former clerk for Judge Alex Kozinski said the powerful and well-known jurist, who for many years served as chief judge on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit, called her into his office several times and pulled up pornography on his computer, asking if she thought it was photoshopped or if it aroused her sexually.

Heidi Bond, who clerked for Kozinski from 2006 to 2007, said the porn was not related to any case. One set of images she remembered was of college-age students at a party where “some people were inexplicably naked while everyone else was clothed.” Another was a sort of digital flip book that allowed users to mix and match heads, torsos and legs to create an image of a naked woman.

Bond is one of six women — all former clerks or more junior staffers known as externs in the 9th Circuit — who alleged to The Washington Post in recent weeks that Kozinski, now 67 and still serving as a judge on the court, subjected them to a range of inappropriate sexual conduct or comments. She is one of two former clerks who said Kozinski asked them to view porn in his chambers.

In a statement, Kozinski said: “I have been a judge for 35 years and during that time have had over 500 employees in my chambers. I treat all of my employees as family and work very closely with most of them. I would never intentionally do anything to offend anyone and it is regrettable that a handful have been offended by something I may have said or done.”

Kozinski provided the statement after The Post called and emailed a spokesman with a detailed list of the allegations this story would include. After the story posted online, the judge told the Los Angeles Times, “I don’t remember ever showing pornographic material to my clerks” and, “If this is all they are able to dredge up after 35 years, I am not too worried.”

After the Harvey Weinstein scandal broke, more women and men have come forward against a growing list of well-known male figures. (Erin Patrick O’Connor, Nicki DeMarco/The Washington Post)
When Bond was clerking, Kozinski was on the precipice of becoming chief judge for the 9th Circuit — the largest federal appeals court circuit in the country, handling cases for a large swath of the western United States as well as Hawaii and Alaska. The other people who alleged that Kozinski behaved inappropriately toward them worked in the 9th Circuit both before and after her, up to 2012.

Bond said she knew that she was to come to the judge’s office when her phone beeped twice. She said she tried to answer Kozinski’s inquiries as succinctly and matter-of-factly as possible. Bond was then in her early 30s and is now 41.

If the question was about photoshopping, Bond said, she would focus on minor details of the images. If Kozinski asked whether the images aroused her, Bond said, she would respond: “No, this kind of stuff doesn’t do anything for me. Is there anything else you need?” She said she recalled three instances when the judge showed her porn in his office.

“I was in a state of emotional shock, and what I really wanted to do was be as small as possible and make as few movements as possible and to say as little as possible to get out,” Bond said.

Bond, who went on to clerk for the Supreme Court and now works as a romance novelist writing under the name Courtney Milan, and another clerk, Emily Murphy, who worked for a different judge on the 9th Circuit and is now a law professor, described their experiences in on-the-record interviews. The other four women spoke on the condition that their names and some other identifying information not be published, out of fear that they might face retaliation from Kozinski or others.

Kozinski, who served as the chief judge on the 9th Circuit from 2007 to 2014, remains a prominent judge, well known in the legal community for his colorful written opinions. His clerks often win prestigious clerkships at the Supreme Court.

Murphy, who clerked for Judge Richard Paez, said Kozinski approached her when she was talking with a group of other clerks at a reception at a San Francisco hotel in September 2012. The group had been discussing training regimens, and Murphy said she commented that the gym in the 9th Circuit courthouse was nice because other people were seldom there.

Kozinski, according to Murphy and two others present at the time who spoke to The Post, said that if that were the case, she should work out naked. Those in the group tried to change the subject, Murphy and the others present said, but the judge kept steering the conversation toward the idea of Murphy exercising without clothes.

“It wasn’t just clear that he was imagining me naked, he was trying to invite other people — my professional colleagues — to do so as well,” Murphy said. “That was what was humiliating about it.”

Murphy, who was 30 at the time of the incident and is now 36, provided The Post with a 2012 email showing that she told a mentor about what had happened at the time. Two of Murphy’s friends who were present at the time of the encounter, speaking on the condition of anonymity, also confirmed her account.

Bond, similarly, provided emails showing that she told a friend what had happened at least as of 2008. The friend, fellow romance novelist Eve Ortega, provided the same emails. She confirmed that Bond had told her years ago that Kozinski made inappropriate sexual comments and showed her porn.

Kozinski has previously been embroiled in controversies related to sexually explicit material.

In 2008, the Los Angeles Times revealed that the judge had maintained an email list that he used to distribute crude jokes, some of them sexually themed, and that he had a publicly accessible website that contained pornographic images.

A judicial investigation ultimately found that Kozinski did not intend to allow the public to see the material and that, instead, the judge and his son were careless in protecting a private server from being accessible on the Internet.

Anthony J. Scirica, then the chief judge of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 3rd Circuit, wrote at the time that Kozinski’s “conduct exhibiting poor judgment with respect to this material created a public controversy that can reasonably be seen as having resulted in embarrassment to the institution of the federal judiciary.”

According to Scirica’s report, Kozinski said that he used the server to keep a variety of items he received by email, including TV commercials, video clips, cartoons, games and song parodies.

Of the sexually explicit files, Kozinski testified: “Some I thought were odd or funny or bizarre, but mostly I don’t have a very good reason for holding onto them. I certainly did not send them to anyone else or ask anyone to send me similar files,” according to Scirica’s report.

Kozinski also testified that he “does not visit and has no interest in pornographic websites,” according to Scirica’s report. He separately apologized for any embarrassment he had caused in maintaining the email list and said he had stopped sending the jokes.

Bond said the images Kozinski showed her seemed to come from his private server, because he pulled them from a site containing the term “kozinski.com.”

The other Kozinski clerk who said the judge showed her porn declined to provide specifics out of fear that Kozinski would be able to identify her. Bond said the judge also showed her a chart he claimed he and his friends from college had made to list the women with whom they had had sexual relations.

Bond said that either Kozinski or his administrative assistant reached out to her around the time of the news reporting on his private server, asking whether she would be willing to defend his character. She wrote to Ortega about the inquiry in 2008, according to emails the women shared with The Post, and Ortega responded that it “sounds like a very bad idea to me.”

“I know he brought you into his office to show you porn, I know he made sexual innuendos to you. I know this because you told me so in DC, and you even used the words sexual harassment,” Ortega wrote. “You said you would warn off other women thinking of clerking for him. And if there’s a woman out there he harassed worse than you, do you really want to be pitted against her? Because that’s what it would be. I’m worried that this is what he’s asking you to do — to be the female, intelligent face of his defense and make whoever it is accusing him look like a stupid slut, and then he hopefully never has to actually address those allegations.”

Kozinski was born in Romania to Holocaust survivors in 1950, and the family fled the communist state when he was a boy. Decades ago, long before he was a federal judge, he appeared on the television show “The Dating Game,” planting a kiss on a surprised young woman who selected him for a date. He is married and has three sons.

Kozinski was appointed to the 9th Circuit by President Ronald Reagan in 1985. He is an atypical federal appeals court judge — authoring irreverent opinions and not shying, as many of his colleagues do, from media appearances.

He styled one opinion in 2012 not as a traditional concurrence or dissent, but instead as “disagreeing with everyone.” He famously wrote during a trademark dispute between the toy company Mattel and the record company that produced the 1997 song “Barbie Girl”: “The parties are advised to chill.”

In more recent years, Kozinski wrote that using lethal injections to impose the death penalty was “a misguided effort to mask the brutality of executions by making them look serene and beautiful — like something any one of us might experience in our final moments,” and he told the Los Angeles Times, “I personally think we should go to the guillotine, but shooting is probably the right way to go.”

The Post reached out to dozens of Kozinski’s former clerks and externs for this report. Many of those who returned messages said that they experienced no harassment of any kind and that their experience — which entailed grueling work into the wee hours of the morning every day — was a rewarding one. They noted Kozinski’s wry sense of humor.

Those who talked to The Post about negative experiences said that they thought his behavior went beyond bad jokes or that they felt personally targeted.

A former Kozinski extern said the judge once made a comment about her hair and looked her body up and down “in a less-than-professional way.” That extern said Kozinski also once talked with her about a female judge stripping.

“I didn’t want to be alone with him,” the former extern said.

A different former extern said she, similarly, had at least two conversations “that had sexual overtones directed at me,” and she told friends about them at the time. One of the friends, also a former extern, confirmed that the woman had told her about the remarks — though both declined to detail them for fear of being identified.

One former 9th Circuit clerk said she was at a dinner in Seattle, seated next to Kozinski, when he “kind of picked the tablecloth up so that he could see the bottom half of me, my legs.” She said Kozinski remarked, “I wanted to see if you were wearing pants because it’s cold out.” The former clerk said she was wearing pants at the time. The incident, she said, occurred in late 2011 or early 2012.

“It made me uncomfortable, and it didn’t seem appropriate,” said the former clerk, who worked for a different judge.

All of the women The Post interviewed said they did not file formal complaints at the time. Bond said Kozinski had so vigorously stressed the idea of judicial confidentiality — that what is discussed in chambers cannot be revealed to the outside — that she questioned even years later whether she could share what had happened with a therapist, even though she had already talked with Ortega about it.

Bond said Kozinski worked his clerks so hard that “there was no thought that I could see him as anything other than in complete control,” and she feared that not leaving with a good recommendation from him might jeopardize her career.

“I did think about walking away and concluded I just didn’t know what I would do if I did,” Bond said.

The other former Kozinski clerk who said the judge asked her to watch porn in his chambers said she both feared what he might do and knew that a complaint was unlikely to strip him of his influence.

“I was afraid,” the former clerk said. “I mean, who would I tell? Who do you even tell? Who do you go to?”

Murphy said she discussed what had happened with the judge for whom she was clerking, and he was supportive of her filing a complaint. But because the complaint would first go to Kozinski himself, then be referred elsewhere, Murphy said she chose not to proceed. The judge, Paez, declined to comment for this report through a representative.

As a judge, Kozinski has addressed the topic of sexual harassment in important ways. In 1991, he joined an opinion that decided such cases should be judged from the perspective of the victims, using what was then called the “reasonable woman” standard. The opinion, written by then-Judge Robert R. Beezer, noted pointedly, “Conduct that many men consider unobjectionable may offend many women.”

Beezer died in 2012. Kozinski himself wrote about sexual harassment in 1992, commenting on how legal remedies could come with unforeseen consequences.

He wrote that men “must be aware of the boundaries of propriety and learn to stay well within them,” while women “must be vigilant of their rights, but must also have some forgiveness for human foibles: misplaced humor, misunderstanding, or just plain stupidity.”

He acknowledged, though, that the problem of harassment was a real one.

“But who knew, who understood, that it was quite so pervasive,” Kozinski wrote. “Apparently most women did, while most men did not. It was the best-kept secret of modern times.”

Now that’s sick, but then again, what else can we expect from a judge from the infamous 9th circuit court who is known for its radical far left agenda leanings. No wonder the 9th circuit wants Muslims Refugees in this nation, they act the same way their judges act.

It seems that for every right-wing leaning man who is accused of sexual misconduct there are at least 100 liberal men accused of the same, or worse. This whole time all these institutions where being run as brothels and not one person in the outside world even knew. They tell us how to think and what is and isn’t moral while at the same time their stench of immorality is off the charts.

Please share if you agree this Judge needs to be in prison….

FOLLOW us on Facebook at Freedom Daily!

Continue Reading

Latest Articles

Trending